This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 14, 2014.
Next Swedish general election
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasprocedural close. This has been converted to an article and so is no longer within the scope of RfD.Thryduulf (talk)16:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
this redirect is currrently outdated. There is no article which regards to election after 2014 in Sweden.Aight 2009 (talk)18:12, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wolverine: First Class
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)16:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the history of this redirect, it has targeted various articles such asX-Men: First Class andX-Men Origins: Wolverine, neither of which seem to be useful or correct. A few minutes ago, I decided to retarget the redirect to the only useful target I could find:Wolverine (character)#Wolverine: First Class; however, not even that target seems completely useful since the redirect's subject is not explained in enough detail at this target, but rather just lists a few of the issues of what I found to be a comic book series starring the character. For this reasoning, I believe that the redirect should bedeleted perWP:REDLINK to promote article creation.Steel1943 (talk)15:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Some redirects to Hi-hat (instrument)
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waswithdrawn. The concerns addressed below have been resolved byHyacinth; information has been added to the lead paragraph ofHi-hat (instrument) which explains these terms/redirects.Steel1943 (talk)07:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm having a difficult understanding the usefulness of these redirects. In the target article, these specific terms (with the adjectives) are not mentioned specifically in a manner in which to explain the subjects of the redirects. For this reasoning, I have to believe that these should bedeleted, or at least, add to the article to explain why these terms redirect to the article and/or create proper section redirects where these terms are explained.Steel1943 (talk)05:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, seeWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 21#Sanjubrokkasen
