I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria outlined atWP:FL. The list is comprehensive, well-structured, and consistently formatted. It is supported by reliable sources and I’ve made efforts to include all notable entries with verifiable sourcing. Special attention was given to maintaining chronological accuracy and consistency in formatting. I welcome feedback and suggestions for improvement. Thank you.25 CENTS VICTORIOUS🍁15:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
"along with a few appearances in Kannada, and Tamil cinema" - no reason for that comma before "and"
Done
"for which she received the Filmfare Lux New Face of the Year" => "for which she received the Filmfare Lux New Face of the Year award"
Done
" in the the 1995 romantic thriller Takkar" - the word "the" is in there twice
Done
I would also suggest changing that same sentence to start "She gained" so that you do not have two consecutive sentences starting with "Bendre...."
Done
"The Broken News (2022-2024)" - the dash should be an ndash (–)
Done
"earned her a nomination for the Filmfare OTT Awards for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series" => "earned her a nomination at the Filmfare OTT Awards for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series"
Done
"Hindi & Tamil" should be "Hindi and Tamil" perMOS:AMPERSAND
Done
"Season 1-3" should be "Seasons 1–3" (with an ndash)
This nomination just stalled out; if this happens in the future I recommend reviewing other FLCs and politely requesting they review yours or another's as well. In any case, fixed the ref formatting issues myself; source review passed; promoting. --PresN14:17, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
"Tropical Albums (formerly known as Tropical/Salsa Latin Albums), is a chart " - no reason for that comma after the brackets
"Since its inception, the chart had been published on a fortnightly basis with its positions" => "Initially, the chart was published on a fortnightly basis with its positions"
"basing it on electronic point of sale data" => "based on electronic point of sale data"
"and was the bestselling tropical of 1990" => "and was the bestselling tropical album of 1990"
"tied for the most number one albums of the decade" => "tied for the most number-one albums of the decade"
"Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] also saw its popularity rise in the 1990s" => "Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] saw its popularity rise in the 1990s"
"Juan Luis Guerra, was credited" - no reason for that comma
"outside of the working-class" => "outside of the working class"
You use both "best-selling" and "bestselling"
"Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interested" => "Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interest"
"second bestselling Latin album of all-time " => "second bestselling Latin album of all time "
"as the bestselling world album of all-time" => "as the bestselling world album of all time"
"Buena Vista Social Club is the second bestselling Latin album of all time in the US as of 2017" - See if you can find a ref that's more recent for this.
While doing this source review, I am looking atthis version of the article.
For Citation 1, the page number should be Y-42. Google Books may refer to this as page 30, but I would go with the page number on the actual document over the number that is assigned when Google Books scanned and archived this.
Citation 1 does not linkBillboard even though this is the firstBillboard citation, and the magazine is instead link for Citation 2. It would make more sense to have this linked on the first citation rather than the second.
I believe thatBillboard should be in italics for the citation titles perWP:CONFORMTITLE, so for instance,Billboard should be in italics for Citations 2 and 3. I would double-check all of the citations for this. Album titles should also be in italics, such asDesde un Principio: From the Beginning should be italicized for Citation 15. Citation 27 is another example in which an album should be italicized.
Non-English sources should have an English translation for the titles in the citation. An example of this is Citation 13. While Citation 4 is an English source, I would still include an English translation for its Spanish title.
Citation 14 is incomplete as it only mentions page 108, when the article starts and is also on page 1. The author (John Lannert) is also missing from the citation.
The author attribution for Citation 16 is not entirely correct. According to page iii, this book was edited by David Horn, so he should be marked as an editor, not as an author. I interpret this page as saying that David Horn and John Shepherd edited a series of volumes for this encyclopedia and that Horn was the sole editor for this volume (Volume VIII Genres: North America). I would also clarify in the citation that this is referencing and link to Volume VIII of the encyclopedia, not the entire thing.
I do not understand the inclusion of "Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar" in Citation 17. Also, why are the publishers for the book citations not linked?
Citation 1 and 3 use the via parameter to represent that the links are from Google Books, but this is not consistently used for other Google Book citations and links.
Citation 20 does not use the author's full name (Deborah Pacini Hernandez). The book does not use an accent for Hernandez.
For Citation 22, these people are editors, not authors, so that reference should be changed to reflect that. I would also clarify in the citation that this is the second volume of a book.
For Citation 26, I am uncertain about usingRemezcla for a potential FL. While Remezcla may be a good source for featured content, there isaBillboard article that supports this information, so I think that it would be better to go for that instead as it is a more official source. The Remezcla source is more recent, and if that is why you are not using theBillboard citation, I think that it would be preferable to find something else. I am uncertain about the Remezcla source as it links to an unrelatedBillboard article to support the best-selling information, which is a bit strange.
This is not required for a FLC, but I always recommend archiving online citations to avoid any future headaches with potential link rot and death.
I hope that these comments are helpful. I will look through the sources again and do a spot check once everything has been addressed. Let me if me know if you have questions about any part of my review so far. I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far, and best of luck with this FLC!Aoba47 (talk)02:11, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47 Thank you for your patience Aoba47! I think I got everything you mentioned. The only issue I had was the Remezcla source, so I reverted back to the original 2017 Billboard source since Billboard hasn't bothered to update its Latin album sales since then.Erick (talk)01:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for addressing everything so far. I think that theBillboard source is the best option in the case. It is a shame that they have not updated their Latin album sales, but that is outside of your control (and I believe that it is preferable to go to the main source for this anyway). I will read through the list again in the near future and will post any further comments if I have any.Aoba47 (talk)14:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is admittedly outside of the scope of a source review, but for the caption forFile:Gloria Estefan (1990).jpg, I would recommend adding the year that the photo was taken to provide additional context for the photo. This would also make this image caption consistent with the other image captions in the list. This is my last comment for my review.Aoba47 (talk)20:51, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria outlined atWP:FL. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, the sources are properly formatted and archived, and relevant photographs are used. Additionally, I have already adapted changes that were requested on similar articles to this one so as to avoid issues. Please let me know if you have any feedback and suggestions for improvement. Thank you.Preferwiki (talk)03:04, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
"one[singular] Blue Dragon Film Awards[plural]" doesn't work
Done
" one Grand Bell Awards, as well as a Buil Film Awards." - same for both of these
Done
"tying him with the K-pop girl group Twice." - no reason for the group name to be in italics
Done
"Kim's breakthrough role in Start-Up" - on the other hand, the title of a TV series should be in italics
Done
"he won Most Popular Actor in 57th Baeksang Arts Awards." => "he won Most Popular Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards."
Done
"he also received the Emotive Award Asia Artist Awards" => "he also received the Emotive Award at the Asia Artist Awards"
Done
"recognized as one of the 2021 Seoul Drama Awards' character of the year" - "one of" suggests multiple characters were recognised, yet you have "character of the year" (singular)
Done
"won Outstanding Actor in the 2022 Seoul Drama Awards." => "won Outstanding Actor at the 2022 Seoul Drama Awards."
Done
"Kim made his debut in the film industry as the title role in Park Hoon-jung's noir film" => "Kim made his debut in the film industry in the title role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film"
Done
"leading to his win of the New Actor Award" => "leading to his winning the New Actor Award"
Done
"at the 32nd Buil Film Awards and the 59th Grand Bell Awards respectively" - there's no reason for the word "respectively"
Done
"nominations in the Most Popular Actor and Best New Actor at the subsequent year 60th Baeksang Arts Awards." => "nominations in the Most Popular Actor and Best New Actor categories at the subsequent year's 60th Baeksang Arts Awards."
Done
Image caption: "Kim Seon-ho at the 2017 MBC Award" => "Kim Seon-ho at the 2017 MBC Awards"
Done
In the "nominee/work" column of the table, titles starting with "The" should sort based on the next word
I don't see why Twice need to be mentioned at all, they are tied at fourth most awards which isn't notable.
Done
References #47 and #48 are duplicated
Done
The hyperlinks for the reference and external links sections should be removed from ToC, I don't believe other comparible FLs have them there
Done
For the lead, films should have their release years in parenthesis ieThe Childe (2023)
Done
I think the lead could have better flow. A start would be to remove the line break after the first two sentences on his TV roles. Then,earned him a nomination for Best Supporting Actor – Television and he won Most Popular Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards is a bit confusing on first read - I wasn't sure they were for the same ceremony. I would change it to "earned him an award for Best Supporting Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards alongside a nomination for Best Supporting Actor at the same ceremony" or something along those lines. Open to your thoughts, I just think it needs to be reworded.
Done
Rephrased to this: Kim's breakthrough role inStart-Up earned him the Most Popular Actor Award at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards, alongside a nomination for Best Supporting Actor – Television at the same ceremony.
Kim made his debut in the film industry in the title role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film The Childe - this doesn't read well - it is the titular role with the Korean title but in English it reads as if he is a child? I would swap titular for lead.
Done
Rephrased to this: Kim made his feature film debut as the top biller in Park Hoon-jung's noir filmThe Childe (2023).
"Top biller" is not an expression in English. I would suggest "Kim made his feature film debut in the leading role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film" --ChrisTheDude (talk)06:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude rephrase to this: Kim made his debut in a feature film with top billing in Park Hoon-jung's noir film,The Childe (2023). I use top billing per Mirriam Webster Dictionary[4], because there are two lead roles but Kim was given top billing status in the film.Preferwiki (talk)07:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done Rephrase as per suggestion: Kim made his feature film debut in Park Hoon-jung's noir filmThe Childe (2023), where he was given top billing status.Preferwiki (talk)03:35, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I also think wikilinking leading man and title role areoverlinking.
The compact toc template does not seem to be working. You can remove it. The table isn't that long anyway.
Row header cells (like "APAN Star Awards") which span multiple rows should have their scope set to "rowgroup". Please seeMOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
In the interest of getting this closed, and since they were minor, I just fixed the accessibility issues myself. Source review passed, no other issues seen, promoting. --PresN14:17, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hey all, mammal list #63 in our perpetual series and rodent list #8: Ctenomyidae. This is our next list covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the tuco-tucos, which look like underground guinea pig-moles. So that checks out. 59 species down in theSouthern Cone of South America, though due to their underground nature a lot are missing pictures—though the Talas tuco-tuco was photographed cruelly taken up into the sky and was quite upset about it. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN01:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
C. brasiliensis seems to be about 300mm in length according to[6].
All images have alt-texts.
I couldn't find any issue with the prose.
Species table is generated via templates and follows accessibility criteria.
Ref 2 should be moved out of the lead and into "Classification" where the information is repeated perMOS:LEADCITE
Ref 2 is citing the sentence it's attached to, not the count of species (which is justWP:CALC), and that sentence is not repeated in Classification. (as a note, this is the 63rd list in this series with the same/similar sentence+cite in the lede, so I would prefer to retain consistency)
Why are years bolded in some citations?
That's how{{Cite journal}} works; more specifically, it's because the IUCN uses the year as the "volume", and Cite journal bolds the volume number
Added the links, but I don't have any other images available. I also find the tail length but not body odd, but that's what the source said... --PresN23:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's my 40th AC number ones list for your delectation. This particular year was mainly about Savage Garden and Faith Hill, but in addition none other than Gwyneth Paltrow had a number one. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon --ChrisTheDude (talk)10:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For clarification, I am doing this review based off ofthis version of the list. My source review is below:
All of the citations come from reliable, high-quality sources that are appropriate for a potential FL and for a music-related list.
Citation 3 does not support the information in the lead. The archived version of the link does though, so I would mark this as dead. It seems like the article related to this link was replaced with something else.
Citation 4 does not support that "I Knew I Love You" was one of Sound Garden's last charting songs before they split. The reference does support that the duo split up in 2001, but I am not sure if a clearer citation would be needed to support the part about the song (or if that would be obvious given that this occurred the following year).
Citation 8 does not support that "Crusin'" was performed inDuets by a father and daughter as part of a karaoke competition. It does say that the song was recorded for the soundtrack, but it does not provide context for how the song was performed in the movie. I also have a comment about the citation structure, as I do not think that theSan Francisco Chronicle fits with the publisher parameter.
I have a question about the titles forBillboard. The citations currently use abbreviated versions of the months (e.g. Sep), but when I access the links, I do not see that reflected in the reference. When I look at the references, I see something like Adult Contemporary: Week of September 16, 2000 for instance. I have clicked on randomBillboard chart links, and they all appear the same. Is there a reason for why the citations are titled this way for this?
A few of theBillboard chart citations are not archived. It is not necessary for a FLC, but I always find archiving helpful to avoid any potential issues with link rot and death. One would think that this would not happen with aBillboard chart link, but I would not take my chances with even that. The archived links also make the information more accessible anyway (as the currentBillboard website now requires users to have a subscription in order to see these charts).
The IABot has been giving me all sorts of trouble recently, running but only archiving some sources, or crashing altogether. I'm currently giving it another try..... --ChrisTheDude (talk)08:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is understandable. I have not used the IABot in years, so I am not as up-to-date about that, but this is not a requirement for a FLC/FL and this will not hold up or affect my review.Aoba47 (talk)13:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following falls outside of the scope of a source review, but I have a few comments about other aspects of the article below:
I have a question about this part, (his first album for more than ten years). Why not use the exact number of years in this instance? I think that it would better to be clearer here, especially since the citation does support this information.
I do not think that "either" works in this context, (was the actress Paltrow's first appearance on either listing), as that word is mostly used in the context of two items, but the three separate charts are referenced earlier in this sentence.
It is not required, but I would recommend alphabetizing the categories, as I think that would make it more navigable for readers (even with just a few categories).
I hope that these comments are helpful. Let me know if you have any questions. Once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to pass this source review. Best of luck with the FLC, and I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far!Aoba47 (talk)02:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your responses. Everything looks good to me. I do have one more source-related comment. I would recommend using thecite interview template instead to provide further information about the source, specifically that the interviewer wasJonathan Ross. That should be my last point for this review.Aoba47 (talk)13:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for addressing everything. Thispasses my source review. Wonderful work as always with these lists. If possible, I would appreciate any help withmy current peer review onan EP, but I completely understand if you do not have the time or interest. Hopefully, this review will help draw more attention to the FLC. It was interesting to learna bout the Huey Lewis and Gwyneth Paltrow cover, as I was unaware of it. I hope that you have a great rest of your day!Aoba47 (talk)14:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's my 39th nomination of a list of AC number ones. Please gloss over the fact that the first number one of the year featured a horrible horrible man, and focus on the achievements of a little balding man from England and two ladies from Canada..... --ChrisTheDude (talk)19:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Bgsu98 (9/27/25)
You spell out some numbers over 10 and render others in numerals. Regardless of WP policy, I'd just pick one to be consistent. Personally, I prefer spelled-out numbers.
I would use the phrase "the Backstreet Boys".
"The song was not at the time available..." reads a little awkwardly. I would recommend "At the time, the song was not available..." or "The song was, at the time, not available..."
I believe the list is consistent with the recently promoted accolades lists and ready for an FLC. Any comments from all editors are very much appreciated.Medxvo (talk)17:38, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Excellent work, the only thing I can suggest is changing "leading to the match between the two men on the ATP Challenger Tour" to "leading toa match between the two men on the ATP Challenger Tour" --ChrisTheDude (talk)07:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For ref 14, replace the hyphen (-) with an Em dash (—) perMOS:DASH
For ref 48, I think it's better to use the actual website of the Georgia Film Critics Association rather than Next Best Picture. I understand the usage of secondary sources, but while Matt Neglia does like fine it some instances, I feel like the actual organization itself is a more reliable source in this case. Now if there was a higher quality souce such asEntertainment Weekly orVariety, then that would probably take precedence over the GAFCA website as long as all statements are supported by the website.
In the figures $96 million and $55 million place between the numeral and the word "million."
Image review – No issues to report with the lead image (the only one in the article). It has appropriate free licensing, caption and alt text.Giants2008 (Talk)22:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Tyla released her debut self-titled studio album on 22 March 2024, which incorporated her digital EP of the same name released on 1 December 2023, it debuted at number 24 on the US Billboard 200 chart" - the second comma should be a semi-colon (or alternatively make that part its own sentence)
Also does "it debuted" refer to the album or the EP? The wording is ambiguous
"In 2025, as Tyla prepared for debut mixtape's release" => "In 2025, as Tyla prepared for her debut mixtape's release"
" She was featured on "When I'm with You by Thai musician" - quote mark at end of song title is missing
"She remixed WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" - pretty sure this should be "She sang on a remix of WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" as I doubt she was the one who did the actual remixing
"though some noted her Coloured identity might affect her U.S. reception" - I don't think "coloured" needs a capital C mid-sentence
"In July 2025, Tyla announced a mixtape featuring "Bliss" and "Is It" via social media with a pre-save link." - as this mixtape apparently hasn't been released yet, I would be tempted to move this sentence to the end
In the EPs table you give the title of the more recent one as "WWP" but in other tables you refer to it as "We Wanna Party". Which is its actual title?
A whole bunch of refs are missing archive links, I suggest running the IA bot.
These are likely for charts likeBillboard, but since the archive doesn't automatically update after a song is added, I removed them.dxneo (talk)10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Refs should be cased consistently as sentence or title perWP:CITEVAR.
Re: reference casing, perWP:CITEVAR, (part ofWP:Citing sources and thus required byWP:FL?), we should use a consistent style of citation capitalisation. Afterthis RfC, consensus was found that just copying the capitalisation used by a source isnot a valid citation style. As such, all references should be consistently capitalised, be that insentence case,title case, or an alternative.
Realistically,this discussion is about whether only title and sentence case are acceptable for reference titles. We explicitly do not have a defined allowable citation style. This will create insane amounts of busy work that does nothing to improve the site, will result in countless additional fights over whether specific terms should be capitalized, restricts editors' freedom, and will only do more to harm the integration of new editors. For what? Because people like certain things and don't like the style others choose to apply consistently? There's plenty of styles I don't like which I recognize as being okay and acceptable. I stand on the side of logic, and what best allows Wikipedia to continue to grow and be improved upon. If we keep forcing ridiculous nitpicky rules like this it just adds more barriers and rules for people to get involved and contribute
I don't believe this is important. No one has time to re-edit all the FAs, FLs, and GAs to correct title case, especially since it doesn't improve the site's quality. To me, it's merely a preference I don't share. Honestly, I'm not willing to fix every "to," "and," "it," and so on in every reference. It's too much work for little benefit.dxneo (talk)20:59, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Re: publishers, you have references like 8 and 13 that say "The Official South African Charts" for both work and publisher, which is redundant. Besides that, including the publisher parameter should either be done for all references or none; otherwise, we do not have a consistent style of citation as required byWP:CITESTYLE (another part ofWP:Citing sources).
References 8 and 13 were added by a bot, and I didn’t want to intervene, but I’ll remove them. As I mentioned, I’ve only included the publisher for sources that clearly state it. I don’t think consistency applies here. Does this mean I should use {{Cite magazine}} throughout the article for consistency just because I’ve used it multiple times?dxneo (talk)20:59, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy with the publisher parameter now as the ones that still use it are to differentiate between the website and the publisher. I missed that in my first round; my apologies.
As for capitalisation, no-one is saying you have to personally go back and edit all old FAs, FLs and GAs. That's not the requirement posed by the FL criteria, which we are evaluating on this article alone. I recognise you agree with Josh on this one, but that opinion was rejected in the RfC I linked. There is a consensus that this is how we should cite sources: no matter how much you disagree it is required by the FL criteria. There exists a userscript (User:ZKang123/TitleCaseConverter) to make this process easier, so the actual workload required is quite limited. Honestly, I agree with you that going back and changing things retroactively would be a waste of time, but that's something to start a new RfC about and not something that pertains to this discussion. Thanks,UpTheOctave! • 8va?22:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that was a bad close that left way too many questions to be answered, and I wish I had challenged it at the time. The close really didn't properly assess that there wasn't a consensus on the matter and the original question was oddly phrased in a way that people focused too much on the aspect of changing an all caps title being what disqualified it from a consistent reference formatting.Hey man im josh (talk)12:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not something that I care enough about to oppose over, but as long asCiting sources statespreserving the capitalization style of each individual source is not considered a consistent style, this is technically required by the Fl criteria.UpTheOctave! • 8va?12:18, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delegate note: I appreciate UpTheOctave! catching source formatting issues and all the work done for source reviews. I'm not as annoyed about the reference capitalization issue as Josh is, though I also disagreed with the close for that RfC; that said, I ultimately think it's a minor quibble and not a major issue. It doesn't affect readers in any noticeable way. If the only thing in a source review that wasn't done was capitalization issues, I wouldn't hold up the nomination for it. --PresN12:53, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the kind words, @PresN. Overall, I agree; it's absolutely not something I would oppose a nomination over. I just think that since the guidelines have changed it's important to at least bring it up, as it is technically covered by the criteria now. I like to make a complete survey of sources when reviewing: whether my formatting advice is ultimately implemented isn't a huge deal, and is certainly not as bad as issues with deadlinks or reliability. Best,UpTheOctave! • 8va?14:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, let's get this over with already.UpTheOctave!, would you please make an example out of at least two references (not charts or certifications) as to how I should go about this please? The script isn't helping at all.dxneo (talk)22:46, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed references 2 and 11 to title case as an example. I tried to get the script to work but oddly it isn't working for me either. To be perfectly honest, I don't really mind whether you revert my examples or change the other references to title case, I'm personally not considering these comments as outstanding for the purposes of promotion. Sorry for the bother.UpTheOctave! • 8va?23:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination has dragged on without further reviews; I'm not seeing any major issues (there's a short 2-sentence paragraph in the lede, and the captions for the tables should be more concise) that would prevent promotion, so promoting. --PresN03:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
P.S. The delegate table has its right border colored with the party color. This isn't there in the member table below that. See if you can make it consistent. The only obvious difference that I see between the two tables is that one has a sticky header. -MPGuy2824 (talk)06:57, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note J shouldn't list Chaney's first name for consistency
Under "1890–present: 1 seat" Roncalio is listed as serving in the 95th Congress from 1977 through 1979. However, he did not serve in 1979 as he resigned in 1978. Additonally, add a EFN about his resignation for consistency
Hi @Olliefant, thanks for your comments. I've made changes accordingly. I did not find a satisfactory reason for Roncalio's resignation other than that he wanted to retire from politics. If you'd like more nuance, I'd be happy to provide it here, but I don't think it fits in the article well. Let me know if there's something else you think I ought to change. Thanks,Staraction (talk |contribs)20:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend rephrasing "The last Democrat to have represented Wyoming in Congress..." with "The last Democrat to represent Wyoming in Congress..." for simplicity.
United States Senate
John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis are each wikilinked twice. Dewikilink the second occurrences.
United States House of Representatives
You exclusively use digits to represent numbers in the Senate subsection, but spell out some number in the House subsection. Recommend picking one style to use consistently.
Hi @Bgsu98, I've reverted my changes associated with that suggestion.MOS:SPELL09 states that numbers less than or equal to nine should be spelled out, and I've done that accordingly. Is there some spot I've missed where I am using numerals for those numbers? Thanks,Staraction (talk |contribs)01:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think you might have to revert your changes.MOS:NUMNOTES says that "Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently". -MPGuy2824 (talk)08:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I would write the first sentence thusly: "Twenty-two people have represented Wyoming in the United States Senate, including sixteen Republicans and six Democrats." Likewise on the House subsection.Bgsu98(Talk)09:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I supported it before and I stand by that support. To clarify, I didn't mean to confuse the issue with regards to the numbers. I was referring explicitly to the numbers under 10, where some were rendered in digits and some spelled out, and I said they needed to be uniform. ButUser:MPGuy2824 is correct that that uniformity needs to encompass all comparable numbers, which in this case included some numbers over 10. Either way, it looks good! I'm sorry for the confusion.Bgsu98(Talk)20:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
He's a bit of a chonky boy, but hes got an interesting story to tell and he's the first of five. Originally, Inominated this list and others like it for merging with the mainList of World Heritage Sites page as unnecessary duplication. The consensus was, so concerns about manageability, readability, and content duplication could be addressed, to make it a simple list without tables and to reorganize it into the UNESCO geoscheme, not the UN geoscheme. Luckily, this region has the least amount of World Heritage Sites (it is also very small compared to the other continent spanning lists) and it was already in UNESCO geoscheme format so I chose this to be the first FL on such a topic. I have included an introduction to World Heritage sites as the first paragraph (standard) and a overview (new) of the entire region.
It doesn't have much prose, there are a lot of references but they only really verify the existence of the sites in the actual list part, and there are only 26 which are in the lead. If anyone has any suggestions like changing prose or removing references, then you may be bold and implement them. Also if you have an idea for how to make a map appear like those that are standard acrossLists of World Heritage Sites, then let me know. If you think other information should be added, then feel free to suggest it!
How do I make the total row of the table add all the values in the natural, cultural, and mixed sections as I need to manually update both right now, what is the template. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩20:25, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Mymis
The table shows that UAE has 6 sites, but I believe it has only 2, no? By looking at the list itself. How many does Algeria have? 6 or 7? And how many in the tentative list, 11 or 12?Mymis (talk)15:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment, I resolved the UAE issued but there was no issue with Algeria, both the first table and dotted list display 12 items (so does the source)@Mymis: Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩00:22, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The issue with Algeria was that there were 11 sites listed while the table said 12. I can see you now added the 12th one. For UAE, it now says 16?Mymis (talk)14:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For Algeria,M'Zab Valley is mentioned in the tentative list: it should be in the main list. On the other hand,Le Parc culturel de la Saoura is missing from the tentative list.
Similar to the above, I see multiple errors in the table. Can you please review every country carefully once again? For instance, it says 0 for Oman? Does Libya have 5 or 6? And there may be more.Mymis (talk)14:52, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oman had one delisted, the table is about the current amount but I thought it would be helpful (and make the list more comprehensive) if I included the delisted site (will add an efn note later). I have fixed Libya and will check the other sites when I have more time (this weekend probably) Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩16:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mymis: I see that you have been inactive for quite some time, but I was pinging here to let you know that I have fixed everything that you mentioned. I thought I already fixed everything and asked you to support, but I misremembered. Better late than never.Easternsaharareview this21:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank youMPGuy2824, I have found done your suggestion and have created a Location map module for the new map you made (Thank you, I might have some more UNESCO georegion maps for you to make if you want in the coming weeks). I asked on AWB help requests for someone to replace the Arab world parameter with Arab States, if that doesn't happen in a couple of days I'll just do it myself.Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩00:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Image rights are easy: there's one map, and it has an appropriate license. I would call this apass on images, though I have two comments:
I am no expert on maps, but this one seems to have a lot of finicky colour-coding, and some colours that are quite similar (e.g., green/turquoise, red/brown). I'm concerned that it's not very accessible for the colourblind and possibly overcomplicated. Did you consider just doing two colours, for cultural and natural?
I agree that it would be an accessibility problem, but I think the two colors (three would be needed as mixed is a different classification) would be too simplistic. I will replace brown and turquoise withthis black x andthis green plus respectively. How does that sound?@LEvalyn: could you share your thoughts with me on this suggestions?
I'm still not entirely clear on why so many individual sites need to have their own icon, but introducing some different shapes is a great idea. That would address my most important concern, about accessibility.~ L 🌸 (talk)02:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As another finicky map suggestion, it might be nice to crop out the bottom third of the image, which is all grayed-out countries.
@MPGuy2824: sorry to bother you (again) but could you do the above suggestion, I tried editing it as a svg and it didn't work, converting from an edited png to svg also lost a lot of definition so could you help please.
I think parallelism would make the third sentence a much clearer read, ie, starting with "Natural heritage consists of..." rather than "[big list]...are defined as natural heritage".
This list is consistent across all of the World Heritage Sites lists. Opposing on that grounds is silly though, but I think a parallelism wouldn't make it more concise without losing clarity. Do you have any specific suggestions (using semicolons for a complex list would only be more complex and unfamiliar for the audience)
I don't think it needs to be more concise, I just think the sentence would be easier to read if the subject & verb were at the beginning instead of the end, as is the case with the previous sentence. (That's all I meant about parallelism -- paralleling the "cultural heritage" sentence.) If consistency is a concern, I would be happy to go personally change it on every relevant article if a different wording is acceptable... for clarity, I'm proposing that the new version of the sentence should be:Natural heritage is defined as natural features (consisting of physical and biological formations), geological and physiographical formations (including habitats of threatened species of animals and plants), and natural sites which are important from the point of view of science, conservation or natural beauty. (or something like that.)~ L 🌸 (talk)02:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When the lead says "currently", should add a note that it isWP:ASOF 2025.
Nice catch! fixed.
I notice that the table includes a column for "World Heritage Committee service" but the article doesn't really explain that committee. Could a sentence or two be added explaining the role of the committee in the process? Or at least a wikilink?
I'll add one, having a tough time finding sources for it right now. A page also has not be created, but there should probably be one.
For the Arabian Oryx Sanctuary, should it be presented differently from the items because it was delisted? I see that there is a little explanatory note, but it still feels odd to see it as one of the bullets under "World Heritage Sites". Perhaps there could be a sentence of prose outside the list explaining that it used to be included but was delisted? Or a separate list of "former sites"?
@LEvalyn: I have addressed your comments, for the visual thing, I have not changed anything yet but I will after finding a suitable alternative as the alternatives look very off, are incorrect size, or are too similar to files already used. I have noted the changes that I have made below each of your suggestions except for the WHS committee one. For that I added 3 sentences (supported by ref 3) for explanation. It was the best place to put that, as the first paragraph deals with UNESCO's processes anywayUser:Easternsaharaplease reviewthis andthis03:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The committee information is great and works well where you've put it. It sounds like the map will proceed in a good direction; I do think it's acceptable as-is (ie certainly no problems with rights) but if you improve it feel free to ping me for a second thumbs-up. Do you object to me putting a slightly different wording of the "natural heritage" sentence across the World Heritage Sites articles? It's a relatively minor change but I think would have an outsized impact on readability -- it took me multiple tries to "follow" that sentence the first time through.~ L 🌸 (talk)03:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have the use dmy dates template which makes it so all dates are in dmy, i do not think there are any dates not in dmy. Also, I want to archive the sources but the bot is very slow and this has a lot of sources. So I'll wait a little bit as I am not doing it manually, that is a big waste of time where i can be improving articles or doing other things in real lifeUser:Easternsaharaplease reviewthis andthis11:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Easternsahara For some reasons, when I runMOSNUMscript on the article, it shows several dates not following the same formats inside the wikitext. I think you could simply run that script to fix this.
Again, no issues with the missing archive links at all.
There's also inconsistency in capitalisation of titles in the references, some references are like "This is a wikipedia article", while some are like "This is a Wikipedia Article". Let's maintain consistency in that if it's title case or sentence case you're using throughout. It doesn't matter how the source puts it in their website.
To be more specific, Citation 90 is supposed to be "Alexandria, Ancient Remains and the New Library", Citation 91 as "Abydos, City of Pilgrimage of the Pharaohs", Citation 95 as "Dahshour Archaeological Area", and so many inconsistent ones. Scripts likeUser:ZKang123/TitleCaseConverter can aid, but you have to be careful with it, watching out for especially URLs that have caps.Vanderwaalforces (talk)14:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"6 for their natural significance" why is "6" not spelled out perMOS:NUMERAL?
done
"Criteria i through vi are cultural" I believe you should capitalize the figures (I, VI, etc.)
UNESCO does not do this, i have not seen secondary sources do this when talking about UNESCO, and other FLS about WHS lists do not do this
I suggest you add one images for each country to further illustrate the article.
I added 1 image per world heritage site list and tentative list, where space allowed. i did not add anymore even where space allowed because I didn't want to spam images
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
TheSeattle Seawolves are a successful rugby union team who finished their eighth season this year, making them finally eligible for a nomination. This is the seventh in my series of lists about Seattle's major league sports teams and their seasons, and fashioned similar to them due to the lack of suitable rugby equivalents at FL. As such, I'm highly amenable to major changes.SounderBruce23:14, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Lead image could probably be made larger
"The team is a member[singular] of the Western Conference and play their[plural] home matches" - I know that there is a lot of ambiguity around whether a sports team is singular or plural (in both US and UK English) but this reads particularly jarringly - is there any way to avoid it?
Swapped in "Seawolves" for "the team".
"Western Conference leaders Austin Gilgronis and the LA Giltinis" - is it correct that you only put "the" before one team name but not the other?
Fixed.
"The remainder of the season, including the playoffs, were cancelled" => "The remainder of the season, including the playoffs, was cancelled" (subject of the sentence is "remainder", which is singular)
The lead image is of a game at Starfire Sports, which I think illustrates things well.
I'm not sure about Americas Rugby News; it looks like it is published onWordPress. Is there a better source, or is there something I haven't found about the source?
Unfortunately, there are no other sources that have consistently logged the standings for MLR seasons; even the league's website omits several years and ESPN does not include the earliest seasons. ARN is considered a reliable source in the rugby union community, but I will try to find an alternative (if one exists).
I'm not able to do a full spot-check here because I don't have access to some paywalled articles (e.g.Seattle Times); if another editor could do that, that would be great.
Hi @SounderBruce, thanks for your reply. If ARN is considered reliable then that's alright by me.Image review passed, andsupport pending somebody else being able to run a full spot-check on the sources in the article.Staraction (talk |contribs)04:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
I am nominating this for featured list because this list is a comprehensive and accessible list which is worthy of FL status. This list mentions all of Olympic medalists from the main Olympics, Youth Olympics, and demonstration games. All of the content in the list is sourced, and it has an engaging lead and history section. It also is accessible with recommendations from myprevious nomination. I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination. Thanks,🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My"blotter")06:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
"Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, the delegation did not gain a medal in their first five participations" => "Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, but did not gain a medal in their first five participations"
There's no reason to have a capital B on badminton (this occurs in multiple places)
"The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal" (unless Malaysia has permanently stopped entering the Olympics)
Link Malaysia in body as well as lead
Link Razif and Jalani Sidek in body as well as lead
Link 1956 Summer Olympics in body as well as lead
Can we explain briefly why Malaysia did not compete at the Olympics until 1956?
"After a 12-year drought of medals in the 2000 and 2004 Olympics," - this reads weirdly. Suggest simply "After failing to win any medals at the 2000 and 2004 Olympics,"
"through Lee Chong Wei, who nearly won against Lin Dan." - who nearly won what event? How did Wei "nearly win"? Who is Lin Dan?
"gained the first bronze medal in Diving that same year" - no reason for capital D on diving
"four silver medals and one bronze medal was gained" => "four silver medals and one bronze medal were gained" ("was" is the singular form of the noun so not appropriate when the subject is plural)
"In the 2020 Olympics, a bronze medal and a silver medal was gained" - same here
"the silver being the first silver medal for Cycling through Awan" - no reason for capital C on cycling
"The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal"
Awang image caption should show his name in full and not have a capital C on cycling
Tables should sort based on surname, not forename
"Malaysia had three medals from participants in a Mixed team" => "Malaysia has three medals from participants in a mixed team"
Also, at which Olympics (youth or "normal") were the mixed team medals gained?
"Malaysia gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports; the following are medalists in the demonstration games:" => "Malaysia has gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports." (no need for the "the following....." bit)
As an aside......"I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination" - as per the instructions at the top, you should not nominate another article until the previous one has substantial support, not just a single !vote, but I had already written all those comments above before I noticed this, so I will leave them here anyway --ChrisTheDude (talk)07:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the lead, Malaysia/the delegation changes back and forth from being treated as singular to being treated as plural"
Fixed.
"The newly formed delegate" => "The newly-formed delegation"
Fixed; I did not add the hyphen.
Razif and Jalani Sidek should be linked on the first usage in the body, not the second
Fixed.
"Pandelela Rinong gained the first bronze medal in diving that same year" => "Pandelela Rinong gained Malaysia's first medal in diving, a bronze, that same year"
Fixed.
In the Awang image caption, cycling should not have a capital C
Fixed.
The medal tally tables look weird with the numbers on the individual rows left-aligned but the numbers of the total rows centre-aligned
Due to the total number being bolded; I do not think I can change it.
1. The word "gain" is used three times very close to eachother in the lead, could you replace at least one of them?
2. "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne sending a total of 32 athletes" - change to "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne, sending a total of 32 athletes"
3. "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock who participated in badminton…" - change to "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock, who participated in badminton…"
A lot of em-dashes are being used[16] and[17], the kuala lumpur city source is suspicious for this reason, but this seems to be written before the tokyo olympics so this article is fine
Nuggeteer, when you are done with fixing the issues the EasternSahara pointed out, make you that youping ChrisTheDude is his section above. Reviewers don't usually watchlist FLC review pages. -MPGuy2824 (talk)06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not an actual author, just a section of the website.
"Five medals have been credited to Malaysia from the Youth Olympic Games; two are gold, three are silver, and one is bronze" first semicolon into colon
Done.
Otherwise everything looks good but I was wondering if the Name section should be turned into Name(s) for those tables which feature multiple people for that parameter
Done.
2, 4, 5, 6, 10 pass
3 does not mention Lee Chong Wei in 2008, add olympedia reference otherwise good. Although I think it is very low quality and should be removed unless other sources can not provide such information
Not low quality, just primary and it is used okay perWP:PRIMARY.
Okay I willpass source review, the sources being used are okay. Please double check if 3 mentions Lee Chong Wei in 2008. Also before passing the image review, I would like you to make the alt for the small svgs showing the sport say see adjacent text since they should have an alt like that perMOS:ALT@TheNuggeteer:support on proseUser:Easternsaharaplease reviewthis andthis16:04, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Bgsu98 (11/1/25)
TheMedal tally by sport tables look super awkward with some of the numbers left-justified and others centered. I would center them all. I might also reconsider the need for these tables considering the few number of sports lists.
Based this on the Philippines lists; the numbers placed in the center are from the bolding.
"Medals gained from the Summer Olympics" reads awkwardly. I would reword as "Medals won at the Summer Olympics"
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hey everyone, mammal list #61 in our perpetual series and rodent list #6: Dasyproctidae. We continue here covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the agoutis, which look like lanky guinea pigs. So that checks out. 21 species, mostly in South America, and for once almost everything has a picture and a range map. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN19:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I must have missed this article when you submitted it originally. I have no issues with the prose or setup/content of the tables.Support.Bgsu98(Talk)15:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Image review – Checked a healthy sampling of the images used in the article, including the lead image, and all had appropriate free licensing and alt text, and the maps I looked at all had sourcing for their information.Giants2008 (Talk)22:18, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am unable to find sources in the article supporting that the film won its two Black Reel awards + its Virtuoso Award
Wicked should be italicized in some citations (such as 4, 5, 6) for consistency with other citations and perMOS:TITLECONFORM
Ref 11 was written by aWP:FORBESCON but he seems like a subject-matter expert so I personally have no issues with it; however, more reliable sources (Variety andDeadline Hollywood) reported that the budget was $150 million, not $145 million
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is a different format than what I'm used to submitting. The Grand Prix of Figure Skating is a prestigious international series of seven competitions, and the current season actually started today with the2025 Grand Prix de France. The tables identify the gold medalists for each competition each season. All of the results have been verified and sourced, the tables should be properly formatted, and the sources should be properly formatted. I look forward to your constructive feedback or suggestions.Bgsu98(Talk)03:48, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
MPGuy2824
A bit weird to have an empty row at the end of every table, but the French results should come by tomorrow, so at least one of those cells will have data.
Only background color should not be a way to highlight a particular cell. But, I think the footnote is enough to satisfy accessibility needs.
I didn't find any problems with table accessibility.
The flags automatically get alt-text from the template used. There is only one other image, the logo, and that has alt-text.
Support on table and image accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
Yes, I only added the 2025 row because the 2025 series literally started yesterday. The women's and pairs results for France will be added today; men's and dance tomorrow. With the time difference from France, I've been watching the event all morning. 😃Bgsu98(Talk)13:57, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
"is a series of senior-level international figure skating competitions sanctioned by the International Skating Union, which debuted in 1995" - I would change this to "is a series of senior-level international figure skating competitions which debuted in 1995 and sanctioned by the International Skating Union" so it doesn't read like it was the ISU which debuted in 1995
"as a replacement for the Bofrost Cup on Ice" - first mention in the body so link
"as a replacement for the Cup of China" - same
"It returned in 2022 as a replacement for the Rostelecom Cup" - same
I rephrased the beginning, because none of those events actually debuted in 1995. They were pre-existing competitions that were yoked together in one series beginning in 1995. Let me know what you think.
I linked the competitions you mentioned except for Cup of China, which was mentioned prior.
I added a color key to the tables, which admittedly I should have already done, but there is no accessibility violation because there is also a footnote in each cell.
Hey there! I know it's been a while since I've stopped by one of your noms (was getting over some general Wiki burnout). Apologies if I missed any in the interim. Anyways, this list is pretty well put together, just a few quick comments:
I realize this is currently ongoing, but just until the actual results are available, I suggest adding{{N/a}} or{{TBA}} to avoid the appearance of empty cells.
It appears there are a few duplicate citations, based off ofthis version. These could likely be merged for ease.
222 and 229 both point to the same citation, despite having different titles
The link was wrong for the 2023 event. I have corrected it, but will have to wait until I get home to add the archive since the school has the archive site blocked for whatever reason.
Closing note: Thiscandidate has beenpromoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please seeWP:FLC/ar, and leave the{{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until thebot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive.Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
I am nominating List of governors of Bauchi State for Featured List status. The article presents a comprehensive chronological record of all military and civilian governors of the state from its creation in 1976 to the present. It is well-structured in a clear tabular format, supported by reliable references, and remains stable without rapid changes or disputes. The list meets the Featured List criteria of being comprehensive, well-written, verifiable, and stable, and I believe it merits recognition as a Featured List.Ibjaja055 (talk)18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Infobox says that the Governor can be addressed as “The Honourable”. I am not really into politics but isn’t this title reserved for members of the legislative body? I would encourage you to cite informations in the Infobox. Best,Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia13:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans I have fixed the issue with the use of proper in-line citations and I have also either removed or replaced some marginally reliable reliable references. Can you check again? Thank you.Ibjaja055 (talk)05:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There’s no page number in Ref2. Also wikilinkCambridge University Press. Also, since it’s a book change the date to|year=2019
@Ibjaja055, I couldn’t do the spotchecks as promised due to real life issues. From my spotchecks, only Ref1 failed verification. It made no mention of the Government House, being the residence of the governor. I believe there are sources out there that can verify this. Anothersuggestion; the first Northern Region section dived into a lot of federal politics that does not belong to this list. Best,Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First subsection of the list needs to be "Northern Region"
Second subsection needs to be "North-Eastern State"
Third needs to be "Bauchi State"
Change table title of Bauchi State list from "Military, administrators and civilian governors of Bauchi State, Nigeria" to "Heads of the government of Bauchi State"
Change table title of Northeastern State list from "Military Administrators of the Northeastern Region, Nigeria" to "Military administrators of the Northeastern Region"
Website name of Citation number 18 needs to be "European Country of Origin Information Network"
Change the|title= of citation number 22 from PROFILE to Profile.
Do the same for citation number 10
For citation number 6, modify the lastnames of the authors, their last names are Ota, Ecoma and Wambu. Either remove the initials entirely or add them to the firstnames instead.
For citation number 14, remove the "Daily Trust" in the title.
In both tables, remove the "No" column; it serves no purpose.
The "! scope="row"" in the No. column before, add it to the Governors' name such that, for the Governors' name, you now have! scope="row" |Rasheed Adisa Raji. Take note that I removed the boldface from the name. This makes it clear that this is the primary column.
The Bauchi State list table is pretty confusing. The "Notes" column serves no purpose. The political parties also need to be cited. Why not adopt the methods used in other similar lists, as inList of governors of Rivers State? Or remove the Note column and replace it with Political Party. The Tenure needs to be cited too, just repeat the citations in the prose that verify it.Vanderwaalforces (talk)09:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For North-Eastern State list, the Note column is not sourced; we need sources to be cited.
For Bauchi State list, the Political parties column is still not fine. In short, the comments (The first military governor of Bauchi State andThe first civilian governor of Bauchi State under the) are not necessary. Let's have this as purely Political party column. You can use template efn for the last comment, don't forget to add a ==Notes== section after the See also section when you use efn. Also, take note that I mentioned "Political party" and not "Political parties", so change that.
ForHe was succeeded by Isa Yuguda, initially elected under the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) in 2007, wikilinkAll Nigeria Peoples Party.
We currently do not know what NRC stands for
In North-Eastern State list, "The first Military Governor of the...", needs to be "The first military governor of the..."
Change table title of Northeastern State list from "Military administrators of the Northeastern Region" to "Military administrators of North-Eastern State", the same way you named the subsection title.
In all tables, "Military Governor" should be "Military governor"; "Military Administrator" should be "Military administrator"; and "Civilian Governor" should be "Civilian governor".
Several other parameters in the infobox are missing; see similar lists.
I managed to get IABot working on this list. It does seem to act up from time to time.
While fixing the portrait column issue, you seem to have removed the row scopes. Please re-add them back. Please seeMOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
There is a gap from 1999 to 2015 in the last table.
For the "Bauchi State" table, you again added the data-sort parameter to the portrait cells. Since that is an unsortable column, that parameter should move to the name column. Alternatively you can eliminate its use completely and just use the{{sortname}} template.
Please add alts to the flag and coat of arms saying "See caption"
Change alt of Map from "Map of Nigeria showing Bauchi State" to "Bauchi State is located in northeastern Nigeria" perMOS:ALTMAP
Add short alttexts for each of the portraits briefly describing the appearance of the leaders. You may be able to copy from their respective articles if those are good
@Easternsahara The image was used in the in the Bauchi State article. The Flag of the Bauchi emirate is not the same as the Bauchi state so I have removed it. All other pictures have been added except for two that violates the non free use rationale and have been removed by bot. The alttexts have been added to the map and images too. Thank you for your time.Ibjaja055 (talk)22:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Fixed
mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk)07:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply].jpg){kind=link}
TheDoctorWho(talk)02:57, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]