July 26

Template:Alpha

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit11:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Alpha →Template:Unsorted list (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused, unclear redirect. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)16:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the page history it's supposed to be shorthand for Alphabetize.86.23.87.130 (talk)22:17, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Left guide (talk)20:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬03:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Trollpasta

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit11:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Trollpasta →Creepypasta#Trollpastas (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The assertion that Trollpasta is notable is false. There isn't an abundance of reliable sources talking about the subject in depth. All previous attempts to add "trollpasta" to the article have only cited Know Your Meme, a group of random forum posts, and the Trollpasta Wiki, all of which areWP:UGC. No reliable sources talk about the subject and it is unlikely to reasonably be talked about in the article. To add, fame ≠ notable.🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk)19:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the previous RfD closed six days before this discussion was opened. That keep closure was based on a mention being added to the article, but that mention has twice been removed by the nominator here.Thryduulf (talk)08:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  To be fair,the sourcing was purely UGC🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk)10:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and the previous RFD. Even those previous keep !votes were conditional upon a mention, which has been correctly reverted due to the poor sourcing.35.139.154.158 (talk)14:41, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete until we get better sources. There's a bookThe Trollpasta Collection (2022) by Opie Donovan Ruedlinger, but it is self-published. Jay 💬09:00, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Wheaton's Law

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:41, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wheaton's Law →Wil Wheaton#Wheaton's_law (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, and the alternate letter-case formWheaton's law was deleted afterthis discussion. This one should probably be deleted too. —Mx. Granger (talk·contribs)18:09, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete obviously.Dicklyon (talk)16:29, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Standard Lithium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit11:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Standard Lithium →Smackover Formation#Mineral resources (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is the name of company and should not redirect to a geological formation.Johnjbarton (talk)16:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the company receives a passing mention in that section. PerhapsWP:RETURNTORED applies? —🪫Volatile ^{📲T |⌨️C}02:52, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, thanks. However I deleted the mention as it was not encyclopedic material.Johnjbarton (talk)20:45, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, Standard Lithium is a moderate size Canadian resource extraction company, and is traded on the NYSE. The redirect was added to what appeared, at the time, as the bestWP:RETURNTORED redirect for it. The fact that the company name was deleted from one article as part of a editing discussion that is ongoing on the Smackover Formation article is temporary, and is in active discussion on thearticle Talk page. The company name is currently not in the article simply 'cause that is not the most important matter under discussion, and the other matter of explicating an important new lithium resource extraction exploration & development project is more important than whether the company name is mentioned (for now at least.)N2e (talk)04:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  If Standard Lithium isWP:Notable then it should have an article or be red in the meantime. It should not be a redirect to an unrelated topic.Johnjbarton (talk)15:11, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  That is incorrect. Standard Lithium is clearlynot an unrelated topic to the Smackover Formation, the article the redirect pointed at. Standard Lithium is the resource company that is developing the major lithium brine mineral resource of the formation, as shown by multiple sources. (easily found via Google)^[1][2][3][4]N2e (talk)04:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perN2e, whose argument convinced me thatWP:RETURNTORED applies. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe there is a misunderstanding of what return to red means. If the article is potentially notable and only receives a passing mention (which N2e has noted), then it is best to delete the redirect to encourage the creation of a new article. I would like to point out there is the option ofboldly creating the article AT the redirect (provided the information is sufficiently cited), in which case I will gladly retract my vote. —🪫Volatile ^{📲T |⌨️C}05:09, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as there is no useful information about the company at the target (or elsewhere on enwiki). I doubt if a mention can be added back to the current target, per the ongoing talk page discussion, as it will beWP:UNDUE. By the end of the year, if what is predicted happens and the company invests, directly affecting the minerals of the area, mention may be added back, again subject to UNDUE. Yes, it does appear N2e misunderstood the process of RETURNTORED. Jay 💬10:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Synod of Rome (313)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasmoot. I created an article in its place.Srnec (talk)23:42, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Synod of Rome (313) →Synod of Rome (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target is a DAB. PerWP:REDYES this redirect should be deleted.Veverve (talk)10:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as aWP:REDYES.49.151.187.185 (talk)10:04, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; It's a useful redirect as the entry on the dab page does have some information specific to that synod beyond just the year. I suggest instead tagging this redirect as{{R with possibilities}}.Colonies Chris (talk)11:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Future SA20 years

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:42, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 2027 SA20 →SA20 (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• 2028 SA20 →SA20 (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Nothing about 2027 or 2028 season mentioned atSA20 article. We've cleaned up hundreds of these "future season" links to pages with no information about the events previously.Joseph2302 (talk)15:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The nomination isn't technically correct - the target article contains the sourced sentenceIn January 2025, Cricket South Africa announced the windows for the competition for 2026, 2027, and 2028. which means that we can be reasonably certain that these seasons will happen, however there isn't any other information in the article (not even what the announced windows are), so anyone using these redirects will not be helped.Thryduulf (talk)16:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page histories of the articles?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬06:28, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perWP:TOOSOON.49.151.187.185 (talk)01:26, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• delete perWP:TOOSOONdrinks orcoffeeᶻ 𝗓 𐰁₍ᐢ. .ᐢ₎_{choose only one...}09:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Let Them Eat Ice Cream

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit11:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Let Them Eat Ice Cream →Nancy Pelosi (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Let Them Eat Ice Cream" is a book written by Margaret Minster and published in 1982A1Cafel (talk)03:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete orRetarget toJustified & Ancient#Formats and track listings (in default of an article on Minster's book being created). The phrase isn't mentioned in Pelosi's article - I gather that it's derived from an interview withJames Corden, but does not appear to be a significant part of Pelosi's public image.Tevildo (talk)12:11, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬06:24, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If its not even mentioned in her article and was just a forgettable throwaway line said just on a TV interview, then it makes no sense for it to be used here.The C of E God Save the King! (talk)08:46, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Nothern Irish

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toPeople of Northern Ireland. This is a totally uncontroversial request to sync (what should be tagged as) an{{avoided double redirect}} from a misspelling, so I'm just going to boldly retarget this. --Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]}(they|xe|🤷)06:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Nothern IrishNothern Irish →Northern Ireland (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirectsNorthern Irish andNorth Irish both point toPeople of Northern Ireland. I suggest aRetarget there.ArthananWarcraft (talk)05:16, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

South-African

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toSouth African.WP:SNOW close as patently obvious.(non-admin closure)Left guide (talk)17:00, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• South-AfricanSouth-African →South Africa (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is already a dabpage titledSouth African, which lists all uses of this term. I suggest aRetarget there.ArthananWarcraft (talk)05:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget as a{{Redirect from alternative hyphenation}}. 🌳BalsamCottonwood (talk) ✝06:48, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toSouth African as per above.The C of E God Save the King! (talk)08:45, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• retarget per above.drinks orcoffeeᶻ 𝗓 𐰁₍ᐢ. .ᐢ₎_{choose only one...}09:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per DrinksorCoffee.49.151.187.185 (talk)10:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toSouth African per nom🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk)19:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Soul of Asia

Flander's fields

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toFlanders Fields.(non-admin closure)Left guide (talk)02:31, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Flander's fieldsFlander's fields →In Flanders Fields (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I suggest redirecting this toFlanders Fields, which is a closer match and has a hatnote to the poem anyway. 🌳BalsamCottonwood (talk) ✝02:00, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Agree with above.The C of E God Save the King! (talk)08:44, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).