Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 June 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion |Log
<June 11
June 13>

June 12

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 12, 2015.

Blackers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete. There is no support for the present target, that is clearly unhelpful, and no consensus on an alternative target. If anyone wants to create a disamb page then that can be done subsequently as a bold editorial action.Just Chilling (talk)16:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've never heard of it, but I am southern English. Strangely, it would seem perfectly good Cockney slang, but not Northern slang. Google lists primarly (and secondarily and teriarwhateverily and quaternily)Blacker's Bakeshop, presumably paid for doing so.
Comment. The only thing I can think of as anywherenear a ref is that it is used inBilly Bragg's song (I forget the name of the song) "When thelackeys send the blackers out to cheat us".Fallen in love with a little time bomb I think. But Bragg is a southerner too.Si Trew (talk)16:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And it's misremembered: it's "When the bosses send their lackeys out".... no mention of blackers.Si Trew (talk)08:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it possible to take it toBlinkers (UK. Eng) orBlinders (Am. Eng). or is that just making more trouble?Si Trew (talk)16:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,BDD (talk)15:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the problem here is that "Blackers" isn't a demonym, but a nickname. I'm relatively local and this is the first time I've heard it, a Google search also didn't result in many hits.--Trappedinburnley (talk)16:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Made the draft for your consideration. Very much a rough first draft.Si Trew (talk)09:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S.A.

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion waskeep/withdrawn. --BDD (talk)19:01, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Thanks to 70.51, I've commented onTalk:S.A. (corporation) and I dislike splitting discussions but we have to start somewhere. (It's a move request there, but not to a title I like:corporations under civil law) Leaving that aside, this R goes toS.A., a DAB page, where it isnot mentioned: Of course the obvious quick fix is to add it at that DAB, but considering the malarkey we have withS.p.A.S.p.A. et al, I think it is better to list here. We could possibly merge into that discussion, I dunno.Si Trew (talk)09:10, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My proposed move would be toS.A.S.A.S.A. (corporation). This is, if you'llexcuse my French, all arse about face, put thearticle atS.A.S.A., the redirects will follow. I do appreciate there are variations in many other Latinate languages, butall are "S.A." in that way, I realise this is not specific to France or French, but I think searching for "S.A." if you see it on a packet (or SA) and wonder what it means, that would be the obvious place to go. There is no need to disambiguate it with "(corporation)" whenS.A.S.A. is going spare. (as indeed am I).Si Trew (talk)09:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article itself is simply a list article of what it is called in various countries/languages.WP:NOTDIC, and not a translation dictionary. In the article, Egypt and Arabic are duplicated, and both have a miscellaneous parenthesis in them – presumably cut and paste. (I guess with Egypt, it is from the time when the spiteful, cowardly French colonizedUpper Egypt and the brave, courageous British brought education, sanitation, roads, etc. etc. toLower Egypt)Don't mention the war!. It's not a designation one commonly sees in alphabets other thanlatin, or at least was not common when I lived in Cairo; but my Arabic is a bit rusty.Si Trew (talk)09:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment.S.A.S.A. is an R to the DAB atSA, and without prejudice I will mark as{{R to disambiguation page}}. 70.51 comes in good faith as always, and I think on this one, wins the day. But even if not, no harm in marking it such in the meantime.Si Trew (talk)13:39, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,BDD (talk)15:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Way too common an abbreviation for both South Africa and South Australia (particularly the latter) to delete and the corporation argument above is not common enough to suggest retargetting in any way.Dragonfire X (talk)23:14, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep andProcedural close as nominator, please. The target has gone under several revisions since I listed it, including one from ourUser:BDD, so I think in light of that, my initial comments no longer make sense. The tags at the redirect can be replaced, I think, just by{{R from other punctuation}}, if we have consent to keep.Si Trew (talk)12:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S.p.A.

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toSPA (disambiguation).Deryck C.12:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete perWP:RFD#D2 "may cause confusion",WP:RFD#D5 "makes no sense". The Italian formation of alimited company is not the same as the French one.Si Trew (talk)15:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ach, on that DAB (Spa being primary topic for a hot water treatment) we also haveS.P.A. (automobile), which would not be relevant except they were Italian (inTurin), full nameSocietà Piemontese AutomobiliSocietà Piemontese Automobili which redirects there. Yes, I knowWP:DIFFCAPS, but unfortunately most search engines, including Wikipedia's, don't.Si Trew (talk)16:34, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) That's more of a problem. I think it's ok for S.p.A. and S.P.A. to be different, perWP:DIFFCAPS, but that might be worthy of discussion, if you'd like. As it stands, deliberate lowercasing of the P almost certainly refers to the Italian corporation suffix. --BDD (talk)16:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done, I struck mine and will try again.Si Trew (talk)08:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ButS.A. (corporation) says S.p.A. is an Italian equivalent. Is that wrong? --BDD (talk)13:13, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To my mind, it is wrong, because the laws of incorporation differ. 'F'rexample, we don't say thatGmbHGesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung is "equivalent", even though that is incorporated undercivil law. (I am leavingcommon law corporate names such asLtd andInc. andplc – all of which are DAB pages – aside). Yes, they are kinda the same structure, but internally they differ a lot: f'rexample how theboard of directors is elected (or not). It's theequivalence that I am unhappy about, they are not equivalent. But perhaps I am being too kinda legalistic or mathematical.Si Trew (talk)19:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,BDD (talk)15:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
n.b.Si,{{R to disambiguation page}} doesn't belong on every R to a disambiguation page, confusingly. Per the template's documentation, it only applies to redirects with (disambiguation) in the title. --BDD (talk)13:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, 7ó.51, I listed them correctly according to the instructions, that is what ittold me to do. I would have been quite happy if we just had it here without my listing it, but the Rfd instructions and so on forWP:Requested move tell me such-and-such. Don't mind if that move request failed, but I went through the proper procedure. It's a pain in the arse to request a move if one is not an admin: I did as I should according to the instructions.My zero keeo key escapes me, I have no idea what keyboard layout it thinks it's on, since I plugged in Flemish one. Not Hungarian, not Flams, not English.Si Trew (talk)07:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Palace of Varieties

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)13:38, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. To come withclean hands, I put this as a link on my talk page referring (kindly) to RfD itself as a "palace of varieties" which is why I like to come here, we get so varied stuff. I wasn't expecting it to go to the Opera House in Belfast, particularly, so that was aWP:SURPRISE.Si Trew (talk)11:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and I would add that there is just one mention of the name and nothing else (and it was only called that for five years, which in the life of the theatre represents a pittance of time really).Dragonfire X (talk)23:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

STFU

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion waskeep. The discussion below has demonstrated thatSouthern Tenant Farmers Union is an appropriateprimary topic for this abbreviation as far as the scope of Wikipedia is concerned. The existing hatnote has taken care of the need for disambiguation.Deryck C.19:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget dependent on our decision at#SHUT THE FUCK UP below. This abbreviation seems more likely than the Southern Tenants Farmers Union, and a quick search around the Web shows it to be true. Retarget and hatnote.Si Trew (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Si Trew (talk)11:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep I don't doubt that that's a more common usage than the Southern Tenants Farmers Union, but we're an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. I think the status quo, with a hatnote, is fine. --BDD (talk)15:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, we don't haveSouthern Tenants Farmers Union, as you wrote. Nor do we haveSouthern Tenants' Farmers Union norSouthern Tenant's Farmer's Union. We do haveSouthern Tenant Farmers' UnionSouthern Tenant Farmers' Union → same target. (Also there are redirects forSdfu, but that's probably ranging too far out of the ambit of these two.) I do still think it gives thetenant farmers perhaps a bit ofWP:UNDUE recognition.Si Trew (talk)11:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IndeedWP:NOTDIC, but also I thinkWP:COMMONNAME has to be considered too. I think if we establish the target below to "Shut up", which seems to be aWP:AVALANCHE of opinion towards that (I could try to hit it with aWP:SNOWBALL), then these will naturally follow.Si Trew (talk)11:20, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I must admit I do have a systemic bias against Southern tenant farmers: especiallly the notable two who becamePresident of the Union.Si Trew (talk)11:59, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, as always. Somehow I missed that the target had the hatnote already.Si Trew (talk)11:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SHUT THE FUCK UP

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasretarget toShut up. I've refined the target of both redirects toShut up#Variations.Deryck C.19:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no mention or obvious connectionEtiquette. The lowercaseShut The Fuck Up is adequate as full caps not used atShut up.Widefox;talk05:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I removed another from immediately above here which was identical, I am sure the nom just listed twice in error – no attempt on my part atWP:CENSORSHIP, just gnoming (I did make trebly sure it was exactly the same and not just an alternative name – the Wikimedia software injected a different section link to distinguish, to make it#SHUT_THE_FUCK_UP_2, so evenit thought they were the same section title and thus the same redirect, from which the section title is derived if you use Twinkle.) I've marked this as{{R from other capitalisation}}, as usual without prejudice to this discussion but until we have consensus that is what it is: but as you see from immediately below my opinion is...Si Trew (talk)09:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, my scientifically conductedopinion poll (population 1:SD: 0: No: 1: Yes: 0: Accuracy: 0) ofUser:Monkap, the missus, shows thatshethe surveyed population has never heard of it, andshethe surveyed population is in the bracket of those who regularly use that kind of new-fangled mobile interweb stuff. But a Google search shows me andherthe surveyed population otherwise.Si Trew (talk)10:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_12&oldid=1037879520"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp