Keep. I thinkWP:NACTOR is satisfied here by his filmography; you erroneously referencedWP:NCREATIVE which is different.
I think there are issues with the article's references, but probably nothing that can't be fixed through editing; draftification at worst.Athanelar (talk)15:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Athanelar: Well, there is an always an issue with regards to notability with just being a contestant inStar Vijay shows. This will just result in tons of passing media mentions from mostlyThe Times of India and nothing else. A search in English and Tamil yields nothing significant[2][3]. Everything that people need to know about him for now is in[4]. SeeWP:TIMESOFINDIA.
Both winning and being the first runner up is seen as significant per[5]. The rest isn't. I don't seeWP:NACTOR being covered unless he acts in more television shows (being in a soap opera with a named character always seems significantly more notable) and/or films. All he has is being an actor in a film, a contestant in 3 reality shows and being a dubbing artist in one film.DareshMohan (talk)19:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
NACTOR states that notability is substantiated if the subject has had 'significant roles in multiple notable television shows'
I would say that being a contestant on three separate reality shows (each notable enough for an individual wiki article of their own, evidently) counts as multiple and therefore satisfies NACTOR. Granted, his movie roles as dubbing and as a character who don't even show up in the plot summary probably aren't 'significant' for NACTOR purposes, but when combined with the reality show appearances i think NACTOR is met.
c.f.Farida Khalifa who I found with a cursory search whose only notability is also a handful of reality TV appearances. (although maybe you could argue this is just another NACTOR fail; we probably need more consensus than just the two of us here)Athanelar (talk)20:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
