| The currentWikipedia:WikiProject AviationCollaboration of the Month is1947 Columbus mid-air collision. Please read thenomination text and help improve the article tofeatured article standard. |
WikiProject |
|---|
| General information |
|
Project organization |
| This page is currently inactive and is retained forhistorical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as thevillage pump. |
Welcome to the WikiProject AviationCollaboration of the Month! This effort seeks to identify articles within the scope of the WikiProject— airports, aircraft and everything in between—that require improvement. Every month, a single article will be selected as the collaboration and everyone will work to improve it as much as possible.
To nominate an article, add
===[[Name of article]]===Nomination text. ~~~~'''Support'''# ~~~~'''Comments'''
at the bottom of the list of candidates, filling in the name of the article and the nomination text (which should indicate why the article would benefit from a collaboration and what needs to be improved).
Please remember to addcollaboration-candidate=yes to the{{WPAVIATION}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see theproject banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax).
The next collaboration will be selected onFriday, February 1 2008. The current time is09:32, November 28, 2025.
At the beginning of every month, a new collaboration article should be selected. This should generally be the candidate with the most support (and the oldest candidate in case of a tie).
To archive the current collaboration:
{{WPAVIATION Collaboration}} from the top of the current collaboration article.To select the new collaboration:
{{WPAVIATION collaboration}} to the talk page the new article.collaboration-candidate=yes withpast-collaboration=<start date>–<end date> in the{{WPAVIATION}} project banner at the top of the new article's talk page.Already a B-class article. A little brush up could get this to FA-class easily..TrevorMacInnis(Contribs)18:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
It is a great shame that 816 aircraft and crews working for 23 years do not have a better record written here.Ratsbew (talk)23:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Several descriptions in the article are wrong, primarily the text describing turbofan and turbojet engines. For example, the turbofan fan description refers to it as having a "low pressure compressor acts as a fan", when in reality that is a turbojet. A turbofan has a first stage fan to drive in airflow. The attached image is also one of a turbojet and not a turbofan.
In dire need of some TLC.Wexcan (talk)02:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Airline has been taken over byEasyjet and will be defunct from30 March2008. Would be great to have the article brought up a few notches.Wexcan Talk 00:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
Juan and Eduardo were the Mexican equivalent of theWright Brothers. A little cleanup and referencing is needed to make a better presentation of the efforts of these aviation pioneers.
Support
Comments
Student group at Penn State want to raise the standard of this article. The heart is there, could use a little bit of work on the editing.
Support
Comments
Well known incident that was in the newspapers worldwide. Inspired the feature filmAlive. 40th anniversary is this October. Hoping for enough improvement to be eligible a TFA by then.--T1980 (talk)20:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comments
This article is quite messy, specially the reference formatting. I think the company is fairly transparent about its operation, so I think this article is an FA potential.Sp33dyphil(Talk)(Contributions)(Feed back needed @ Talk page)23:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support
Comment