The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:speedy keep. Self-close perwp:snow. Consensus is that being hideous and weird is not a legitimate deletion argument.(non-admin closure)Dronebogus (talk)17:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bedford/userboxes/User Bachelor (edit |talk |history |links |watch |logs)​

While not offensive, this is an ugly and fairly incomprehensible (what doesDrew Carey have to do with anything?) userbox by a banned user, not in use anywhere but his pages.Dronebogus (talk)02:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep - No valid reason for deletion put forward. —Rhododendrites^talk \\02:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep We don't delete userboxes of banned users solely because they are banned.--Pawnkingthree (talk)13:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, as another rather worthless and obscure userbox; stuff like this is basically just taking space here. —Sundostund (talk)17:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep These nominations are time-wasting. Other than the painfully bad colour contrast, there are no actual issues with this userbox:banning someone does not mean we erase their userboxes from existence. —PerfectSoundWhatever (t;c)20:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I don't know who Drew Carey is, but an userbox having been created by a banned user isn't a valid reason for deletion.—CX Zoom[he/him]^{(let's talk • {C•X})}07:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.