April 13

Hello, How Do You Do?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, How Do You Do? →La Raspa (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear.Steel1943 (talk)19:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.Veverve (talk)14:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete huh? What?Dronebogus (talk)00:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as confusing. According to my Google Books search, this sentence seems to be used for training kids in manners or for people who are learning basic English language. --Lenticel^(talk)00:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Dead Leaves (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Dead Leaves (upcoming film) →Aki Kaurismäki (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also,WP:REDLINK applies.Steel1943 (talk)19:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perWP:CRYSTAL.Veverve (talk)14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the worst possible case of crystalDronebogus (talk)00:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Pros and Cons of the Euro

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.Salvio^giuliano08:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pros and Cons of the Euro →Euro (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

​I'm not nominating this redirect on the basis of the unusual title, but because the target is too broad for it to be useful. I could understand if, for example, it pointed to a section named "Support and criticism", or even just "Response" or "Reception". The article on theeuro doesn't have any of these sections (Criticism of the European UnionCriticism of the European Union is a redirect toEuroscepticism). The redirect also doesn't havepage history ormainspace backlinks worth preserving. For all these reasons, it should bedeleted as acostly title.Dsuke1998AEOS (talk)19:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete deceptive POV redirectDronebogus (talk)19:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think it gets used much; the page view statistics show 577 views since its creation in 2007. There were reasons I thought it was appropriate in 2007; but I don't think those reasons are applicable today. I think most people looking for information on the Euro will just search for Euro. ~ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving19:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.Crouch, Swale (talk)19:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel^(talk)00:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete – 577 views in the last 8 years (as far back as data goes at the current source) certainly indicates enough use to outweigh the minor maintenance burden, but I don't think this redirect is helpful as it stands, and don't really feel it should be a redirect title to be honest due to how synthesis-y it sounds.J947 †^edits06:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget toEuro#Economics, whichdoes (albeit in a roundabout and indirect way) discuss the economic benefits and risks of countries adopting the euro.(Also, there was briefly an article at this title; it was moved to this title fromArguments for and against the single european currency?, then deleted atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arguments for and against the single european currency?. I wouldn't support making the latter title into a redirect, though, because it's phrased like a question/essay prompt.)Duckmather (talk)19:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clearly acostly redirect as stated by the nom, so definitely no point in keeping. I also don't think that retargeting this anywhere would be helpful; though I do note that the above suggestion by Duckmather seems decent, it wouldn't be a completely precise target in my opinion.CycloneYoris^talk!04:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Monster (upcoming film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Monster (upcoming film) →Hirokazu Kore-eda (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Doesn't make sense to redirect this title to the redirect's subject's potential director when the subject of the redirect may be attached to other notable subjects with articles. Also,WP:REDLINK applies.Steel1943 (talk)19:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perWP:CRYSTAL.Veverve (talk)14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

"Upcoming" no longer upcoming

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Limbo (upcoming Hong Kong film) →Limbo (2021 film) (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Murder Mystery 2 (upcoming film) →Murder Mystery 2 (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No longer upcoming, seeWP:UFILM.Steel1943 (talk)19:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.InfiniteNexus (talk)00:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per previous RfDs where there is a consensus to delete these sorts of redirects.InterstellarGamer12321 (talk |contribs)09:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete perWP:CRYSTAL.Veverve (talk)14:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This has nothing to do with CRYSTAL, but okay.InfiniteNexus (talk)16:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Reverse crystal? “Predicting” events that have already occurred?Dronebogus (talk)00:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no longer useful --Lenticel^(talk)00:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Execution of Tymofii Shadura

Account of My Life

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Account of My Life →The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too vague, no mention at the target. I proposedeletion.Veverve (talk)18:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I assume this is an alternate title?Dronebogus (talk)19:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)21:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

His Autobiography

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• His Autobiography →The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Way too vague, I proposedeletion.Veverve (talk)17:58, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly the least clear redirect everDronebogus (talk)19:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)21:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague --Lenticel^(talk)00:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

2038 Asian Games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2038 Asian Games →Asian Games (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:FUTURE andWP:TOOSOON, same reason we don't have2044 Summer Olympics as a redirect.Hey man im josh (talk)17:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perWP:CRYSTAL.Veverve (talk)18:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete perWP:TOOSOON, won't have bidding process soon. --Aleenf122:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a redirect andWP:ATD. There is already some coverage but it would be best to have a full article till later. A comment on theAsian Games article would be sufficient for now.Sportsfan 1234 (talk)22:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an incredibly shiny, brightWP:CRYSTAL ... oh, and theWP:REDLINK potential in like 15 years.Steel1943 (talk)18:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete arbitrary future date for regularly occurring event that will presumably continue indefinitely.Dronebogus (talk)00:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it is unhelpful to the reader as it stands; the target article has no information on the topic.2034 Asian Games and all earlier exist, by the way.J947 †^edits10:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Rules of the Senate

Mount Everett (Canmore)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. Jay 💬16:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Mount Everett (Canmore) →Grotto Mountain (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how this relates to the target. Not mentioned there anyplace.Onel5969^{TT me}16:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I cannot find a source linking the two. There doesn't seem to be a "Mount Everett" in Alberta. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)19:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly a hoaxDronebogus (talk)17:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Gary Metropolitan Area

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep.(non-admin closure)—Compassionate727 ^(T·C)13:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Gary Metropolitan AreaGary Metropolitan Area →Chicago metropolitan area (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear why the former (not used since 1896) name ofHodgkins, Illinois (a village with 1500 population) would be a plausible redirect for the Chicago metropolitan area. Miscapitalised, and only has 58 pageviews since its creation in 2017. –dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they)15:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a{{r from incorrect name}}{{r from former name}} (see below). There is no Gary Metropolitan Area, but theGary, IN Metropolitan Division is part of the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Metropolitan Area. -Eureka Lott16:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• DeleteNeutral. I getEureka Lott's point, but since Gary, as the name of a city, is ambiguous (seeGary#Places), there's no guarantee this is the "Gary" that readers are intending to locate.Steel1943 (talk)21:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  None of the other populated places listed atGary#Places come close to having metropolitan areas. The largest of them has a population of 762. There's no realistic chance of confusion here. -Eureka Lott23:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Not particularly if another "Gary" is close to another actual "metropolitan area" (which is the case with the current situation.) That's why I'm thinking better safe than sorry.Steel1943 (talk)23:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I looked a bit closer, and this can be considered a historical name for the area. Prior to 2000, it was known as the Gary, IN PMSA (Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area). See[1] (The PMSA/CMSA nomenclature is no longer used.) Updated my !vote above. -Eureka Lott00:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Don't think I have a dog in this fight anymore, so changing my vote.Steel1943 (talk)00:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per EurekaLott. Just to make it clear, this isn't based off 1500 Gary, but off 70000Gary.J947 †^edits10:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Shah Pahlavi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasno consensus. However, because there was a consensus against keeping the redirect as-is and a disambiguation page would consist of the first two entries atPahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi, I have retargeted it there.(non-admin closure)—Compassionate727 ^(T·C)01:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Shah PahlaviShah Pahlavi →Reza Shah (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I propose wedisambiguate this redirect because in addition toRezaShah Pahlavi, these words can also refer to his son,Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.NotReallySoroka (talk)00:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Sounds good to me.Nv8200patalk00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support disambiguation - It could even be reasonable to redirect to the younger shah, considering he is often simply known as "the Shah" and by far a primary topic.Estar8806 (talk)02:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget toPahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi: Both of the Pahlavis to hold the title Shah are listed with some contextTartarTorte13:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toPahlavi dynasty#Heads of House of Pahlavi per TartarTorte. --Lenticel^(talk)00:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,CycloneYoris^talk!23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation allows for a more succinct page conducive to finding the Pahlavis themselves.Not·Really·Soroka05:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬14:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Wikipedia:BOLDMOVE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toWikipedia:Requested moves#Undiscussed moves.✗plicit23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:BOLDMOVEWikipedia:BOLDMOVE →Help:How to move a page (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Created by a now blocked user in an appear effort to help justify their controversy moves. Has no incoming links and I've only seen it mentioned in edit summaries by the creating user and a user that has now been blocked as a sock (ex:Special:Diff/1139343657). The word "bold" also doesn't appear at target so delete.Skynxnex (talk)14:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on mytalk page)17:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toWikipedia:Requested_moves#Undiscussed moves: as where I expected this shortcut to take me when I clicked on it, rather than to this RfD page.HouseBlaster^talk18:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per HouseBlaster. Although the redirect has a shady history I think it can be useful. --Lenticel^(talk)00:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per HouseBlaster. I also thought that the redirect would most naturally point to our guidance on undiscussed moves. —Red-tailed hawk _(nest)01:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

The School Up North

Template:Prose timeline

Norph

Raat Ka Khel Saara

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toRatris Khel Chale.(non-admin closure)Carpimaps (talk)05:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Raat Ka Khel SaaraRaat Ka Khel Saara →And TV (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure how this relates to the target article, not mentioned there (or on their list of programs).Onel5969^{TT me}13:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It was previously aired onAnd TV. It was dubbed from Marathi seriesRatris Khel Chale.49.32.180.67 (talk)18:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit01:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget toRatris Khel Chale per anon, where it is mentioned. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)02:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toRatris Khel Chale. Seems to be its Hindi dub's alternative name. --Lenticel^(talk)00:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Missing Zee Kannada programmes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toList of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada.(non-admin closure)Carpimaps (talk)05:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pattedari PratibhaPattedari Pratibha →Zee Kannada (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Niguda RatriNiguda Ratri →Zee Kannada (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target,List of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada or anywhere else on Wikipedia. Delete unless a duly-sourced mention can be added somewhere._signed,Rosguill^talk21:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Both shows are mentioned onList of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada in Former broadcast section.49.32.180.136 (talk)09:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit01:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget toList of programmes broadcast by Zee Kannada per anon. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)02:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Porta Fidei

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.✗plicit23:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Porta Fidei →Pope Benedict XVI (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at the target. It refers toa specific document that is not mentioned anywhere else on WP. Therefore, I proposedeletion.Veverve (talk)00:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete incomprehensible to the average readerDronebogus (talk)19:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haven't looked at this redirect at all, but how would the average reader come across this redirect? The use case here is a reader more in-the-know wanting to find en.wp content on it.J947 †^edits04:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    But thereis no information on it.Dronebogus (talk)00:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey, there you go, that's a way better argument for deletion right there.J947 †^edits06:10, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking now and I'm seeing several academic pieces that talk about this exactmotu propio as well as the Year of Faith that it created. That being said, I support deletion perWP:REDYES, as this warrants its own page rather than a redirect to an article that does not mention it. —Red-tailed hawk _(nest)01:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review).

Bxvi