15 February 2026

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

RecentAfDs:    Today   Yesterday     February 13 (Fri)     February 12 (Thu)     February 11 (Wed)    More... Media  Organisations  Biography  Society  Web  Games  Science  Arts  Places  Indiscernible  Unsorted

Purge server cache

Calamity Jane (grunge band) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Of the current sources in the article:

1. Interview with a member, therefore a primary source
2. Also an interview
3. MusicBrainz, a directory listing which only verifies the existence of the album
4. A Consequence article which, while reliable, only mentions Calamity Jane in passing
5. A Substack post from one of the members
6. Blog posts from one of the members

Of these, only the Consequence article is independent coverage, but it's not significant as they are only name-dropped in passing.

"Gilly Ann Hanner" + "Calamity Jane" turned up only seven results on newspapers.com. Of them, onlythis review is significant third-party coverage. The rest were just routine name-drops of them as concert openers. Additionally, no results for "Gilly Ann Hanner" turn up at all outside Washington or Oregon, which is telling. CompareWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donora (band), where no results for that band turned up outside of their home state of Pennsylvania.

The only result for "Gilly Ann Hanner" + "Calamity Jane" on World Radio History was a passing name-drop in a music magazine, reviewing a separate project from 2000 in which Hanner was involved.

Google Books turned up multiple books about Nirvana which mention the concert at which Calamity Jane was an opener. However, the coverage is still extremely scant and mostly focused on Nirvana. To wit:

1. I Found My Friends is an oral history that interviews Gilly Ann Hanner, so it is a primary source.
2. Nirvana FAQ dedicates one paragraph, and at least has the decency to name the members, but still only talks about them in passing and focuses mainly on Nirvana.
3. The Rough Guide to Nirvana also dedicates a paragraph or two to the concert, but still says very little about Calamity Jane themselves.
4. Nirvana: The True Story dedicates a couple sentences, but then mostly dives into a recollection of the event by a person who appears to have been Nirvana's guitar tech. It also fails to mention anything about Calamity Jane other than that they were an opener.

The concert with Nirvana seems to be a pretty non-trivial moment in Nirvana's career, given how often it's brought up in material on Nirvana. But notability isWP:NOTINHERITED from asingle opening act gig that went wrong. Also, the fact that every mention of Calamity Jane centers on the singular Nirvana opener would suggestWP:BLP1E is at play here.

I could see a case for merging/redirecting toNirvana (band) orList of Nirvana concerts, especially given that this concert is not mentioned at all in their article despite multiple sources on Nirvana bringing it up. However, I don't see anything here suggesting that Calamity Jane themselves meet any criterion ofWP:NMUSIC or have otherwise crossed theWP:BLP1E threshhold.Ten Pound Hammer •^{(What did I screw up now?)}17:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Bands and musicians andOregon.Ten Pound Hammer •^{(What did I screw up now?)}17:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Third row seating (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Based on a review of sources I do not see SIGCOV beyond theuse-mention distinction, making me believe this topic does not have standalone notability.Historyexpert2 (talk)17:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Products-related deletion discussions.Historyexpert2 (talk)17:30, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Simply Slang (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Article was recently nominated forA7 speedy deletion, though I think there's a credible claim to significance. However, the article has been tagged for notability concerns since 2020, and I couldn't find sources to meet NMUSIC.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)17:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Music andIllinois.Significa liberdade(she/her) (talk)17:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dehati Disco (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Promo article of a Non-notable film, created by a now-blocked UPE, failsWP:GNG as the sources are mostly promotional in nature and press releases/announcements. Also failingWP:FILM, as the film is not widely distributed and has not received any award so far.Zuck28 (talk)05:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Dance,Film,Music,India, andUttar Pradesh.Zuck28 (talk)05:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect toList of Hindi films of 2022.Wp:ATD-R--~2026-86141-6 (talk)10:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: as above to the list of Hindi films from that year, seems fine.Oaktree b (talk)15:47, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect toList of Hindi films of 2022 as bestWP:ATD for otherwiseWP:NFILM fail.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)15:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as there are multiple reliable sources reviews of this film such as aTimes of India here,Rediff here,Film Information here, andNews India Times so thatWP:NFILM is passed and deletion or redirect is unnecessary in my view,Atlantic306 (talk)23:51, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Areview fromAmar Ujala which is reliable perWP:ICTF.Kelob2678 (talk)11:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Vanderwaalforces (talk)16:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not My Business (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:GNG.〜Festucalex •talk01:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Poetry andNigeria.〜Festucalex •talk01:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of the guidelines is this failing? I found several sources, includingJournal of Pristine (PDF),Journal of English Scholars’ Association of Nigeria, anda lecturer at Ibom State University.SenshiSun (talk)06:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A few literary analyses do not establish notability, that is done to many poems and literary works without making them individually notable. The poem can be discussed comfortably enough in the article about the poet.〜Festucalex •talk13:30, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in the GNG saying that literary analysis wouldn't count for notability. Reviews count as coverage for movies and music. As you are a far more experienced editor than I am, I trust your judgement but would like to know your reasoning.

Currently supportingmerge to poet's page per nominator.SenshiSun (talk)18:57, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the sources above. The first one can be accessed bysearching for its title in Google Scholar. Contrary to the nominator, literary analysis establishes the notability of literary works.Kelob2678 (talk)23:47, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV. The term also doesn't work as a redirect because it means several different things.Svartner (talk)02:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Vanderwaalforces (talk)16:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Azafran (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

A disambiguation page is not required. "Corrales azafran" is aWP:Partial title match. Redirecting toSaffron is not appropriate (Wikipedia:Redirects in languages other than English)Shhhnotsoloud (talk)16:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.Shellwood (talk)16:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in the Honorverse (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

I am an unashamedHonorverse fan. Which doesn't change the sad fact that this gigantic (250kb) list is pure unadulteratedWP:FANCRUFT, with just two primary references, and failsWP:NLIST. PerWP:ATD-R I suggest this is preserved in a redirect form (and fear not, fans, the content is generally better developed at honorverse wikia already)._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}05:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Fictional elements,Science fiction and fantasy, andLists._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}05:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Trim drastically to only major recurring characters, not every Tom, Dick and Harriet.Honorverse doesn't have any sort of character list.Clarityfiend (talk)06:31, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. This list is clearly non-notable with a lack of strong coverage and WAY too much fancruft, but a redirect preserves history if anyone wants to merge anything over later. As an anthology, unless there's a strong recurring cast, a list does not seem necessary here. Magneton Considerer:Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs)05:12, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply. It's not an anthology, and there is a recurring cast of characters.Clarityfiend (talk)19:28, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Per AFDISNOTCLEANUP, the sourcing needs improvement, but this is a highly notable series and the list, while extensive, is useful. It would be ridiculous for the primary article about the series to have this list, it was appropriately broken into a separate article. The comparison to the Wikia for the topic is apples and oranges. Might be worth trimming a bit, but frankly, “every Tom, Dick, and Harry” is a content discuss, not an AFD discussion. Per NLIST: “Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; and other guidelines on appropriate stand-alone lists.” Further, “The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.” Full stop, end of story. Keep the list, clean it up.Montanabw^(talk)02:40, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Passes theWP:TNT threshold as an in-universe mess of fancruft. Completely unsalvageable in its current state and would require a rewrite even if it is notable.ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)09:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Vanderwaalforces (talk)15:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Lacks sources establishing the notability of these characters as a group (rather than the notability of the fictional setting). Sandstein09:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Owen×☎15:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Laissez les bons temps rouler (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:GNG as there is only one source. CBS news is semi unreliable.Bryce M (talk)15:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Literature,Popular culture,United States of America, andLouisiana.Bryce M (talk)15:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Was any BEFORE conducted at all? Maybe books and news articles to draw on to expand the page, e.g.https://www.myneworleans.com/why-bon-temps-rouler/pburka (talk)16:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • NB: there appears to have been a previous discussion in 2016 (minor spelling variation) which was closed as "Redirect toMardi gras":Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laissez les bon temps roulerpburka (talk)16:28, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hậu Hoàng (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Lack of sigcov. Poorly sourced too with YouTube references.Go D. Usopp(talk)14:29, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Bands and musicians,Women,Internet, andVietnam.Go D. Usopp(talk)14:29, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Dance andEntertainment.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}14:30, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per OR and BLP. A completely unsourced "Private life" section is a gigantic red flag oforiginal research. It is alsopoorly sourced; a pile of unreliable citations are not enough for aBLP. There have been no efforts in the past five years to improve the sources. Remember, the burden of proof for a BLP is on the creator. Ping me if you findand add three better sources.Bearian (talk)18:29, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article was created on 31 January 2026, not five years ago. The article creator added a source toHậu Hoàng#Private life. Most of the sources are from reputable Vietnamese newspapers and news websites.Cunard (talk)10:44, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independentreliable sources. The subject passesWikipedia:Notability (people)#Basic criteria, which says:

  People are presumednotable if they have received significant coverage inmultiple publishedsecondary sources that arereliable,intellectually independent of each other, andindependent of the subject.

  • If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.

  Sources

  1. Thùy, Trang (2023-07-10).""Parody music sensation" Hau Hoang undergoes a sexy transformation".Người Lao Động [vi].Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Archived fromthe original on 2026-02-05. Retrieved2026-02-05 – via Vietnam.vn.

     The article notes: "Audiences are used to the playful, petite image of parody singer Hau Hoang, so her transformation into a more seductive look has attracted considerable attention. Hau Hoang (real name Hoang Thuy Hau, born in 1995) is known as a popular online content creator. Thanks to her humorous videos and parodies of popular songs, she is known by the audience as the "Queen of Parody Music". In addition to creating content across multiple platforms, YouTuber Hau Hoang has also ventured into the field of MC (presenter) and actively accepts invitations to participate in entertainment programs. This new job is the reason Hau Hoang decided to change her look with a more stylish and seductive fashion style. ... Hau Hoang is a former student of the Finance department at the Hanoi Academy of Finance. Her family has a tradition of working in the military. Her father currently holds the rank of Colonel, and her mother is a Lieutenant Colonel."

  2. "Hậu Hoàng gây sốc với nhan sắc hiện tại" [Hậu Hoàng causes surprise with her current look].Kênh 14 (in Vietnamese). 2025-01-16. Archived fromthe original on 2026-02-05. Retrieved2026-02-05.

     The article notes: "Với 8,3 triệu người đăng ký kênh YouTube, Hậu Hoàng (tên thật là Hoàng Thúy Hậu, sinh năm 1995) là một cái tên vô cùng quen thuộc với cư dân mạng, được mệnh danh là “thánh nữ nhạc chế”. Thời gian gần đây cô cũng được chú ý khi tham gia show Chị Đẹp Đạp Gió 2024 song phải dừng bước ở tập 11, để lại nhiều tiếc nuối cho khán giả. Mới đây, Hậu Hoàng đã gây bất ngờ cho netizen chỉ với đoạn clip vỏn vẹn 12s. Trong clip này, Hậu Hoàng có màn “lột xác” cực kỳ ấn tượng khi diện trang phục menswear nguyên “cây” đen, lối makeup nhấn vào mắt, kiểu tóc vuốt ngược cá tính và cực cool. Ngoài ra cô nàng còn đeo kính, kết hợp phụ kiện nên càng đẹp phi giới tính, trông chẳng khác nào bước ra từ truyện ngôn tình."

     From Google Translate: "With 8.3 million YouTube subscribers, Hau Hoang (real name Hoang Thuy Hau, born in 1995) is a very familiar name to netizens, dubbed the "queen of parody songs." Recently, she also gained attention for participating in the show "Beautiful Sisters Riding the Wind 2024," but had to stop at episode 11, leaving many viewers disappointed. Recently, Hau Hoang surprised netizens with a short 12-second clip. In this clip, Hau Hoang underwent a stunning transformation, wearing a complete black menswear outfit, with striking eye makeup, a stylish slicked-back hairstyle, and a cool demeanor. She also wore glasses and accessories, making her look even more androgynous and beautiful, like something straight out of a romance novel."

  3. Thùy, Trang (2021-10-17).""Nữ hoàng nhạc chế" của Vbiz: Hậu Hoàng kiếm tiền tỷ, Thiên An có kênh YouTube hơn 1 tỷ lượt xem" [The 'Queen of Parody Music' of V-pop: Hậu Hoàng earns billions, Thiên An has a YouTube channel with over 1 billion views].Dân Việt [vi] (in Vietnamese). Archived fromthe original on 2026-02-05. Retrieved2026-02-05.

     The article notes: "Xuất hiện trên YouTube lần đầu tiên vào năm 2017, đến nay kênh Hậu Hoàng hiện đang sở hữu 7,45 triệu lượt theo dõi và đạt khoảng 3 tỷ lượt xem trên toàn kênh. Cô chính thức trở thành Top 3 Nhà sáng tạo YouTube nổi bật 2020. Đây được xem là một thành tích đáng ngưỡng mộ khi vượt mặt cả một số người nổi tiếng như Sơn Tùng M-TP (2 tỷ lượt xem), Miss Thy (1,2 tỷ lượt xem). Nổi tiếng trong cộng đồng giới trẻ nhưng đến khi Hậu Hoàng tham gia chương trình Sao nhập ngũ, cô được công chúng biết đến nhiều hơn. Với tính cách hài hước và dễ thương, nữ YouTuber nhanh chóng chiếm được cảm tình của khán giả. Đáng chú ý, cặp đôi Hậu Hoàng và Mũi trưởng Long (Nguyễn Việt Long) được nhiều khán giả yêu thích. Những khoảnh khắc đáng yêu của cả hai đều trở thành "chất liệu" để các fan "đẩy thuyền". Thời gian gần đây, Hậu Hoàng mạnh dạn hơn trong việc tham gia các gameshow truyền hình và một số MV ca nhạc như Hết yêu thật sao (JSOL), Thanh xuân của tôi là bạn (Đức Phúc)..."

     From Google Translate: "Appearing on YouTube for the first time in 2017, Hau Hoang's channel currently boasts 7.45 million subscribers and approximately 3 billion views across all videos. She officially became one of the Top 3 prominent YouTube creators of 2020. This is considered an admirable achievement, surpassing even some famous figures like Son Tung M-TP (2 billion views) and Miss Thy (1.2 billion views). While already popular among young people, Hau Hoang gained even more public recognition after participating in the "Sao Nhap Ngu" (Celebrity Military Training) program. With her humorous and charming personality, the female YouTuber quickly won the hearts of viewers. Notably, the pairing of Hau Hoang and Sergeant Long (Nguyen Viet Long) was very popular with many viewers. Their adorable moments together became "material" for fans to "ship" them as a couple. Recently, Hau Hoang has been more actively participating in television game shows and music videos such as "Het Yeu That Sao" (JSOL), "Thanh Xuan Cua Toi La Ban" (Duc Phuc)..."

  4. Tiểu, Mai (2024-10-26)."4 năm sau "Sao nhập ngũ", nhan sắc Hậu Hoàng thay đổi thế nào mà khiến dân tình nhận không ra?" [Four years after ‘Sao nhập ngũ,’ Hậu Hoàng’s appearance has changed so much, fans barely recognise her!].Thanh Niên (in Vietnamese). Archived fromthe original on 2026-02-05. Retrieved2026-02-05.

     The article notes: "Sở hữu kênh Youtube với hơn 8 triệu người theo dõi và hơn 3 tỷ lượt xem, Hậu Hoàng (sinh năm 1995) được biết đến với danh xưng "thánh nữ nhạc chế" với những clip triệu view trên khắp các nền tảng. Cô cũng là một nhân vật hiếm hoi giữ vững phong độ trong suốt nhiều năm hoạt động trên MXH. Năm 2020, cái tên Hậu Hoàng càng phủ sóng mạnh mẽ hơn sau khi tham gia chương trình "Sao nhập ngũ". Khi đó Hậu Hoàng gây ấn tượng là một cô nàng "bé hạt tiêu" với tính cách nhí nhảnh, vui vẻ, là nhân tố gây cười xuyên suốt chương trình."

     From Google Translate: "With a YouTube channel boasting over 8 million subscribers and more than 3 billion views, Hau Hoang (born in 1995) is known as the "queen of parody music" with her viral videos across various platforms. She is also one of the rare figures who has maintained her popularity throughout many years of activity on social media. In 2020, Hau Hoang's name became even more widely known after participating in the show "Sao Nhap Ngu" (Celebrities in the Military). During the show, Hau Hoang impressed viewers as a petite and cheerful young woman, a constant source of humor throughout the program."

  5. Bạch, Dương (2022-08-06)."'Thánh nhạc chế' Hậu Hoàng từng bị cấm cản theo nghệ thuật nhưng giờ bố mẹ sẵn sàng 'đu trend' cùng con" ['Queen of Parody Music' Hậu Hoàng was once barred from the arts, but now her parents happily join her trends].Việt Nam News (in Vietnamese). Archived fromthe original on 2026-02-05. Retrieved2026-02-05.

     The article notes: "Được biết, Hậu Hoàng là cựu sinh viên ngành Tài chính của Học viện Tài chính Hà Nội. Gia đình của cô nàng vốn có truyền thống công tác trong ngành quân đội. Bố cô hiện mang hàm Đại tá còn mẹ là Trung tá. Trước đó, Hậu Hoàng được bố mẹ định hướng cho một công việc ổn định và nhàn hạ. Sau khi ra trường, 9X từng làm việc ở một công ty truyền thông nhưng chỉ vỏn vẹn được 3 tháng vì môi trường công sở không phù hợp với tích cách và sở thích của cô. Năm 2017, Hậu Hoàng bắt đầu sáng tác, biểu diễn và đăng tải các ca khúc nhạc chế trên YouTube như “Nhậu cũng là 1 đam mê”, “Lùn thì sao”, loạt “Tấm Cám chuyện Hậu Hoàng sắp kể”, “Sức mạnh của Sao Đỏ”... Dần dần, những clip nhạc chế của cô nhận được nhiều sự chú ý và có lượng xem lớn. Từ đầu năm 2020, Hậu Hoàng không còn chế nhạc trên những bản nhạc nổi tiếng của người khác nữa, cô đã tiến đến giới hạn xa hơn: tự hát nhạc mới do ekip tự sản xuất hoặc "đặt hàng". Hướng hát chế trên nền nhạc gốc do chính mình sở hữu của Hậu Hoàng là một điểm khác biệt của Vpop hiện nay."

     From Google Translate: "It is known that Hau Hoang is a former student of Finance at the Hanoi Academy of Finance. Her family has a tradition of working in the military. Her father currently holds the rank of Colonel, and her mother is a Lieutenant Colonel. Previously, her parents guided her towards a stable and easy job. After graduating, the 9X generation (born in the 1990s) worked at a media company for only 3 months because the office environment didn't suit her personality and interests. In 2017, Hau Hoang began composing, performing, and posting parody songs on YouTube such as "Drinking is also a passion," "So what if I'm short?", the "Tam Cam story that Hau Hoang is about to tell" series, "The Power of the Red Star," etc. Gradually, her parody music videos received a lot of attention and garnered a large number of views. From the beginning of 2020, Hau Hoang no longer parodied popular songs by other artists; she moved to a further limit: singing new songs produced or commissioned by her own team. Hau Hoang's approach of creating parodies on original music that she owns is a distinguishing feature in today's Vpop."

  There is sufficient coverage inreliable sources to allow Hậu Hoàng to passWikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage inreliable sources that areindependent of the subject".

  Cunard (talk)10:44, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources identified above that together show a pass ofWP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view,Atlantic306 (talk)00:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Vanderwaalforces (talk)15:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Why do folks keep shoving incomplete stubs into main space? Why don't they use AFC? Why are they wasting our time?Why do they want us to look silly? These are serious questions that need answering.Bearian (talk)08:13, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Cunard asWP:GNG is clearly met, but there are alsoWP:PROMO issues with the article, butWP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)13:51, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Owen×☎15:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thapar Polytechnic College (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Lacks sufficient sources to passWP:NSCHOOL andWP:GNGFilmssssssssssss (talk)15:01, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education,Schools,India, andPunjab.Shellwood (talk)15:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Engineering-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}15:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Y S College (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Lacks sufficient sources to passWP:NSCHOOL andWP:GNGFilmssssssssssss (talk)15:00, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education,Schools,India, andPunjab.Shellwood (talk)15:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

D.A.V. College, Jalandhar (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Lacks sufficient sources to passWP:NSCHOOL andWP:GNGFilmssssssssssss (talk)14:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education,Schools,India, andPunjab.Shellwood (talk)15:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rayat Institute of Engineering & Information Technology (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Lacks sufficient sources to passWP:NSCHOOL andWP:GNGFilmssssssssssss (talk)14:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education,Schools,India, andPunjab.Shellwood (talk)15:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Engineering andTechnology.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}15:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ipar adalah Maut the Series (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

All sources in the article seems to originate from a single event (press conference) on 1 October 2025, with multiple outlets publishing similar article within a narrow timeframe. PerWP:PRSOURCE, such source is not independent, also indicates one-off publicity rather than sustained coverage, failingWP:SUSTAINED.Ckfasdf (talk)04:12, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Television andIndonesia.WCQuidditch☎✎04:14, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Areview of the series, articles on the series ending[1][2], speculation about a potential second season[3]. And the news articles about its launch also shouldn't be dismissed as PR[4].Kelob2678 (talk)11:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit14:51, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 1st slogans (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Article based entirely on sources from the Chinese Communist Party. The topic may be notable but we’re not here to just republish official statements and authorized accounts. TNT applies.Mccapra (talk)22:44, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Politics andChina.Mccapra (talk)22:44, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:This book andthis book both include parts discussing them.NHCLS (talk)04:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Essentially a non-notable info dump of a page. FailingWP:SIGCOV and passing mentions are insufficient.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)19:54, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment.@Cunard: Given your Chinese language skills, what is your opinion on this one?4meter4 (talk)03:15, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Kelob2678 (talk)12:39, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,✗plicit14:50, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yiğitcan Gölboyu (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

I tried prodding this twice, my bad. I believe he failsWP:SPORTCRIT, never having played in his country's highest league, andWP:GNG because all the coverage isWP:ROUTINE. This goes for[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10]. Is there anything ofactual substance? The closest I get is an injury report[11][12]. Opinions need to explain where there is significant coverage, if any.Geschichte (talk)13:36, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Sportspeople,Football, andTurkey.Shellwood (talk)13:54, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Peter of Enghien (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Unsourced since 2005. Foreign wikis appear to use a genealogy source. FailsWP:GNG. Suggest a redirect or merge toCount of Lecce perWP:ATD.4meter4 (talk)12:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Italy-related deletion discussions.4meter4 (talk)12:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:History andRoyalty and nobility.Shellwood (talk)13:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

K Muralikrishna (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Failing GNG, due to a lack of significant coverage in independent sources, also failsWp:CREATIVE.Zuck28 (talk)07:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:People,Actors and filmmakers,India,Karnataka, andOdisha.Zuck28 (talk)07:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

He could passWikipedia:DIRECTOR, though, don’t you think? Three of his films have a page on this Wiki. Odia cinema articles are generally not the easiest to source but coverage about his films includeshttps://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2016/Jun/03/agastya-is-a-tale-of-love-and-values-says-ollywood-superstar-anubhav-mohanty-936291.htmlhttps://www.newindianexpress.com/states/odisha/2016/Jun/09/bong-beauty-rocking-in-odia-film-industry-938485.htmlhttps://www.mycitylinks.in/ollywoods-dussehra-dhamaka-2024Keep?~2026-86141-6 (talk)19:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merely having an article on Wikipedia doesn't mean the subject is notable; here, the concern is significant coverage in independent sources, possibly including the films' articles, which may also be missing.Zuck28 (talk)20:05, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I'm not familiar with the reliability of the sources, except one.Bearian (talk)18:38, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)11:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Passes WP:ENT as he has directed notable films.IJA (talk)16:27, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Acting Ka Bhoot (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Non-notable film, fails GNG andWp:NFILM, due to the lack of Independent reliable sources. Previously soft deleted at an Afd,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acting Ka Bhoot but recreated after a short time. Possible COI/ UPE involvement as the previous creator is now blocked as a UPE. Pinging @DreamRimmer.Zuck28 (talk)06:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Film,India,Maharashtra, andUttar Pradesh.Zuck28 (talk)06:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable reviews, only found[13].DareshMohan (talk)03:36, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Then, for verifiably released films with notable cast,Wikipedia:ATD-R should be identified andredirect toList of Hindi films of 2023 is the obvious one for this one.~2026-87553-1 (talk)13:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)11:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kirk Perron (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Contested redirect. I don't see any evidence of Perron's notability that isn't related to Jamba Juice, and he's mentioned there.StarMississippi03:35, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.StarMississippi03:35, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of California-related deletion discussions.WCQuidditch☎✎03:55, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the coverage is on both the man and the smoothies.Bearian (talk)15:29, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)10:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Stylophore (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Multiple issues — almost all of the sources are links to encyclopedias, dictionaries, and, in one instance each, a Google search and the Book of Revelation. The article is not written appropriately and LLM involvement is suspected. It is a clearWP:TNT target, and I would have blanked the current text and left a stub had I been able to find any suitable sources for this subject. Having failed to do so, I bring it to AfD.Einsof (talk)03:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Architecture-related deletion discussions.WCQuidditch☎✎03:58, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment (probably keep) I think this has not been written using LLM. Rather, it has been translated fromru:Стилофор where it had previously been developed normally. At this stage I think to keep because the references are more than passing, but I'll consider further to see if I change my mind.Thincat (talk)10:00, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finding a book^[1] (found online) with a note "Une version assez différente de cet article a été publiée dans le "Bulletin annuel du Centre international d'études romanes", 1998, p. 251-290. - Extrait de : "Arte medievale", (2002)no 2". Also an article^[2]. Rather obscure but quite sufficient forkeep.Thincat (talk)11:27, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The Russian article is by the same user and may have been started as a translation fromw:it:stiloforo, which also does not have appropriate sources. These sources you mention seem hard to track down digitally, but I did also findhttps://journals.openedition.org/frontieres/450?lang=en, which at least has a paragraph about them but does not really offer a definition. There may be a definitional problem here becausewikt:en:styophore actually defines the term as the same or similar as acaryatid. The French definitionwikt:fr:stylophore refers to lions but is circular. The Italian definitionwikt:it:stiloforo at least gives something definite (an animal or monster at the base of a column), but in the absence of any usage of the word in English it seems like OR to me to base an en-wiki article on that.Einsof (talk)15:14, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am elderly and British so (1) I know what aStylophone is and I originally thought this might have been a typo, and (2) I know what acaryatid is – but I'd never seen or heard of astylophore. It isn't OR unless you simply mean there is unreferenced material. Finally, (3) my writing style seems alien to many (most) editors here – a bit like a LLM!Thincat (talk)15:59, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• This is a) a real architectural term b) a more common term in zoology, and c) of rather limited use, with few existing sources. It might be best just to redirect toGlossary of architecture, creating a new cited entry there. If enough decent sources can be found, an article is possible but as it stands, we can say little more than a dictionary, andWP:NOTDICT would apply.Chiswick Chap (talk)19:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Needs a rewrite but sufficiently passing GNG.Zuck28 (talk)04:45, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)10:23, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• I dropped a notification toWikipedia:WikiProject Architecture (probably should have done that from the outset).Einsof (talk)13:45, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: A brief of scan ofGoogle Scholar shows extensive use of the term in academic literature. Also, this article is better sourced than many other articles on architectural elements/terms.
  • Question: Aren't encyclopedias and dictionaries the sources we're supposed to use for articles?Prburley (talk)

    Encyclopedias and dictionaries, beingtertiary sources, can supplement Wikipedia articles but are not supposed to be the main foundation on which they are built. We are mainly supposed to use secondary sources, whichBechamel has been adding to this article since the AfD started.

    • Thanks for the clarification, I'm going to read those guidelines. I catalog a lot of encyclopedias at work, they straddle primary, secondary, tertiary, and outright nonsense.Prburley (talk)
• Keep - Clearly a notable topic. Just take a look at google books and google scholar.IJA (talk)16:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Endemic COVID-19 (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

DeleteEndemic COVID-19. This article is aWP:POVFORK of the mainCOVID-19 andCOVID-19 pandemic articles. Whether COVID-19 is endemic is a subject of ongoing scientific debate, not a settled separate topic warranting a standalone article.

By creating a page titled "Endemic COVID-19", the article inherently violatesWP:NPOV by presenting a contested hypothesis as a distinct reality. The content relies onWP:SYNTH, combining definitions and opinion pieces to advance a narrative that contradicts major health organizations (like the WHO, which still classifies it as a pandemic). Relevant information about the transition to endemicity belongs in the "Epidemiology" section of the main article, not here.

Furthermore, the article creates a false dichotomy and violatesWP:NOTSOAPBOX by potentially pushing a specific narrative regarding public health policy.Worstbull (talk)09:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Politics,COVID-19, andMedicine.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}10:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

England VS Scotland Rugby Union 2026 (Six Nations) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

We don't usually have an individual article for a Six Nations/Calcutta Cup match and, looking at the coverage, I don't see this match being any more notable than the last few meetings between these two teams. Scotland had won 4 out of the previous 5 Calcutta Cup matches so their win was not a huge, huge shock or anything. I can't judge this event againstWP:LASTING as it only happened yesterday. If this does somehow passWP:GNG orWP:SPORTSEVENT and qualifies for a stand-alone article, then it should be moved to2026 Scotland versus England rugby union match to follow the format of1971 Scotland versus England rugby union match. Scotland should be first in the title as they were the home side.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Events,Rugby union,England, andScotland.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:42, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – PerWP:INDISCRIMINATE.Svartner (talk)11:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sybarite Jewellery (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

This page was created in 2021 byan SPA with the name Ostashevskiy. It was tagged immediately as having questionable notability, and none of the subsequent edits has resolved this. I can find no significant coverage of the company beyond native advertising in trade and lifestyle magazines, mentions in articles covering trade fairs, and mentions of awards which appear to only be given to paid subscribers. The fact that thepage is an orphan (other than being linked from a disambiguation page) adds to my doubts about its notability.~dom Kaos~ (talk)09:38, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Companies andEngland.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Panama, Indiana (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

I'm not coming up with any documentation of this place, and from StreetView it looks like a bunch of vacation cottages. Perhaps someone else can find something.Mangoe (talk)02:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Geography andIndiana.WCQuidditch☎✎04:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein09:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – Per nom.Svartner (talk)11:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - "... no cottages appear until one reaches what is known as "Panama". This was named by Lloyd Waterhouse, who laid out this section about 1908. It gives the appearance of a small village, since he left a street between every four cottages. The first cottage was erected here by John Helmkamp , of Fort Wayne . This is cottage 143. The following year the Clemens cottage , No. 144 , was built . It is still occupied by Mrs. Clara Clemens , one of the few cottages which are now occupied by the ori- ginal builders . In 1914 Theodore Geller and his daughter Louise built the large frame building , which served as living quarters bakery , grocery store and green house . The bakery and store were closed out in the late 20s , but Louise Geller , who survived her father by many years, continued to operate the greenhouse until her death — about 1942." inThe 1955 History of Steuben County, Indiana. Any chance there is some sort of historical conservation thing applicable here? --Soman (talk)11:49, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with nom. Don't see much significant coverage while searching - failsWP:GNG.Asteramellus (talk)12:48, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mighty Warriors (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

As noted ina related AfD, I cannot find any RS for this that go beyond confirming it is not a hoax - i.e. that it is notable. If nothing can be found,WP:ATD-R gives us a good target:Games Workshop#Warhammer Fantasy universe. Additional notes: the article currently only has a ref to a user-generated catalogue (BGG) that common-sense is ok to confirm this is not a hoax, but doesn't help withWP:GNG.Courtesy ping to users who commented in related AfD where we discussed this game:User:Daranios,User:Robert Wellock,User:Schützenpanzer_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}01:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Science fiction and fantasy,Games, andUnited Kingdom._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}01:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Per the related AfD forUltra Marines,Mighty Warriors is a standalone product, not a supplement. It belongs to theWarhammer Fantasy setting, making the proposed redirect to the Warhammer 40,000 section a significant category error. As noted previously, the 1991 introductory line (Mighty Warriors,Kerrunch,Space Fleet,Ultra Marines) was a mechanically distinct market expansion. Reliable sources such as theBell of Lost Souls (Nov 2025) retrospective confirm the standalone status and historical standing of these individual titles. Primary documentation for Mighty Warriors establishes a ruleset entirely discrete from the 1989Advanced Heroquest D12 system. Standardising these nodes is an ongoing project to correct the 1989/1991 provenance.Robert Wellock (talk)06:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Sigh. Your comment has no bearing on the issue raised (WP:GNG) and you don't even read the nom, it appears (since the proposed redirect is not to 40k but to WF)._{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}13:31, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• There are reviews in the article which this nomination doesn't seem to acknowledge.keep.Hobit (talk)20:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein09:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan Orienteering Association (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Two sentences permastub that completely failsWP:NORG. No secondary sources. No evidence of significant in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources.AusLondonder (talk)08:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Organizations,Sports, andPakistan.AusLondonder (talk)08:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV.Svartner (talk)11:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus Orienteering Federation (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:NORG as lacking significant in-depth coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Belarusian Wikipedia article is completely unsourced.AusLondonder (talk)08:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Organizations,Sports, andBelarus.AusLondonder (talk)08:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV.Svartner (talk)11:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Loujazz Bravo (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Despite previous PROD and speedy deletion, this continues to be recreated. I can find no evidence of a passing ofWP:GNG orWP:NMUSICIAN. MyWP:BEFORE only yielded social media when searching the multiple variations of his name. He is not notable as a rapper, songwriter or 'gangster'.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}08:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Bands and musicians andUganda.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}08:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This article appears to fail bothWP:GNG andWP:NMUSICIAN.IJA (talk)16:37, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nomination. Also, potentially look atWP:SALT due to it being previously deleted and recreated 3 times now within a very short period. I suspect the author will keep trying to create this article, as they have done, if something more permanent isn't put in place.Nyxion³⁰³💬 Talk17:04, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Winpdb (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

No evidence that this is notable.ArthurTheGardener (talk)07:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Software-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}08:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian_Bandy_Federation (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Federation was dissolved perhttps://pozirk.online/en/news/92806/ and does not seem notable enough to still be on wikipedia in its stub form just in past tense 06:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Organizations,Sports, andBelarus.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}08:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect toBelarus national bandy team asWP:ATD.Geschichte (talk)13:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yoonchae (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:GNG,WP:SINGER, andWP:BANDMEMBER due to the lack ofsignificant independent coverage establishing individual notability. Existing sources consist primarily ofpassing mentions in reporting related toKatseye and/orDream Academy, including routine and/or trivial information that is derivative and/or contextually driven. AWP:BEFORE search was performed however doesn't indicates otherwise.—Paper9oll(🔔 •📝)06:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:People,Bands and musicians,Women,Korea, andSouth Korea.—Paper9oll(🔔 •📝)06:35, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. This is a case ofWP:TOOSOON and the page should be draftified. —Cactoideae♫♪ (talk)07:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of California-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:03, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify andredirect to Katseye. Too soon, there is barely anything here that demonstrates her notability outside the group.orangesclub🍊09:46, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, leaving history intact, andstrong oppose draftifying. Per the above !votes, it seems that consensus is that Yoonchae lacks individual notability, such that she doesn't meetWP:GNG or is aWP:NOPAGE situation. Fine. But that being the case, what's the point in draftifying it? The !votes above offer no rationale for that. Either she's notable enough for a page, in which case the article should remain, or she isn't, in which case we delete the page or leave the article history intact and redirect the page to the band.WP:DRAFTNO point 4 says that draftification should not be used it"there is no chance that the article can be improved to the point that is suitable for mainspace; problems that can't be fixed are reasons for deletion", and lacking notability surely qualifies for that criterion. This has been draftified repeatedly without explanation, and that's unfair on those who then try to work on the article, if the consensus is that this doesn't qualify for an article at this point in time. If that situation changes, the history is right there under the redirect where we need it.  — Amakuru (talk)15:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kha with inverted breve (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

It should be redirected with mention at target, that would beKha (Cyrillic). It does not meet SIGCOV and it is just a CONTENTFORK. It was recreated for some reason.Earth605^talk06:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Language-related deletion discussions.I am bad at usernames (talk·contribs)06:51, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Astron Health (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Company doesn't appear to meetWP:NCORP guidelines - BEFORE shows fairly limited sources that aren't promotional or primary in nature. Article is written in a promotional tone and sources are mostly primary or promotional in nature - and the academic ones do not directly mention this company at all.

There's even an instance where the source for the "Polaris research report" is a misnomer - it's about an evaluation of cancer patients in astudy called POLARIS.netstars22 (talk)05:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Companies,Biology,Medicine, andEngland.netstars22 (talk)05:55, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish American businesspeople in real estate (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Yet another article that was not actually nominated for deletion despite the AfD template being on the page (the template was meant forList of Jewish American businesspeople and linked to that article's AfD, not this article, and no AfD discussion was ever started for this one).

FailsWP:PEOPLELIST, per the same rationale ofWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American businesspeople andWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American businesspeople in financeApexParagon (talk)05:54, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Businesspeople,Lists of people,Judaism, andUnited States of America.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}08:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. What does religion or ethnicity have to do with real estate in general?Clarityfiend (talk)11:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Bergfelder (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Is he really notable? The article cites one reference (his university bio), Google News comes up with almost nothing, and Google Scholar has some citations but not a huge number. He's a professor who has written a number of books, but can we argue that his "research has had a significant impact in [his] scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources", persuant to criterion #1 ofWP:PROF? Given the lack of independent reliable sources I would argue no.Uhooep (talk)04:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I created the page because I noticed he is cited quite a few times in Wikipedia. Why would Wikipedia cite nonnotable people? I dont know how to look for citation index, but ResearchGate reports 391 citations, I nave no idea, is this high? --Altenmann>talk04:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Academics and educators,Film,History, andEngland.WCQuidditch☎✎04:53, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A strong and easy pass ofWP:AUTHOR through many published book reviews (each of which is also the kind of in-depth sourcing about the subject's contributions that providesWP:GNG notability). An incomplete list of book reviews:[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23]/[24],[25]/[26],[27],[28]. —David Eppstein (talk)08:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Easily passesWP:AUTHOR. Just take a look at google books and google scholar. This individual has clearly contributed a lot to his field of academia.IJA (talk)16:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jewish American businesspeople in retail (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

This article was not actually nominated for deletion despite the AfD template being on the page (the template was meant forList of Jewish American businesspeople and linked to that article's AfD, not this article, and no AfD discussion was ever started for this one).

FailsWP:PEOPLELIST, per the same rationale ofWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American businesspeople andWikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American businesspeople in financeApexParagon (talk)04:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Businesspeople,Lists of people,Judaism, andUnited States of America.WCQuidditch☎✎04:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. About as valid asList of redheaded American businesspeople in retail.Clarityfiend (talk)12:01, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Endpoint security (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

It looks like there have been challenges with keeping it free ofWP:PROMO and maintainingWP:NPOV, even fromthe start.Most of the sources here are promotional in nature (usually sourced from some vendor's website or something - I count at least 9 that are just links to some cybersecurity vendor). And then theAISIGNS startshowing up in later revisions (including retained prompt language):

Endpoint security is a constantly evolving field, primarily because adversaries never cease innovating their strategies. A foundational step in fortifying defenses is to grasp the myriad pathways adversaries exploit to compromise endpoint devices. Here are a few of the most used methods:

netstars22 (talk)03:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Technology,Computing, andSoftware.netstars22 (talk)03:41, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because topic is clearly notable. Maybe we need to protect it?WidgetKid^converse05:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: I'm definitely not disputing the notability - however at the state it's been and is currently in (especially with the LLM content),I'm of the frame that this is aWP:TNT (unless one can rescue it in this state).netstars22 (talk)05:51, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Kumar S. Haripad (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Non-notable Author to passWP:AUTHOR. Non-notable awards. Nothing significant improvement after the 1st nomination.WP:NEWSORGINDIA issue persists.SatnaamIN (talk)02:59, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:People,Authors,Poetry, andIndia.SatnaamIN (talk)03:00, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Kerala-related deletion discussions.SatnaamIN (talk)03:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctlytranscluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it toWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 February 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}03:25, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Avalon (TV series) (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:GNG, it's a show that never got picked up after being dropped. It's production history is not notable, it's cancellation is not notable. Plenty of shows get nipped in the bud despite initially being planned to happen, but this doesn't make them notable productions.Avalon is applicable there.Rusted AutoParts03:12, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Television andCalifornia.WCQuidditch☎✎04:32, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Ahmednagar (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:NSCHOOLFilmssssssssssss (talk)03:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Schools andMaharashtra.WCQuidditch☎✎04:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Education-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:05, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmednagar College (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:NSCHOOLFilmssssssssssss (talk)03:09, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Schools andMaharashtra.WCQuidditch☎✎04:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education andChristianity.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}09:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chalo Trust School (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2020. Fails in GNG as wellWP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield a single source with atleast a mention, leave aside SIGCOV. Found only directorial listings and social media handles.BhikhariInformer (talk)03:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Education andSchools.BhikhariInformer (talk)03:06, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Africa-related deletion discussions.WCQuidditch☎✎04:34, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Toporovski (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

nn bio;WP:SINGLEEVENT, the bio contains nothing beyondToporovski collection controversy --Altenmann>talk02:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Arts,Crime,Belgium, andRussia.WCQuidditch☎✎04:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect toToporovski collection controversy: Not independently notable outside of the controversy —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr)08:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hubie Smith (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

I could not find wide secondary coverage regarding this individual. Only primary database sources and community newspaper postings.Historyexpert2 (talk)01:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of People-related deletion discussions.Historyexpert2 (talk)01:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Sportspeople,Basketball, andTennessee.Shellwood (talk)01:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• del - no in-depth coverage, also failsWP:NCOLLATH. --Altenmann>talk02:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks the realWP:SIGCOV needed forWP:ANYBIO to be kept. Possibly redirect to one of the schools with most championships. If we end up going that direction and we can decide on a redirect target, ping me please.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)03:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Silvia Folloni (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Subject fails to meet theWP:GNG because of a lack ofWP:SIGCOV from reliable, independent sources.Let'srun (talk)01:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Sportspeople,Women,Cycling, andItaly.Let'srun (talk)01:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV.Svartner (talk)11:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Sanders (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

FailsWP:GNG, particularly the significant coverage criteria (none of the refs talk specifically about the character).Poirot09 (talk)13:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.Poirot09 (talk)13:39, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Film-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}16:19, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect' toOdd Man Rush (film). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}01:56, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)00:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect' toOdd Man Rush (film) asWP:FANCRUFT not otherwise notable enough for a character page.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)03:12, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Mansker (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Subject fails to meet theWP:GNG because of a lack ofWP:SIGCOV from reliable, independent sources covering the subject in depth.Let'srun (talk)00:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Sportspeople,Cycling, andUnited States of America.Let'srun (talk)00:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV.Svartner (talk)11:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Per lack ofWP:SIGCOV. Also note that the creator of thin article "... user has been banned indefinitely from editing the English Wikipedia by the community. Administrators," for what appears to be more than one offense— Maile (talk)14:58, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Next Salahuddin (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

The film does not appear to be notable, with no independent coverage outside of reviews, which are quoting from the producers anyway. Article is also likely AI generated; funnily enough the entire article makes no mention of Palestine despite that being the subject of the film.SecretSpectre (talk)11:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Film andArtificial intelligence.SecretSpectre (talk)11:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "no independent coverage outside of reviews" Uh, sorry, what? The film is said to be the first Pk production entirely AI-generated, so meetsWP:NFIC in my view. A redirect either toList of Pakistani films of 2025] orCultural discourse about the Gaza genocide seems pretty clearlywarranted if a standalone page is not judged apppropriate.--~2026-33418-5 (talk)11:45, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  My main concern is it does not appear to be notable enough for any source to give a critical review of the film. In fact, I could only find a single source which gave a synopsis. All the sources I've found just say it... exists. Yes, it's the first AI generated film in Pakistan, but why is that significant? Is it the first of hundreds or will it remain the only one? Does it pioneer a technique in film which is used in the future? There currently isn't enough information from reliable secondary sources to say.WP:TOOSOON might apply here.SecretSpectre (talk)11:51, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  There are many AI Generated video and movies made by other studios its the first movie that launched by a cinema and flopped.Wahabsubzwari (talk)10:18, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}12:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The film is flopped hardly 11 passes sold in last week no credibility no box office nothing. you cant find about anything related to movie online just a personal branding on some pages.Wahabsubzwari (talk)10:16, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this isn't the first AI generated film--just Pakistan's first AI generated film. It also does not have solid secondary sources.Agnieszka653 (talk)17:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)00:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete insufficient independent coverage. --Altenmann>talk02:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete peruser:Agnieszka653 and the fail ofWP:NFILM more broadly.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)03:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Goldman and Garrett Donovan (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

Article about a television writing team, notproperly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for television writers. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have jobs, and must be shown to have specific noteworthy achievements, supported byWP:GNG-worthy coverage in reliable sources, to establish that they're more special than other people who also have jobs. But as written, this essentially amounts to "writers who exist" rather than "writers who have earned X, Y or Z distinction", and citesonly a single news brief about them leaving one show's writing team for sourcing. But one footnote isn't enough to get them over GNG all by itself, and the article doesn't say anything about them that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to pass GNG.Bearcat (talk)15:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Authors,Film, andUnited States of America.Bearcat (talk)15:11, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in thelist of Television-related deletion discussions.Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)}16:17, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat Hello. You don't think that sources are enough to prove they meetWikipedia:CREATIVE?Nobody's Watching is very much their baby and their other contributions to notable series (includingCommunity) seem sufficiently important. Examples of coverage to prove that (and not GNG passdirectly) include:https://screencrush.com/community-season-4-writers/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-reviews/superior-donuts-review-971121/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/kevin-hart-comedy-snapped-up-644011/ I would tend to think we canKeep a page about them.~2026-33418-5 (talk)16:38, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, it's not my job toguess that other sourcesmight existbeyond what's actually beenshown to exist. If you think that a topic has enough sources to get a Wikipedia article, then it'syour job touse those sources in the article, not my job topresume that there are more sources out there that nobody has ever bothered to cite at all.
Secondly, it isn't necessarily enough that a sourcementions their names — there's a certain level of "about them" that a source has to pass before it counts as a notability builder, and not every web page that has their name in it necessarily always passes that level, so not every web page you can find with their name in it necessarily counts as proof of notability. It's also questionable whetherScreen Crush would count as areliable source at all, as it's not a well-known or well-established media outlet of record.
So if you can fix the article with properly reliable sources that are about them, then just fix it rather than giving me a hard time for assessing the article as inadequate in its existing state.Bearcat (talk)16:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wooow....Is there any reason for you to reply like that? With that attitude and tone?I amgiving you a hard time for assessing the article as inadequate in its existing state??? By simply asking you your opinion after presenting sources? No way I am replying here anymore or edit that page. You're most welcome, congratulations, goodbye.~2026-33418-5 (talk)16:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I tried searching for similar duos, and all I've found are double acts likeFry and Laurie orAbbott and Costello. Two people who write together isn't the same thing as a double act. It does appear that they have landed multiple television gigs as producers for shows over the years, but all of these are press releases.Dateline,Vulture,Deadline.

Abstaiing from voting at this time.SenshiSun (talk)18:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - poorly sourced; one possibly unreliable citation is not enough for aBLP. Ping me if you findand add three better sources.Bearian (talk)08:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,Svartner (talk)00:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Arabella Mall (edit |talk |history |protect |delete |links |watch |logs |views) – (View AfD |edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL)

No indication of notability for this mall. This article was previously deleted for unambiguous promotion, by the same editor.JTtheOG (talk)00:08, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Prev Del: 12:57, January 20, 2026user:Justlettersandnumbersdeleted page Arabella Mall (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) --Altenmann>talk02:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in thedeletion sorting lists for the following topics:Shopping malls andJordan.Shellwood (talk)00:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

del - no indepedent coverage. --Altenmann>talk02:17, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I have said at other shopping mall pages which lack reason for an encyclopedic article, this has at mostWP:ROUTINE andWP:ROTM mentions. Delete it.Iljhgtn(they/them ·talk)03:14, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no in-depth coverage, no indication that this might meetWP:NCORP. Note: this version is substantially different from the excessively promotional one I deleted earlier asWP:G11.Justlettersandnumbers (talk)11:57, 15 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia deletion

• Noindexed pages