This page enablesadministrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.
Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do sofollowing the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go toSpecial:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".
This version of the page may not reflect the most current changes. Pleasepurge this page to view the most recent changes.
Bot report:No errors! Report generated at 19:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Permissions
Handled here
Account creator(add request ·view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in therequest an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
Autopatrolled(add request ·view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations areauto patrolled inSpecial:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especiallyWP:BLP andWikipedia:Notability.
AutoWikiBrowser(add request ·view requests):AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automatedMediaWiki editor forMicrosoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read therules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a trueuser right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to theCheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace editsor 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
Confirmed(add request ·view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold forautoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag canupload files and editsemi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
Event coordinator(add request ·view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
File mover(add request ·view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them,subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
Page mover(add request ·view requests): The page mover user right allows usersexperienced in working with article names tomove them,subject to policy, without leaving behind aredirect. They may also move allsubpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
Rollback(add request ·view requests): Rollback enables users to removevandalism much more quickly and efficiently than byundoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutescapable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern betweengood and bad faith editswill not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, seeWikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, seehere.
Template editor(add request ·view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates andLua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
IP-block-exempt: While the IP-block-exempt right can be granted by administrators, this flag is not handled here. Requests for the IP-block exempt right should be submitted via email to the checkuser team atcheckuser-en-wpwikipedia.org or contact a CheckUser directly.
If you believe someone's actions meritremoval of a permission, raise your concern at theadministrator's noticeboard
The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed atmeta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of theArbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.
Process
Requestors
To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.
Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets thecriteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, abot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meetconfigurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.
Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add{{done}} or{{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed,{{already done}} should be used.N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by theconfig), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placedhere; declined requests will gohere. SeeUser:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.
Other editors
Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for theirown account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.
A limited exception to this isWikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.
Current requests
Account creator
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
@Cypp0847 has authored 198 articles, of which only 2 have been deleted. One of these was forWP:SYNTH,the AfD having taken place during October 2022. They primarily translate articles from the Chinese Wikipedia, recent examples contain no issues that require action by an NPR. I reviewedMa Tau Wai Road building collapse and found no issues, other than adding the translation banner to thetalk page. Chinese sources vary in reliability, but based on the articles I have reviewed from @Cypp0847, the sourcing appears consistent and without issue. BLPs such asJohn Clancey are well sourced and do not leave any information uncited. A recent AfD of their articleJohn MacLennanresulted in a unanimous keep. Theirtalk page is mostly filled with automated messages regarding images, with little after April 2025. Based on what I've seen from @Cypp0847, I am quite confident the 2022 AfD SYNTH concerns were an anomaly, and doesn't appear to have been an ongoing issue, with no reoccurrences since. Thank you for your contributions and translations, @Cypp0847!11WB (talk)10:38, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I came across Javajourney while reviewing new pages and was impressed with their clean pages on music subjects. They have created 106 undeleted mainspace pages since late 2024. (There are three deleted articles, all from early on in their Wikipedia career, plus a recently deleted inadvertently created redirect. A number of articles created in 2024 were redirected or merged at AfD, and Javajourney appears to have takenBastun's advice to bone up on notability to heart.) I reviewed the last 10 created pages in depth. Notability is always clearly demonstrated, whether through chart performance, reviews or some otherWP:NMUSIC criterion. (NMUSIC is one of the harder SNGs to master and Javajourney appears to understand how to strongly demonstrate notability for the benefit of a reviewer.) Pages are all highly presentable, NPOV is maintained, and talk pages are created. Sourcing is strong and primary sources are used appropriately (e.g. for chart performance). At the pace Javajourney is creating new articles, granting them autopatrolled will reduce the queue for reviewers without compromising on the quality of the encyclopedia.Dclemens1971 (talk)03:36, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Bro i mean they are not completely unreliable, they are reliable enough in spaceflight lists as a source but if you want to create a spaceflight article at that time it becomes unreliable and other sources like NASASpaceflight, Ars Technica, etc becomes more reliable. That why it is part of{{TLS-R}}.Abdullah1099 (talk)03:46, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've been editing Wikipedia regularly for about a year now. Initially, the quality of editing was poor, but I have always tried to contribute to Wikipedia through constructive editing. In addition to this, there have been about 30,000+ edits. Most of his edits and articles are constructive, so his articles do not require initial verification. I am aware of the right to autopatrolled verification and think that having this right would reduce the workload on article examiners.Mathew D'Marco (talk)06:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
I am requesting AWB/JWB access to assist with the maintenance and standardization of articles related to Moroccan institutions, governance, and infrastructure. Over the past few days, I have created several high-quality articles (e.g.,ONSSA,ADD, and several Moroccan Ministries).
I have noticed many related pages require repetitive cleanup tasks, such as fixing internal links, standardizing infoboxes, and adding relevant portals like{{Portal}}. While I am currently approaching 150 manual edits, my contributions consist of significant article creations and major expansions. Access to JWB would allow me to handle these routine tasks more efficiently. I am familiar with AWB policies and will use the tool responsibly.Mohamed Filali (talk)10:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting AWB access to assist with maintaining, polishing and standardizing articles related to fictional characters, anime, and video games. I have just under 20,000 edits and have created several good articles. There have been discussions about changing expectations regarding infoboxes at WP:VG, and AWB access would enable me to more quickly standardize infoboxes as well as fixing internal links. I'm aware of all the policies and guidelines surrounding AWB use.Gommeh(talk!sign!)15:18, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting AWB rights for updating deprecated CS1 parameters to their current forms ("accessdate" to "access-date", "archiveurl" to "archive-url", "archivedate" to "archive-date", etc.).RedShellMomentum20:52, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
And yes, this is my real legitimate account. I have just created this doppelganger account as a back-up account in case this one gets compromised and this account may be used periodically by me as an account I may use on public computers.Theeverywherepersontalk here14:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
I will be on-site coordinator for Wikimedia Community Ireland events going forward. Will use the Programs and Events Dashboard but this will be a fall-backGeichel (talk)14:00, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
And yes, this is my real legitimate account. I have just created this doppelganger account as a back-up account in case this one gets compromised and this account may be used periodically by me as an account I may use on public computers.Theeverywherepersontalk here14:28, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
I am a member ofWP:WikiProject Women in Red and have been involved in organising our regular monthly events for some time. Each month a message goes out to members on the distribution list (see e.g.the February message). We have a couple of people who send these mass messages at the moment anda call has been put out for more volunteers. I would like to help out.
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hello, I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights again. This is my second request, and I would like to return to reviewing articles that need work. I have experience working at AfD last year and currently making articles. I have created and expanded several articles and through this work, have become familiar with notability requirements (especially the importance of notable sources) and BLP policy. I would like to help out further by reviewing new pages.AdobongPogimasarap 🍛04:19, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
On hold. In your prior trial run, I think you made the wrong call atHussain Al-Aryan andThe Festival Players Theatre Company, which comprise about a third of the pages you reviewed. However, you've opened a lot of AfDs recently, and most of them appear to be going well at the moment. If your AfD track record still looks good in a week or two once those are closed, I think a second trial run is warranted.signed,Rosguilltalk16:59, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to help address the NPP backlog. I've been a pending changes reviewer for some time, but the backlog there is typically very low.Coining (talk)22:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions and interest in this permission. However, between a lack of new article creations that demonstrate strong understanding of notability guidelines, and an AfD record that suggests more of an interest inWP:PIA flashpoints than anything else, I'm not seeing a track record of relevant experience for new page reviewing.Not donesigned,Rosguilltalk17:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your consideration. I wasn't aware that involvement in a contentious topic was relevant to the criteria for this permission. Beyond one article that I know I have tried to draft a few times and has been knocked asWP:NOTTVGUIDE (including by a now topic-banned editor), even though it was subsequentlyconceded thatWP:NOTTVGUIDE did not apply, which of thenew articles that I've created have been problematic? More generally, what threshold would you suggest I need to meet before coming back here to try to help with the NPP backlog?Coining (talk)22:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've written a decent number of pages and participated in a few AfD discussions. I'd like to extend my involvement in this area of Wikipedia by now reviewing pages.Phibeatrice (talk)01:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I'm impressed by the quality of articles you have written about ephemeral internet phenomena that can easily be a minefield for notabilitysigned,Rosguilltalk18:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Do you have any specific experience administrators can review? Your AfD record is minimal at present, and you also have no AfC or article creation history.11WB (talk)18:00, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. I agree with 11WB that I'm not seeing sufficient relevant experience with article creation/deletion. I'd also recommend that you adjust your signature to include your username, perWP:SIGPROB, especially if you intend to seek advanced permissions like new page reviewer, as it can give the impression that you are avoiding accountability.Not donesigned,Rosguilltalk18:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I would like to renew my New Page Reviewer Rights which I was granted on 20th November 2025 that expired on 31st Jan 2026. I was invited to participate in the January–February 2026 NPP drive - [Phase 1 & 2] but partly participated in Phase 1 and I would like to participate in Phase 2 for the remaining days so I kindly request for renewal.MichealKal (talk)10:39, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, I'm concerned by the quality of several of reviews, especially at pages such asJosh Brooking,Brodi Hughes,Javiera Caballero which were previously draftified or redirected at AfD, only for you to proceed to accept them with almost no improvement in terms of notability. Meanwhile, at pages likeDavid Hryck, you appear to have missed clear signs ofWP:UPE. I'm also concerned by the pace of some of the reviews, which in some cases seems faster than a copyright check could have completed (on top of concerns of quality of the review).Not donesigned,Rosguilltalk18:27, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rightsI had not realised there was such a big backlog at NPP and would like to help reduce it; I am an experienced editor and article creator myself, and would be very happy to do more to help new editors learn about Wikipedia. I am interested in helping to eliminate the backlog, particularly for articles involving Indian articles sources—languages I am familiar with—that often remain stuck for long periods due to language barriers. (Littlestepsforward (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2026 (UTC))Littlestepsforward (talk)05:32, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. Regrettably, I'm not seeing any relevant experience with article deletion or page moves, and your experience with article creation also seems limited.Not done for now.signed,Rosguilltalk19:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting NPR rights to assist with the sustained and significant backlog. I am comfortable making independent, policy-based judgments on notability, sourcing, BLP compliance, and promotional content, and I understand the importance of balancing improvement with deletion when warranted. My approach to page review emphasizes accuracy, restraint, and clear communication with page creators, particularly newer editors. If granted, I intend to review pages consistently and focus on reducing backlog pressure by addressing both articles and redirects that have remained unreviewed for extended periods. I am familiar with the expectations and responsibilities of the role and am prepared to contribute on an ongoing volunteer basis. Thank you for your consideration.Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 09:32, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Umais Bin Sajjad (talk)09:32, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not seeing much recent engagement with article creation and deletion, and you have failed to disclose your past block for UPE (among other reasons); it's long enough ago that we can look past it, but you need to be up front about it if you're going to pursue advanced permissions that are directly related to trust.Not done.signed,Rosguilltalk19:18, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the huge backlog you're currently having the other day and I was shocked. I have experience with deletion and creation of pages, as I have written a few pages, am currently anAFC reviewer and I have a secondary account to deal with deletion that is currently inactive calledDelete the Earth that I plan on reactivating. I used that account to perform various merges of pages and CSDing some drafts.
Earth605, could you comment on the use of citations to Bilbaopedia on your most recent article creation,Calle Urazurrutia? Also, separately from the question of conferring permissions, I strongly recommend that you not use a separate account just for deletion-related editing. It is likely to lead to misunderstandings that will lead to hostility in your direction, and makes it more difficult to review your record when considering applications like this.signed,Rosguilltalk19:26, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the question. Well, I translate that article, so I must have forgotten to review that citation.My bad. I've corrected the mistake. As for the separate account, I have it there because I don't wanna be seen like an evil-deletionist reviewer that screws good faith newbies, instead, I want to be what everyone wants, a friendly accepting reviewer that just wants to help and accepts newbies, which is what I am. Thanks for your consideration.Earth605talk05:48, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've written a decent amount of new articles (including getting a significant number of them to GA) and have been participating at AFD discussions. My AFD accuracy rating (if you want to call it that) is around 80%, which means I think I have a solid understanding of what the notability requirements are for articles within my area of expertise, and I decided I'd like to help reduce the backlog at NPP. I am also an AFC reviewer, rollbacker and recent changes patroller.Gommeh(talk!sign!)16:21, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting the New Page Reviewer right to assist with reviewing newly created articles. I have several years of editing experience, including creating and improving articles related to Indian politics and regional topics.Bdm166 (talk)15:27, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. However, I'm not seeing adequate experience with article deletion processes, which is particularly an obstacle to this permission given that you have had articles deleted at AFD and PROD in the past year--that's long enough ago that it's not insurmountable, but there needs to be a more recent track record that demonstrates that you now understand notability guidelines.Not donesigned,Rosguilltalk21:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
My page mover rights expire on the 27th and I would like to renew them. I have very much enjoyed working atWP:RM and have also found having page mover useful when mentoring and dealing with page move vandals, both of which I do. Cheers!–LuniZunie(talk)19:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I sometimes wish to move drafts from my user page into mainspace over articles with only a simple history; for example, I'm wanting to moveUser:Cukie Gherkin/Super Leaf toSuper Leaf, but because of minor edits redirecting the name, I cannot. In cases where there is a previous version of an article at the target page, I will not use these privileges to overwrite that version. -Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Cukie Gherkin (talk)01:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Pending changes reviewer
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights
I have ~10,000 edits now in ten months on the website (with a 200+ day edit streak), and have been using AntiVandal (and occasionally WikiShield) for a month now (had some dumb accidental reverts in the first few days cause of the controls being a little hard at first), and have gotten used to the controls. I have also sometimes looked at the pending changes backlog and looked over the edits pending review if any to evaluate if I would accept or decline if I had PCR rights. I remain a Recent Changes patroller as well and make sure there is no hours-old vandalism untouched. For these reasons, that is why I am requesting PCR rights for my account, thank you.MakaylaHippo1998 (talk)00:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights
I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been active for months now and have made 500+ edits, mostly focused on improving article tone, adding reliable sources, fixing formatting issues, and cleaning up drafts. I’ve created and improved a number of articles, particularly in biographical and cultural topics. I’m familiar with key policies like WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:COPYVIO, and I aim to contribute more to content maintenance through reviewing edits on protected pages. I’m careful with sourcing and would use reviewer tools with that same level of care.
Active in anti-vandalism and content creation, with a reasonable enough track record to establish knowledge of the required policies. I have read the reviewing guideline and criteria. Thanks,UpTheOctave! • 8va?19:59, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have been actively editing Wikipedia for several weeks and have accumulated over a thousand contributions. Since January 25th, I have been using Ultraviolet to revert vandalism and warn users who engage in disruptive edits. I am confident in my ability to identify contributions that are vandalism separately from contributions that are not vandalism but good-faith.
If granted the Pending Changes Reviewer right, I will continue patrolling recent changes and carefully review pending edits to ensure they are appropriate and meet Wikipedia’s standards.ArthurPlummer (talk |:)03:08, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have been reverting vandalism ever since I started getting really active on Wikipedia last spring, and it's one of the main things I do on-wiki. I have experience using lots of anti-vandal tools such as Twinkle, AntiVandal, RW, and (although I don't use it as often because it clogs up my watchlist) Huggle. I'm very familiar with the criteria atWP:PCCRITERIA and understand what is and isn't vandalism, the content policies listed in criterion 4, copyright policy and theguideline on reviewing. I want to help with the backlog so I can make sure pending edits are compliant with applicable policies and guidelines. Thanks!Gommeh(talk!sign!)21:03, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
I've been doing RCP for over a month, using UV (and sometimes Twinkle) to revert edits and give users an appropriate warning. I'm requesting the rollback permission to be able to use Huggle (orWikiShield) to do RCP even more efficiently, and also to have quicker rollbacks in UV.🍅 fx (talk)02:07, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm requesting rollback rights so I can use tools such as Huggle or AntiVandal to make it easier to patrol Recent changes. I have been patrolling on Recent changes for over a month and have been using mainly Twinkle to revert vandalism and warn users, as well as reporting persistent ones to AIV.Mesocyclonic93(t)(c)17:19, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've been patrolling recent changes since December, doing quick vandalism reversions and notices/warnings. I've been active on Wikipedia for over five years and have more than 4800 mainspace edits. I've started using Twinkle to give notices and warnings, but I'd like rollback to be able to get Huggle access for more efficient counter-vandalism work.Likeanechointheforest (talk)20:42, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've been patrolling recent changes for several months, and the vast majority of my edits have been cleaning up vandalism and related user warnings. I've been using Twinkle, but I was hoping to get rollback in order to use AntiVandal, as I've seen it in use and it seemsincredibly efficient.radioactOlive(she/it)(talk)09:51, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have patrolled Recent Changes for around a year at this point and I feel that to help in my anti-vandal work, I will have to use the rollback tool probably anywhere I see vandals and reverse their contributions to the last helpful version.shane(talk to me if you want!)14:29, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Template editor
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hi, requesting template editor access to help fix dark mode problems which are sadly quite common in template-protected pages. For example, many of the WikiProject templates, such as{{WikiProject Mythology}}, and also some of the article editnotices, where dark mode functionality is often overlooked. I've worked with templates quite a lot in my time here, and made quite a few edit requests, so having the permission would be great. Cheers,Newbzy (talk)00:27, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say, I'm not sure Guideline 6's count is accurate. Seehere andhere,here,here, andhere for five template-protected edit requests that I have had successfully implemented. I guess they could be considered insignificant, but then again I only really like making small additions/fixes to templates.Newbzy (talk)13:56, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct, the "significance" aspect of the guideline is what I failed to find in the majority of your edit requests. Points 5 and 6 are there primarily as the subjective demonstrations that a TPE candidate has the skills and ability to successfully implement edit requests.Primefac (talk)22:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary account IP viewer
Sorry,temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Pleasecreate an account in order to request user account permissions.
This permission would be useful for me in countering vandalism as well as identifying undisclosedWP:COI edits/potentialWP:SPI investigations. I agree to use the IP addresses in accordance with the Foundation's guidelines.Marquardtika (talk)17:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
