Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 September 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion |Log
<September 10
September 12>

September 11

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 11, 2014.

Wikipedia:Damianos Sotheby's International Realty

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasspeedy delete. Redirects created when moving pages unambiguously created in the wrong namespace can be speedy deleted under criterion G6.Thryduulf (talk)19:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect (article is now atDamianos Sotheby's International Realty).DexDor (talk)19:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Olga Aleksandrovna Sedakova

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion waswithdrawn.Thryduulf (talk)15:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

different Olga Sedakova thanru:Седакова, Ольга Александровнаgobonobo+c03:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, entirely my fault.Should be deleted until the correct article has been created.--Ymblanter (talk)05:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Now corrected, can be speedy kept.--Ymblanter (talk)08:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect is good now. I withdraw this. Thanks Ymblanter.gobonobo+c14:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

User:CakeProphet

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasregister adoppelganger account and keep to minimise disruption.� (talk)12:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

User:CakeProphet does not exist.KonveyorBelt02:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Фонд Викимедиа

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)16:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially Russian -TheChampionMan123401:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • No needed in this wiki;delete. --Kaganer (talk)08:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as above.ru:Фонд Викимедиа already exists and is Interwiki linked. Perhaps I shouldn't grumble, but the way now Interwiki links are done rather than adding them manually like we used to do in the good old days, tends to multiply useless Interwiki links. Now, doing the IW was a right old pain if one had a few languages one had collated an article from; but it had the advantage that one could pick and choose (and not necessarily direct to the exactly parallel topic but to a near but more informative topic); it was quite frequent to go around the houses, for me, from English to German to Spanish to French to Hungarian or whatever, then back to English, and find myself going fromLondon Transport toLPTB or whatever, in a series ofChinese whispers. I am not sure that was a bad thing, on the whole; as BD pointed out recently elsewhere and which I wholeheartely agree with, we are here to serve readers looking for information, and I am not sure that this automatic IW stuff helps that: it saves editors some effort, but harms readers searching. (End of diatribe.)Si Trew (talk)14:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

國際象棋

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)16:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially Chinese. -TheChampionMan123401:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, but is it usedby mistake? We don't have stats on how long someone stays on the target page. (We could implement some naughtiness to do awatchdog timer, but that would be against WP philosophy, I think.) My guess is they are better served atzh:國際象棋.Si Trew (talk)09:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most likely intentional, as the 'en' article will be more informative. Regards,Sun Creator(talk)21:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Daegu International Film Festival

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion wasdelete. --BDD (talk)16:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such festival,this just reveals pages mirroring Wikipedia such as OneLook dictionary, it isn't the first time I've seen this. -TheChampionMan123400:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I was not aware of that. I always sign for myself and suffer the consequences! I only use that form for Interwiki links etc. That spins another yarn, then. That might be quite relevant, DexDor, because tracing the creator of these Rs to articles (that I tink areWP:PROMO) has taken me a lot of time but I got nowhere. Should we take the articles themselves to AfD? Then obviously the Rs follow. It seems like a promo for various language schools.Si Trew (talk)10:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_September_11&oldid=1138579870"

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp