This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 7, 2016.
Miss Tourism World 2014
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasprocedural close. You were told to take this toWP:AFD, so take it there. You can't turn this into a redirect and then immediately nominate it for RFD.(non-admin closure) --Tavix(talk)23:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Parent article has been deleted 3x already, so the only annual edition title is an orphan. Delete as commercial spam of an unnotable event.Legacypac (talk)22:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete all. The 3rd item has an obvious consensus to delete. The first two could either be deleted or retargeted toWhip My Hair as{{R from incorrect name}}, so it's a "consensus unclear but everyone wants it changed, default to delete".Deryck C.17:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another alleged single of Rihanna's not mentioned anywhere. The first two could be seen asincorrect names forWhip My Hair, but obviously not the last one. --BDD (talk)14:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It does look like this song exists, even if it's not on Wikipedia. (There are such dedicated editors who work on pop songs that I'm reasonably certain we'd have an article if it were notable.) It's not the same song as "Whip My Hair", which is not by Rihanna, but I'm saying "Whipping My Hair" could perhaps be treated as a reader not remembering the exact title of Willow Smith's song. But anyone who includes "(Rihanna Song)" in their search is definitely looking for the latter, and we can't help them with that. It looks like "Whip My Hair" earned Smith comparisons with Rihanna, but I don't see any evidence that anyone would actually think it was by her. --BDD (talk)17:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Emergency room (song)
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete all.Deryck C.20:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In 2008, this was arumored single for Rihanna, but it turned out to not even be her; seeD.N.A. (Mario album).Emergency room (disambiguation) doesn't list any songs, and the Mario recording didn't even appear on any albums, so it sort of feels like any attention given to this isWP:UNDUE. But that album would probably be the place to retarget the first item. The second is less certain, and would definitely need{{R from incorrect name}} if retained; the third just seems completely wrong, with no indication that Akon was involved with the track or popularly thought to be. --BDD (talk)14:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 16#Romans 1:27
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toCompassion#Religious and spiritual views andkeep, respectively. I strongly encourage someone to add "Rumjal" toRamiel, lest we see it at RfD again. --BDD (talk)15:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This was tagged for deletion on November 19th, but never listed in the logs. I presume it was to be added toWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 19#Evening of God, whereLegacypac's rationale was "Incorrect, various languages, created to build edit and page creation count." --Tavix(talk)05:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- For the sake of developing consensus, I'm fine withkeepingRumjal as an alternative transliteration of Ramiel. I would be surprised ifRumjal (Dungeons & Dragons) survived AfD, and as Rossami notes above, a hatnote should clear up any confusion. --Notecardforfree (talk)15:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)15:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"ScreenCrush" is a movie website unmentioned in the target article (and apparently never mentioned, even at the time of the redirect's creation). ScreenCrush seems to be one of many, many websites owned or acquired by this media company, and from a news search unlikely to deserve even a fragment of a sentence in the company article.McGeddon (talk)09:26, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget. Edit history shows this originally described that tour, which at one point was redirected toRihanna for notability concerns. As there's an article on the tour again, retargeting there is a no-brainer. The edit history also mentionsanother redirectRihanna: World Tour 2013 in the same situation; I'll also fix that one and check for others like it. --BDD (talk)14:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Propose retargeting toDiamonds World Tour.sst✈05:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
History of the Jews in Somalia
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete.JohnCD (talk)12:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably a low-carb alternative to a regular taco, this dining option isn't exclusive to Chipotle or mentioned at its article. --BDD (talk)03:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)14:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any evidence that this is a common name for the plant Acanthus mollis or that it ever refers to anything else.Plantdrew (talk)01:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)14:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Greek mythology meaning too general.Legacypac (talk)12:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak dabify toMegaera and theThe Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations where the "Jealous one" is one of the key figures in #32 of the situations. It's also a preemptive redlink for the 1942 Turkish filmKıskanç (The Jealous One) byMuhsin Ertuğrul --Lenticel(talk)02:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Disambig. The creator is irrelevant, and both targets are plausible.Thryduulf (talk)16:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Gorobay. Magaera is NOT known as "the jealous one" anywhere, that is simply the English translation of that name, which, we have decided in multiple RFD's are not plausible search terms. That would leave retargeting toThe Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations, but that would be aWP:SURPRISE. This isn't like a play with a character of "the jealous one", but more of a teaching aid where a certain character inother works can be represented as a jealous one. Since it's just an abstract idea, it would be analogous to retargeting tojealousy, which I would actually support more than a retarget to Situation #32. Now, my Google searches overwhelmingly show songs and other media with that name, so I would reckon that someone searching for "the jealous one" would be looking for something along those lines. Therefore, deleting is the most helpful course of action for our readers. --Tavix(talk)16:51, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- comment given the many RfDs we have found these translations are not good redirects, I still prefer deletion.Legacypac (talk)22:38, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
