 | This page has anadministrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with{{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
Before requesting, read theprotection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism tohigh-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see therough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stoppagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see therough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed onSpecial:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid ofobvious vandalism.
Requestprotection of a page, or increasing the protection level Requestunprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request a specificedit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page'stalk page before posting here | ||
Place requests forprotection increases at theBOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check thearchive of requests or, failing that, thepage history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – per ARBPIA.ser!(chat to me -see my edits)14:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Bbb23 (talk)15:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Block evasion byUser:TRCTheRaulChannelProductionsInc2021 from Brazil. The rangeSpecial:Contributions/2804:1A68:10E:BDAE:0:0:0:0/64 has been active recently.Special:Contributions/186.137.232.172 was blocked in January.Binksternet (talk)18:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content.Waxworker (talk)18:44, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
User(s)blocked.Bbb23 (talk)15:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP fromShwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk ·contribs).MrOllie (talk)18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentsockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP fromShwapneel ahnaf 1999 (talk ·contribs).MrOllie (talk)18:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Bbb23 (talk)15:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)20:14, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Since January, a person behind some IPs has had their eyes on these articles, wanting to a huge and unsourced genealogy tree.HistoryofIran (talk)20:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing – Multiple IPs, some socks.Geraldo Perez (talk)22:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: High level of vandalism, mostly surrounding the prolonged wait for the game's sequel. —AllCatsAreGrey(talk)22:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity tojustify protection.Bbb23 (talk)15:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Extended confirmed protection:Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA.PlotinusEnjoyer (talk)22:59, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Repeated insertion of exceptional and unverifiedWP:BLPCRIME claims by POV-pushing IPs based in Canada.Borgenland (talk)23:42, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. SeeWikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_misinformation_and_disruption_by_183.99.45.1034300streetcar (talk)01:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentdisruptive editing. IP user claiming that the Autonomous administration of N&E Syria has joined the STG.🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk·contribs)05:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason:Semi-protection Disruptive editing started again a day after year-long protection expired.Barry Wom (talk)13:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent vandalism.202.67.47.28 (talk)13:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistentvandalism – Same as the last protection (IP hopper adding false information).Mike Allen13:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content.Waxworker (talk)14:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
User(s)blocked.Bbb23 (talk)15:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition ofunsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by anonymous editors.livelikemusic(TALK!)15:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protection:BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of poorly sourced birth date (WP:DOB). —Sangdeboeuf (talk)16:48, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check thearchives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Page has been protected since 2010 (15 years ago). I think we can try pending changesFilmssssssssssss (talk)21:56, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reason: Not much vandalism since page protection in 2013, I think we can try pending changesFilmssssssssssss (talk)15:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.{{Edit COI}} template should be used."Israeli soldiers have summarily executed Palestinian civilians, often in front of their families." This is one citation that leads to another citation (why not list the original reference?) where it describes a single alleged incident that has been disputed. The original citation is careful to use the term 'alleged' and 'still under verification' and yet the wiki page does not say 'alleged' or 'accused of' - and goes on to add the word 'often', even though only one alleged incident is referenced.— Precedingunsigned comment added by169.230.248.39 (talk)02:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The pagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GrimesStates she is no longer in relationship with Musk. What should one do to correct that on the Musk page?2601:645:C601:6010:9077:1CFB:BFDC:1DF6 (talk)23:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. It isn't clear what you want corrected. State your request specifically, in the form "change X to Y" and cite sources. Neither the article on Grimes nor Musk say that they have a current relationship; in fact both articles say the relationship ended in 2021. ~Anachronist(talk)14:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]Possible change/remove "Ross was not a member of any specific organized religion" to possible "member of the Christian religion". I see a lot of articles saying he was brought up on Christian faith. I'm not sure the current information is correct, based on many other articles out there. I would like this to be looked at. I dont know if he was or wasn't based on conflicting information. But I think it should be looked in to, to determine accuracy.2600:4040:9642:3200:BDE9:3672:D034:519F (talk)23:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This isn't a rather vague edit request that doesn't provide sources. Please use the pageTalk:Bob Ross to discuss your proposed change. The talk page isn't protected, so you can communicate there. ~Anachronist(talk)14:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found atWikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.