The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result wasredirect toSocialisti.sk. History is under the redirect if someone wants to perform a merger.StarMississippi13:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eduard Chmelár (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Never elected to any public office, English-language sources refer to him in passing only.Newklear007 (talk)10:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Politicians andSlovakia.Newklear007 (talk)10:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless someone finds a big old pile of non-English-language sources to support notability.GoldenRing (talk)11:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Imagine openly admitting you didn't conduct aWP:BEFORE search. I can give a pass to the newer editor as they at least tried, but an experienced editor should know better.Curbon7 (talk)03:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Not sure what are you talking about, friend. I am arguing for deletion of this article precisely because the person covered by it fails theWikipedia:Notability test as there is a "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."Newklear007 (talk)09:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I wasn't referring to you my friend, and in fact, I credit you with already having a good understanding of policy despite only having editing for a short periodCurbon7 (talk)19:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Liz^Read!Talk!18:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. His Slovak page definitely looks better. There might be enough notability there if someone is prepared to seriously fix the English version. --Suitskvarts (talk)18:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Liz^Read!Talk!20:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge The fact that "he participated in 1989 Velvet Revolution for Public Against Violence" doesn't make him notable. The only potentially notable fact is that he's the chairman of the Socialisti.sk movement. The party is on the Wikipedia page but I'm not sure if it qualifies. If no other sources found, I propose to merge his page with his party's page.--Onetimememorial (talk)21:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge option to, I'm guessing,Socialisti.sk. Please correct me if this is the wrong suggested target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Liz^Read!Talk!22:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Searches reveal very little but I am prepared to believe that there may be Slovak sources out there but not within my competence to evaluate. The merge looks tempting at first glace, but that article is almost as weak as this one, and the party only came into existence in 2019. I suspect that it is allWP:TOOSOON. Velella  ^{Velella Talk} 23:10, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect toSocialisti.sk.DatGuy^Talk_Contribs09:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.