This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 9, 2017.
2006 Louisville vs. West Virginia football game
[edit]
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 18#2006 Louisville vs. West Virginia football game
Os Videos Mais Increveis Do Mundo
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --Tavix(talk)03:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Translation of the English title into a language that has no obvious connection to the subject of the target article.NewYorkActuary (talk)15:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waswithdrawn. --Tavix(talk)17:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this redirect to a disambiguation page for multiple reasons:
1. None of the entries have anaffinity for Latin.
2. "Eboracum" was the name of the city that is nowYork, England when it was under Roman rule as part of the provinceBritannia (see the article:Eboracum). If Eboracum were less notable, it would probably make a great {{R from historic name}} to York, but New York was never referred to using Eboracum in any shape or form. The translations just don't work like that.
The combined title feelsWP:MADEUP. It would be a clever name for a fictional city inspired by New York City, but it doesn't help on Wikipedia. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 15:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- suprisingly,keep For whatever reason there are hits in old books for this, includingA Life of George Washington: In Latin Prose, which is just what it says on the box.Mangoe (talk)15:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 23#Nova York
Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --Tavix(talk)02:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ClassicWP:XY, similar toWikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_July_2#Mac_OS_X_10.6_and_10.7, this isn't useful. -CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs)05:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It was probably about 10 years ago, but as I recall the reasoning behind the creation of this redirect was a "missing topics" redlinks page from a computing encyclopedia. I'm not that fussed about it, it's a pretty unlikely search string, but I think it is a bit different from Mac OS X 10.6 and 10.7 in that this represents a distinct generation of the pre-XP Windows OS. --Canley (talk)06:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Canley Except it doesn't. At the time, MS made two Windows lines, with 95/98/ME in a consumer-oriented line and NT/2000 part of a business oriented line. These two OS lines weren't combined until XP in 2002 or so.Oiyarbepsy (talk)13:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Double sided random access memory
[edit]Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 August 21#Double sided random access memory
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasDelete.Ruslik_Zero20:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:
I wasn't able to find any religious information about Saba, so someone wouldn't even be able to deduct how many people aren't Hindu. We don't seem to have aDemographics of Saba or aReligion in Saba article. --Tavix(talk)00:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as misleading. I've not been to Saba yet but I've been on it's closest neighbor and supply base St Maartin, and if there is one hindu on either island I'd be shocked.Legacypac (talk)11:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
