 | It has been suggested that this page bemerged withWikipedia:Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia. (Discuss) Proposed since 15 February 2024. |
 | This is anessay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not beenthoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: A quick overview of some of Wikipedia's most important policies. |
To some, Wikipedia can seem very bureaucratic. There are hundreds of policy and guideline pages, a virtual "alphabet soup" such asWP:V,WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,WP:THIS, and WP:THAT (not to mentionover 1600 like this one). However, if you start out by following these eight simple rules, the rest should come naturally.
Wikipedia is not the place to host your blog or personal web page, or to promote yourself, your company, your band, etc. If you are here to do only one thing and that one thing is prohibited by policy, guideline, and/or consensus, then this is not the project for you.
Assume that any other editor you encounter is also "here to build an encyclopedia" unless there is evidence to the contrary. Note that simply disagreeing with you is not "evidence to the contrary".
There's not much more to say about this than has already been written in the link above and in various other policy, guideline, and essay pages except that it's our basic editorial policy. In other words, Wikipedia would not be "Wikipedia" without it.
For this project to work, editors have to behavecivilly toward each other and treat each other with respect. No matter how smart you are or what you have to offer, if you're constantly rude to everybody and treating others in a condescending manner, then nobody is going to listen to you or want to work with you.
This one is very simple. If a rule would prevent you from improving, or preventing harm to, the encyclopedia, then just ignore it. However, be certain that what you are doing would really improve Wikipedia and is not just something that you want to do. Be prepared to justify your actions to anybody with a reasonable objection.
Wikipedia is not an MMORPG or other role playing game. Your edits can affect real people in the real world. You should havereliable sources for anything potentially controversial or likely to be challenged. This is especially true when writing aboutliving people.Wikipedia is an online free-content encyclopedia project helping to create a world in which everyone can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.About-wiki
Wikipedia is not aboutwinning or losing. Holding grudges against other editors who disagree with you only creates unnecessary drama and negative effects that distract others from improving the encyclopedia.
No matter how mundane your edits or how right you think you are, there will be times when other editors will object to, revert, and/or otherwise question your edits. In these cases, you must be prepared to discuss and justify your contributions. The role of "Talk page" discussion is so important that theBold, Revert, Discuss cycle has been encouraged as a model for editing. If your only edits to talk pages are periodically blanking your own, then this is not the project for you.