May 20

Leika, Leyka, Leica

British Kashmiri

Paravian Raiders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.Just Chilling (talk)03:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Paravian Raiders →Star Fleet Universe (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as uselessWP:CRUFT. This is a Minor Power of the Star Fleet Universe. It's not helpful as a redirect because someone searching for this would want specifc information on this subject, of which Wikipedia has none.Tavix | Talk 18:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LIGLY

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• LIGLY →Title (Meghan Trainor album) (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term based on the initials of a song that is not known by them (and is not individually notable; the redirect points to its parent album). –Chase (talk /contribs)16:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I don't understand how that abbreviation goes to that title in any way (and yes, I have checked the target).WP:RFD#D5 nonsense.Si Trew (talk)21:43, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SCOTLAND

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep. n.b., stats.grok.se isnot case sensitive. I think WMF Labs has a case-sensitive page view tool. --BDD (talk)13:40, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• SCOTLANDSCOTLAND →Scotland (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete perMOS:ALLCAPS. A country isnot spelled with all caps.Pickuptha'Musket (talk)15:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep.MOS:ALLCAPS only applies to text in articles, some internal search tools are case-sensitive, and this is useful: gets (roűghly) 6 to 8thousand hits a month, i.e. about 1 hit for every 125,000 Scotsmen, which is about 124,999 hits per 125,000 scotsmen fewer than I try to hit each month. (Wha dar meddle wi' me?)Si Trew (talk)21:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment:@Si Trew: The all caps redirect getsexactly the same hits as the target, unless groks needs fixing.Pickuptha'Musket (talk)09:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and tag as alternative capitalization --Lenticel^(talk)00:24, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep{{R from alternate capitalization}} --65.94.43.89 (talk)04:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - directs readers to what they're looking for. Any argument that has to reference the Manual of Style should be disregarded.WilyD17:07, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lika A Cat

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Lika A Cat →Like a Cat (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect was created by mistake. It's not recently created, so not eligible for speedy deletion.Random86 (talk)08:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment' I was wondering aboutLeika, (transliteration from Russian or Ukranian) the first mammal in space, but he was a dog, so that's a long stretch. Mentioning only to eliminate. The R goes toLeyka, a Greek neighborhood, which seems unlikely or at least should be hatted, but we can't hat Rs in themselves. I will list separately:Laika.Si Trew (talk)21:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as a{{R from other capitalisation}}.Steel1943 (talk)16:57, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Steel1943: In case it matters, it's notjust an R from other caps. There's also a typo at the end of "Like" (e→a).Tavix | Talk 17:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix: Yep, it mattered. My eyes deceived me, and my vote had been struck. I'm neutral now due to there being multiple issues in the redirect.Steel1943 (talk)17:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't see this a plausible. At best one could potentially argue that someone could mistake like a for lika but even if that happen we would get lika cat not lika a cat.--70.27.231.57 (talk)01:37, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete too many spelling issues to be a plausible misspelling. --Lenticel^(talk)07:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LMlYD

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• LMlYD →Love Me like You Do (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term based on the initials of a song that is not known by them. –Chase (talk /contribs)07:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete', with those below. All created on 14 March 205 by@MaranoFan:.Si Trew (talk)22:39, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NGfY

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• NGfY →Title (Meghan Trainor album) (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term based on the initials of a song that is not known by them (and is not individually notable; the redirect points to its parent album). –Chase (talk /contribs)07:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Delete. I don't understand how that abbreviation goes to that target in any way. (Yes, I checked the target.)WP:RFD#D5 nonsense.Si Trew (talk)21:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TBP (I)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:37, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• TBP (I) →Title (Meghan Trainor album) (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term based on the initials of a song that is not known by them (and is not individually notable; the redirect points to its parent album). –Chase (talk /contribs)06:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete.WP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Not at target. Not even is "TBP" without the qualifier at the target. Is this just someWP:PROMO for the album, that seems to be becoming more common here, or is that just my impression? Some marketing geezer just throws in random stuff into Wikipedia to get hits?Si Trew (talk)22:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2100s (decade)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion waskeep.Deryck C.21:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 2100s (decade)2100s (decade) →22nd century (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

For consistency with2200s (decade).GeoffreyT2000 (talk)04:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: These were originally bundled, but I decided toWP:BEBOLD and split them.Tavix | Talk 05:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep2100s (decade) I see no reason presented for deletion. The article covers the decade.2100s (century) should also be created to redirect there --65.94.43.89 (talk)05:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because events from that specific decade are covered in that article.Tavix | Talk 05:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. 2200 is not in the 22nd century. It is in the 21st century. Centuries start at 1, not 0. Though this may beWP:PEDANTRY, do we haveWP:CENTURY?Si Trew (talk)21:15, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do, it seems, but only for how to write them (R to [[1]]), not what they mean. Since patently there was no0 BC norAD 0, by common consent I think, thefirst century ran from 1–100, the second from 101–200,etc cetera. There was a bit of aschism between the years (in Catholic countries) and 1752 (in Great Britain and her Empires) from theJulian to theGregorian calendars, but that is neither here nor there: Centuries start at 1 and end at 100. You wouldn't say a cricketer who made 99runs hadmade a century just because he or she started having no runs.Si Trew (talk)21:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You must have very short eyesight. An article was presented for deletion (WP:CENTURY although the other entries on the same subject did not explicitly mention it) but all similar areWP:RFD#D5 nonsense. Take that for the others as well, please.Si Trew (talk)21:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep: The article22nd century covers some events from this decade, but has no section devoted to it.Dimadick (talk)18:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2100s (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 2100s (disambiguation) →22nd century (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

For consistency with2200s (disambiguation).GeoffreyT2000 (talk)04:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: These were originally bundled, but I decided toWP:BEBOLD and split them.Tavix | Talk 05:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as confusing because the targeted article isn't a disambiguation.Tavix | Talk 05:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment.@Tavix: I think you would have been better keeping them together, or recombining them: the point basically is when a century starts. That didn't stop me celebrating New Year's Eve in 1999/2000 either, but I had another go at celebrating the Millenium in 2000/01, as well.Si Trew (talk)22:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• You didn't understand my rationale. It has to do with the fact that the qualifier says (disambiguation) and is pointed to an article that is NOT a disambiguation. It has nothing to do with anything you just said.Tavix | Talk 22:02, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I did: I probably just put them in the wrong one. I agree with you on your !vote, just I thought they were similar enough to stay together. Certainly that is misleading to take something ending in (disambiguation) to that which is not; no doubt about that. Nice to see you.Si Trew (talk)22:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not a DAB, should not be marked as such, per Tavix.Si Trew (talk)22:48, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Leaf Hedger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.Deryck C.14:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Leaf Hedger →Heath Ledger (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm pretty sure this was created as a joke.Tavix | Talk 03:17, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment it can be considered a transposition error typo --65.94.43.89 (talk)05:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the case here because it's more than just a single transposition. The "th" in heath was also replaced with an "f".Tavix | Talk 

• Comment Created by a strange and disruptive sockmasterChantessy. --Mr. Guye (talk)20:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget toHedge trimmer as an{{R from incorrect name}}.Steel1943 (talk)21:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I gave this some more thought, and I think it may do more harm than good being retargetted since there are several gardening tools that can be used for leaves or "hedging" (which actually had to do with finances) ... so,delete.Steel1943 (talk)18:17, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

BSPN.com

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion wasdelete.Deryck C.14:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• BSPN.com →ESPN.com (links ·history ·stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Inappropriate redirect because BSPN.com is actually a completely different website for the "Big Screen Preview Network."Tavix | Talk 03:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment it can be considered a{{R from typo}} , especially as the uppercase "E" looks like an uppercase "B" when using serif fonts, so a plausible misreading of the term --65.94.43.89 (talk)05:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, I am not sure I amquite with 65.94, but with removal of excessive whitespace from adjacent characters on small-resolution devices (the word escapes me, in my youth typographers will call itklining (which is red, and not listed at the DAB atkline) and can't find it on Google in that way - you know what I mean, in a proportional font, sans or serif, you abut adjacent characters so there is not too much whitespace, WA being the classic example) I can see how the B and the S could bump into each other. Not perhaps so much on the bottom part of the S. TSi Trew (talk)21:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It's calledkerning. But that has nothing to do with the point I'm making. If you type "BSPN.com" into an address bar, you don't get espn.com, you get something totally different. It is harmful and confusing that we would make BSPN.com redirect to a completely unrelated website.Tavix | Talk 22:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the fellow I wanted, thanks. I may have misinterpreted you, I was thinking with these touchscreen or handwriting devices that are popular now, from a visual (not typing) aspect would they be confused.Delete asWP:RFD#D5 confusing, since the two (according to a search from My Favourite Search Engine) are patently not the same, the first-named being the Big Screen Preview Network i.e. presumably (no way I am going to click through)movie trailers from the big film/movie producers.Si Trew (talk)22:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.