TheWeber–Fechner laws are two relatedscientific laws in the field ofpsychophysics, known asWeber's law andFechner's law. Both relate to human perception, more specifically the relation between the actual change in a physicalstimulus and the perceived change. This includes stimuli to all senses: vision, hearing, taste, touch, and smell.
Ernst Heinrich Weber states that "the minimum increase of stimulus which will produce a perceptible increase of sensation isproportional to the pre-existent stimulus," whileGustav Fechner's law is an inference from Weber's law (with additional assumptions) which states that the intensity of our sensation increases as thelogarithm of an increase in energy rather than as rapidly as the increase.[1]
Both Weber's law and Fechner's law were formulated byGustav Theodor Fechner (1801–1887). They were first published in 1860 in the workElemente der Psychophysik (Elements of Psychophysics). This publication was the first work ever in this field, and where Fechner coined the termpsychophysics to describe the interdisciplinary study of how humans perceive physical magnitudes.[2] He made the claim that "...psycho-physics is an exact doctrine of the relation of function or dependence between body and soul."[3]
Ernst Heinrich Weber (1795–1878) was one of the first persons to approach the study of the human response to aphysical stimulus in aquantitative fashion. Fechner was a student of Weber and named his first law in honor of his mentor, since it was Weber who had conducted the experiments needed to formulate the law.[4]
Fechner formulated several versions of the law, all communicating the same idea. One formulation states:
Simple differential sensitivity is inversely proportional to the size of the components of the difference; relative differential sensitivity remains the same regardless of size.[2]
What this means is that the perceived change in stimuli is inversely proportional to the initial stimuli.
Weber's law also incorporates thejust-noticeable difference (JND). This is the smallest change in stimuli that can be perceived. As stated above, the JNDdS is proportional to the initial stimuli intensityS. Mathematically, it can be described aswhere is the reference stimulus and is a constant.[5] When plotted, this relation is a straight line with zero intercept. It may be written asΨ =k logS, withΨ being the sensation, being a constant, and being the physical intensity of the stimulus.
Weber's law always fails at low intensities, near and below the absolute detection threshold, and often also at high intensities, but may be approximately true across a wide middle range of intensities.[6]
Although Weber's law includes a statement of the proportionality of a perceived change to initial stimuli, Weber only refers to this as a rule of thumb regarding human perception. It was Fechner who formulated this statement as a mathematical expression referred to asWeber contrast.[2][7][8][9]
Weber contrast is not part of Weber's law.[2][7]
Fechner noticed in his own studies that different individuals have different sensitivity to certain stimuli. For example, the ability to perceive differences in light intensity could be related to how good that individual's vision is.[2] He also noted that how the human sensitivity to stimuli changes depends on which sense is affected. He used this to formulate another version of Weber's law that he nameddie Maßformel, the "measurement formula". Fechner's law states that the subjective sensation is proportional to the logarithm of the stimulus intensity. According to this law, human perceptions of sight and sound work as follows: Perceived loudness/brightness is proportional to logarithm of the actual intensity measured with an accurate nonhuman instrument.[7]
The relationship between stimulus and perception islogarithmic. This logarithmic relationship means that if a stimulus varies as ageometric progression (i.e., multiplied by a fixed factor), the corresponding perception is altered in anarithmetic progression (i.e., in additive constant amounts). For example, if a stimulus is tripled in strength (i.e.,3 × 1), the corresponding perception may be two times as strong as its original value (i.e.,1 + 1). If the stimulus is again tripled in strength (i.e.,3 × 3 × 1), the corresponding perception will be three times as strong as its original value (i.e.,1 + 1 + 1). Hence, for multiplications in stimulus strength, the strength of perception only adds. The mathematical derivations of the torques on a simple beam balance produce a description that is strictly compatible with Weber's law.[10][11]
Since Weber's law fails at low intensity, so does Fechner's law.[6]
An early reference to "Fechner's ... law" was in 1875 byLudimar Hermann inElements of Human Physiology.[12]
Fechner's law is a mathematical derivation of Weber contrast.
Integrating the mathematical expression for Weber contrast gives:
where is aconstant of integration andln is thenatural logarithm.
To solve for, assume that the perceived stimulus becomes zero at some threshold stimulus. Using this as a constraint, set and. This gives:
Substituting in the integrated expression for Weber's law, the expression can be written as:
The constant k is sense-specific and must be determined depending on the sense and type of stimulus.[7]
Weber and Fechner conducted research on differences in light intensity and the perceived difference in weight.[2] Other sense modalities provide only mixed support for either Weber's law or Fechner's law.
Weber found that thejust noticeable difference (JND) between two weights was approximately proportional to the weights. Thus, if the weight of 105 g can (only just) be distinguished from that of 100 g, the JND (or differential threshold) is 5 g. If the mass is doubled, the differential threshold also doubles to 10 g, so that 210 g can be distinguished from 200 g. In this example, a weight (any weight) seems to have to increase by 5% for someone to be able to reliably detect the increase, and this minimum required fractional increase (of 5/100 of the original weight) is referred to as the "Weber fraction" for detecting changes in weight. Other discrimination tasks, such as detecting changes in brightness, or in tone height (pure tone frequency), or in the length of a line shown on a screen, may have different Weber fractions, but they all obey Weber's law in that observed values need to change by at least some small but constant proportion of the current value to ensure human observers will reliably be able to detect that change.
Fechner did not conduct any experiments on how perceived heaviness increased with the mass of the stimulus. Instead, he assumed that all JNDs are subjectively equal, and argued mathematically that this would produce a logarithmic relation between the stimulus intensity and the sensation. These assumptions have both been questioned.[13][14] Following the work of S. S. Stevens, many researchers came to believe in the 1960s that theStevens's power law was a more general psychophysical principle than Fechner's logarithmic law.
Weber's law does not quite hold forloudness. It is a fair approximation for higher intensities, but not for lower amplitudes.[15]
Weber's law does not hold at perception of higher intensities. Intensity discrimination improves at higher intensities. The first demonstration of the phenomena was presented by Riesz in 1928, in Physical Review. This deviation of the Weber's law is known as the "near miss" of the Weber's law. This term was coined by McGill and Goldberg in their paper of 1968 in Perception & Psychophysics. Their study consisted of intensity discrimination in pure tones. Further studies have shown that the near miss is observed in noise stimuli as well. Jesteadt et al. (1977)[16] demonstrated that the near miss holds across all the frequencies, and that the intensity discrimination is not a function of frequency, and that the change in discrimination with level can be represented by a single function across all frequencies:.[16]
The eye sensesbrightness approximately logarithmically over a moderate range andstellar magnitude is measured on a logarithmic scale.[17]This magnitude scale was invented by the ancient Greek astronomerHipparchus in about 150 B.C. He ranked the stars he could see in terms of their brightness, with 1 representing the brightest down to 6 representing the faintest, though now the scale has been extended beyond these limits; an increase in 5 magnitudes corresponds to a decrease in brightness by a factor of 100.[17]Modern researchers have attempted to incorporate such perceptual effects into mathematical models of vision.[18][19]
Perception ofGlass patterns[20] and mirror symmetries in the presence of noise follows Weber's law in the middle range of regularity-to-noise ratios (S), but in both outer ranges, sensitivity to variations is disproportionally lower. As Maloney, Mitchison, & Barlow (1987)[21] showed for Glass patterns, and as van der Helm (2010)[22] showed for mirror symmetries, perception of these visual regularities in the whole range of regularity-to-noise ratios follows the lawp =g/(2+1/S) with parameterg to be estimated using experimental data.
For vision, Weber's law implies constancy ofluminancecontrast. Suppose a target object is set against a background luminance. In order to be just visible, the target must be brighter or fainter than the background by some small amount. The Weber contrast is defined as, and Weber's law says that should be constant for all.
Human vision follows Weber's law closely at normal daylight levels (i.e. in thephotopic range) but begins to break down at twilight levels (themesopic range) and is completely inapplicable at low light levels (scotopic vision). This can be seen in data collected by Blackwell[23] and plotted byCrumey,[24] showing threshold incrementlog versus background luminancelog for various targets sizes. At daylight levels, the curves are approximately straight with slope 1, i.e.log =log, implying is constant. At the very darkest background levels ( ≲ 10− 5 cd m−2, approximately 25 mag arcsec−2)[24] the curves are flat - this is where the only visual perception is the observer's own neural noise ('dark light'). In the intermediate range, a portion can be approximated by theDe Vries - Rose law, related toRicco's law.
Activation of neurons by sensory stimuli in many parts of the brain is by a proportional law: neurons change their spike rate by about 10–30%, when a stimulus (e.g. a natural scene forvision) has been applied. However, as Scheler (2017)[25] showed,the population distribution of theintrinsic excitability or gain of a neuron is aheavy tail distribution, more precisely alognormal shape, which is equivalent to a logarithmic coding scheme. Neurons may therefore spike with 5–10 fold different mean rates. Obviously, this increases the dynamic range of a neuronal population, while stimulus-derived changes remain small and linear proportional.
An analysis[26] of the length of comments in internet discussion boards across several languages shows that comment lengths obey the lognormal distribution with great precision. The authors explain the distribution as a manifestation of the Weber–Fechner law.
The Weber–Fechner law has been applied in other fields of research than just the human senses.
Psychological studies show that it becomes increasingly difficult to discriminate between two numbers as the difference between them decreases. This is called thedistance effect.[27][28] This is important in areas of magnitude estimation, such as dealing with large scales and estimating distances. It may also play a role in explaining why consumers neglect to shop around to save a small percentage on a large purchase, but will shop around to save a large percentage on a small purchase which represents a much smaller absolute dollar amount.[29]
It has been hypothesized thatdose-response relationships can follow Weber's Law[30] which suggests this law – which is often applied at the sensory level – originates from underlyingchemoreceptor responses tocellular signaling dose relationships within the body. Dose response can be related to theHill equation, which is closer to a power law.
There is a new branch of the literature on public finance hypothesizing that the Weber–Fechner law can explain the increasing levels of public expenditures in mature democracies. Election after election, voters demand more public goods to be effectively impressed; therefore, politicians try to increase the magnitude of this "signal" of competence – the size and composition of public expenditures – in order to collect more votes.[31]
Preliminary research has found that pleasant emotions adhere to Weber’s Law, with accuracy in judging their intensity decreasing as pleasantness increases. However, this pattern wasn't observed for unpleasant emotions, suggesting a survival-related need for accurately discerning high-intensity negative emotions.[32]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Texts on Wikisource: