January 11

Palatable →Toxin

AlsoPalatability →Toxin andUnpalatable →ToxinAlthough speedy deletion does not appear to apply to these three redirects, the redirects don't make a great deal of sense either, because food does not need to be toxic to be unpalatable. Either we should find better targets for these redirects or create a new article onPalatability or justdelete them.Metropolitan90(talk)04:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree that these redirect are incorrect. None of them have any useful history either. I do not believe that you could ever write an article on Palatability that would ever be more than amere definition.You could soft-redirect them to Wiktionary butdeletion is probably better.Rossami(talk)05:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • On reconsideration, a retargetting toflavor might be the best approach.Rossami(talk)06:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"This is Living" →PlayStation 3

Wikipedia is not Wikiquote. The redirect has quotes. Let'sdelete itMagioladitis (talk)01:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unlikely search term.--h i s^{s p a c e}_{r e s e a r c h}17:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --M4gnum0n (talk)08:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton Predators →Nashville Predators

The Nashville Predators are not the Hamilton Predators. They will not be the Hamilton Predators. At some point in the summer of 2007, the owner ofBlackBerry attempted to purchase the team and move it to Hamilton. It never materialized. No intelligent person would search for "Hamilton Predators" when looking for the Nashville Predators.—Precedingunsigned comment added bySmashville (talk •contribs)00:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep An intelligent person might search "Hamilton Predators" to look for information about the proposed move, which is documented in a large section in theNashville Predators article. –Pomte01:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The move was never proposed. It was a rumor. The team was never even sold to the guy who it was rumored had the intention of moving the team. --Smashville^BONK!18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I stand corrected. –Pomte05:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep-I disagree with the nom's statement that no "intelligent person" (which, as a side note, is a whole can of worms by itself) would ever search for this. Probably not many, granted, but I'd not call it impossible. Redirects are cheap enough that the potential value, however low, is enough to keep this one.--Fyre2387^{(talk •contribs)}15:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment...now I'm not accusing the creator of bad faith, but I should also add that a lot of message board trolling was done referring to the Nashville Predators as the Hamilton Predators. It's kind of inflammatory. --Smashville^BONK!20:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fapfapfap →Masturbation

"Fap" is a slang dicdef not even in Wiktionary. Why we need it repeated three times as a redirect I don't know.--h i s^{s p a c e}_{r e s e a r c h}17:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "Fapfapfap" is sometimes used as an alternative to "fap", to signify vigorous or really fast masturbation, similar as how "lololol" (whichredirects toLOL) is used to mean intense LOLs.Floaterfluss^{(talk)(contribs)}19:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not only do I highly doubt that anyone is going to search Wikipedia for Fapfapfap intending to find Masturbation, but Floaterfluss brought up the point aboutlololol which doesn't link to any articles, and I also find highly doubtful people will search Wikipedia for intending to find LOL since, from my experience, people tend to be lazy, and if they wanted to, they'd just type in "lol" or "LOL" into Wikipedia's search box and be taken to the same place. For this reason, I do not believe we need a redirect on "fapfapfap", when people will just be lazy and type "fap" and be taken toFAP, where at the bottom there's a soft redirect tomasturbation with a good description of how it relates to masturbation.--十八00:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it got used so much that it was put on GameFAQ's blacklist of words. (of which the words mast(u|e)rbat(er|ion) were already there).Will^(talk)23:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, considering Will and Floaterfluss's statements. --Ned Scott04:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete.Fap already has the link tomasturbation in the disambiguation page. This one is a very unlikely search term. --M4gnum0n (talk)08:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. --Babedacus (talk)15:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where We Dine Tonight →Hell

Joke redirect,300 reference/4chanmeme.Floaterfluss^{(talk)(contribs)}18:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Joke. Funny though.VegaDark (talk)07:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--h i s^{s p a c e}_{r e s e a r c h}16:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --M4gnum0n (talk)08:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Toss it off a cliff per this is Sparta. --Babedacus (talk)15:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects toBarack Obama

Obama! →Barack Obama
My.BarackObama.com →Barack Obama

Unnecessary redirects.Floaterfluss^{(talk)(contribs)}19:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. its not needed--Hu12 (talk)19:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Very bad redirects. -- 19:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC) --Magioladitis (talk)21:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Bad redirects.CarbonLifeForm (talk)21:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Originally this redirect came as a result of discussion atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/My.BarackObama.com. It now seems to be unnecessary. --WebHamster22:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --M4gnum0n (talk)08:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Heuer →God

Vanity redirect, delete.Floaterfluss^{(talk)(contribs)}19:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Ian Heuer is not God. --Magioladitis (talk)19:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy-delete as vandalism.Rossami(talk)21:20, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]