The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - I don’t agree that it is commonly used, it has had 674 views over the past ~5 years (and around 50 of those have been while this RfD has been open) , whileMiley Cyrus has had over 30 million. I’m also not sure what purpose it serves, as surely someone who can search for this spoonerism is capable of reversing it and thereby getting the correct title?ƒirefly(t ·c )23:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not like it's harming anything and it has saved time for 600 people at the very least. 600 people helped is a lot in the context of misnomer redirects.— J947 ‡message ⁓edits21:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
File:W. S. Gilbert - Alice B. Woodward - The Pinafore Picture Book - Frontispiece - Original.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Deletion. As perWP:RfD#DELETE If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. The redirect is a campaign group; the target article mentions the philosophy and another group but not this one NOTE lower case a in against; a UK secular group, not the book or the US based religious group.Jontel (talk)16:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Not a nickname by which the film is called, nor was it a working title. I'm sure anyone looking for "that film where people have buttons for eyes" could Google it and find the Wikipedia article.Dominicmgm (talk)22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete there are lots of references to this film when searching for "Buttons for eyes" on google and excluding Wikipedia, but at least most of them are using it as a descriptor not a name and there are a nearly equal number of hits for other things such as using buttons for eyes of soft toys.Thryduulf (talk)12:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Jimmy Zoppi