Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion |Log
<July 29
July 31>

July 30

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 30, 2024.

Trundling

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.Complex/Rational23:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Trun" appears nowhere in the target.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf) 21:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Implausible redirect unless/until the term is defined and sourced within the glossary article. —Jéské Courianov^_^vthreadscritiques23:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with Jéské, if it's not in the article (and judging by blame searches, it's never been in the article), this redirect shouldn't exist as it is not helpful to the reader.BugGhost🦗👻16:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

R. Tucker

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toTucker (surname)#R.(non-admin closure)asilvering (talk)01:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't usual to have a redirect of a single initial and a surname without a good reason, and I can't determine what that reason is here. "R. Tucker" is very ambiguous: seeTucker (surname)#R.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)20:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Slender man murder

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion waskeep.(non-admin closure)asilvering (talk)01:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Murder took place. Implausible redirect.BletheringScot19:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Outsmart

[edit]

Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 7#Outsmart

world but with numbers!

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.Complex/Rational23:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vague as h*ck. don't even thinkworld 1-1 would be a fitting target for world 1cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)18:52, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Red neckrampage the game

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit14:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very implausible pile of writing mistakes that started off as... an adcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Duty calls

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit14:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that's a vague phrase. no idea if it should be soft redirected towikt:duty calls, or just deleted, but the term doesn't seem primarily associated with bulletstormcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Duke Nukem Whenever

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit14:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same-ish case as "duke nukem for never" below, different target for some reason. seems a little more commonly used thoughcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:27, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The history is whenever the media asked about the release ofDuke Nukem Forever before its 2011 launch, the developer said, "When it's done." but never whenever, so this redirect makes no possibility. –The Grid (talk)12:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Extraction Point: Alien Shootout.

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit14:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pointless point.cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Duke nukem for never

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit15:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

that's actually pretty funny, but seemingly not commonly used even before the game releasedcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Duke 4

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit15:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

vague, and it's arguably not even the 4rd mainline installment (not that that means much with dick kickem)cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is indeed uselessly vague, but as far as mainline instalments goForever is indeed the 4th main instalment; there were fourgaiden games released duringForever's protracted development (Time to Kill,Zero Hour,Land of the Babes,Manhattan Project). —Jéské Courianov^_^vthreadscritiques18:17, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Duke Nukem (company names!)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toDuke Nukem.plicit15:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

two different targets for each- i'm not getting into the confusing history of apogee and 3d realms here, would the series article be the better target here?cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget toDuke Nukem - Yes, the series article would be the proper target here. There's no reason "<franchise> (<company>)" should redirect to the page of a character in that franchise. —Jéské Courianov^_^vthreadscritiques18:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Pig cop

[edit]

Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 7#Pig cop

Neo-newtonian

[edit]

Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 15#Neo-newtonian

Wiimake

[edit]

Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 16#Wiimake

Palestien

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toPalestine (disambiguation).Complex/Rational12:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More likely a misspelling ofPalestine -CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)07:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget toPalestine - Apprently a common misspelling:[1]Catalk to me!10:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ca:,@Glades12:,@Jéské Couriano: Just want to note thatPalestine is not an article, but another redirect which targetsState of Palestine.CycloneYoristalk!08:23, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ca,Glades12,Jéské Couriano. In case you didn't read my message:Palestine is not an article, so you three need to modify your !votes above. Also pinging nom to let them know:Champion.CycloneYoristalk!00:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I read this and forgot about it. I think all the retarget supporters above meantState of Palestine. 👍Catalk to me!00:14, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did initially, since I assumedPalestine would be an article title and not a redirect. Some speakers might pronounce this misspelling differently from the region in the Middle East though, so it's probably best to send them to the disambig page where they won't be as confused in case they meant another topic than the state.Glades12 (talk)09:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Baguette City

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.plicit15:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term not mentioned at target.Clovermoss🍀(talk)06:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an{{r from meme}}, but a pretty small meme. Most uses online seem to be about restaurants instead.jlwoodwa (talk)07:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
retarget to francedelete as a joke so common and predictable it could realistically refer to any single place in francecogsan(nag me)(stalk me)12:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Sand hanitizer

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.Clovermoss🍀(talk)05:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be urban dictionary slang, unsure of its usefulness as a redirect. Term not mentioned at target.Clovermoss🍀(talk)05:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, I would like to say that I will tag the page for speedy deletion under{{db-g7}}, as I'm not quite sure why I created it. Whoops! –The Sharpest Lives (💬✏️ℹ️) (ping me!)05:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toJoe Biden 2024 presidential campaign#Calls to withdraw.Hey man im josh (talk)19:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Democrats who opposed the Joe Biden 2024 presidential campaign might be a better target. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk ·contribs ·email)18:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!03:50, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Power flower

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toFlower power (disambiguation). It's mentioned on that dab page already. I'll add #Gameplay to the link as well.(non-admin closure)asilvering (talk)23:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

things named "power flower" have been in three mario games so far (though they're all different things), and none of them seem to be the primary target for the termcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!03:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Republican blue

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toPolitical colour.Hey man im josh (talk)19:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?* Pppery *it has begun...05:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

those sound more like pokémon fangames than political terms.delete per "what"cogsan(nag me)(stalk me)13:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I searched on duck.com and saw no sources using this term. Best I found isRon Paul 2012 presidential campaign § "Blue Republican" movementCatalk to me!16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!03:47, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteDemocrat red,retargetRepublican blue toRepublican Blues. We don't have articles on either of these topics, as those political parties don't use those colours, and judging by the stats nobody is searching for them either.Second preference is retargetting both toPolitical colour.BugGhost🦗👻11:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The colors used for US general presidential elections switched between red and blue prior to the 2000 US election. Republicans as blue in 1980[2] and 1976 election.[3] I think a redirect to bothred states and blue states is the most plausible version here. –The Grid (talk)13:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Democratic parties in other countries use red.Thryduulf (talk)13:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Safe state

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete.Complex/Rational23:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious primacy - searching for "safe state" is giving me lots of non-political ways a state can be safe. Suggest deletion unless a better target is found.* Pppery *it has begun...05:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete as vague, as it's also subject to varying definitions of "state". could refer to a move in a fighting game being plus on block for all we knowcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)14:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!03:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Wrong warp

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toWarp (video games). An explanation can be added.(non-admin closure)CFA💬21:52, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "wrong warp" exists in the target.Mia Mahey (talk)00:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a video gameglitch where awarp sends you to the wrong place. Secondary coverage is bare but passable –Ars Technica andKotaku have a paragraph and a sentence on it respectively. They don't connect it tosequence breaking though, so it's hard to justify describing it in that article. Maybe it could go inGlossary of video game terms?
It's also an episode ofMeta Runner, but that's definitely not theprimary topic.jlwoodwa (talk)08:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Ars Technica says wrong warping allowsskipping a large section of World 8-4 – sounds like sequence breaking to me.jlwoodwa (talk)08:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
it's a sequence breaking glitch used in super mario bros 3 speedruns, so they're all technically correctcogsan(nag me)(stalk me)15:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the term seems pretty much exclusively used to refer to a speedrunning glitch insuper mario bros. 3, so i'd sayretarget to it. or tospeedrunning if there's no room to add a mention to any other targetscogsan(nag me)(stalk me)11:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - wrong warping is a technique/glitch where a warp (eg. through a door/loading screen/teleporter/whatever) takes you to the "wrong" place, which is used by sequence breakers. It's used in multiple Mario games (at least original SMB and SMB3, probably others), Pokemon games, Elden Ring, and others. Should be kept because a wrong warp is a way of sequence breaking. Would also be fine with retargetting toGlitching orSpeedrunning if consensus leans that way.BugGhost🦗👻11:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget toWarp (video games) per below - much better targetBugGhost🦗👻09:22, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_30&oldid=1240692609"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp