This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 2, 2018.
Template:Infobox coat of arms/doc
[edit]Katherine Graham Sulzberger
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasspeedy deleted by Bbb23.(non-admin closure)feminist (talk)08:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence this is a valid name or was ever in use by reliable sources: appears to misleadingly conflateKatharine Graham, publisher ofThe Washington Post, with theSulzberger family, longtime publishers of theThe New York Times.--Animalparty! (talk)22:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Strangely, this is it's original author's only contribution. I can find no use of this name either. --Bsherr (talk)00:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as misleading and possibleWP:SURPRISE. Regards,User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me |Contributions). This message was left at02:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is no evidence known to google that a person by this name has ever existed, let alone a notable person or this specific person.Thryduulf (talk)08:37, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not even mentioned in the article and perWP:BLPPRIVACY if it were discovered by some family tree / legal records, compare to recent RFDWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 24#Leah Guey.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)23:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As stated above, this seems like nonsense.CoffeeWithMarkets (talk)06:03, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Ismail Mohammed (disambiguation)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasKeep. [withdrawn]Vexations (talk)19:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
redirects to a disambiguation page where no primary topic existsVexations (talk)17:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I didnd't explain that very well, did I? There are two disambiguation pages, with very similar names,Ismail Mohamed andIsmail Mohammed, neither of which have a primary topic. Should eitherIsmail Mohamed (disambiguation) orIsmail Mohammed (disambiguation) exist then?Vexations (talk)17:43, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If that's the same question for the second dab, then it's the same answer.
- If your asking about merging them, which is possible, but... a) this is the wrong venue (and focussing on the wrong aspect - the redirects will still exist even if the two dabs are merged) b) bad nom for thatWidefox;talk18:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toHomosexual agenda.
- (non-admin closure)feminist (talk)08:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The forwarding is not correct. The article "Homosexual agenda" does not describe the term "gay propaganda". The term is neither explained nor even mentioned. Thus, this forwarding is an original invention and must be deleted. --Charmbook (talk)14:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- LGBT propaganda was created 21 July 2018 and also redirects to Homosexual agenda.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)19:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment whatever the result, this redirect andhomosexual propaganda should be consistent with each other (right now the latter points to the section that Iffy mentioned), so I'm adding it to this nomination.59.149.124.29 (talk)17:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect are fine with me.Bearian (talk)18:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I'll go ahead and alertWP:LGBT to this discussion.Flyer22 Reborn (talk)00:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- RetargetGay propaganda toSocietal attitudes toward homosexuality#Opposition to promotion of homosexuality, andkeepHomosexual propaganda as it is. I agree that both of these ought to point to one target. The section seems like a broader and thus more useful topic, and "gay propaganda" is mentioned there, whereas the article is narrower, referring to the specific phrase rather than the broader phenomenon. – Arms & Hearts (talk)17:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- keep these terms are synonymous with each other, and they are relatively common terms. Thus, "gay propaganda" and "homosexual propaganda" meetWP:R#KEEP.desmay (talk)14:38, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: I'm having trouble understanding the desired outcome for some of you.
Bearian, are you suggesting merging one of the target articles into the other?
Desmay, do you want these to continue to point to different places despite seeing them as synonyms?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,BDD (talk)16:25, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 9#Kalyanasundaranar
