This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 2, 2010
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was deleted perWP:CSD#G3.Thryduulf (talk)15:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This has been left over from a move of the article I performed after finding no usage of the name in aGoogle News search. The original mover,Ryanstamen, had one previous articleedit that looks like vandalism, so the move may not have been legitimate in the first place. I can't see any use for this redirect.Giants2008 (27 and counting)03:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as quickly as possible - both "contributions" of the originating editor were acts of vandalism, done six minutes apart. Because the redirect is from 2008, it is technically too old for a speedy deletion, but I would strongly recommend deleting this quickly as vandalism/housekeeping.B.Wind (talk)14:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
