April 18

Purple flurp

Karmelo Anthony

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasto be determined byTalk:Killing of Austin Metcalf/Archive 1#RFC: Name of alleged killer. If the discussion there results in a consensus to exclude the subject's name, this redirect should then be deleted (if non-admin: tag with{{db-xfd}}). --Tavix^(talk)17:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Karmelo AnthonyKarmelo Anthony →Killing of Austin Metcalf (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:BLPCRIME -- this is a person (and a minor) who has not been convicted of a crime, whose name is being redirected toward that of a killing.Nat Gertler (talk)18:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. While they are prominently mentioned in the article, there is no BLP issue with the redirect. If you don't think they should be mentioned then discuss that on the talk page where the current consensus is to include the name.Thryduulf (talk)18:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  There is not a consensus there to keep the name; there appears to be one person inquiring about a redirect, one who is using some garbled language butseems to be against inclusion, citingWP:BLPCRIME makes what they call a "tough call" for inclusion, and one who seems to want to include it. --Nat Gertler (talk)18:58, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Before your comment there were three comments, one implicitly saying it should be included if that's in accordance with policy and two people saying to include it (one explicitly quoting the policy). That is a consensus to include, it's not a strong one, but it is one. I see you've now removed the name citing the same policyR. G. Checkers used to justify its inclusion. I don't have a strong opinion either way (I've not looked at the evidence), but you should have discussed it on the talk page first rather than just removing. Regardless, the redirect should follow the article: it's useful if there is a mention, it isn't if there isn't. I'm going to wait until that is settled before opining further regards the redirect.Thryduulf (talk)19:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I think it's a stretch for someone who asked for a pointer to policy thanking the person who responded with pointer to the policy as "implicitly saying it should be included", particularly since the person who pointed to the policy describes it as "suggests that we should be cautious in including the name of an accused nonpublic figure". I adjust my statement that the one person seems to be against inclusion; I was too busy dealing with the muddled language in the middle of his message rather than the "tough call" he makes at the end. And now there's one (me) who definitely wants to exclude. --Nat Gertler (talk)20:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete- Minor not convicted of any crime, which was discussed previously atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karmelo Anthony. I have recommended atWP:BLPN that his name be permanently deleted from Wikipedia. --Jax 0677 (talk)19:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete perNatGertler andJax 0677. This namespace can be a redirect if and only if there's a conviction. It may be too soon, or it may never be a good redirect. It takes more time and patience to tell.JFHJr (㊟)21:21, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Additional thoughts: this article was speedy'd after correctly-done blanking for severe BLP reasons and this redirect should be deleted for the same reasons. I hope the closing admin can see the old versions and considerssalt in order to prevent further recreation before a legal resolution. When that happens, it can be unprotected or recreated by an admin. As pointed out above, this is a minor facing significant criminal charges. SeeWP:BLPCRIME.JFHJr (㊟)22:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment There is also a notable athlete namedCarmelo Anthony, for whom this could be a plausible misspelling. The existence of the other individual makes me hesitant to propose retargeting, but I think it's worth mentioning in the discussion. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)21:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • We can only redirect toCarmelo Anthony if revisions pointing toKilling of Austin Metcalf are removed. --Jax 0677 (talk)13:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Eh? There is no reason this could not be retargetted without (revision) deletion.Thryduulf (talk)13:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, assuming that we want to conceal the name of the accused. --Jax 0677 (talk)00:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    If the name were oversighted or subject to revdel, then yes, but those don't apply in this case (per the AN thread) so only a consensus to delete the redirect would necessitate removal of any revisions.Thryduulf (talk)02:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep.WP:BLPCRIMEmight be a reason not to mention Anthony in theKilling of Austin Metcalf article. But given that heis mentioned there, the redirect should stand. Obviously, there are lots of readers who are searching for his name[1] Do we want these readers to make it to theKilling of Austin Metcalf article or not?StAnselm (talk)23:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The name was removed from the article earlier today, and reinserted by an IP user; it's presence there should not be considered stable. --Nat Gertler (talk)01:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  And it has been bounced back and forth again since that was stated. --Nat Gertler (talk)13:16, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I have reported the issue atWP:AN andWP:RFPP. --Jax 0677 (talk)14:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. If there is a consensus at the article not to mention the alleged killer's name for BLP reasons, then it probably would make sense to not have this target there, but I really don't see such a consensus yet. In other contexts, the thing that comes to mind is a misspelling ofCarmelo Anthony. So, we've either got a reasonable target of the article on the killing, or as a misspelled name of a basketball star. Either keeping (if there is consensus to include the alleged killer's name in the article) or retargeting (if there is not consensus to do that) makes sense, but deletion seems weird. —Red-tailed hawk _(nest)20:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if the consensus is to retain the redirect (and the mention in the article) then we would need a hatnote.StAnselm (talk)21:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Sync with article content. If its talk-page consensus is to include the name, redirect makes sense (weak support); if to exclude, then definitely do not have a redirect (against redir guideline to have a redirect to a target that does not mention the redirect, and goes against the presumably policy+guideline-based on consensus reasoning).DMacks (talk)22:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if the outcome of the RfC is to name the suspect (which I voted for in the RfC); but if not, then delete.Levivich (talk)16:46, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• No redirect yet - We should probably wait to see if there's a conviction before creating a redirect.NickCT (talk)16:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Friendly reminder that Wikipedia had not just a redirect, but a whole article, on the then criminal suspectDerek Chauvin. And don't give me the "oh that case was higher profile" or "there was video evidence in that case" as the whole idea of due process is for a fair trial in spite of any preconceptions. Wikipedia needs to decide whether it scrubs all suspects, or none. There's no moral or legal argument to take it case by case.Unknown Temptation (talk)19:50, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Readers who are typing "Karmelo Anthony" in the Wikipedia search bar already know his name and just want to learn more about the case. The redirect helps with that.Some1 (talk)21:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Widely reported, non-disparaging. The question isn't whether there was a killing (there was) or whether Mr. Anthony did it (he did); the question is whether that killing was a justifiable homicide under self-defense law, so alleging that Mr. Anthony is a criminal is ade facto assertion that the justifiable homicide defense is inappropriate and he should charged with homicide. That seems more problematic to me than simply redirecting to the most carefully curated and neutrally worded place.Jclemens (talk)01:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Juvenile who has not been convicted of a crime makes this a clearWP:BLP violation.Symphony Regalia (talk)10:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Follow the RfC at the target page.Rusalkii (talk)20:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Violation of BLPCRIME. No issue with recreating if there is a conviction.मल्ल (talk)14:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for reasons I listed on the RfC, but the result of this should depend on the result of theRfC for the matter -presidentofyes, thesuperaussaman20:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as Jclemens points out, "Widely reported, non-disparaging..."Halbared (talk)08:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

帰ってきたマリオブラザーズ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep.✗plicit00:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 帰ってきたマリオブラザーズ帰ってきたマリオブラザーズ →Mario Bros.#Ports and other versions (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:ENGLISHTITLEValorrr^{(lets chat)}17:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep perWP:RFOR. This is the original Japanese name forKaettekita Mario Bros., a modified version of the game released only in Japan.Golem08 (talk)17:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per what source, is this translated in? According to google translate, it returns to "Return of Mario Bros." and according to apple translate, it translates to something else, I haven’t done my research on this topic, but it doesn’t seem like it translates to said.Valorrr^{(lets chat)}02:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Original title" does not mean "your own translations" as often times original tiles aren't directly translated due to weird outcomes:Huis Clos for example. It literally means "shut door(way)" but it's generally "No Exit" in English.JFHJr (㊟)03:10, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep perGolem08 and my comment with example above.JFHJr (㊟)03:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per comments byGolem08 andJFHJr.Limmidy(talk)02:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nintendo is a Japanese company, so in extension, so are its products.WP:FORRED has been satisfied.Steel1943 (talk)20:29, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Madison International Airport

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep.Rusalkii (talk)01:00, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Madison International AirportMadison International Airport →Dane County Regional Airport (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not an international airport.Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk)04:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment apparently a proposed name for the target:[2]Plant🌱man (talk)05:01, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, round 2 I found some matches/mentions online, but I have no opinion on this particular RfD.[3][4][5]Plant🌱man (talk)05:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per Plant🌱man. Redirects are cheap and this one is at least mentioned in the media, if not very often.JackFromWisconsin (talk |contribs)23:22, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬16:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, proposed name perthis recent local news story,WP:CHEAP and harmless, as I cannot find a likely alternate target.Carguychris (talk)17:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Unimon

Duocorn

Walt Disney Animation shorts and TV

Koprziwa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. Jay 💬18:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Koprziwa →Kopřiva (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Kopříva →Kopřiva (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Koprziva →Kopřiva (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Non-existent variant of the surname, created by a sockpuppet of a banned user.FromCzech (talk)09:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete #1 and #3 as implausible and not widely used. However,keep #2 as it might be useful to people who don't speak Polish, and might get confused with the accents.Plant🌱man (talk)14:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But which option is #2?FromCzech (talk)05:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KopřívaPlant🌱man (talk)05:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is a Czech surname not Polish. Kopříva is a very unlikely typo.FromCzech (talk)07:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further opinion on #2 Kopříva.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬14:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete #2 as it seems to be a rather unlikely typo. Agree on deletion for #1 and #3.Golem08 (talk)17:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

You'll Always Be My Maybe

Mcr discography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep and add hatnote.(non-admin closure)CycloneYoris^talk!10:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Mcr discographyMcr discography →My Chemical Romance discography (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

stop. no. you can't just redirect this toMy Chemical Romance's discography and call it a day. you forgot thatModena City Ramblers has the exact same initialsUser:Someone-123-321 (Icontribute,Talk page so SineBot will shut up)03:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and hatnote, as of right now thediscography​'s pageviews outnumber the articleModena City Ramblers about 20:1 (withMy Chemical Romance outnumbering them by about 189:1), so there's likely a primary topic for the abbreviation in music. Combine that with the fact thatModena City Ramblers discography doesn't even exist and I can see the redirect being useful. Of course, theother MCR still exists, so might as well hatnote toModena City Ramblers#Discography just for good measure.mwwv^converse∫_edits18:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬08:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and hatnote per mwwv.Thryduulf (talk)11:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Uncapaedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wassoft delete. Based onminimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expiredPROD (a.k.a."soft deletion"). Editors canrequest the redirect's undeletion. Previous discussion over 15 years ago closed as no consensus with a mention in the article, so I am comfortable deleting this with no further participation given the two relists, but if anyone disagrees I can revert my close.Rusalkii (talk)23:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Uncapaedia →Uncyclopedia (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This was discussed atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 September 26#Uncapaedia, but there is still no content on this Latin language edition of the website in any of our articles.1234qwer1234qwer412:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit14:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬08:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Psyklopedin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wassoft delete. Based onminimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expiredPROD (a.k.a."soft deletion"). Editors canrequest the redirect's undeletion. Previous discussion closed as no consensus with a mention in the article, so I am comfortable deleting this with no further participation given the two relists, but if anyone disagrees I can revert my close.Rusalkii (talk)23:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Psyklopedin →Uncyclopedia (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Discussed atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#Psyklopedin, at which point a mention was added. Right now this is no longer mentioned in any enwiki article.1234qwer1234qwer412:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit14:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬08:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Heroic Sons and Daughters

America's Free-Roaming horses (also commonly referred to as "wild horses")

Illinois University

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toList of colleges and universities in Illinois.(non-admin closure)CycloneYoris^talk!10:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Illinois UniversityIllinois University →University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While UIUC might be the most prominent, there are several other universities that "Illinois University" could possibly refer to, such asIllinois State University. Therefore proposing retarget toList of colleges and universities in Illinois which can serve as a disambiguation page.TruenoCity (talk)01:37, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. I'm not seeing anything on Google suggesting either a primary topic or that this is used for univeristies not in the state of Illinois.Thryduulf (talk)01:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

R.O.B. Sentry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• R.O.B. Sentry →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• R.O.B. Blaster →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• R.O.B. Launcher →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While the target does mentionR.O.B., these concepts do not seem to be mentioned in any of our articles.1234qwer1234qwer400:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Galaxia Darkness

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Galaxia Darkness →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Cracker Launcher →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of these in any of our articles.1234qwer1234qwer400:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Auroros

Shellpod

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Shellpod →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. "Shell pod" is used once atFish scale, but that does not look like a target alternative.1234qwer1234qwer400:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. No mention of anything by this name on en.wp.Thryduulf (talk)01:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Awadhiya bahrain

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep.(non-admin closure)CycloneYoris^talk!10:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Awadhiya bahrainAwadhiya bahrain →Awadhiya, Bahrain (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Had to undo page move vandalism, now this redirect feels unnecessary.Faster than Thunder (talk |contributions)00:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Regardless of the circumstances of its creation, this seems like a plausible and useful search term.Thryduulf (talk)00:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that I have undone the page move vandalism and moved the article back to its original titleAwadhiya. I have no opinion whether two of the redirects created in the process,Awadhiya ( Bahrain ) andAwadhiya bahrain, are worth retaining; will let the Redirect mavens decide. Cheers.Abecedare (talk)01:29, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awadhiya ( Bahrain ) has been speedily deleted under criterion G3 (vandalism), although R3 (recently created, implausible redirect) would also fit.Thryduulf (talk)01:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• KeepThryduulf makes a good point. We shouldn't delete a redirect just because it is an unprintworthy term. It's fairly close to the intended target of the article.Faster than Thunder (talk |contributions)22:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Awadhiya Kshatriya

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasmoot. Original target was restored.(non-admin closure)CycloneYoris^talk!01:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Awadhiya KshatriyaAwadhiya Kshatriya →Kurmi stealing awadhiya kshatriye history (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Double redirect through improper term.Faster than Thunder (talk |contributions)00:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Kurmi stealing awadhiya history

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.Abecedare (talk)01:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Kurmi stealing awadhiya history →Kurmi#Eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Improper redirect term with bad grammar.Faster than Thunder (talk |contributions)00:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert page-move vandalism and return title toAwadhiya Kshatriya (without leaving a redirect). This current title is certainly implausible, but the original redirect was created in 2012 and the page history needs to be preserved.CycloneYoris^talk!01:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Ticken

Jyk

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Jyk →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, and the searching for this in other articles does not seem to reveal any suitable alternatives.1234qwer1234qwer400:18, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The Super Smash Bros. wiki notes thata Jyk is an enemy/trap in Super Smash Bros. Brawl's Adventure Mode: The Subspace Emissary., that's probably verifiable in reliable sources but as our content about that "mode" (Super Smash Bros. Brawl#Adventure Mode: The Subspace Emissary) feels too high level to make it DUE for inclusion so I've not attempted to find such sources. The only other possible target I've found isList of administrative divisions of Ningxia notes JYK as the administrative division code forJingyuan County, Ningxia, that's enough for a dabmention but not a good redirect target.List of railway stations in Indonesia#Jakarta did list JYK as the station code forJayakarta railway station, but that article states that the code is actually JAY so that isn't even a dab page entry. Google gives me all sorts of hits, the most prominent being Super Smash Bros and a Kimchi restaurant in Southend, but none of them seem notable and definitely none are primary. So in the absence of any good target, I see no option but delete.Thryduulf (talk)00:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Greap

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Greap →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. There is a township with this name mentioned atStaffin, which is an article on a different township in the same area, so this should probably be deleted to potentially encourage article creation.1234qwer1234qwer400:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Mizzo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Mizzo →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned;Miles "Mizzo" Ramon Jackson Cartwright and other unrelated uses of this in articles do not appear to be suitable alternatives.1234qwer1234qwer400:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Diffusion Beam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit02:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Diffusion Beam →Super Smash Bros. Brawl (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; unrelated fictional element appears atCharacters_of_the_Metroid_series#Adam_Malkovich.1234qwer1234qwer400:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most search results are forMetroid: Other M; the element of the same name inBrawl isR.O.B.'s Final Smash. I don't think there is any nontrivial mention of either item, and I didn't find usage of the name for anything else. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)03:25, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).