- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result wasdelete. A clear consensus following relisting.Malcolmxl5 (talk)21:40, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Daniel Vladař (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log ·Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)
failsWP:NHOCKEYJoeykai (talk)03:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.Shawn in Montreal (talk)11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.Shawn in Montreal (talk)11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: (sighs) Another NN substub hockey article, and I'm almost at the point of writingWP:DOLOVISCREATEDIT intoWP:COMMONOUTCOMES. Somewhat brazenly (and neither for the first time or the fiftieth time), he set forth that the "honours" qualifying this mid-minors goalie with no distinction for an article was participating in the Hlinka tournament and in junior amateur championships, despite all-but-unanimous and ongoing consensus that such explicitly didn't meet the requirements of NHOCKEY. Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence that the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing12:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in thelist of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.• Gene93k (talk)19:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
