This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 26, 2024.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#Mr. Bland
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Grood
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Kerrek
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Asplode
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Melonade
'Cause ain't no such things as halfway crooks
[edit]Yippie-yi-o, yippie-yi-yay, ghost riders in the sky
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Arrowed
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdisambiguate.wbm1058 (talk)18:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned at target. Linked from an article and receives decent page views and search results might have some target alternatives, though I personally do not know what I should be looking for.1234qwer1234qwer422:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Your Mom Goes to College
[edit]List of yo momma jokes
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#KGVC (FM)
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#North Takoma
North Tacoma (The Simpsons)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waswithdrawn. Never mind, itis mentioned at the target page, but spelled as "North Takoma".(non-admin closure)Steel1943 (talk)21:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- North Tacoma (The Simpsons)North Tacoma (The Simpsons) →Springfield (The Simpsons) (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Springfield, North, TacomaSpringfield, North, Tacoma →Springfield (The Simpsons) (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Springfield, NTSpringfield, NT →Springfield (The Simpsons) (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Shelbyville, NTShelbyville, NT →Springfield (The Simpsons)#Shelbyville (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Springfield, North TacomaSpringfield, North Tacoma →Springfield (The Simpsons) (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- North Tacoma (Springfield's state)North Tacoma (Springfield's state) →Springfield (The Simpsons) (talk ·links ·history ·stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
"North Tacoma", also most likely represented by "NT" in two of the nominated redirects, is not mentioned in target article.Steel1943 (talk)21:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Capstan Station (SkyTrain)
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Misbehaviour
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Universal Studios
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#MrBro
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Awantipora
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Awantipora
Diffusion semigroup
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 9#Diffusion semigroup
Paraguay men's national under-19 basketball team
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬18:29, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like todelete these three redirects. Paraguayan youth national basketball teams play only in categories: U15, U16 and U17. They never played in the U18 category, not even in the U19 category.Maiō T. (talk)16:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdisambiguate.wbm1058 (talk)20:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem to be mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia in the context of GTA. There is, however, an article on a beach calledPraia de Santa Maria, as well as content on some beaches located in places named Santa Maria, such asSanta_Maria,_Ilocos_Sur#Santa_Maria_Beach,Santa María del Mar District (Peru),Capo_Vaticano#Geography,Beach_cleaning#Cleanest_beaches, as well as some image captions.1234qwer1234qwer401:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,LizRead!Talk!02:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit14:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is turned into a disambiguation page, we don't need to worry about that.1234qwer1234qwer415:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Mention wasremoved on 8 March 2012, when§ Los Santos was removed. From that, apparently "Santa Maria Beach" is a fictionalized version ofSanta Monica Beach. –wbm1058 (talk)15:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- "Praia" is Portuguese for "beach". Portuguese is the official language ofCape Verde, home toPraia de Santa Maria ("Santa Maria Beach" in English). –wbm1058 (talk)15:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambiguate - given theWP:X or Y options presented, determining a best target for a redirect isn't really useful when all are not the main focus. Search options (via deletion) might be OK, but since we have the key entries, just use them, and preserve the history. -2pou (talk)15:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thoughts on the page history?
Yes, this was the first offour edits by Johnlovescookies. If the PROD that was immediately placed on their stub creation had been accepted, we wouldn't be here, and the disambiguation might only have happened organically. But here we are; their drive-by edit has tied up a lot of experienced-editor's time. –wbm1058 (talk)15:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]- Drafted a dab at the redirect. Jay 💬17:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Independence of Path
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 4#Independence of Path
God of the New Testament
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toGod in Abrahamic religions#Christianity. Multiple targets have been suggested for this title. However, I find consensus to be leaning towards retargeting toGod in Abrahamic religions#Christianity, mirroring the Old Testament variant. There was thought about improving the New Testament article to explain the concept of this search term, but such actions have not been taken. With the discussion going on for a month at this point, this title about "God [in] New Testament" will target an article about "God [in Christianity]", which discusses the New Testament deeply and links to the overarching article ofGod in Christianity.(non-admin closure)Utopes(talk /cont)22:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When theGod of the Old TestamentGod of the Old Testament (also a recently created redirect) is contrasted with the God of the New Testament, this is not generally the sentiment being expressed. Certainly not attempting to start a trinitarian debate though -- ha.— Godsy (TALKCONT)05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The New Testament God is Greek and doesn't equate with the Hebrew Yahweh. Trinity is at odds with the Old Testament. Jesus is a better re-direct that the "Trinity."--Arbeiten8 (talk)08:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Change target toNames and titles of God in the New Testament. Definitely not "keep", as either the Trinity or God the Father are more obvious synonyms than Jesus.Fram (talk)08:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget, either as suggested by Fram (though that article is solely about naming) or toGod in Christianity.Rosbif73 (talk)08:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget as suggested by Fram. At best the phrase is ambiguous, and "Jesus" is not usually described as "God" in the New Testament, but treated as a separate entity.P Aculeius (talk)11:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I actually don't think we have a good target here. The nominator is correct that Jesus is not really an appropriate target. I don't think the target suggested by Fram is that helpful, as searchers would probably not be looking for information on the name of God IMO. My preference would be for a red link, because having an article about the concept of God in the New Testament specifically seems like a plausible article topic. (Rosbif73's suggestion ofGod in Christianity is a better target than the other two articles but still not my first preference). -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)01:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- There is alsoNew Testament theology. Surprisingly, we don't seem to have a lot of content on the topic of this redirect anywhere.1234qwer1234qwer401:36, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I considered that as a target as well, but that article is more about academic studies than discussing the theologyper se.Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)01:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Let's take a step back a moment and consider the context of these two phrases. In modern English discourse, when someone says "God of the Old Testament" they, rightly or wrongly, are referring to the concept of an angry vengeful god that actively destroys the wicked, or just anyone insufficiently respectful. When someone says "God of the New Testament", they, rightly or wrongly, are referring to a "peace and love", "hippie" style pacifist, non-interventionalist, forgiving god. Again, I'm not talking theology right now (if I was, I would vehemently disagree with both of the previous statements) I'm simply talking about what these phrases mean in the English language. Given that this is what the phrases mean, I think both links should go to an article that discusses thesespecific aspects or perceptions of god... I'm sure we have some, or should have some, given how extensively these topics have been discussed and written on by all manner of scholars. There may be more than one good target, in which case a disambiguation page might be appropriate. I think I would object to simply targetingJesus orGod in Christianity, as these don't really cover the plain meanings of how the phrases are used in English. I don't think we should delete, because this is a VERY plausible search term, and we DO have information on it... the problem is just pointing the user to the correct spots they are looking for. I don't have specific suggestions for where to go though, as... quite frankly, there's a lot. But the status quo doesn't seem right.Fieari (talk)04:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!10:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, again several different retarget pages are being proposed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,LizRead!Talk!01:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
God of the Old Testament
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toGod in Abrahamic religions#Judaism. Multiple targets have been suggested for this title. However, I find consensus to be leaning towards retargeting toGod in Abrahamic religions#Judaism, mirroring the New Testament variant. While the article for the Old Testament mentions the phrase "God of the Old Testament", the target of "God in Abrahamic religions" is fundamentally about "God", and features much of the same information about God as the Old Testament article does, without diverting to the various themes described inOld Testament#Themes.(non-admin closure)Utopes(talk /cont)22:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Recently created alongsideGod of the New Testament (also under discussion at RfD). I don't think thatYahweh is the best target, as it's hard to know if readers will be looking for the ancient interpretation as discussed in the current target or more contemporary ones. I suggest retargeting toGod of Israel (a disambiguation page), which is a synonymous phrase IMO.Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)01:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,LizRead!Talk!02:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have several different retarget pages proposed. If this is to be closed, participants need to find consensus on one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,LizRead!Talk!01:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete1.(I live to serve.)asilvering (talk)02:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As opposed to Łódź 2 and Łódź 3? The city is not known as "Łódź 1," though there is a rather normal office building called Łódź 1 that is not mentioned at the target. The redirect appears to be a leftover from a now blocked account incorrectly moving the page from Łódź to Lodz and has only received 8 page views in 2 years.Schützenpanzer(Talk)00:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- you don't have sequels to your cities?delete as... i'm not entirely sure if it's malformed or just collateral damage from a typo, but get it out of my sightcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)19:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.New and improved—now made with organic materials and 100% asbestos-free!Cremastra (talk)20:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- [citation needed]cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)19:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.I had sequels to my cities all the time back when I playedSim City 2000 regularly. I don't think I named any of them Lodz though, and definitely not Łodź. To the best of my knowledge, every single one of them would failWP:V.Thryduulf (talk)22:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this implausible leftover from some sequence of page moves.1234qwer1234qwer422:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.Clearly yall are not thinking out the box, why not create PREQUELS to your cities? New from the Local Government of Łódź, it's Łódź -1! Now with more pollution and inefficiency!mwwvconverse∫edits11:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- SoNew Amsterdam 2? Obviously the solution is aresetquel to the entire city of Chicago, in the same vein asMeigs Field.mwwvconverse∫edits18:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I just hope the closing admin closes it as at "[result] 1".Cremastra (talk)18:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.asilvering (talk)02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cross-wiki redirectCFA💬00:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Iam the creator of this redirect, but still, this seems like avery useful cross-wiki redirect. There's no article for Ostprussenlied on the English Wikipedia yet, so having this redirect will most likely make things much more convienent... Also there's no rule against cross-wiki redirects, is there?Kxeon (talk)01:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, more dumbness from me. As it turns out, thereis a rule on that: "Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. Instead, editors should link to the alternate language Wikipedia directly with one of various forms of interlanguage links."
So IOppose deletion but it seems best toChange to interlanguage links.— Precedingunsigned comment added byKxeon (talk •contribs)02:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment would it be better to make the current redirect into an article based on the de.wiki version? --Lenticel(talk)02:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeah, it probably would. I just hope someone here knows German so that it can work. Unless a machine translation somewhat touched up would be fine...Kxeon (talk)04:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Interlanguage links are only useful directly from the prose and as the entire content of the page areless useful than soft redirects.Thryduulf (talk)10:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unhelpful. (Alternatively,weak retarget toEast Prussia, which has this in the infobox including an audio recording, though it is currently linked there so the redlink could encourage article creation.)1234qwer1234qwer417:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is definitely useful as aWP:REDLINK. This article is available in six languages, but love it when it has yet to come to ENWP.JuniperChill (talk)22:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- return to red per junipercogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.asilvering (talk)02:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cross-wiki redirectCFA💬00:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Iam the creator of this redirect, but still, this seems like avery useful cross-wiki redirect. There's no article for Ostprussenlied on the English Wikipedia yet, so having this redirect will most likely make things much more convienent... Also there's no rule against cross-wiki redirects, is there?Kxeon (talk)01:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Oops, looks like I immediately thought this was aboutdeletion. It doesn't have to be about that. Once more, I'm dumb.— Precedingunsigned comment added byKxeon (talk •contribs)01:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, more dumbness from me. As it turns out, thereis a rule on that: "Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. Instead, editors should link to the alternate language Wikipedia directly with one of various forms of interlanguage links."
So IOppose deletion but it seems best toChange to interlanguage links.— Precedingunsigned comment added byKxeon (talk •contribs)02:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- return to red per the nomination above. tpyo seems plausible-ish tbhcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target for this page. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful. Additionally, the plain{{soft redirect}} templateis not used in the mainspace (WP:SOFTSP). Seehere for precedents.— Godsy (TALKCONT)15:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, similar as Ostpreußenlied. --Cyfal (talk)07:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Question toKxeon: Nevertheless, why did you create Ostprussenlied? Was this a typo and you ment Ostpreussenlied, for replacing the ß by ss because the letter ß is not part of the English alphabet? --Cyfal (talk)15:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer toCyfal: Heck, I even tried to type it as Ostprussenlied just now...
Did I ever catch it? No, because I forgot of the e's mere existance. I made Ostprussenlied before Ostpreußenlied. Oops.
And as for the eszett, I'm on a tablet right now!
My laptop is getting fixed right now! It is the one with the compose key; if I had it the eszett wouldn't be a problem for me. But I'm stuck on Android right now, so yeah...
- Kxeon (talk)16:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your answer! Typos can happen to anyone, I've made a number of them myself... --Cyfal (talk)22:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Jimmy Neutron Happy Family Happy Hour
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.asilvering (talk)02:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable YouTube video based on the series where the quote "The pizza is aggressive" comes from. It's not mentioned in the target article, so I'm not sure if we still need this redirect lying around. Regards,SONIC67800:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete indiscriminate vanity redirect. Not mentioned in the target.-1ctinus📝🗨13:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toLGBTQ people in Mexico. There's a thin consensus for this.LGBTQ topics in Mexico has been proposed for merge intoLGBTQ people in Mexico, which would make this matter moot. There's much inconsistency in primary topics for "LGBTQ in...", which might be better addressed by discussing conventions atWikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies.wbm1058 (talk)19:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn'tLGBT people in Mexico be theWikipedia:Broad-concept article? --MikutoHtalk!00:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That would be fine by me. It currently redirects to LGBTQ topics in Mexico, which is broader. I'd have no objections changing it. I believe it originally redirected to LGBT topics in Mexico and I just added the Q forWP:CONSUB.Lewisguile (talk)06:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking atSpecial:PrefixIndex/LGBT in, I would sayretarget toLGBTQ rights in Mexico unless we want to change the entire list of redirects.1234qwer1234qwer422:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @1234qwer1234qwer4 checkthis andthis, there are few country articles withLGBTQ people in prefix, and only two withLGBTQ topics in. --MikutoHtalk!23:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, this is probably less consistent than I thought; might need a mass-nomination in the future.1234qwer1234qwer400:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The need to improve consistency in the organization of our articles on LGBTQ people by country came up recently atWT:LGBT#"LGBT rights in country" vs "LGBT in country".--Trystan (talk)01:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I would retarget toLGBTQ people in Mexico, consistent with the name of the broad concept article for other countries (for those that have one). The topics article could be merged into the other existing articles.--Trystan (talk)03:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Special:PrefixIndex/LGBTQ in doesn't indicate any consistency or clear primary topic. In Chile,LGBTQ in Chile is ambiguous. In Guatemala,LGBTQ in Guatemala is abroad-concept article. In the United States,LGBTQ people in the United States is the primary topic. In Croatia,LGBTQ rights in Croatia is the primary topic. In France,LGBTQ history in France is the primary topic. In the Philippines,LGBTQ culture in the Philippines is the primary topic. People, rights, history, culture, topics, whatever.LGBTQ in Mexico is still a red link. –wbm1058 (talk)14:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
