This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 2, 2020.
Unused redirects to disambiguation templates
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep most,delete the misspellings. --JHunterJ (talk)12:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Unused redirects. I am developingModule:Disambiguation, which will automatically detect disambiguation pages. In order to simplify the code, it is necessary to reduce the number of redirects, so I am starting by nominating the unused redirects for deletion. — Martin(MSGJ · talk)22:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, generally. Redirects are cheap, and you wouldexpect these to be currently unused because the template is removed once the tagged page is, in fact, cleaned up.BD2412T22:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in princple: most look perfectly plausible, and as BD2412 points out, we don't know whether they get used or not. On a side note, is there really a need for a module to detect if a page is a disambiguation page? I don't know the inns and outs of the dab machinery, but all the dab templates add categorie, so I would imagine that a page is a dab page if it's a member ofCategory:All disambiguation pages orCategory:All article disambiguation pages. You don't need to parse the text and look for templates. –Uanfala (talk)23:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep just do a regular AWB run to replace them, if it's a problem for you. All the best:RichFarmbrough00:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep per abovebut deleteTemplate:Disambig-clenup andTemplate:Disambig-cleanip andTemplate:Disambig-cleaup which are clearly misspellings and not required.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)08:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the redirects that are not misspelled, but the misspellings can bedeleted (includeTemplate:Diaambig-cleanup with SNSL's list). --Tavix(talk)15:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteTemplate:Disambig-clenup,Template:Diaambig-cleanup,Template:Disambig-cleanip, andTemplate:Disambig-cleaup as obvious misspellings, butkeep the rest perWP:CHEAP and everyone above. They still might be used to some degree. Regards,SONIC67819:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the mispelled ones, butkeep the correctly spelled ones. Stuff like cleanip and cleaup aren't going to be particularly useful as templates, but the others ones all have potential for correct use.Hog FarmBacon02:24, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a batch without prejudice to considering individual nominations. Reasonable shortcuts.— Godsy (TALKCONT)07:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk22:07, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
non notable minor leaguer - player no longer with the Royals so no need for redirectSpanneraol (talk)20:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Without a mention, this redirect is confusing because the name may be ambiguous. This is tricky, because this page and those like it seem doomed to generate such redirects over the course of time, unless there is a "Former players" section.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)08:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Matt Lipka (baseball)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. "Hopelessly ambiguous" is the consensus, current target is clearly non-exclusive and there are far too many southeast coasts to disambiguate. ~mazcatalk20:09, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't unambiguously refer to the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. Could maybe be converted to a dab but the term is so broad that it may not be worth the effort.signed,Rosguilltalk18:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
China occupied Kashmir redirects
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 10#China occupied Kashmir redirects
Pakistani-held Kashmir
[edit]Haque (disambiguation)
[edit]"Liturgical Christian"
[edit]Template:Dalli–Rajhara–Jagdalpur line
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk22:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redundant redirect. Template name changed leaving redirect, but sole incoming link has been changed to use new name, so redirect now has no links and presence of endash makes it unlikely search term, so no reason to keep.Colonies Chris (talk)17:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasprocedurally closed, with the article restored, as RfD isn't the place for discussing articles. There are sources out there, but if anybody (Lithopsian,Onel5969?) has concerns aboutnotability, then the place to discuss that would beWP:AfD. If the issue has to do withprimary topic status, then feel free to move/disambiguate, but bear in mind that the previous target may be seen as apartial title match, and is apparently pretty obscure itself.(non-admin closure) –Uanfala (talk)23:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An attempt to write a stub about the Tapete audio format was reverted twice despite being in use for almost 40 years by the RNIB213.205.198.132 (talk)16:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 14#Hekate event
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am unable to determine why this redirects here, other than that it might be a misspelling ofMr. Boeing.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)08:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be exclusively connected to the current target, although it could result from that.Hog FarmBacon03:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toSoft Sounds from Another Planet.(non-admin closure)Asmodea Oaktree (talk)16:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not really explained anywhere on enwiki, another obscure slang term.Hog FarmBacon02:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Urban Dictionary stuff. Roadhead is also adictionary word and avillage near Carlise.Narky Blert (talk)08:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]- Delete A obscure urban dictionary slang. Road head never refers to oral sex.ֆօʍɛɮօɖʏǟռʏɮօɖʏ05 (talk)12:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, then redirect otBewcastle unless there is a better target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)13:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I found no evidence that the place in Cumbria is ever spelt as two words.Narky Blert (talk)17:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toSoft Sounds from Another Planet - second track on the album. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos)02:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget (changing !vote) per Deacon Vorbis as{{R from song}}.Narky Blert (talk)09:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget per Deacon Vorbis.CycloneYoristalk!06:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget per above, and add a hatnote to the village as it's a plausible misspelling of that, especially for anyone hearing rather than reading it.Thryduulf (talk)17:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
South Carolina Highway 93 (1937)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk22:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The original SC 93 existed from the 1920s to the 1950s. It did not begin in 1937.Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk)01:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
