This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 12, 2012
See Encyclopaedia Britannica
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasdelete perWP:REDLINK.Thryduulf (talk)02:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A redlink would be more useful. This is a chemical relevant to medical conditions, such asRheumatism. A redlink would be more useful, unless there is a better place to target this.Ego White Tray (talk)14:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion wasSnow Keep(non-admin closure).Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk)18:38, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Should probably be deleted; has the dubious honor of being the only redirect on Wikipedia, of all the "Battle of X" pages we have, that assumes people will spell battle batttle and can't be bothered to capitalize Manila.CarniCat (meow)06:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - plausible tttypo, no rationale for deletion.WilyD10:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep-Per Willy, plausible typo. Redirects are cheap.--Fyre2387(talk •contribs)21:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WilyD. -Presidentmantalk ·contribs (Talkback)21:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - no real rationale given for deletion, but not an utterly unreasonable typo.Against the current (talk)15:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Two plausible typos don't always combine to make a plausible typo. Are users going to make two errors at once? The pre-RFD hit stats don't convince me that this is being used by anyone except bots.Nyttend (talk)12:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WilyD. With 10-20 hits/month consistently, it's clear to me that this is getting more than background noise usage (2-3 hits/month).Thryduulf (talk)19:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.