The following discussion is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article(edit |visual edit |history) ·Article talk(edit |history) ·Watch •Watch article reassessment page •Most recent review
- Result: Delisted.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk)14:50, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The lead is too short and does not cover all major aspects of the article. Meanwhile, there's an "Overview" section that could be merged with the lead and resolve this concern, but this information would need to be checked against the article body to ensure all information is cited in the article and trimmed for length concerns. The "Works" section is uncited, and the article is over 12,000 words in length, so it probably needs to be trimmed for information that is too detailed or can be summarised more effectively.Z1720 (talk)02:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I would also add that there is a fair amount of reliance on primary sources (diary entries, contemporary army handbooks etc). In some cases these primary sources are the only source for a statement; at other times they are lumped in with other more reliable sources which points toWP:OVERCITE andWP:INTEGRITY issues.Vladimir.copic (talk)04:00, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- As information. As with many older articles, there have been many contributors to this article. However, the user who contributed the most text to this article RoslynSKP has not edited Wikipedia since 2014. Of course, that does not mean that others who have contributed to the article or who are interested in it might not step forward to work on it. It does mean that other than the post on the military history project talk page, there seems to be no individual contributor or small group of contributors who could be notified directly about this GAR.Donner60 (talk)01:57, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
