This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 22, 2020.
Rudnichny City District, Prokopyevsk
[edit]Rudnichny City District, Kemerovo
[edit]Saray-Chekurcha, Republic of Tatarstan
[edit]Zheleznodorozhnogo razyezda Saray-Chekurcha
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#1st runner-up
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#Kaitak
Redirects to Cleopatra Records
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.signed,Rosguilltalk17:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A set of musicians and groups that aren't mentioned at the target article. They are non-notable acts who may be signed to the label and whose only mentions on Wikipedia are on a compilation or two put out by the label, such as the recently createdThe Black Bible andThis Is Goth!, but offer no other info.StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me20:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasno consensus.signed,Rosguilltalk17:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Implausible redirect. Besides, we don't have the redirects "Ostralian", "Ostralians", and "Ostralias".Seventyfiveyears at19:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Fonemik misspelling of Australia. --Soumya-8974talkcontribssubpages05:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Implausible mispelling of Orstrylia.Narky Blert (talk)05:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A very unlikely misspelling, no need for keeping this.CycloneYoristalk!08:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a plausible stab at a phonetic spelling of the country.WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST is not a valid argument; it could just as easily mean that the other redirects should be created. --Tavix(talk)17:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Tavix – for someone who had encountered the country's name in conversation but not know how to spell it, this is the most plausible guess.Gets views.— J947 ‡message ⁓edits20:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Humorous misspelling. Nobody would expect to find Australia searching under this name.--Grahame (talk)02:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Then we should deleteYurop as a humorous misspelling. --Soumya-8974talkcontribssubpages06:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Please readWP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It’s quite pointless to make such comparisons, just because Yurop exists doesn’t mean other similar redirects should also exist.CycloneYoristalk!07:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, please stop thesered herringWP:OTHERSTUFF statements as this is definitely not the first time you've done this, and they serve no purpose in the discussion. If you want to start a separate discussion for the other redirect, go for it, but keep theWP:OTHERSTUFF statements out of them.Steel1943 (talk)19:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete About9.4 pageviews/month, versus 553k for the target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)10:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Singapore redirects
[edit]Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasspeedy delete byFastily percriterion R2. The content and edit history formerly at this title can be found atDraft:Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai.(non-admin closure)Steel1943 (talk)19:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Improbable search term. Currently a redirect, after an inexperienced editor copy/pasted the article contents from another page.
Nobody in their right mind is going to be searching for the TV series "Maddam Sir" by using the title plus its tagline. There are five Google News hits for the title+tagline, and over 3000 for for "Maddam Sir". So the correctWP:COMMONTITLE isMaddam Sir, and that's where the article should go, and that's what most people are going to search for. Dubious that we need a redirect to this other article.Cyphoidbomb (talk)18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure I understand the logic of this !vote. I'm not denying that the phrase exists. Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai is a tagline, as indicated inthe source you mention above. It would be like having a redirect from "Alien - In Space No One Can Hear You Scream" or "The Big Lebowski - They Figured He Was a Lazy, Time Wasting Slacker. They Were Right." Who's ever going to type that?Cyphoidbomb (talk)20:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 30#Dr. Kubota
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete --JHunterJ (talk)11:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect is neither mentioned nor found in the "Wino" disambiguation page.Seventyfiveyears at15:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep.(non-admin closure)Steel1943 (talk)00:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
Implausible redirect, not even a close spelling to its target name.Seventyfiveyears at14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per previous discussion. It is a fonemik misspelling of Missouri (see the RfD ofYuropYurop). --Soumya-8974talkcontribssubpages14:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Previoius discussion of a list of these misspellings was closed asWP:TRAINWRECK with instructions to individually nominate each item. That keep does not set a precedent for this one, it needs to be decided on its own merits.Geraldo Perez (talk)14:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Two spelling errors in one word is too many.Narky Blert (talk)16:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I !voted for procedural close in the previous nomination.Narky Blert (talk)16:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this is the correct Spanish spelling (see e.g.Rio MisuriRio Misuri orwikt:Misuri), though I don't have any opinion if there's a strong enoughWP:FORRED connection to keep this or whether it's worth a mention atMissouri#Etymology and pronunciation. Separately, it's an old unit of volume used in Naples (seeItalian units of measurement#Volume (dry)).59.149.124.29 (talk)05:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as both a phonetically plausible misspelling in English and also the correct name in the country's second most spoken language. The unit of measure mentioned above appears to bemesura (pluralmesure, of which I would venture to guessmesuri is either a misspelling or a regional variant), but at any rate this is one obscure unit among dozens of others mentioned in the same article, so obscure in fact that I don't see a need to incorporate a mention of it into hatnotes or dab pages. –Uanfala (talk)16:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The country? It's a subnational unit.Hog FarmBacon21:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Spanish is the second most spoken language in the country where Missouri is. I don't know what is the second most spoken language in Missouri. –Uanfala (talk)00:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Spanish is the second most spoken language in Missouri with around 146,000 speakers or about 2.65% of the population in 2010. --Tavix(talk)13:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.MBisanztalk15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This redirect is old, but without a mention in the target article, remains as incomprehensible as the day it was created on 11 May 2010.Shhhnotsoloud (talk)13:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Software Entertainment Company
[edit]List of twin towns and sister cities in The Netherlands
[edit]Michael Walker (journalist)
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Michael Walker (journalist)
List of Middle-earth rivers
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasno consensus.signed,Rosguilltalk17:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not finding anything that suggests this is a common misnomer for the organization.Hog FarmBacon22:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.MBisanztalk15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The title of the word "1/2" is not mentioned in target article, and is implausible and confusing. See section#Star Wars one and a halves for more. The redirect was createdas the redirect which targets toRogue One.Chompy Ace13:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To editorChompy Ace: I moved this discussion lower to be grouped next to the others. I didn't feel good merging since one already garnered some !votes, and this one had not. If an admin sees no issue, perhaps they will.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Star Wars one and a halves
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.MBisanztalk15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"1/2" redirects are neither a sequel or extension to the seventh film of theSkywalker saga,Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, and it is false imformation. Therefore,Rogue One: A Star Wars Story is a standalone anthology film. I searched "Star Wars Episode 7 1/2" onGoogle Search, and it says which contains pure content aboutThe Force Awakens.Chompy Ace08:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Chronologically, this film has been accepted to have taken place between "3" and "4", meaning a number such as "3 1/2" would be plausible, but certainly not "7 1/2".Steel1943 (talk)12:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Implausible and likely to cause confusion.1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)14:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete confusing, made-up, and not worth keeping per nom. -2pou (talk)17:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If this was at least correct, it would be Episode 3 1/2.CaptainGalaxy21:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
