This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 11, 2024.
Vetter Stone Amphitheater
[edit]Lewis & Clark Caverns State Park Amphitheater
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An event that just so happens to take place in Ohio with no mention in the actual article.Okmrman (talk)22:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Maine article does have Aroostook in it but it doesn't talk about any specific trail.Okmrman (talk)22:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Hamler Country Fest
[edit]Hambler Country Fest
[edit]Great River Folk Festival
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No mention. Made by a user with a history of creating redirects for non-notable events.Okmrman (talk)22:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draft-to-mainspace redirect with no clear reason to exist. This isn't a leftover of any page-moving history, but was just created a couple of days ago as a redirect right from the jump, whereas wealready have adisambiguation page at the mainspace titleTPT. My best guess is that this was created in an attempt to render the game into the primary topic bybypassing the dab page — but even if the creator (an anonymous IP) actually wants to assert that the video game should be primary topic for TPT, using draftspace this way isn't the process for doing that.Bearcat (talk)20:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Cedar Ridge Middle School
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Cedar Ridge Middle School
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 22#Population 0
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Hyperstar
Wikipedia:GREENGABLES
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19#Wikipedia:GREENGABLES
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. Jay 💬15:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this is related to Intel Core i3. — AP 499D25(talk)12:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. Jay 💬15:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No such thing as "Intel Core 0". I can't see anything about Intel Core i3 being related to this. — AP 499D25(talk)12:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. Jay 💬15:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such thing as "Intel Core 4". I fail to see how Intel Core i5 is related to this. — AP 499D25(talk)12:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Template:Transcluded section2
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬15:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
0 transclusions. Unused.Magioladitis (talk)09:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Template:End U.S. judge succession 2
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬15:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Totally unused and insignificant edit history.Magioladitis (talk)08:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Template:Wide image-2
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬15:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Never really used.Magioladitis (talk)08:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Template:Wiki category 2
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬15:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No edit history. Just an incomplete template move. Unused.Magioladitis (talk)08:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Template:Infobox software2
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬15:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are several mentions in Enwiki of people called "Denis Cohen", none notable enough to have their own article, and this redirect's target (father of a Denis Cohen) isn't the primary topic, and obscures those other results: delete.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)08:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Technofascism and Techno-fascism
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 30#Technofascism and Techno-fascism
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasMove without redirect* Pppery *it has begun...19:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk)02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The page was partially merged. I've made an attribution notice in an edit summary at the target to avoid attribution issues in case the page does get deleted. --Paul_012 (talk)10:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I redirected the page because I merged content toSolimar Beach and redirects are cheap. The only other reason to keep the redirect is that if you search for the Solimar Beach community in GNIS, the only entry that comes up is Dulah; that's the only reason I started an article under Dulah in the first place, since Solimar Beach is used on local signage and I started the article way back when I assumed GNIS was reliable.TheCatalyst31Reaction•Creation04:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak restore article (
perWP:PROD, can be taken to AfD if desired), but could this name not be added to the current target? As things stand this is confusing for someone searching this.A7V2 (talk)00:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,ToadetteEdit!17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!07:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Move without redirect toSolimar Beach Colony per JayOkmrman (talk)15:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Colonia Ulpia Traiana
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was torestorethis version of the article. There is rough consensus to restore the article that existed before it was converted into a redirect underWP:EVASION. —MarkH21talk21:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]
In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected toXanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section toVetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- PingingJoNeuen: Instead of reverting the redirect, please discuss here why you think the current redirect target is incorrect and where you think the page should redirect to.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)02:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I have proposed this on the Xanten page. The reason for reverting is that Colonia Ulpia Traiana is an archaeological/historical site, which is only briefly discussed in the Xanten article.JoNeuen (talk)02:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi there! So, the link toVetera was made because I created this article myself. As withColonia Ulpia Traiana, theVetera article was redirecting toXanten before, but I cancelled it because I was working on a translation from theGerman article. I considered this justified, because I didn't get a response on theXanten talk page in over a week. Since translating and complementing articles using translation is what I mostly do here, my intention is to do the same withColonia Ulpia Traiana. TheXanten page is already considered incomplete and these German pages are full of valuable historic and archaeological information that might benefit English speaking Wikipedia.JoNeuen (talk)22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,signed,Rosguilltalk16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,ToadetteEdit!17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Jay's proposal to restore the earlier version, and use it as the basis of further development (which would heavily involve translation from de.wiki). Refusing to use the article on the grounds that it would "reward socking" is cutting off WP's nose to spite its face.Furius (talk)13:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!07:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Jay's proposal instead of retargeting. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)14:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasno consensus. Editors remain divided between keep, retarget, and delete after two relists.signed,Rosguilltalk17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could refer to most films listed at{{Snow White}}, such asMirror Mirror (film) andSnow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect referencesSnow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions ofSnow White that are not Disney-related.Steel1943 (talk)03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RetargetSnow White (disambiguation), basically everything on that list after the first is a remake by definition. Alternatively,delete due to being vague and unhelpful (deletion is probably my first choice now that I think about it more), Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out what article people are imagining in their heads by typing "remake" nowadays.Utopes(talk /cont)04:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]- On second thought, I'm striking my retarget !vote. Wikipedia is not a search engine, "remake" is not useful in the form of a redirect. Currently it refers to anything on that list, but it's too vague and subjective in doing so (as remake isn't mentioned). Would be ridiculous to haveFoo remake targetany disambiguation page with multiple pieces of fiction with the same title, so let Google or Wikipedia's search function figure it out. Delete.Utopes(talk /cont)07:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Retarget toSnow White (disambiguation) as plausible search by a reader. I'm also fine withdelete due to the malformed "remake" modifier --Lenticel(talk)05:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget as per Utopes, and tag as R from incomplete disambig.𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk)17:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator preference:Delete per above. The existence of the word "remake" and since it makes it so the redirect is not a word-for-word title variation of "Snow White" leave me to believe that the nominated redirect is better deleted than targeting a disambiguation page.Steel1943 (talk)16:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toSnow White (franchise) that has got hatnotes to anything else the reader may be interested in. I find this a better alternative to Snow White (disambiguation). I find suffixing of "remake" to a film as a valid search term. I would do the same if I was looking for a film remake, or the latest remake if there are multiple. Jay 💬06:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As far as I'm aware, the upcoming Disney remake is the most notable (if not the only) remake of a previous film titledSnow White.Mirror Mirror (film) is not a remake of a prioer film; neither isSnow White and the Huntsman.InfiniteNexus (talk)00:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per InfiniteNexus's argument.Fieari (talk)23:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Infinite. Disney's remake is the only one I've seen referred to as this and is the most notable as Infinite said. The others do not qualify as a remake. Retargeting to a DAB page and deleting are not viable options as we are supposed to help guide readers, and with the amount of traction the upcoming film has gotten already, I'm sure this will remain a useful search term as those looking for the "Snow White remake" are most likely looking for the 2025 film.Trailblazer101 (talk)00:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Hey man im josh (talk)15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!07:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toComparison of photo stitching software. If the retargeted page is deleted in AfD, it will be tagged as{{db-redirnone}} and automatically deleted.(non-admin closure)Catalk to me!13:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect.Utopes(talk /cont)06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Hey man im josh (talk)14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteper nomOkmrman (talk)04:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!07:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toComparison of photo stitching software per Jay. I don't see a reason to AfD that target... possibly it could be renamed "List of..." instead of "Comparison of..." but as a list I think it would passWP:NLIST and seems well sourced. Anyway, right now it has all the information we possess, and probably all that we should posess, on PanoramaMaker, so that should be the target.Fieari (talk)03:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's pure fancruft/OR/SYNTH and violatesWP:NOTDIR. CompareWP:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software,WP:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software, etc.* Pppery *it has begun...19:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Reading those AfD's you linked for comparison, they used the rationale thatall the entries within those lists were non-notable. They aren't saying that software comparisons in general aren't notable, violateWP:NOTDIR, fancrust/OR/SYNTH... they're saying that those specific lists were not notable. This list is not the same level of "niche" that fails to collect notability. Again, I see no reason that this list in question wouldn't meetWP:NLIST.Fieari (talk)00:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- At the timeComparison of XMPP server software was deleted, seven of the nine entries compared had standalone articles. And presumably the same argument that led to all-redlink lists being deleted would suggest non-notable entries be removed from the table here, making the retarget proposal moot. But whatever. I'm just going to start an AfD now instead of continuing to make vague allusions to one:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of photo stitching software.* Pppery *it has begun...03:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 27#Baak (Telugu Film)
Blockbuster Monster Movie
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasno consensus. Jay 💬16:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
could literally refer to any mainstream monster/kaiju movie such as the monsterverse moviesOkmrman (talk)04:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: TheProduction section of the target article states that
[o]n February 18, 2022, Robot Communications announced the film, with the working title Blockbuster Monster Movie (超大作怪獣映画, Chōtaisaku Kaijū Eiga), via a casting call on its official website
. If there aren't any other films that have been known by the same title, I'm inclined to keep the redirect for this reason. All the best,—a smart kitten[meow]16:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 18#American actress
