This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 25, 2018.
Push (Marvel Comics)
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 8#Nokmim
B-double-flat major
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep.(non-admin closure)feminist (talk)08:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The keys with more than six or seven accidentals are rarely used already, and I can see reason to keep those in which the root note only has one accidental (some of which are theoretical, but may still be searched for). Even though they are mentioned briefly intheoretical key, I don't think any scores exist in keys starting on a double sharp or double flat - as there are enharmonic keys that are much easier notated - rendering them impractical and probably non-notable. Therefore, I proposedeletion of these redirects.ComplexRational (talk)00:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; there may not be scores using such theoretical keys as tonics, but there is nothing stopping them from being temporarily tonicised (for instance,♭VI of D♭ major is B
major). I see no reason to delete them as they are hence plausible search terms. (I created these redirects with one of my previous accounts.)Double sharp (talk)01:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Speculative philosophy
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 8#Speculative philosophy
Ayurveda medicinal plant lajjalu
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. Per the redirects history, this was supposedly merged toMimosa pudica, but as none of the content remains in that page, we do not need to retain the history for attribution. ~Amory(u •t •c)17:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This's an implausible and weird redirect. Common sense and all that.∯WBGconverse13:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.Deryck C.19:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect to a DAB page with no relevant entry. In use, andUser:DPL bot is complaining about theWP:INTDABLINK errors. Different fromSamarahan Division, according to that article.Delete to avoid confusion and to encourage article creation.Narky Blert (talk)10:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toSamarahan Division. I agree with the nom that the district is different from the division; but the district is a part of the division, as described in that article, and anyone looking for what information exists on the district will find it in the article on the division. This is consistent withWP:POFR, "Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article."TJRC (talk)20:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. We should have a separate article about Samarahan District (just as we have forSimunjan District andAsajaya District), andWP:REDLINKing it is the best way to send a signal to editors that we need an article. Alternatively as always, anyone can start a stub about Samarahan District (e.g. based on[1]) over the next few days and make this RFD moot.59.149.124.29 (talk)01:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm all for a new article, and that would certainly be the preferred situation; but in the absence of an article, a redirect to the division is preferable to a redlink. It's better to send the reader tosome information, what division the district is in, by the redirect, than to provideno information, by the redlink.TJRC (talk)03:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redirecting a geographic entity to a parent entity is nearly always a bad idea, as long as the smaller entity is notable. If Malaysian districts are ordinary local governments, they're necessarily notable, and we shouldn't make it look like we have an article on the subject until we really do have such an article.Nyttend (talk)03:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Music Video Production Association
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect to a DAB page with no relevant entry.User:DPL bot is complaining about theWP:INTDABLINK errors.Delete.Narky Blert (talk)10:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Anthropos (journal)
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect to a DAB page with no relevant entry, except an{{ill}} link to a section of an article in German WP. It is in use, andUser:DPL bot is complaining.Delete to encourage article creation, if a separate article is justified, or at least until there is a valid redirect target of some sort.Narky Blert (talk)10:05, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Machines that can think
[edit]List of places in the United States named after other places in the United States
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep. ~Amory(u •t •c)17:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The target list article does not have a section or subsection with the specific list as specified by the redirect. One cannot assume that the reader knows which places listed are in the United States.Steel1943 (talk)21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I've added a column to the sortable table so that those people who are looking for this can easily find it. I debated splitting it into sections, but given that only one entry was outside the United States that seemed less useful at the current time.Thryduulf (talk)12:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Adams and others v Cape Industries plc & another
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Since this doesn’t seem like an alternate name of the case, this redirect just seems like an unclear, spurious use of the terms "others" and "another".Steel1943 (talk)20:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 4#Restyling
Happy Holidays 2011
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. ~Amory(u •t •c)16:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Happy holidays from seven years ago! --Tavix(talk)04:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
major). I see no reason to delete them as they are hence plausible search terms. (I created these redirects with one of my previous accounts.)Double sharp (talk)01:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]