July 31

St. Louis Exchange

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk16:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• St. Louis ExchangeSt. Louis Exchange →Omni Royal Orleans (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

DeleteSt. Louis Exchange because the hotel article to which it is redirected has nothing to do with the old St. Louis Exchange.BeenAroundAWhile (talk)21:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wendell and Wild (version 2)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasresolved by finishing theround robin move, movingWendell and Wild (version 2) toWendell and Wild (film) without leaving a redirect.Anthony Appleyard, "version 2" redirects are undesired and appear frequently enough at RfD, please finish these moves with aswap. --Tavix^(talk)01:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wendell and Wild (version 2) →Wendell and Wild (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Personally, I think this content should have been preserved (histmerge?) as early contributions toWendell and Wild, but if histmerge is not possible then I see no reason to keep this page. Please see talk page discussion for more. --Another Believer_(Talk)17:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there isn't a purpose for this version.Cardei012597 (Talk)18:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wendell and Wild (version 2) andWendell and Wild can't be history-merged, as they areWP:Parallel histories: seeTalk:Wendell and Wild (version 2). I had never heard of this film until I saw this discussion.Anthony Appleyard (talk)20:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, that is all good, Another Believer is only saying "the redirect titled Version 2" does not need to exist and should be deleted.Cardei012597 (talk)22:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrong place@Another Believer: This belongs atWP:RFD, notWP:MFD.GeoffreyT2000 (talk)18:19, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This discussion has been moved fromWikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wendell and Wild (version 2).GeoffreyT2000 (talk)00:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Infobox missile

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasno consensus._signed,Rosguill^talk16:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox missileTemplate:Infobox missile →Template:Infobox rocket (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

People who will use this as an alias of{{Infobox weapon}} will be heavily confused. Retarget to{{Infobox weapon}}.Soumya-8974^talk_contribs^subpages16:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Unless there is evidence of this being used incorrectly I've missed, yes its theoretically ambiguous but that doesn't matter in template space and it is currently being transcluded on an article (Nike Smoke) where the target infobox is the correct one.Thryduulf (talk)17:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Look at themissile articles likeBlue Streak (missile),Black Knight (rocket),Hermes (missile program), etc. that are using{{Infobox rocket}} instead of{{Infobox weapon}}. --Soumya-8974^talk_contribs^subpages13:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  How is that relevant to this redirect?Thryduulf (talk)14:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I will say that a rocket is not a missile and a missile is not a rocket. Particularly, not all missiles are rocket based, there are a very many missiles that are not rockets, such as all cruise missiles, which are usually jet based. If this is formissiles it is using the wrong box, because, it could be using a jet engine instead of a rocket motor. All missiles are weapons systems, but many rockets are not weapons. --70.51.44.93 (talk)01:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Among other things, arrows, javelins, slingshots, bullets, and shot and shell are missiles, and none of those has anything to do with rockets.Narky Blert (talk)06:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IPhone 12

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasno consensus._signed,Rosguill^talk16:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• IPhone 12 →List of iOS devices#iPhone (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The consensus on the discussion atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone 12 wasdelete, so how does this page still exist as a redirect? And yes, while this redirect will technically help the user, when iPhone 9 was nominated for deletion, instead of being redirected toList of iOS devices#iPhone, which would have also been a helpful redirect, especially since the iPhone 9 was page being visited more than the iPhone 12 page, it was deleted. Delete until a justification can be provided.theultraUsurper06:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I created the redirect in my editorial capacity after deleting the article, but I'm also fine with deleting it if people here prefer that. Sandstein06:39, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There is no iPhone 12 at that list, so this redirect is misleading and unhelpful. --Tavix^(talk)14:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You just hijacked my discussion lol. I didn't even know you could do that, as i had withdrawn it. Add the redirect nomination thing on the iPhone 12 page as i'm too lazy.theultraUsurper16:47, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't tell for sure, because it sounded like you still wanted to delete it. If I am wrong about that, let me know and we can get it stricken. As for the tagging, the redirect page is fully protected so you wouldn't be able to tag it anyway. I'll get that taken care of now. --Tavix^(talk)17:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at17:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my extensive rationale at the previous discussion. I remain convinced that this is by far the best way to help our readers.Thryduulf (talk)17:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep perThryduulfNeel.arunabh (talk)00:46, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Woman-killer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. This can't be history-merged due toparallel histories, but I have verified that nothing from the merge remains at the target (it was removed backin 11 November 2005 after being added28 October 2005.) --Tavix^(talk)18:38, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Woman-killer →George Armstrong Custer (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A minor historical name of this figure. However, the subject is not thing readers searching for this would expect to find. SeeWP:ASTONISH. This was originally a stub merged into the Custer article, so this should behistory merged and deleted. The history needs to be kept for attribution purposes, but this is not a useful redirect.Hog Farm_Bacon19:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget toFemicide after histmerge. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)16:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Femicide is not an appropriate target because woman-killer doesn't imply killing womenbecause they are women—the definition of femicide. (t ·c)buidhe01:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – to me this seems more likely to be a misnomer ofLady Killer, but the articles listed at that dab page consistently avoid using "woman" so it doesn't seem like it would be appropriate to redirect there._signed,Rosguill^talk16:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Slightly weak delete,Lady Killer (like Rosguill above me) seemed to be my first choice of thought, but I'm not sure about retargeting there, since it doesn't mention "woman."— Precedingunsigned comment added bySonic678 (talk •contribs)04:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

21st-century Quran

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete No participants seem to have identified any strong actual use of this term to describe this particular edition. An inaccurate nickname like this could be justified if there's actual significant usage with this specific meaning, but without it the redirect is held to be generally misleading. ~mazca^talk19:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• 21st-century Quran →History of the Quran#1924 Cairo edition (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, not clear why a 1924 edition would be considered 21st century. Delete unless a justification can be provided._signed,Rosguill^talk19:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep The target section says this edition is used in almost all the Muslim world today. That explains why this would be called "21st-century Quran", though whether it should be is a different question. Most Google results I'm seeing are about 21st-century translations. I'll notify WikiProject Islam for input. --BDD (talk)14:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As the current target says, the 1924 version is a scholarly consensus about the original Qur'an text, which has unfortunately fuelled the popular misbelief "that the Qur’an has a single, unambiguous reading". In other words, there's nothing particularly "21st century" about this edition and Wikipedia will be fuelling the popular misbelief if we accepted this new redirect.Deryck C.22:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A 21st-century Quran would simply be a Quran published in the 21st century. Per Deryck, that isn't necessarily the 1924 version, nor are any other editions popularly called "21st-century Quran" AFAICT. --Tavix^(talk)18:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brokenbridge, Colorado

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk16:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Brokenbridge, Colorado →Breckenridge, Colorado (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This seems to be implausible. Same creator as Kmountain Dew below.Hog Farm_Bacon20:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kmountain Dew

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk16:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kmountain Dew →Mountain Dew (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a plausible error. Nobody's gonna add a k to the beginning of this.Hog Farm_Bacon20:14, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Implausible misspelling.CycloneYoris^talk!00:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lemsip Armpit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --Tavix^(talk)18:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Lemsip Armpit →Lembit Öpik (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like a disparaging nickname, no mention at the target nor in an internet search. Delete unless a justification can be provided._signed,Rosguill^talk18:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It is an insulting nickname; I've come across it before, when he was an MP, i.e. up to 2010. I found one mention in a decent source; but in an parody piece byHugo Rifkind, allegedly quoting a cab driver:link, fromThe Times (2006).Narky Blert (talk)18:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alfred Gyan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep._signed,Rosguill^talk18:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Alfred GyanAlfred Gyan →Alfred Ekow Gyan (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Duplicate page. Same as Alfred Ekow Gyan. Currently a redirect has been placed on both pagesAmpimd (talk)17:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Closenominator converted the former articleAlfred GyanAlfred Gyan into a redirect toAlfred Ekow Gyan an hour before this nomination. That makes it a perfectly good{{R from duplicate article}}, just needs to be cleaned up. Don't see that there's anything else we need to discuss here either - the choice to convert the duplicate article into a redirect appears entirely uncontroversial - it had been marked as needing a merge since April.59.149.124.29 (talk)06:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep legitimate redirect, remove all the other text from the page, and remove merge tag fromAlfred Ekow Gyan.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)16:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Members of Congress who have represented Erie, Pennsylvania

Medium Rarities

Untitled Fred Hampton project

God's Own Village

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk17:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• God's Own Village →Panamattom (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I've just removed the unsourced assertion that the target is nicknamed this. Given that it's unsourced, this is not a suitable redirect. ♠PMC♠(talk)16:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Good spot. This redirect from such a generic term to a specific subject shouldn't exist, and it is original research.Zindor (talk)14:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. --Ab207 (talk)14:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

El Pozolero

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk17:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• El Pozolero →Teodoro García Simental (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no clear mention of "Pozolero" in either English or Spanish WP, including this English target and the corresponding Spanish article. Bizarrely, Serbo-Croatian (and also Serbian) WP has articles aboutsh:El Pozolero, Bella Vista andsh:El Pozolero, Motozintla, two villages in Mexico. I could find nothing else, except a mention of a defunct baseball team Pozoleros de Jalisco (seeCharros de Jalisco); and possibly also basketball team with the same name (seees:Circuito Mexicano de Básquetbol. Neither Wiktionary (both English and Spanish) nor Google Translate recognise "pozolero" as a word.Delete.Narky Blert (talk)15:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Justine Sacco

A-double-flat minor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toTheoretical key#The need to consider theoretical keys._signed,Rosguill^talk17:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• A-double-flat minorA-double-flat minor →G minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• E-double-flat minorE-double-flat minor →D minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• B-double-flat minorB-double-flat minor →A minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• F-flat minorF-flat minor →E minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• C-flat minorC-flat minor →B minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• G-flat minorG-flat minor →F-sharp minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• B-sharp minorB-sharp minor →C minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• F-double-sharp minorF-double-sharp minor →G minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• C-double-sharp minorC-double-sharp minor →D minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• G-double-sharp minorG-double-sharp minor →A minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• D-double-sharp minorD-double-sharp minor →E minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• A-double-sharp minorA-double-sharp minor →B minor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• C-double-flat majorC-double-flat major →B-flat major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• G-double-flat majorG-double-flat major →F major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• D-double-flat majorD-double-flat major →C major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• A-double-flat majorA-double-flat major →G major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• E-double-flat majorE-double-flat major →D major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• B-double-flat majorB-double-flat major →A major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• D-sharp majorD-sharp major →E-flat major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• A-sharp majorA-sharp major →B-flat major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• E-sharp majorE-sharp major →F major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• B-sharp majorB-sharp major →C major (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• F-double-sharp majorF-double-sharp major →G major (talk·links·history·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• C-double-sharp majorC-double-sharp major →D major (talk·links·history·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Enharmonical equivalents not mentioned at target, but listed atTheoretical key#The need to consider theoretical keys. Propose retargeting.1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)12:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget all per nom.Narky Blert (talk)15:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Solid electrolyes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk17:08, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Solid electrolyes →Fast ion conductor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a common misspelling of "electrolyte".rayukk |talk10:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - pageviews suggest the nominator is correct.Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits)13:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dungu River, Romania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasrestore article._signed,Rosguill^talk17:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Dungu River, RomaniaDungu River, Romania →Zizin (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Dobromiru RiverDobromiru River →Zizin (talk ·links ·history ·stats)

Delete. Old stubs for those rivers were redirected byuser:Markussep stating "not sure this river exists".[1][2] The target articleZizin formerly stated "It starts at the confluence ofheadwaters of theDungu andDobromiru rivers" but this was removed by Markussep, replacing the original citations.[3] The article no longer mentions Dungu or Dobromiru. –FayenaticLondon09:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete.ro:Râul Zizin says that it arises from the confluence ofro:Râul Dungu andro:Râul Dobromiru, but all three articles are unsourced stubs. Not mentioned in our articleZizin, therefore useless redirects. No evidence of passingWP:NGEO, which could justify keeping as{{R with possibilities}}.Narky Blert (talk)10:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore.Markussep had a lot of hasty redirections which resulted in many confusing and misleading redirects tosurprising targets. If Markussep believed the river does not exist, then why would we have a redirect that implies that a riverdoes exist? Restoring the article fixes the hasty redirection problem, and if someone thinks there shouldn't be an article on the subject river, the place to discuss that would be AfD. --Tavix^(talk)14:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore exactly per Tavix. There are dozens of these in this can of worms.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)18:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Back to Me (Mariah Hill and Lauren Jauregui song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete --JHunterJ (talk)11:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Back to Me (Mariah Hill and Lauren Jauregui song) →Back to Me (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The songwriting duo is calledMarian Hill, not "Mariah Hill". This typo redirect will confuse readers if it pops up in the search box.NØ09:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Confusing misspelling.Narky Blert (talk)10:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: the correct version exists atBack to Me (Marian Hill and Lauren Jauregui song).Shhhnotsoloud (talk)18:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dragon One

Pakistani empire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Pakistani empire →Muslim rule of India (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Originally created as a frivolous hoax page later redirected ambiguously to another article, retargeted by anothersock and his IP (isn't/wasn't mentioned in any of the targets).Gotitbro (talk)01:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as misleading. The word "Pakistan" was coined as recently as 1933 (seePakistan#Etymology), and Pakistan is not and has never been an imperial power.Narky Blert (talk)03:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete: Nothing but a hoax. --Ab207 (talk)14:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rolf (fictional only)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete._signed,Rosguill^talk17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rolf (fictional only) →List of Ed, Edd n Eddy characters (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This particular Rolf redirect does not specifically mention Ed, Edd n Eddy like its counterparts. It is a redirect from an implausible search term and should be removed. —Paper Luigi^{T •C}01:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget toRolf#Fictional characters (this Rolf isn't the only character with that name, but I'm not sure someone would search with "fictional only") ordelete-this doesn't appear to be a very likely disambiguator someone would use to search their intended target, also ambiguous. Regards,SONIC67805:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to ambiguity and the bizarre disambiguator.Hog Farm_Bacon20:09, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete implausible search term.Troll Control (talk)05:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.