This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2023.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit03:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned in the target article, even as a notable game made with the engine.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)22:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit23:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
non notable minor league player who is no longer with the Twins orgSpanneraol (talk)22:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
not listed at target article and no longer in the Brewers minor league systemSpanneraol (talk)22:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Luis Contreras (baseball)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
not listed at target article and no longer in the Brewers minor league systemSpanneraol (talk)22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
non notable player, not listed at target article and no longer in Royals organizationSpanneraol (talk)22:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
National Produce Stakes
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#National Produce Stakes
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
not mentioned at target page and not currently in the Reds minor league systemSpanneraol (talk)21:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not mentioned at target page and he is not currently a member of the Reds organizationSpanneraol (talk)21:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is not mentioned at target page as he is not in the Cubs system anymore.Spanneraol (talk)21:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 16#Gilbert Lara
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; this isn't mentioned in the article's extensive list of examples and a Google search of "paw internet" found a wide variety of results, none of which had anything to do with the definition given in the edit summary of this redirect's creation.Anonymous19:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Hey man im josh (talk)20:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.Hey man im josh (talk)18:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seem like a plausible misspelling for "sandbox". Searching the term up exactly how this is spelled on Google gives results about a drug/medicine tablet branded as that.1033Forest (talk)18:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#JUNIPER
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit04:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
<deep breath>Desperation Move is an avoided double redirect ofDesperation Attack, which was in turn a redirect left behind from a move toDesperation attack, which was in turn an article "that had something to do with video games" that was converted to a redirect before being deleted in 2016, afterWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 10#Desperation attack.InfiniteNexus (talk)22:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both per the result ofWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 November 10#Desperation attack. --(Roundish✡t)23:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget the former toDesperado (chess), which is also known as a "desperation move". The latter can probably be safely deleted. —Red-tailed hawk (nest)00:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Source?InfiniteNexus (talk)00:13, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- PingingRed-tailed hawk in case he missed. Jay 💬08:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand this as common parlance, but I think that there's quite a good number of examples of use that was inChess Review if you take a good read through the whole issue, for example. —Red-tailed hawk (nest)00:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete someone could write an article on suchWP:REDLINK to cover various desperation moves, such as attacks, hail marys, desperation versions ofBreakout (military)/Relief (military), feints, etc. and other intentionally selected low probability moves in order to seek relief from an oppressive encumbrance --65.92.247.90 (talk)03:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For another opinion on Desperation Move. Also, notified of this discussion at the talk of proposed target Desperado (chess).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬07:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasclosed as speedy deleted. ByVanjagenije as aWP:G5 - Created by a banned or blocked user (Your Pritam) in violation of ban or block). Jay 💬10:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The target has a mention of the actor in the cast. However, the actor is listed in the cast of multiple films on enwiki, no reason to have the current target as the primary.Delete. Jay 💬05:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Bagua/Hsing-i
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 16#🔞
Kogen Province, North Korea
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Kogen Province, North Korea
Kogen Province, South Korea
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Kogen Province, South Korea
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Fu-chien County
Fu-chien County, Taiwan
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 16#Fu-chien County, Taiwan
Events in rail transport
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasset-indexify.(non-admin closure)—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh)08:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rail transport did not only exist in 2009.(The day is January 1st... 2010... all rails have instantly disappeared. The events have finished happening. It's over. The ships won.)Utopes(talk /cont)05:31, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- but ships are not so good on land – I think that the cars won really.Sore point considering yesterday's announcement —GhostInTheMachinetalk to me14:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Set indexify, linking toHistory of rail transport,List of years in rail transport,Rail transport by country,Lists of rail accidents,Timeline of railway history and anything else appropriate we have.Thryduulf (talk)09:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Created due to me moving it back following abad move in 2022-11. Probably
re-point toList of years in rail transport —GhostInTheMachinetalk to me14:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Why assume someone is looking for a list organised by year rather than lists organised by location or type of event?Thryduulf (talk)21:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toTimeline of railway history, which has the major events listed in one place. --Tavix(talk)13:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget toTimeline of railway history per Tavix; very helpful target. Not entirely sold, however, that everyone using this search term are referring to events over time.J947 †edits02:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Setindexify.J947 †edits21:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,signed,Rosguilltalk21:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget toTimeline of railway history — the other pages cross-link —GhostInTheMachinetalk to me14:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]- @GhostInTheMachine: Could you clarify your recommendation for this discussion? You have two conflicting !votes to retarget — please strike one.—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh)02:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!04:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — undetermined consensus between retargeting and set-indexifying.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh)02:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasno consensus. --Tavix(talk)18:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no information at the target about listicles, which is what I was looking for when trying out this as a possible source of information for advice about listicles, whether that be for notability, reliability, usefuless, whatever. I don't know if there was at the time of redirect creation, but as things stand now, this is just unhelpful at best, and misleading at worst, so I simply suggest deletion.35.139.154.158 (talk)17:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I'm really confused as to what the issue is here.Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists isthe page for information on list articles — the nomination rationale makes no sense to me.—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh)19:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- See the article onlisticles:
In journalism and blogging, a listicle is an article that is structured as a list, which is often fleshed out with additional text relating to each item.[1][2] A typical listicle will prominently feature a cardinal number in its title, with subsequent subheadings within the text itself reflecting this schema. The word is a portmanteau derived from list and article.
I.e., generally Buzzfeed-style "10 Times Squirrels Got Inside Celebrity Homes. Number 6 Will Shock You". The target guideline page on lists doesn't say anything about these, which is what I and most others would be looking for. WP lists aren't (or at least shouldn't be) listicles.35.139.154.158 (talk)19:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]- I highly doubt that "
most others would be looking for
" information of the BuzzFeed variety; no Wikipedia article is structured this way, and I can think of no reason to expect information about this kind of content in the projectnamespace. It's also worth noting thatarticle means very different things in the contexts of journalism and encyclopediography — and solisticle will inherit that difference in meaning. In talk page discussions, I've seen the termslist,list article, andlisticle used interchangeably, so these redirects are undoubtedly useful to the community.—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh)19:55, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]- I really don't understand your keep rationale here. I've never seen anyone use "listicle" to refer to a WP list, whereas I've seen it used extensively to see it refer to the clickbait-style example I described above, often somewhat pejoratively. I'd expect a redirect like this to point to information or guidance or opinion about their use as sources, not the overall page about WP lists generally (unless that page actually had information about listicles, but it doesn't, hence the nomination in the first place).35.139.154.158 (talk)20:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless it's been used significantly I would also lean delete /disambuate - I would have thought it was about listicles as sources. (t ·c)buidhe15:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've had a mostly-written essay on the specific topic of Listicles & Wikipedia lying around in a Google Doc for ages. I'd be happy to clobber the redirect and replace it with my essay if there's a desire for Listicle-specific content in the Wikipedia space, which would render the RFD moot (there'd just be a hatnote to the stand-alone lists target).SnowFire (talk)04:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Edward-Woodrow •talk20:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoristalk!01:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Morenoism
Template:Filmmaker-stub
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toTemplate:Film-bio-stub.(non-admin closure)CycloneYoristalk!02:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ambiguous redirect that's been unwisely pressed into misleading service. The problem with "filmmaker" is that it can meaneither a directoror a producer, and is sometimes even incorrectly used to mean almost any behind-the-scenes film crew at all, but this was commandeered specifically to the director side of the equation.Bearcat (talk)01:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).
