The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I believe there is some sort of Memorial to Thomas Jefferson included within Lewis and Clark National Historical Park, but I also believe most searchers are seeking theJefferson Memorial article regarding the well-known Jefferson Memorial in D.C. Perhaps this should be retargeted pursuant toWP:ASTONISH? Unless someone can confirm a memorial in Oregon/Washington that carries this name that would justify the current target.Mdewman6 (talk)17:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep per J947. In addition to both that and the one above receiving those pageviews, this guy was also born in England, so this redirect is also perfectly plausible. Regards,SONIC67819:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirects don't have to be correct. What matters here is how helpful the redirect is to readers. As shown by the pageviews above, this redirect is used – and if deleted, would result in those readers being negatively affected. ReadRHARMFUL andK4.— J947 ‡message ⁓edits23:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. When I saw the comments above I had assumed Waterhouse must have moved to Wales and represented Welsh constituencies. He was born in England, and was contesting elections only in English constituencies. As a title, yes one could argue its misleading, but as a redirect, even before the considerations about incoming external links, it's hardly incorrect. As for Julia Gillard, a suitable title would be Julia Gillard (Australian politician), but aredirect from something like Julia Gillard (Victorian politician) should be fine (but not as a title as it would be misleading/confusing, but we are discussing a redirect not a title) since her seat was in Victoria.A7V2 (talk)23:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
So this presumably exists because of[1], but the target is a tiny article on a defunct reality TV show. If we hadHousing in Los Angeles that would be an appropriate target, but this redirect strikes me as confusing/misleading at the moment. (Indeed, I was confused/misled until I Googled it.) I suggest deleting outright.AleatoryPonderings (talk)03:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
very weak retarget toLos Angeles County Assessor which is the office that deals with the government functions related to real estate in Los Angeles, which is relevant to some ways this search term could be used, but it's the best I can find. I'm not going to be upset in if the consensus is for deletion though.Thryduulf (talk)10:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No mention at target or anywhere on Wikipedia. Created as an article back in 2004 then redirected 4 minutes later.Delete.A7V2 (talk)02:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not in article as way too niche. Looks like there's a Alfa 164 Register website where you can register yourself as having one of these cars, but nothing about that is ever going to be in an encyclopedic article aboutAlfa Romeo.Joseph2302 (talk)14:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Clearly the current target is unsuitable (the only use of the word "game" is a hatnote toF1 2009 (video game) but there are many F1 games). Arguably could be retargeted toFormula One video games, however as far as I can tell no such game actually exists (so of course there is no mention at that article) and there are other kinds of games which aren'tvideogames, egFormula 1 (board game). I would preferdeletion.A7V2 (talk)01:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.