May 19

아이슬란드

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 아이슬란드 →Iceland (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per theredirect policy, “In particular, redirects from a foreign language title to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. ” Last I checked Korean was not the majority language in Iceland.Beeblebrox (talk)17:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perWP:FORRED. Being the majority language isn't the only criterion by which we judge non-English language redirects (e.g.Y Deyrnas Unedig →United Kingdom andÉtats-Unis d'Amérique →United States are good redirects) however some significant connection between language and subject is required, and I'm not seeing that for Korean and Iceland.Thryduulf (talk)23:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I agree. There doesn't seem to be any inherent reason to keep this.CoffeeWithMarkets (talk)08:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Gal Gun 2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toGal*Gun#Legacy.(non-admin closure)TheSandDoctor^Talk04:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Gal Gun 2Gal Gun 2 →Gal*Gun: Double Peace (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a highly misleading redirect since a game titledGal*Gun 2 was released this year, which doesn't have an article. There is also no franchise article to point this redirect to so a redlink serves the reader better.Xezbeth (talk)17:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the article says it's a sequel to Gal Gun, so if it isn't, it should go redirect toGal Gun and have the original one cover the franchise.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)18:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking online confirms that there is an actual Gal Gun 2 that came out internationally this year so it should not redirect to the Vita game.--69.157.253.30 (talk)21:35, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget toGal*Gun#Legacy which lists all the varieties.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)21:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Angus. ~Amory(u •t •c)00:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as mentioned previously an actual Gun Gal 2 exists now.--69.157.253.30 (talk)22:14, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget as Angus suggested.Raymond1922 (talk)23:24, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010 North Korean nuclear test

D-ascorbic acid

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toAscorbic acid (molecular aspects). The article, not done to a section. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• D-ascorbic acidD-ascorbic acid →Vitamin C (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of D-ascorbic acid in article and D-ascorbic acid is not the same as Vitamin C witch is L-ascorbic acidAbote2 (talk)10:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. There is a mention atAscorbic acid (molecular aspects)#Industrial preparation but it's not a huge mention and goes way over my head. I'll ping WikiProject Chemicals as some subject understanding would clearly be of benefit to this discussion.Thryduulf (talk)12:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toAscorbic acid (molecular aspects) based on where topic is discussed, per previous comments. That was actually where it was originally intended to point, but was mis-changed during some page-moves a few years ago. The problem is thatAscorbic acid is the generic name (not specifying D or L), but in aWP:COMMONNAME sense, it refers specifically to the L form. And the target actually had been ascorbic acid (meaning the chemical not the vitamin). When[1]User:Doc James reasonably moved our article about the chemical toAscorbic acid (molecular aspects) and then redirectedAscorbic acid toVitamin C, the D-ascorbic acid redirect got changed to point to Vitamin C rather (automatic fix of double-redirect) rather than changing to follow where the former ascorbic acid article had actually gone.

Likewise, I changed theC₆H₈O₆ redirect from →Vitamin C to →Ascorbic acid (molecular aspects).DMacks (talk)16:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget toAscorbic acid (molecular aspects) as it is mentioned there.Graeme Bartlett (talk)13:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is retargeted to molecular, then it should be bolded.AngusWOOF (bark •sniff)21:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:RDRR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. I'm generally in favor of such things — amusing projectspace redirects are amusing — but 78 pageviews in 2 years ain't use, and the maintenance was just two moments when mass edits were made to the entire redirect space. ~Amory(u •t •c)11:44, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:RDRR →Category:Wikipedia humor (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

FollowingWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 4#Wikipedia:JOKE, most Wikipedia space shortcuts toCategory:Wikipedia humor were retargeted toWikipedia:Humor. However, I was not able to make heads or tails of this one. The closest I can come up with isWikipedia:Redirect (the target ofWP:RDR), but even that seems a bit far-fetched. Sinceit has never been used, I recommend todelete it. --Tavix^(talk)20:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; I'm assuming it's a reference tothis very old Simpsons joke, wherein "RDRR" sounds like "ha de ha ha", as in laughter. Does not strike me as in any way helpful as a redirect, though. ~mazca^talk23:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• keep or redirect This is, surprisingly, getting a steady stream of views, and isn't harming anything or likely to be confused with anything else soWP:CHEAP firmly applies here - especially as the page history shows that people have been maintaining it.Thryduulf (talk)20:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.Steel1943 (talk)16:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eutheism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasretarget toDystheism. ~Amory(u •t •c)11:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• EutheismEutheism →Omnibenevolence (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• EutheistEutheist →Misotheism (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is tough. "Eutheism" concept isn't mentioned at the target article, though perhaps it could be. It's not explicitly mentioned at the article for its opposite,Dystheism, nor atSummum bonum, where it originally pointed. Itis mentioned atMisotheism#Terminology, which has become a sort of collection point for several related terms. "Eutheist" already redirects toMisotheism; I'll add it since we will want them to go to the same place. --BDD (talk)15:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• here, the solution is to briefly mention "eutheism" as the antonym of "dystheism" in theDystheism article. Then point it atDystheism. "Eutheism" is a real term (barely), but it is only ever used in contrast with "dystheism", so the redirect point there. Eutheism is the belief in a benevolent god or gods, but not necessarily in "omnibenevolence", and pointing the redirect there does nothing. --dab(𒁳)19:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Do the same thing to both. I don't really have an opinion about what the best course of action for these redirects is, but if one exists they other should and if they do exist they should target the same place.Thryduulf (talk)12:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget - This is indeed a tough situation. However, we have a bunch of other redirects from antonyms, and it makes sense to go ahead and put both terms over to 'dystheism'. That article can get expanded a bit to mention the dys-/eu- distinction.CoffeeWithMarkets (talk)17:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Opera Software Inc

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep. ~Amory(u •t •c)00:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Opera Software Inc.Opera Software Inc. →Opera Software (talk ·links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Opera Software IncOpera Software Inc →Opera Software (talk·links·history·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Opera Software, IncOpera Software, Inc →Opera Software (talk·links·history·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Opera Software, Inc.Opera Software, Inc. →Opera Software (talk·links·history·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wrongful redirects. Invalid company name, such a company doesn't exist. Even a Google search (https://www.google.com/search?q="Opera+Software+Inc") does not yield any meaningful result.

Note: A company did exist with the name ofOpera Software Inc. but there is nothing connecting it to the redirect target and was dissolved long before the creation of these redirects. (See Also: All companies that were related toOpera Software -Annual Report 2014, pg. 162).Gotitbro (talk)16:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Very plausible error. Tag with{{R from incorrect name}}. --BDD (talk)16:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As seen from a Google search the error hardly appears anywhere. It doesn't seem to be a plausible error to me.Gotitbro (talk)18:41, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep I can see that there is usagehere for example, so it's not all that implausible, methinks. -CHAMPION^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)}04:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.