The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasdelete.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk,contributions)19:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Smutný (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log ·Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:Notability (people), poorly sourced, promotional^{Atsme📞📧}08:26, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)09:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Law-related deletion discussions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)09:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T)09:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The sources that are significant aren't independent and the sources that are independent aren't significant.Eggishorn(talk)(contrib)00:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- an advertorial BLP, sourced to primary and / orWP:SPIP sources. Notability not established by the existing sources and there's nothing better out there.K.e.coffman (talk)04:11, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.