It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not beenthoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
In wartime,sabotage was the deliberate disruption and subversion of the war effort by breaking and destroying things.In Dante'sInferno Virgil tellsPlutus, who is menacing Dante, to "Be silent, thou accursed wolf; Consume within thyself with thine own rage."[1]
Griefing refers to actions in online gaming where a player deliberately annoys or disrupts others in ways that are not part of the intended gameplay. If used outside gaming, it generally describes deliberate behavior meant to annoy or frustrate others in an online community. The termgriefer originated in theonline gaming world, and while it is not commonly thought thatWikipedia is a game, the phenomenon can be found on mostonline communities, including here on Wikipedia.
Griefers are similar totrolls, with the main difference being that griefers will sometimes act in groups, in the form oftag team editing, to deliberately ridicule content on Wikipedia with which they disagree, to ridicule and harass editors associated with that content, and to interfere with the normal workings of the project. Trolls will instead more often act individually by baiting other members in an attempt to disrupt, and by causing other community members to waste time in dealing with the troll's actions. Both griefers and trolls are usually acting out in a desire for attention, or for what they perceive as revenge.
With the growth of external websites where participants sometimes discuss content at Wikipedia that they find humorous and/or offensive (sometimes referred to as"wikigroaning"), there has been a growth in the number of persons who come to Wikipedia motivated by discussions at those sites. In some cases, these persons come asmeatpuppets, although their actions are usually not officially endorsed by the websites from which they came. They can arrive, often within a concentrated period of time, assingle-purpose accounts, and may be reluctant to explain why so many editors with the same opinions have arrived at a page at the same time. If they become registered users, they may decorate their user-pages with material that mocks the subject matter that concerns them. For processes such asrequests for comment, where editors depend upon transparency and the absence ofcanvassing, griefers can be very disruptive to the normal editing process.
Griefers may lacksocial skills. They fail to adjust to social norms and do not take criticism well. They may think it is funny to get a reaction from other people. On Wikipedia a griefer may be aPOV warrior, avandal, someone engaging inpersonal attacks, an editor who habitually lackscivility, or even anadministrator sympathetic to other griefers. However, not all griefers are rude, and some may be unfailingly polite, while at the same time they are making deliberate attempts to disrupt the community. They maygame the rules, possibly following the letter but not the spirit of a policy, and they may repeatedly violate socialnorms.
Boredom. Some griefers feel that they want something to do, and if they're not interested in participating in a constructive manner, they will generate their "fun" by antagonizing others. This boredom generally arises due to a lack of sufficient stimulus or creative outlets that can sometimes be the result of excessive regulation and moderation by authoritarian personalities and overly broad interpretation about what sort of activities constitute 'griefing' (see, for example,Linden Lab's definition of "broadly offensive").
Seeing no other recourse to address systemic problems which result in Wikipedia's inability to rid itself of bad characters.
In terms of dealing with griefers, the community must eventually make acost–benefit analysis to determine whether a participant's contributions justify the loss of morale they inflict on other users.
Dealing with a griefer is often dependent on the exact nature of their activities.
Sometimes, with effort on the part of other good members of the community, a griefer may be socialized if they can be given sufficient attention and brought back to a more cooperative standard of behavior. One way to handle suspected griefers is to politely ask about their concerns and explain constructive ways to raise those concerns in a socially acceptable manner.
If positive engagement does not lead to improvement, habitual griefers should be politely, but firmly,asked to leave the community.
In any case, editors and administrators should recognize griefing when it occurs, and, as with any other form of disruptive editing, endeavor not to let it impair the quality of Wikipedia's content.
