This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 15, 2012
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion waskeep.Thryduulf (talk)18:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am recommending deletion. This redirect is confusing to me. I do not know anything about this character except it is apparently an alias for "Doopliss the Duplighost." This redirects to an existing article, but a nonexistent section. Either this redirect should be deleted or someone should re-include information on "Doopliss the Duplighost" in the destination article. Since this character appears to be a minor one and is not significant enough to have a place in the larger article, I am recommending deletion.Randomizer3 (talk)15:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This redirect was created (then at the title????) as the result of this May 2005deletion discussion. The redirect itself was later moved as the result ofthis RfD debate. The target articlehad content on this character until July 2005 when it and a large block of other content wasremoved without explanation by an anon editor. Subsequent edits suggest that the content was moved and not simply stricken from the article.
"Doopliss" does not appear to be on any current page in Wikpedia (though that title does also redirect to this title) but it may be restored. The redirect itself seems harmless to me and is not in the way of any other content.Keep in order to be sure that we are living up the the attribution requirements of GFDL and CC-BY-SA.Rossami(talk)23:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
