Article(edit |visual edit |history) ·Article talk(edit |history) ·Watch •Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I am considering putting it forward for Good Article status, but it would be nice to have some feedback first.

Thanks,PatGallacher (talk)18:43, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments after a quick skim:

• I added some "citation needed" templates to the article. These will need to be resolved before a GAN.
• For the "Fictional portrayals" section, I would only include mentions where the book/movie/piece of media has a Wikipedia article. In other words, if it is not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article, it is probably not notable enough to be included in this list.

Once these are resolved, I think this can go toWP:GAN, where a reviewer will give more thorough comments.Z1720 (talk)15:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• January 2026 peer reviews
• History peer reviews
• Current peer reviews