The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result wasdelete.Doczilla_{Ohhhhhh, no!}05:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Saint-Pete (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View log |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:NENTERTAINER, has so far been a participant in one series of a reality TV series, noWP:SIGCOV outside of that, soWP:SINGLEEVENT andWP:PSEUDO also applies. In the same way that we do not have articles for every participant on other reality shows (Big Brother for example), appearing on this show does not automatically assume notability.--woodensuperman08:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Television-related deletion discussions.--woodensuperman08:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Poland andEngland.WCQuidditch☎✎10:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. There's coverage (WP:INTERVIEW) level at major Polish TV station (TVN,[1]) and a few similar pieces at much less notable outlets. Borderline, but, somewhat surprisingly (to me, given the rather niche single role), not zero notability. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}02:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  But it's still relating to the single event.--woodensuperman08:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hence, weak qualifier for my keep._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}09:38, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Piotrus. ---Another Believer_(Talk)17:10, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as Piotrus has showed that there is coverage.DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)17:17, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Coverage does not equal notability asWP:INTERVIEW clearly demonstrates.--woodensuperman19:33, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Had trouble finding decent secondary sources seems to be a lot of social media posts.Agnieszka653 (talk)19:31, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)22:05, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Liz^Read!Talk!22:53, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Piotrus.Go D. Usopp(talk)05:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. FailsWP:BLP1E.4meter4 (talk)21:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the "Weak Keeps" are weak for a reason, and 4meter4 is on the right track with the fact thatWP:BLP1E is why this should be deleted.Iljhgtn (talk)22:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article'stalk page or in adeletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.