March 5

MoS:TM →Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks)

Cross-namespace redirect (omg terrible awful), should be deleted.Hbdragon8807:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:MoS: appears to be a pseudo-namespace for MoS redirects. If you disagree, then a mass nomination would be better than nominating just one. --ais523 13:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. MoS and MOS are commonly used pseudo-namespaces. ---RockMFR20:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whish really isn't that good asMOS is an article dab page. But very well, I see that this is beyond the scope of one RfD, and will require a broader discussion.Hbdragon8822:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per ais523>Kamope<Talk·Sign Here21:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the above. Also, I just happened to type that very thing into the search box while I was looking for that very page, so you really can't say it's not useful. --Ihope12721:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pussy licking →Oral sex

Highly unlikely search term, highly inappropriate, and nothing links to it except for RfD.>Kamope<Talk·Sign Here21:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep An absence of links does not dilute its usefulness. It is a slang term and the redirect prevents people from believing that no such article exists and creating one. Kind of likeGTFO, also offensive, with few incoming links, but redirects toList of Internet slang.Hbdragon8823:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Useful slang redirect. Please do not nominate articles for deletion because they are "inappropriate". ---RockMFR23:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Wikipedia isn't censored. 05:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - it's plausible that someone will search for this. - Richardcavell 00:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Dan Schneider (TV/Movie Producer, Writer, Actor) →Dan Schneider (TV producer)

It is not likely that anyone would type in the redirect title. The redirect page was actually created by another editor as a duplicate of the target articleDan Schneider (TV producer), but I changed it into a redirect to reduce confusion.Metropolitan9000:16, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unlikely search.John Reaves(talk)05:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The pages involved have received a couple of moves in the last 24 hours which have been unduly confusing. I don't care whether this person's main page is atDan Schneider (TV producer) orDan Schneider (actor); I just want to avoid having a redirect that uses his entire resume as a qualifier. --Metropolitan9016:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Whether it ends up at actor or TV producer, this redirect in entirely unnecessary.--Wizardman18:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree withMetropolitan90 about there being too many moves with this article. Pick a title and stay with it. But having the entire resume in the title must go.--Alabamaboy19:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the article has just been moved toDan Schneider (TV/Movie Producer, Writer, Actor). I'm going to try and convince the editor that this isn't a good way to do this.--Alabamaboy20:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]