Waldorf education, also known asSteiner education, is based onthe educational philosophy of Rudolf Steiner, the founder ofanthroposophy. Its educational style isholistic, intended to develop pupils' intellectual, artistic, and practical skills, with a focus on imagination and creativity. Individual teachers have a great deal of autonomy in curriculum content, teaching methods, and governance.Qualitative assessments of student work are integrated into the daily life of the classroom, withstandardized testing limited to what is required to enterpost-secondary education.
The first Waldorf school opened in 1919 inStuttgart, Germany.[1] A century later, it has become the largest independent school movement in the world,[2] with more than 1,200 independent schools and nearly 2,000 kindergartens in 75 countries,[3] as well as more than 500 centers forspecial education in more than 40 countries.[4] There are also numerous Waldorf-basedpublic schools,[5]charter schools, andacademies, as well as ahomeschooling movement.[6] Germany, the United States, and the Netherlands have the most Waldorf schools.[3]
Many Waldorf schools have faced controversy due toSteiner's connections to racist ideology[7][8][9] andmagical thinking.[discuss] Others have faced regulatory audits and closure due to concerns over substandard treatment of children with special educational needs.[10] Critics of Waldorf education point out the mystical nature ofanthroposophy and the incorporation of Steiner's esoteric ideas into the curriculum.[11][12] Waldorf schools have also been linked to the outbreak of infectious diseases due to the vaccine hesitancy of many Waldorf parents.[13][14][15]
The first school based upon the ideas of Rudolf Steiner was opened in 1919 in response to a request fromEmil Molt, owner and managing director of theWaldorf-Astoria Cigarette Company inStuttgart, Germany. This is the source of the nameWaldorf, which is now trademarked in the United States when used in connection with the educational method.[16] Molt's proposed school would educate the children of employees of the factory.[17]: 381 Molt was a follower ofanthroposophy, anesoteric spiritual movement based on the notion that an objectively comprehensible spiritual realm exists and can be observed by humans, and of Rudolf Steiner, the movement's founder and spiritual leader.[18] Many of Steiner's ideas influenced the pedagogy of the original Waldorf school and still play a central role in modern Waldorf classrooms: reincarnation,[19] karma,[7][20] the existence of spiritual beings,[21][22] the idea that children are themselves spiritual beings,[23] andeurythmy.[24]
As the co-educational school also served children from outside the factory, it included children from a diverse social spectrum. It was also the firstcomprehensive school in Germany, serving children of all genders, abilities, and social classes.[25][26][27][28] At Steiner's behest, the early Waldorf schools were "open to all students, regardless of income. If the parents were unable to pay the full tuition, the remaining amount would be subsidized."[29]
Waldorf education became more widely known in 1922 through lectures Steiner gave at a conference atOxford University.[30] Two years later, on his final trip to Britain atTorquay in 1924, Steiner delivered a Waldorf teacher training course.[31] The first school in England (Michael Hall) was founded in 1925; the first in the United States (the Rudolf Steiner School in New York City) in 1928. By the 1930s, numerous schools inspired by Steiner's pedagogical principles had opened in Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Norway, Austria, Hungary, the United States, and England.[32]
From 1933 to 1945, political interference from theNazi regime limited and ultimately closed most Waldorf schools in Europe, with the exception of some British, Swiss, and Dutch schools; the United Kingdom and Switzerland were not occupied by Nazi Germany. A few schools elsewhere in Europe (e.g. in Norway) survived by going underground.[33]
In general, Nazis did not like private schools;[34] however,Rudolf Hess, the adjunct Führer, was a patron of Waldorf schools.[35][36] According to Karen Priestman, "Although the Anthroposophy Society was prohibited in November 1935 and Reich Education Minister Bernhard Rust forbade all private schools from accepting new students in March 1936, the last Waldorf school was not closed until 1941."[29] This was shortly after especially after Hess flew to England to negotiate peace.[35][36] The affected schools reopened after the Second World War ended.[37] Some schools inEast Germany were re-closed a few years later by theCommunistgovernment.[38]
In North America in 1967, there were nine schools in the United States and one in Canada.[39][40] As of 2021, that number had increased to more than 200 in the United States and over 20 in Canada.[3][41][42][43] There are currently 29 Steiner schools in the United Kingdom and three in theRepublic of Ireland.[44]
After thedissolution of the Soviet Union, Waldorf schools again began to proliferate inCentral and Eastern Europe. More recently, many have opened in Asia, especially China.[45][46] There are currently over 1,200 independent Waldorf schools worldwide.[3]
The structure of Waldorf education follows a theory ofchildhood development devised by Rudolf Steiner, utilizing distinct learning strategies for each of three developmental stages or "epochs":[47][48] early childhood, elementary, and secondary education.[17][7][49] Steiner believed each stage lasted approximately seven years.[50][51][52][53][54] Aside from their spiritual underpinnings, Steiner's seven-year stages are broadly similar to those later described byJean Piaget and also theories described earlier byComenius andPestalozzi.[55][17]: 402 [56] The stated purpose of this approach is to awaken the "physical, behavioral, emotional, cognitive, social, and spiritual" aspects of each pupil.[57]
In Waldorf pedagogy, young children learn best through immersion in unselfconscious imitation of practical activities. The early childhood curriculum focuses onexperiential education and imaginative play.[58][59][60][61] The overall goal of the curriculum is to "imbue the child with a sense that the world is good".[62]
Waldorfpreschools employ a regular daily routine that includes free play, artistic work (e.g. drawing, painting or modeling),circle time (songs, games, and stories), outdoor recess,[62]: 125 and practical tasks (e.g. cooking, cleaning, and gardening), with rhythmic variations.[63] Rhythm and repetitive patterns are considered important in anthroposophy and are believed to hold spiritual significance.[17][64] The classroom is intended to resemble a home, with tools and toys usually sourced from simple, natural materials that lend themselves to imaginative play.[65] The use of natural materials has been praised as fulfilling children's aesthetic needs and reinforcing connections to nature,[65][66][67][68] though some scholars have questioned whether the preference for natural, non-manufactured materials is truly a "reasoned assessment of twenty-first century children's needs", rather than "a reaction against the dehumanizing aspects of nineteenth-century industrialization".[69]
Pre-school and kindergarten programs generally include seasonal festivals drawn from a variety of traditions, with attention placed on traditions brought forth from the surrounding community.[70] Waldorf schools in theWestern Hemisphere have traditionally celebrated Christian festivals,[71] though one source states that some North American Waldorf schools also include Jewish holidays.[72]
Waldorf kindergarten and lower grades generally discourage pupils' use of electronic media such as television and computers.[60] There are a variety of reasons for this: Waldorf educators believe that use of these conflicts with young children's developmental needs,[73] media users may be physically inactive, and media may be seen to contain inappropriate or undesirable content and to hamper the imagination.[74]
Waldorf pedagogues consider thatreadiness for learning to read depends upon increased independence of character, temperament, habits, and memory, one of the markers of which is the loss of the baby teeth.[17]: 389 [55][75] Formal instruction in reading, writing, and other academic disciplines are therefore not introduced until students enter the elementary school, when pupils are around seven years of age.[76] Steiner believed that engaging young children in abstract intellectual activity too early would adversely affect their growth and development.[17]: 389
Waldorf elementary schools (ages 7–14) emphasize cultivating children's emotional life and imagination. In order that students can connect more deeply with the subject matter, academic instruction is presented through artistic work that includes story-telling,visual arts, drama, movement, music, and crafts.[77][78][79] The core curriculum includes language arts, mythology, history, geography, geology, algebra, geometry, mineralogy, biology, astronomy, physics, chemistry, and nutrition.[62] The school day generally begins with a one-and-a-half to two-hour, cognitively oriented academic lesson, or "Main lesson", that focuses on a single theme over one month's time.[62]: 145 This typically begins with introductory activities that may include singing, instrumental music, and recitations of poetry, generally including a verse written by Rudolf Steiner for the start of a school day.[71] There is little reliance on standardized textbooks.[55]
Waldorf elementary education allows for individual variations in the pace of learning, based upon the expectation that a child will grasp a concept or achieve a skill when he or she is ready.[37] Cooperation takes priority over competition.[80] This approach also extends to physical education; competitive team sports are not introduced until upper grades.[60]
Each class remains together as acohort throughout all elementary, developing as a quasi-familial social group.[81] In elementary years, a core teacher teaches primary academic subjects. A central role of this teacher is to provide a supportiverole model both through personal example and through stories drawn from a variety of cultures,[62] educating by exercising "creative, loving authority".[82] Class teachers are normally expected to teach a cohort for several years,[83] a practice known aslooping. Starting in first grade, specialized teachers teach many subjects, including music, crafts, movement, and two foreign languages from complementary language families[17] (in English-speaking countries these are typically German and either Spanish or French).
While class teachers serve a valuable role as personal mentors, establishing "lasting relationships with pupils",[83] Ullrich documented problems when the same teacher continues intomiddle school. Noting that there is a danger of anyauthority figure limiting students enthusiasm forinquiry andautonomy, he cited a number of schools where the class teacher accompanies the class for six years only, after which specialist teachers play a greater role.[62]: 222
Steiner considered children's cognitive, emotional, and behavioral development to be interlinked.[84] When students in a Waldorf school are grouped, it is generally not by a focus on academic abilities.[57]: 89 Instead, Steiner adapted the pseudoscientific proto-psychological concept of theclassicfour temperaments – melancholic, sanguine, phlegmatic, and choleric.[85] Steiner indicated that teaching should be differentiated to accommodate the different needs that these "types" represent.[86] For example, Anthroposophists believe "cholerics are risk takers, phlegmatics take things calmly, melancholics are sensitive or introverted, and sanguines take things lightly".[57]: 18 Steiner also believed that teachers must consider their own temperament and be prepared to work with it positively in the classroom,[87] that temperament is emergent in children,[37] and that most people express a combination of temperaments rather than a pure single type.[85] No evidence exists for such "personality types" to be consistent in an individual across time or context,[88][89] nor that such "types" are useful in providing more effective education.[90][91][92]
Today, Waldorf teachers may work with these pseudoscientific "temperaments" to design instruction for each student. Seating arrangements and class activities may take into account the supposed temperaments of students but this is often not described to parents, students, or observers.[93][94]
In most Waldorf schools, pupils enter secondary education when they are fourteen years old. Secondary education is provided by specialist teachers for each subject. The curriculum is purported to foster pupils' intellectual understanding, independent judgment, and ethics.[58][65]
In the third developmental stage (14 years old and up), children are supposed to learn through their own thinking and judgment.[95] Students are asked to understand abstract material and expected to have sufficient foundation and maturity to form conclusions using their own judgment.[17]: 391
The overarching goals are to provide young people the basis on which to develop intofree,morally responsible,[57][96] and creative beings.[97] No independent studies have been published as to whether or not Waldorf education achieves these aims more than any other approach.[81]
The philosophical foundation of the Waldorf approach,anthroposophy, underpins its primary pedagogical goals: to provide an education that enables children to become free human beings, and to help children to incarnate their "unfolding spiritual identity", carried from the preceding spiritual existence, as beings of body, soul, and spirit in this lifetime.[98] Educational researcher Martin Ashley suggests that the latter role would be problematic for secular teachers and parents in state schools,[81] and the commitment to a spiritual background both of the child and the education has been problematic for some committed to a secular perspective.[42][81][99]
While anthroposophy underpins the curriculum design, pedagogical approach, and organizational structure, it is explicitly not taught within the school curriculum and studies have shown that Waldorf pupils have little awareness of it.[57]: 6 Tensions may arise within the Waldorf community between the commitment to Steiner's original intentions and openness to new directions in education, such as the incorporation of new technologies or modern methods of accountability and assessment.[81] Prominent critics[a] of Waldorf education commonly focus their criticism on its links to anthroposophy. While scholars with more favorable views of Waldorf education point out that Steiner never wanted Waldorf schools to be schools based on anthroposophy as aworldview.[100][101] Jost Schieren argues that legal frameworks in countries such as Germany, which force Waldorf education to conform to non-anthroposophical standards, and social factors which only allow it to be evaluated according to the standards ofempiricaleducation science lead to an environment in which these tensions grow ever larger. Waldorf education can—according to this perspective—only use anthroposophy as a methodical tool, but not as one to derive the contents of its teaching materials; a situation which in essence means a continual and ever-expanding relinquishment of anthroposophy by the field of Waldorf education.[102]
Waldorf schools frequently have striking architecture, employing walls meeting at varied angles (not only perpendicularly). The walls are often painted in subtle colors, often with a lazure technique, and include textured surfaces.[103]
The schools primarily assess students through reports on individual academic progress and personal development. The emphasis is on characterization through qualitative description. Pupils' progress is evaluated through portfolio work in academic blocks and discussion of pupils in teacher conferences. Standardized tests are rare, with the exception of examinations necessary for college entry taken during secondary school years.[62]: 150, 186 Letter grades are generally not given until students enter high school.[104] Pupils are not typically asked to repeat years of elementary or secondary education.[105]
Though Waldorf schools are autonomous institutions not required to follow a prescribed curriculum (beyond what is required by law in a given jurisdiction) there are widely agreed upon guidelines for the Waldorf curriculum.[73]
Main academic subjects are introduced through two-hour morning lesson blocks that last for several weeks.[57]: 18 These blocks are horizontally integrated at each grade level in that the topic of the block will be infused into many classroom activities and vertically integrated in that each subject will be revisited with increasing complexity as students develop their skills, reasoning capacities and individual sense of self. This has been described as a spiral curriculum.[106]
Many subjects and skills not considered core parts of mainstream schools, such as art, music, gardening, and mythology, are central to Waldorf education.[107] Students learn a variety of fine and practical arts. Elementary students paint, draw, sculpt, knit, weave, and crochet.[108] Older students build on these experiences and learn new skills such as pattern-making and sewing, wood and stone carving, metal work, book-binding,[109] and doll or puppet making.
Music instruction begins with singing in early childhood and continuing through high school. Pupils also usually learn to playpentatonic flutes,recorders and/orlyres in early elementary grades. Around age 9,diatonic recorders and orchestral instruments are introduced.[110]
Certain subjects are largely unique to the Waldorf schools. Foremost among these iseurythmy, a movement art usually accompanying spoken texts or music which includes elements of drama and dance.[80] Although found in other educational contexts, cooking,[111] farming,[112] andenvironmental andoutdoor education[113] are centrally incorporated into Waldorf curriculum. Other differences include: non-competitive games and free play in younger years as opposed to athletics instruction; instruction in two foreign languages from the beginning of elementary school; and an experiential-phenomenological approach to science.[114] In this method, students observe and depict scientific concepts in their own words and drawings[115] rather than encountering the ideas first through a textbook.
The scientific methodology of modern Waldorf schools utilizes a so-called "phenomenological approach" to science education employing a methodology ofinquiry-based learning aiming to "strengthen the interest and ability to observe" in pupils.[116]: 111
Experts have called into question the quality of this phenomenological approach if it fails to educate Waldorf students on basic tenets of scientific fact.[117] The Waldorf approach is said to cultivate students with "high motivation" but "average achievement" in the sciences.[118] One study conducted byCalifornia State University at Sacramento researchers outlined numerous theories and ideas prevalent throughout Waldorf curricula that were patentlypseudoscientific and steeped inmagical thinking. These included the idea that animals evolved from humans, that human spirits are physically incarnated into "soul qualities that manifested themselves into various animal forms", that the current geological formations on Earth have evolved through so-called "Lemurian" and "Atlantean" epochs, and that the four kingdoms of nature are "mineral, plant, animal, and man". All of these are directly contradicted by mainstream scientific knowledge and have no basis in any form of conventional scientific study. Contradictory notions found in Waldorf textbooks are distinct from factual inaccuracies occasionally found in modern public school textbooks, as the inaccuracies in the latter are of a specific and minute nature that results from the progress of science. The inaccuracies present in Waldorf textbooks, however, are the result of a mode of thinking that has no valid basis in reason or logic.[119] This unscientific foundation has been blamed for the scarcity of systematic empirical research on Waldorf education as academic researchers hesitate in getting involved in studies of Waldorf schools lest it hamper their future career.[120]
A Swedish parent wrote a book in 1990 stating that Waldorf schools do not allow questioning the historical accuracy of theOld Testament.[121]Dan Dugan reiterated such criticism in an interview from 2016, accusing Waldorf schools of teachingpseudohistory.[122]
One study of science curriculum compared a group of American Waldorf school students to American public school students on three different test variables.[116] Two tests measured verbal and non-verbal logical reasoning and the third was an internationalTIMSS test. The TIMSS test covered scientific understanding ofmagnetism. The researchers found that Waldorf school students scored higher than both the public school students and the national average on the TIMSS test while scoring the same as public school students on the logical reasoning tests.[116] When the logical reasoning tests measured students' understanding of part-to-whole relations, the Waldorf students also outperformed the public school students.[116] The authors of the study noted the Waldorf students' enthusiasm for science, but viewed the science curriculum as "somewhat old-fashioned and out of date, as well as including some doubtful scientific material".[116]
In 2008,Stockholm University terminated its Waldorf teacher training courses. In a statement, the university said "the courses did not encompass sufficient subject theory and a large part of the subject theory that is included is not founded on any scientific base". The dean, Stefan Nordlund, stated "the syllabus contains literature which conveys scientific inaccuracies that are worse than woolly; they are downright dangerous".[123]
Because they view human interaction as the essential basis for younger children's learning and growth,[81]: 212 Waldorf schools viewcomputers as being first useful to children in the early teen years, after they have mastered "fundamental, time-honoured ways of discovering information and learning, such as practical experiments and books".[124]
In the United Kingdom, Waldorf schools are granted an exemption by theDepartment for Education (DfE) from the requirement to teachICT as part ofFoundation Stage education (ages 3–5).[69]
Waldorf schools have been popular with some parents working in the technology sector in the United States, including those from some of the most advanced technology firms.[125][126][127][128] A number of technologically oriented parents from one school expressed their conviction that younger students do not need the exposure to computers and technology, but benefit from creative aspects of the education; one Google executive was quoted as saying "I fundamentally reject the notion you need technology aids in grammar school."[129]
Waldorf education aims to educate children about a wide range of religious traditions without favoring any single tradition.[80] One of Steiner's primary aims was to establish a spiritual yet nondenominational setting for children from all backgrounds[77]: 79 [103][130] that recognized the value of role models drawn from a wide range of literary and historical traditions in developing children's fantasy and moral imaginations.[55]: 78 For Steiner, education was an activity which fosters the human being's connection to the divine and is thus inherently religious.[131]: 1422, 1430
Waldorf schools were historically "Christian based andtheistically oriented",[79] as they expand into different cultural settings they are adapting to "a truly pluralistic spirituality".[57]: 146 Waldorf theories and practices are often modified from their European and Christian roots to meet the historical and cultural traditions of the local community.[132] Examples include Waldorf schools in Israel and Japan, which celebrate festivals drawn from these cultures, and classes in the Milwaukee Urban Waldorf school, which have adopted African American and Native American traditions.[80]
Religion classes are typically absent from United States Waldorf schools,[133] but are mandatory in some German federal states, which require teachers who identify with each offered religion to teach such classes in addition to a nondenominational offering. In the United Kingdom, public Waldorf schools are not categorized as "Faith schools".[134]
Anthony Mellors criticized Waldorf education for presenting itself as supportive of Christian principles, while hiding what he describes as an heretical interpretation of the Bible.[135]
Waldorf teacher education programs offer courses inchild development, the methodology of Waldorf teaching, academic subjects appropriate to the future teachers' chosen specialty, and the study of pedagogical texts and other works by Steiner.[2][136][137] For early childhood and elementary school teachers, the training includes considerable artistic work in storytelling, movement, painting, music, and handwork.[138]
Waldorf teacher education includes social–emotional development as "an integral and central element", which is unusual for teacher trainings.[139] A 2010 study found that students in advanced years of Waldorf teacher training courses scored significantly higher than students in non-Waldorf teacher trainings on three measures of empathy: perspective taking, empathic concern, and fantasy.[139]
One of Waldorf education's central premises is that all educational and cultural institutions should beself-governing and should grant teachers a high degree of creative autonomy within the school;[140]: 143 [79] this is based upon the conviction that a holistic approach to education aiming at the development of free individuals can only be successful when based on a school form that expresses these same principles.[141] Most Waldorf schools are not directed by aprincipal or head teacher, but rather by a number of groups, including:
There are coordinating bodies for Waldorf education at both the national (e.g. the Association of Waldorf Schools of North America and the Steiner Waldorf Schools Fellowship in the UK and Ireland) and international level (e.g. International Association for Waldorf Education and The European Council for Steiner Waldorf Education (ECSWE)). These organizations certify the use of the registered names "Waldorf" and "Steiner school" and offer accreditations, often in conjunction with regional independent school associations.[143]
Independent schools receive complete or partial funding in much of Europe, particularly in Northern and Eastern Europe. Sweden, Finland, Holland, and Slovakia provide over 90% of independent schools' funding, while Slovenia, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, Hungary, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Spain, and Portugal provide the majority of independent schools' funding.[144] Ireland funds Waldorf schools on the condition that they follow the state curriculum.[citation needed] In countries outside of this region, funding for independent schools varies widely.
Waldorf-inspiredhome schools typically obtain their program information through informal parent groups, online, or by purchasing a curriculum. Waldorf homeschooling groups are not affiliated with the Association of Waldorf Schools of North America (AWSNA), which represents independent schools and it is unknown how many home schools use a Waldorf-inspired curriculum.
Educationalist Sandra Chistolini suggests that parents offer their children Waldorf-inspired homeschooling because "the frustration and boredom some children feel in school are eliminated and replaced with constant attention to the needs of childhood [and] connections between content and the real world".[145]
Some Waldorf schools in English-speaking countries have met opposition due tovaccine hesitancy among parents.[146] In a 2011 article, Waldorf schools were identified as a risk factor for noncompliance with measles vaccination programmes.[15]
Other controversies have centered on Waldorf schools' educational standards and the mystical and antiquated nature of some of Steiner's theories.[147][7][148][149]
The first US Waldorf-inspired public school, the Yuba River Charter School in California, opened in 1994. The Waldorf public school movement is currently expanding rapidly; while in 2010, there were twelve Waldorf-inspired public schools in the United States,[150] by 2018 there were 53 such schools.[41]
Most Waldorf-inspired schools in the United States are elementary schools established as eithermagnet orcharter schools. The first Waldorf-inspired high school was launched in 2008 with assistance from theBill and Melinda Gates Foundation.[150] While these schools follow a similar developmental approach as the independent schools, Waldorf-inspired schools must demonstrate achievement onstandardized tests in order to continue receiving public funding. Studies of standardized test scores suggest that students at Waldorf-inspired schools tend to score below their peers in the earliest grades and catch up[150] or surpass[136] their peers by middle school. One study found that students at Waldorf-inspired schools watch less television and spend more time engaging in creative activities or spending time with friends.[150] Public Waldorf schools' need to demonstrate achievement through standardized test scores has encouraged increased use of textbooks and expanded instructional time for academic subjects.[150]
A legal challenge alleging that California school districts' Waldorf-inspired schools violated theFirst andFourteenth Amendments of theUnited States Constitution and Article IX of theCalifornia Constitution was dismissedon its merits in 2005[151] and on appeal in 2007[152] and 2012. A 2012 paper in legal science reports this verdict as being provisional, and disagrees with its result, i.e. anthroposophy was declared "not a religion" due to an outdated legal framework.[153] Another author disagrees with the point of that paper.[154] Yet another author agrees with the point of that paper.[155]
The first state-funded Steiner-Waldorf school, theSteiner Academy Hereford opened in 2008. Since then, Steineracademies have opened inFrome,Exeter, andBristol as part of the government-fundedfree schools programme.
In December 2018,The Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) judged the Steiner Academy Exeter as inadequate and ordered it to be transferred to a multi-academy trust; it was temporarily closed in October 2018 because of concerns, including significant lapses in safeguarding of students' wellbeing, mistreatment of children with special educational needs and other disabilities, and misspending of funds.[156] In July 2018, two 6-year-old children were found by police having walked out of the Exeter school unnoticed. Their parents were not informed until the end of the day.[157] Subsequently, the Steiner Academies inBristol andFrome have also been judged inadequate by Ofsted, because of concerns over safeguarding and bullying. A number of private Steiner schools have additionally been judged inadequate in the ensuing investigation.[158] Overall, several Waldorf schools in the UK have closed in the last decade due to their administrations' failure to adhere to state-mandated standards of education (e.g. required levels of literacy, safety standards for child welfare, and mistreatment ofchildren with special educational needs).[159][160][161]
In November 2012,BBC News broadcast a segment about accusations that the establishment of a state-funded Waldorf School in Frome was a misguided use of public money. The broadcast reported that concerns were being raised about Rudolf Steiner's beliefs, stating he "believed in reincarnation and said it was related to race, with black (schwarz) people being the least spiritually developed, and white (weiß) people the most".[162] In 2007, the European Council for Steiner Waldorf Education (ECSWE) issued a statement, "Waldorf schools against discrimination", which said in part, "Waldorf schools do not select, stratify or discriminate amongst their pupils, but consider all human beings to be free and equal in dignity and rights, independent of ethnicity, national or social origin, gender, language, religion, and political or other convictions. Anthroposophy, upon which Waldorf education is founded, stands firmly against all forms of racism and nationalism."[163]
TheBritish Humanist Association criticized a reference book used to train teachers in Steiner academies for suggesting that the heart is sensitive to emotions and also promotinghomeopathy, while claiming thatDarwinism is "rooted in reductionist thinking and Victorian ethics".Edzard Ernst, emeritus professor of complementary medicine at theUniversity of Exeter, said that Waldorf schools "seem to have an anti-science agenda". A United KingdomDepartment for Education spokeswoman said "no state school is allowed to teach homeopathy as scientific fact" and that free schools "must demonstrate that they will provide a broad and balanced curriculum".[164]
Australia has "Steiner streams" incorporated into a small number of existing government schools in some states; in addition, independent Steiner-Waldorf schools receive partial government funding.
The majority of Steiner-Waldorf schools in New Zealand are Integrated Private Schools under The Private Schools Integration Act 1975, thus receiving full state funding.
In the Canadian provinces of British Columbia,Quebec and Alberta, all private schools receive partial state funding.[165]
The first Steiner school in Russia was established in 1992 in Moscow.[166] That school is now an award-winning government-funded school with over 650 students offering classes forkindergarten and years 1 to 11 (the Russian education system is an eleven-year system). There are 18 Waldorf schools in Russia and 30 kindergartens. Some are government funded (with no fees) and some are privately funded (with fees for students). As well as five Waldorf schools in Moscow, there are also Waldorf schools inSaint Petersburg,Irkutsk,Yaroslavl,Kaluga,Samara, Zhukovskiy,Smolensk,Tomsk,Ufa,Vladimir,Voronezh, andZelenograd. The Association of Russian Waldorf Schools was founded in 1995 and now has 21 members.[166]
The first Waldorf school in India, Sloka, was founded in Hyderabad in 1997, followed by Tridha in Mumbai in 2000.[167][168] Hyderabad became an early centre for the movement because of its receptive teacher community and openness to alternative education.[169] During the 2000s Waldorf education spread to other cities including Bengaluru, Pune, Nagpur, Delhi–NCR, Coimbatore and Jaipur.[170]
Over time the curriculum has been dovetailed and the approach has been contextualised to Indian languages, festivals and crafts. There are around 28 Waldorf kindergartens in the country and about ten full fledged Waldorf schools.[171][172] These include Sloka Waldorf School, Abhaya Steiner School and Prerana Waldorf School in Hyderabad; Tridha School, Inodai Waldorf School and the Golden Spiral Waldorf School in Mumbai; Bangalore Waldorf School in Bengaluru; Yellow Train School in Coimbatore; and Swadhaa Waldorf School in Pune.[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181]
The movement’s growth led to the formation of organisations and forums that represent and coordinate Waldorf activity in the country. TheAnthroposophical Society in India was founded on 21 October 2011 by representatives of Waldorf education, biodynamic farming, curative education, anthroposophical medicine and eurythmy.[182] Sadhana, the Indian Waldorf kindergarten association, was created in 2014 as the national representative of the International Association for Steiner/Waldorf Early Childhood Education (IASWECE).[183]
The Indian Waldorf Education Forum (IWEF) was established in 2017 to connect Indian schools with international bodies such as Friends of Waldorf Education and the Hague Circle, which publish the worldwide lists of Waldorf schools.[184] Since 2005 the Asian Waldorf Teachers’ Conference has been held every two years; the 2011 conference in Hyderabad marked a milestone for Indian participation in the regional network.[185]
Today Waldorf and Waldorf-inspired initiatives exist in many Indian states. In Delhi–NCR there are Banyan Earth School and Aarambh Waldorf School;[186][187] in Gujarat, Shining Spiral Kindergarten;[188] in Bengaluru, Kingdom of Childhood, InBloom, Prakriti, Chiguru, Bangalore Steiner School and Tulasi Kindergarten;[189][190][191][192][193][194] in Mumbai, Kalpavruksha and Bodhi Vidyalaya;[195][196] in Nagpur, Nagpur Waldorf-Inspired School;[197] in Pune, Swadhaa learning centre;[198] in Tamil Nadu, The Vels Academy, Pearls Kindergarten, Vedavyas, Indra Dhanu, Lokhaa, Agastya Academy and OHAA School; inAndhra Pradesh, Swechha Waldorf-Inspired School;[199] and inTelangana, Thraya Waldorf-Inspired School.[200] Together these institutions reflect the continuing expansion of Waldorf education in India and its adaptation to diverse cultural settings.
Steiner's belief that all people are imbued with a spiritual core has fuelled Waldorf schools' social mission.[201] The schools have always been coeducational and open to children of all social classes. They were designed from the beginning to becomprehensive, 12-year schools under the direction of their own teachers, rather than the state or other external authorities,[202] all radical principles when Steiner first articulated them.[203]
Social renewal and transformation remain primary goals for Waldorf schools,[204] which seek to cultivate pupils' sense of social responsibility.[65][205][206][207] Studies suggest that this is successful;[55]: 190 [57]: 4 Waldorf pupils have been found to be more interested in and engaged with social and moral questions and to have more positive attitudes than students from mainstream schools,[208] demonstrating activism and self-confidence and feeling empowered to forge their own futures.[209]
Waldorf schools build close learning communities, founded on the shared values of its members,[57]: 17 in ways that can lead to transformative learning experiences that allow all participants, including parents, to become more aware of their own individual path,[57]: 5, 17, 32, 40 [87]: 238 but which at times also risk becoming exclusive.[55]: 167, 207 Reports from small-scale studies suggest that there are lower levels of harassment and bullying in Waldorf schools[57]: 29 and that European Waldorf students have much lower rates ofxenophobia andgender stereotypes than students in any other type of schools.[210] Betty Reardon, a professor and peace researcher, gives Waldorf schools as an example of schools that follow a philosophy based on peace and tolerance.[211]
Many private Waldorf schools experience a tension between these social goals and the way tuition fees act as a barrier to access to the education by less well-off families. Schools have attempted to improve access for a wider range of income groups by charging lower fees than comparable independent schools, by offering a sliding scale of fees, and/or by seeking state support.[81]
Waldorf schools have linked polarized communities in a variety of settings.
In 2008, 24 Waldorf schools in 15 countries were members of theUNESCO Associated Schools Project Network.[226] TheFriends of Waldorf Education is an organization whose purpose is to support, finance and advise the Waldorf movement worldwide, particularly in disadvantaged settings.
The French government anti-cult agencyMIVILUDES reported in 2021 that it remains vigilant about anthroposophy, particularly because of its deviant medical applications and its work with minors (Waldorf pedagogy).[227][228][229]
Although studies about Waldorf education tend to be small-scale and vary in national context, a 2005 independent comprehensive review of the literature concluded there was evidence that Waldorf education encourages academic achievement as well as "creative, social and other capabilities important to the holistic growth of a person".[57]: 39 [81]
In comparison to state school pupils, European Waldorf students are significantly more enthusiastic about learning, report having more fun and being less bored in school, view their school environments as pleasant and supportive places where they are able to discover their personal academic strengths,[230] and have more positive views of the future.[231] Twice as many European Waldorf students as state school pupils report having good relationships with teachers; they also report significantly fewer ailments such as headaches, stomach aches, and disrupted sleep.[230]
A 2007 German study found that an above-average number of Waldorf students become teachers, doctors, engineers, scholars of the humanities, and scientists.[232] Studies of Waldorf students' artistic capacities found that they averaged higher scores on theTorrance Test of Creative Thinking Ability,[233] drew more accurate, detailed, and imaginative drawings,[234] and were able to develop richer images than comparison groups.[231]
Some observers have noted that Waldorf educators tend to be more concerned to address the needs of weaker students who need support than they are to meet the needs of talented students who could benefit from advanced work.[235]
Professor of educational psychologyClifford Mayes said "Waldorf students learn in sequences and paces that are developmentally appropriate, aesthetically stimulating, emotionally supportive, and ecologically sensitive."[236] Professors of education Timothy Leonard and Peter Willis stated that Waldorf education "cultivates the imagination of the young to provide them a firm emotional foundation upon which to build a sound intellectual life".[237]
Professor of education Bruce Uhrmacher considers Steiner's view on education worthy of investigation for those seeking to improve public schooling, saying the approach serves as a reminder that "holistic education is rooted in a cosmology that posits a fundamental unity to the universe and as such ought to take into account interconnections among the purpose of schooling, the nature of the growing child, and the relationships between the human being and the universe at large", and that a curriculum need not betechnocratic, but may equally well be arts-based.[17]: 382, 401
Thomas Nielsen, assistant professor at theUniversity of Canberra's education department, said that imaginative teaching approaches used in Waldorf education (drama, exploration, storytelling, routine, arts, discussion and empathy) are effective stimulators of spiritual-aesthetic, intellectual and physical development, expanding "the concept of holistic and imaginative education" and recommends these to mainstream educators.[77][238]
Andreas Schleicher, international coordinator of thePISA studies, commented on what he saw as the "high degree of congruence between what the world demands of people, and what Waldorf schools develop in their pupils", placing a high value on creatively and productively applying knowledge to new realms. This enables "deep learning" that goes beyond studying for the next test.[232]Deborah Meier, principal ofMission Hill School and MacArthur grant recipient, while having some "quibbles" about the Waldorf schools, stated: "The adults I know who have come out of Waldorf schools are extraordinary people. That education leaves a strong mark of thoroughness, carefulness, and thoughtfulness."[239]
Robert Peterkin, director of the Urban Superintendents Program at Harvard's Graduate School of Education and former Superintendent ofMilwaukee Public Schools during a period when Milwaukee funded a public Waldorf school, considers Waldorf education a "healing education" whose underlying principles are appropriate for educating all children.[240]
Waldorf education has also been studied as an example ofeducational neuroscience ideas in practice.[241]
Heiner Ullrich remarked about Waldorf pedagogy: "fruitful practice based on a dubious theory".[242][243] He also stated that if Waldorf pedagogy succeeded, that is because it is in many ways lacking originality.[242] Deep inside it is based upon pedagogical theories of others, which were already popular in Steiner's era.[242] Ullrich later made clear that Steiner's pedagogy is based upon Austrian Herbartianism.[244]
In 2000, educational scholar Heiner Ullrich wrote that intensive study of Steiner's pedagogy had been in progress in educational circles in Germany since about 1990 and that positions were "highly controversial: they range from enthusiastic support to destructive criticism".[55] In 2008, the same scholar wrote that Waldorf schools have "not stirred comparable discussion or controversy... those interested in the Waldorf School today... generally tend to view this school form first and foremost as a representative of internationally recognized models of applied classic reform pedagogy"[62]: 140–141 and that critics tend to focus on what they see as Steiner's "occult neo-mythology of education" and to fear the risks of indoctrination in a worldview school, but lose an "unprejudiced view of the varied practice of the Steiner schools".[55] Ullrich himself considers that the schools successfully foster dedication, openness, and a love for other human beings, for nature, and for the inanimate world.[62]: 179
Professor of Comparative EducationHermann Röhrs describes Waldorf education as embodying original pedagogical ideas and presenting exemplary organizational capabilities.[245]
A UKDepartment for Education and Skills report suggested that Waldorf and state schools could learn from each other's strengths: in particular, that state schools could benefit from Waldorf education's early introduction and approach to modern foreign languages; combination of block (class) and subject teaching for younger children; development of speaking and listening through an emphasis on oral work; good pacing of lessons through an emphasis on rhythm; emphasis on child development guiding the curriculum and examinations; approach to art and creativity; attention given to teachers' reflective activity and heightened awareness (in collective child study for example); and collegial structure of leadership and management, including collegial study. Aspects of mainstream practice which could inform good practice in Waldorf schools included: management skills and ways of improving organizational and administrative efficiency; classroom management; work with secondary-school age children; and assessment and record keeping.[57]
American state and private schools are drawing on Waldorf education – "less in whole than in part" – in expanding numbers.[246] Professor of EducationElliot Eisner sees Waldorf education exemplifying embodied learning and fostering a more balanced educational approach than American public schools achieve.[247]Ernest Boyer, former president of theCarnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching commended the significant role the arts play throughout Waldorf education as a model for other schools to follow.[248] Waldorf schools have been described as establishing "genuine community" and contrasted to mainstream schools, which have been described as "residential areas partitioned by bureaucratic authorities for educational purposes".[249]
Many elements of Waldorf pedagogy have been used in all Finnish schools for many years.[232]
Ashley described seven principal ways Waldorf education differed from mainstream approaches: its method of working from the whole to the parts, its attentiveness to child development, its goal of freedom, the deep relationships of teachers to students, the emphasis on experiencing oral traditions, the role of ritual and routine (e.g. welcoming students with a handshake, the use of opening and closing verses, and yearly festivals), the role arts and creativity play, and theGoetheanistic approach to science.[81]
Benjamin Lazier calls Steiner a "maverick educator".[250]
Steiner is also known for bizarre statements such as "knitting produces strong teeth" or "overstimulating intelligence produces dwarfism".[228] That is why Waldorf schoolchildren are knitting and crocheting.[251]
In US states where nonmedical vaccine exemption is legal, 2015 reports showed Waldorf schools as having a high rate of vaccine exemption within their student populations, however, recent research has shown that in US state schools, child immunization rates often fall below the 95-percent threshold that the Centers for Disease Control say is necessary to provideherd immunity for a community.[252][253][254][255][256][257] A 2010 report by the UK Government said that Steiner schools should be considered "high risk populations" and "unvaccinated communities" with respect to children's risks of catching measles and contributing to outbreaks.[258] On 19 November 2018, theBBC reported there was an outbreak ofchickenpox affecting 36 students at the Asheville Waldorf School located in North Carolina.[259] Out of 152 students at the school, 110 had not received theVaricella vaccine that protects against chickenpox.[259] TheUnited States Advisory Committee on Immunization, theCenters for Disease Control, and theNorth Carolina Department of Health and Human Services all recommend that all healthy children 12 months of age and older get vaccinated against Varicella.[260][261][262]The Guardian reported that several Waldorf schools in California had some of the lowest vaccination rates among kindergarten pupils in the 2017–18 school year, with only 7% of pupils having been vaccinated in one school.[263] In the same article, however,The Guardian also reported that, in a 2019 statement, the International Center for Anthroposophic Medicine and the International Federation of Anthroposophic Medical Associations stressed that anthroposophic medicine, the form of medicine Steiner founded, "fully appreciates the contributions of vaccines to global health and firmly supports vaccinations as an important measure to prevent life threatening diseases".[263]
Rudolf Steiner founded the first Waldorf school several years before vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and whooping cough were invented.[264][265] After such vaccinations became widespread in Europe, Steiner opposed their use in several contexts, writing that vaccination could "impede spiritual development" and lead to a loss of "any urge for a spiritual life". Steiner also thought that these effects would carry over into subsequent reincarnations of the vaccinated person.[266]
The Association of Waldorf Schools of North America released the following in a statement in 2019:[267]
The Association of Waldorf Schools of North America wishes to state unequivocally that our educational objectives do not include avoidance of, or resistance to, childhood immunization. The health, safety, and wellbeing of children are our forefront concerns.
- All members of our association are schools or institutions that are free to make independent school policy decisions in accordance with AWSNA's membership and accreditation criteria. Our membership and accreditation criteria require schools to be compliant with national, state, provincial, and local laws. While policy decisions regarding immunizations may vary from school to school, such decisions are made in accordance with legal requirements set by local, state, provincial or federal government.
- The Association encourages parents to consider their civic responsibility in regards to the decision of whether or not to immunize against any communicable disease, but ultimately, the decision to immunize or not is one made by parents in consultation with their family physician.
In 2021, Waldorf schools in Germany were associated with outbreaks ofCOVID-19 duringa pandemic of the disease, as well as reticence to incorporate public health measures relating to disease outbreak.[268]
The Association of Waldorf Schools of North America (AWSNA) and European Council for Steiner Waldorf Education have put out statements stating that "racist or discriminatory tendencies are not tolerated in Waldorf schools or Waldorf teacher training institutes. The Waldorf school movement explicitly rejects any attempt to misappropriate Waldorf pedagogy or Rudolf Steiner's work for racist or nationalistic purposes."[269] Similar statements were put out by the Waldorf school association in Britain ("Our schools do not tolerate racism. Racist views do not accord with Steiner's longer term vision of a society in which such distinctions would be entirely irrelevant & modern Steiner Waldorf schools deplore all forms of intolerance, aiming to educate in a spirit of respect & to encourage open-hearted regard for others among the children they educate")[270] and Germany.[271]
These statements are the necessary response to Rudolf Steiner's contradictory beliefs about race: he emphasized the core spiritual unity of all the world's peoples, sharply criticized racial prejudice, and articulated beliefs that the individual nature of any person stands higher than any racial, ethnic, national or religious affiliation,[272][273][274] yet he asserted a hierarchy of races, with thewhite race at the top, and associated intelligence with having blonde hair and blue eyes.[7][275] People who believe in reincarnation may not see his beliefs as racist in the same way as people who do not.[276]
In 2019 a school inChristchurch, New Zealand, began considering removing "Rudolf Steiner" from the name of the school "so that the our best ideals are not burdened by historical, philosophical untruths."[277] In 2014, after an investigation by the NZMinistry of Education, a small school on theKāpiti Coast of New Zealand was cleared of teachingracist theories. An independent investigation concluded that while there were no racist elements in thecurriculum, the school needed to make changes in the "areas of governance, management and teaching to ensure parents' complaints were dealt with appropriately in the future...[and that]...the school must continue regular communication with the school community regarding the ongoing work being undertaken to address the issues raised and noted that the board has proactively sought support to do this."[278]
Racist attitudes and behaviour have been reported in particular Waldorf schools, and some teachers have reportedly expressed Steiner's view that individuals reincarnate through various races, however, Kevin Avison, senior advisor for the Steiner Waldorf Schools Fellowship in the UK and Ireland, calls the claim of belief in reincarnation through the races "a complete and utter misunderstanding" of Steiner's teachings.[275]
"Steiner's collected works, moreover, totalling more than 350 volumes, contain pervasive internal contradictions and inconsistencies on racial and national questions."[279] Martins and Vukadinović describe the racism of Anthroposophy as spiritual and paternalistic (i.e. benevolent), in contrast to the materialistic and often malign racism of fascism.[280]
Organisations which Hess had supported, such as the Rudolf Steiner schools, were closed down.
Although in his reply, Himmler pretended to share Astel's assessment of anthroposophy as a dangerous movement, he admitted to be unable to do anything about the school of Rudolf Steiner because Rudolf Hess supported and protected it.
In recent years, China has seen a major expansion of alternative teaching establishments such as those that operate under the educational principles of Austrian philosopher Rudolf Steiner.
The first epoch (0–7 years), when the child is intensely sensitive to people and surroundings, is seen by Steiner educators as the empathic stage – where empathy means embracing the unconscious of another with one's own unconscious, to live into the experience of another. The kindergarten teacher purposefully employs her own empathic ability as she strives to be a role model worthy of imitation by the children, but she also creates a space and ethos conducive to imaginative play that actively develops children's capacity for empathy.
In individuals the temperaments are mixed in the most diverse ways, so that it is possible only to say that one temperament or another predominates in certain traits. Temperament inclines toward the individual, thus making people different, and on the other hand joins individuals together in a group so proving that it has something to do both with the innermost essence of the human being and with universal human nature.
For example, melancholic children like sitting together because they are unlikely to be annoyed or disturbed by their neighbors. Livelier temperaments such as sanguine or choleric are said to be likely to rub their liveliness off on each other and calm down of their own accord. Little evidence of this aspect of practice was immediately apparent to outside observers, and teachers did not readily volunteer to talk about it.
Es ist Rudolf Steiner dabei ein großes Anliegen gewesen, dass die Waldorfschule keine Weltanschauungsschule werden darf. Er hat immer wieder dezidiert darauf hingewiesen, dass die Anthroposophie nicht in den Lehrplan der Schule einfließen dürfe.
[Pictoral representation] is also a way of focusing attention and closely observing what is happening. However, there are problems when it comes to having students draw. Some are inhibited because they feel they have to have very realistic representations. This can be overcome if throughout the grades drawing is approached both as a way of self-expression and a way of capturing the external world. In Waldorf education, there is an ongoing practice of having students draw. Others would do well to find ways of adapting this approach in public school practice so that drawing is second nature to the students and they are not inhibited in attempting it.
Thus my conclusion is that it is quite uncontroversial to see Anthroposophy as a whole as a religious movement, in the conventional use of the term, although it is not an emic term used by Anthroposophists themselves.
Stockholm University has decided to wind up its Steiner-Waldorf teacher training. Steiner science literature is 'too much myth and too little fact', the university's teacher education committee has ruled.
une pratique fructueuse sur la base d'une théorie douteuse
By the 1920s gnosticism (the term) had hardly a vestige of an agreed-upon meaning. That gnosticism had returned in some form was a sentiment shared by many, but what that meant was up for debate. Some, notably those on the occult scene inspired by the maverick educator Rudolf Steiner, greeted the new age with enthusiasm.
Und genau diese komfortable Situation macht es möglich, dass Anthroposophie bis heute eine ganz erstaunliche Auswahl von rassischen und Völker-Stereotypen tradiert, die in ihrer Gründerzeit anscheinend kaum als skandalös auffielen, aber heute den politischen Status des Ganzen verändern. Steiners nationalistische, antijüdische und rassistische Vorstellungen notierten um 1920 nicht einmal linke Kritiker wie Ernst Bloch Oder Siegfried Kracauer, aber sie sickern zum Beispiel auch noch in die jüngere Waldorf-Literatur ein und führen seit den 1990er Jahren periodisch zu erbitterten wissenschaftlichen, journalistischen und juristischen Auseinandersetzungen. Die Argumente Sind seit Jahrzehnten ausgetauscht, das Andauern der Debatte gleicht einem Sich wahnsinnig weiterdrehenden Hamsterrad. Anthroposophen reagieren dabei stets reaktiv auf externe Kritik. Dass Steiner Sich von den wilden Rassisten des 19. Jahrhunderts distanzierte, wird manchen seiner heutigen Anhänger zur Ausrede, um seinen eigenen, spirituell-paternalistischen Rassismus in der Gegenwart schönzureden.4 Einer überschaubaren Anzahl kritischer Aufsätze5 stehen monographische Hetzschriften gegenüber, die Kritiker des „gezielten, vorsätzlich unternommenen Rufmords"6 bezichtigen. Derweil sprechen Sich die anthroposophischen Dachverbände, wenn die Kritik allzu laut wird, in formelhaften Allgemeinplätzen gegen Rassismus aus und gestehen vage, zeitbedingte' Formulierungen Steiners zu.7 Überhaupt dreht Sich die Diskussion zu oft um Steiner. Es Sind jüngere Beiträge, die seine Stereotype in die Gegenwart transportieren.
