Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
"WP:CFDS" redirects here. For all criteria for speedy deletion, seeWikipedia:Speedy deletion.
This help page is ahow-to guide.
It explains concepts or processes used onWikipedia:Categories for discussion. It is not one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, and may reflect varying levels ofconsensus.
Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Speedy renaming orspeedy merging of categories may be requested if they meet one of thespeedy criteria listed below. To nominate a category:

  1. Determine which speedy criterion applies.
  2. Tag the category page with{{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} or{{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}}.
  3. List the request along with aspeedy criteria reason at§ New requests.

Speedy requests must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points but only at a full discussion atCategories for discussion.

The nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience. Categories that qualify forspeedy deletion can be tagged with the regular speedy tags with no required delay or listing. Renaming underC2E may be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation onG7.

Opposing

Requests generally take about 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the criteria and raise any objections.

To oppose a speedy request, insert this immediately under the nomination:

*'''Oppose''': Explain your objection.~~~~

If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins whoprocess speedy nominations. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a regular CfD discussion. Unless you withdraw your opposition, the nomination may be turned into a regularCfD discussion.

Contested speedy requests become stale and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and{{Moved from|[[WP:CFDS]]|~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested atCfD in accordance withits instructions.

Speedy criteria

Shortcut

The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming or merging arestrictly limited to:

C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes

Shortcut
  • Correction of spelling errors andcapitalization fixes. Differences betweenBritish and American spelling (e.g.Harbours → Harbors) arenot considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate underC2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
  • Appropriate conversion of hyphens intoen dashes orvice versa (e.g.Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
  • Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missingconjunction (e.g.Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includespluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is atopic or set category.

C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices

Shortcut

C2C: Consistency with established category tree names

Shortcut

Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified atWikipedia:Category names

  • This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
  • This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full CfD nomination.
  • This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g.Category:Transportation in the United States andCategory:Transport in the United Kingdom).

C2D: Consistency with main article's name

Shortcut
  • Renaming atopic category to match its eponymous page (e.g.Category:The Beatles andThe Beatles).
  • This appliesonly if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
    • unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is theprimary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
    • uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines atWP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in ano consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
  • This criterion may also be used to rename aset category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
  • Before nominating a category to be renamed per C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.

C2E: Author request

Shortcut
  • This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
  • The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.

C2F: One eponymous page

Shortcut
  • This criterion applies if the category containsonly an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable.
  • Nominations should use{{subst:cfm-speedy}} (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination atWP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.
Admin instructions
Administrators andpage movers:Do not use the "Move" tab to move categories listed here!
Categoriesare processed following the 48-hour waiting period and are moved by a bot.

When handling the listings:

  1. Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
  2. With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
  3. Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.

If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions atWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is toRename,Merge, orDelete"; to list it for the bots, use theSpeedy moves section.

A nomination tomerge orrename, brought forward as a fullCfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:

  • The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
  • No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.

The closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised, then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.

For out of process deletions, checkCategory:Empty categories awaiting deletion. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow theCfD process. After renaming, copy and paste the listing toWikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.

Current requests

[edit]

If the category does not match one of the above criteria or you are not sure it qualifies,do not list it here. Instead, use themain CfD process. Requests may be completed if more than 48 hours old; i.e., if the nomination was created before 14:51, 23 November 2025 (UTC). Currently, there are691 open requests (refresh).

To list it here, use the following format on a new line at thebeginning of the list:

*[[:Category:old name]] to[[:Category:new name]] – Reason~~~~

If the current nameshould be redirected rather than deleted, use:

* REDIRECT[[:Category:old name]] to[[:Category:new name]] – Reason~~~~

If human action is required, e.g. updating templates that populate the category, use:

* NO BOTS[[:Category:old name]] to[[:Category:new name]] – Reason~~~~

Remember to tag the category page with:{{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}

New requests

[edit]
  • Oppose — More mindless "one size fits all" busy work and a less concise title to boot. I'm pretty sure this category was so named for a reason and the editor responsible is still active. Did you ask that editor to explain themselves first? (@Dereckson:) Considering the articles on individual races are titled "Iditarod" and not "Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race", and "Iditarod" redirects to the article on the race rather than other uses or a disambiguation page, perhaps the logical first step is to conduct the RM that should have been done a long time ago to determine where consensus lies. RadioKAOS/ Talk to me, Billy/ Transmissions15:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Opposed requests

[edit]


On hold pending other discussion

[edit]
  • None currently

Moved to full discussion

[edit]
Wikipedia categorization
Guidelines
Help pages
Discussions
Projectspace essays
Userspace essays
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Speedy&oldid=1324098460"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp