This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 28, 2016.
Emerson (diismabiguation)
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasDelete.bd2412T 13:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete perWP:RTYPO, too many typos to be a plausible search term. --Tavix(talk)20:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasSpeedy Delete. →AA(talk) —22:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tony Blair isn't German. I think this Neelix redirect could be retargeted toGerhard Schröder because Schröder wasnicknamed that after he was elected.MrLinkinPark333 (talk)19:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
God's chosen people
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep. --BDD (talk)20:33, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Neelix rediret). Not sure about this. The target article is fine and very balanced, but I am not sure that putting "God: (the Christian God, to anenglish language audience) is any go. Adeste fideles and all that. Pr we create [[There is no god but Allah, and Mohammed is his his Prophet], much as I respect and love Christian formal language and Muslim well most things really except abjuring alcohol, wrong religion for me the, I tiink this is rather confusing.Si Trew (talk)17:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasretarget toFrench. --BDD (talk)20:34, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stub Article is fine but this is an absurd redirect to it,WP:RFD#D1 hinders search, the place is not callled "Frenches" but "Frenches Ravine". I imagine it was called something like French's Ravine before theUS Board of Geographic Names got hold of it.Si Trew (talk)15:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toFrench's as a plausible error.Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)15:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toFrance perhttp://www.dictionary.com/browse/frenches which targets it at French "relating to, or characteristic of France, its inhabitants, or their language, culture, etc." orFrench per[1] "third-person singular simple present indicative form of French" or justDelete as not needed or too vague a word target. The current target is about the most irrelevant of all the choices. Typical Neelix redirect lacking any thought or research.Legacypac (talk)16:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget to France perLegacypac. --Rubbish computer (HALP!:I dropped the bass?)19:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toFrench. I think Ivanvector has a point, but I've also seen it refer to multiple people withthe surname French or toFrench kisses. All of these are listed at the dabFrench. --Tavix(talk)23:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Retarget toFrench per Tavix. It's a valid plural or verb form of a couple of things which are listed at the disambiguation page, but it is neither the correct name of the current target nor the correct plural of "French" in the sense of "related toFrance".210.6.254.106 (talk)01:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok,French's is listed on the dab page anyway, so that suits my argument.Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)15:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasSpeedy Delete. →AA(talk) —22:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Neelix redirect) I'll ask forUser:Ivanvector advice on this one, one Potawatami, two Potwaatamies? This is the people in general so is a a bit like sayingEnglishes orFrenches. I am not sure it would be pluralised in this wayIn English (and canadian English would probably know better than my British English).Si Trew (talk)15:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It's like Ivanvector says potato and I saypotaties, I say beer and he saysLCBO, potato, potaties,tsunami,tsunamiae, lets call the whle thing off.Si Trew (talk)16:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Neelix's special flavour of nonsense modification, in this case pluralizing a word that is already plural, forming utter nonsense. Multiple people of Potawatomi heritage are Potawatomi, not Potawatomies or Potawatomians or whatever else. We don't haveIroquoises norAnishnaabegs norMi'kmaqs, norMétises norQuébecoises (those might be French for a feminine group ofMétis orQuébecois, not sure) nor do we haveIrishes,Portugueses,Finnishes, and on and on. We do haveCanadians andAcadians andGermans andBelgians and the like, because those are the proper plural forms.Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)16:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) These days, you say beer, I sayLoblaws.Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)16:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Blimey I used to have to get it atThe Beer Store. Have the lcbo loosened up a little?Si Trew (talk)17:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- No, not really. They do sell 12-packs now, but you have to fight to find anything there that's not eitherAB InBev orMolson Coors. Province allowed a trial recently of letting "select grocery retailers" (meaning just Loblaws as it turns out) to carry beer, and that's generally where I buy it now owing to the much better selection.Ivanvector 🍁 (talk)20:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasSpeedy Delete. →AA(talk) —22:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Neelix redirect) Not sure about this one, targets a DAB which is people called "Stackhouse" without the space. With the space i think this is nonsense, it is not as if it is achimney house or acounting house or any other kind ofreal bricks and mortar house. With my cryptic crossword head on I could see it going toHouse of cards orstockhouse (storehouse,stockhouse,warehouse) or pretty much anything.WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target.Si Trew (talk)15:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
