Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Vukovar resolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Vukovar resolution" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(March 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Vukovar resolution was the document in whichSerbs from Vukovar and neighboring communities, at the end of 1939, requested fromcentral Yugoslav government exemption of Vukovar county from theBanovina of Croatia and its annexation to theDanube Banovina or futureBanovina of Serbia.[1][better source needed]

Political circumstances

[edit]

WithCvetković-Maček agreement, Banovina of Croatia was created fromSava Banovina,Littoral Banovina, and parts ofVrbas Banovina,Drina Banovina andZeta Banovina The new creation included large number of areas in whichCroats weren't ethnic majority (i.e. were Serbs where ethnic majority),[2] or areas that weren't earlier part of the Croatian state (Prevlaka,Dubrovnik and westernSrem). This turn of events provoked outcry in part of the Serbian people because the creation of Banovina of Croatia didn't resolve the so-called Serbian issue.[3] Protests followed, mostly organized or incited bySerbian Cultural Club which demanded revision of Cvetković-Maček agreement, that is, border revision of the newly formed Banovina of Croatia. Serbian Cultural Club claimed that the agreement wasn't signed by all Serb representatives but was in fact the result of bargain struck between the crown and representatives ofCPP.[4][5]

Map of Banovina of Croatia, 1939

Through its newspaper, the "Serbian Voice", Serbian Cultural Club, by means of different articles presented opinion on necessity of Serb political autonomy in Banovina of Croatia (in 19 of counties where Serbs were absolute or relative majority) or alternatively, separation from Banovina of Croatia and addition to other Banovina level units that were to enter Banovina of Serbia later on.[5]

To implement this, Serbian Cultural Club formed its subcommittees on territory of eastSlavonija, Srem, Bosanska Posavina and in the final months of 1939. started collecting signatures for separation of Ilok, Šid and Vukovar county from Banovina of Croatia.[5]

Historical, geographical and other resolution reasons

[edit]

Historical reasons

[edit]

As main reasons for the resolution, the document itself names the historical reasons:

"For many years, Vukovar was the seat of theSyrmia County. Together withBanat andBačka, Syrmia formsSerbian Vojvodina. This is irrefutable, because even the national spirit attests to it through song "Syrmia, Banat and Bačka, the three courageous hearts". We had Serb majority in Vukovar county for several centuries now. Different sources confirm this; for example, one modern German writer from the first half of 18th century says: "Orthodox believers built their church in 1731. for which 50.000 bricks were requested from local nobility. Their requests were easily met for they made the majority of county population and their religion was tolerated as they already had one older church in Vukovar. Furthermore, they benefited from poor demand for the landowner brick.

Summoned by Syrmia-Karlovci metropolitanVikentije Jovanović, Russians teachers arrived to educate the Serbian youth and one of those teachers stayed inSremski Karlovci while others leave forBelgrade and Vukovar, so they can find schools there. The fact that in 1733. Timitej Levandovski went to Vukovar and started a Serbian school shows how, even then, Vukovar represented a strong Serbian cultural center. It remained as such through history to the present day. Vukovar gave the first Serbian journalist and polyglot,Zaharije Stefanović Orfelin, predecessor to theDositej Obradović.

"Dobra Voda", Vukovar picnic resort, where most notable Serbs from Syrmia regularly gathered near the little church of St.Paraskeva, was whereBranko Radičević found inspiration for his poems.Svetozar Miletić, returning fromVac, first stops by in Vukovar to visit the Serbian political centar of Syrmia. These examples are not unique, many others can be added to the list. Cultural and educational Serbian societies even today mention Vukovar Serbs action."

Geographical reasons

[edit]

According to the signatures of the resolution, Vukovar, in economic sense "absolutely and solely gravitates towards Novi Sad and creates one economic unit with Syrmia...Only applicable authority in matters of price regulation of commercial goods on Vukovar market is the stock exchange of Novi Sad. The only place where a farmer from Vukovar county can buy his tools is Novi Sad. The economic structure of the Vukovar county is identical with that of Danbue Banovina.

Political reasons

[edit]

Signatories of the resolution stated that Vukovar has always a single political whole with rest of the Syrmia, that is, Danube Banovine back then: "Croats and their political parties didn't once win an election majority in this county, therefore neither was the political representative theirs. During the campaign for the political reorganization of the country, it was requested from the Croats that they honor specific historical individuality. If this individuality was to be taken into an account, Vukovar could be added to the Vojvodina".

Likewise, it was stated that according to the census from 1931. Vukovar county had 51.334 citizens. 26.342 were Serbs, 11.893 were Croats while the rest consisted of national minorities (Germans, Hungarians, Russians/Rusyns, Czechs, Slovaks, Jews...), therefore, Vukovar county, as an area populated mostly with Serbs had no reason or basis to remain part of Banovina of Croatia.

Signatories

[edit]

Initiators and authors of the resolution were Marko R. Bingulac and Marko Lj. Bugarski. As such, they were mentioned as first signatories of the resolution. Afterwards followed signatures by representatives of Serbian Orthodox Church municipalities:

  • for Serbian Church municipality ofVukovar, signatories were its president Teodor Selaković, Cvetko Bingulac and archpriest Jovan Kozobarić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofBorovo, priest Bogdan Dejanović, archpriest Đurica Skakić and vice-president Milan Buzaretić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofGaboš signatories were its president, Andrija Ćelić and the priest Milan Petović,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofTrpinja, president Jovo Palić and priest Spasoje Vukotić
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofMarkušica, president Mladen Petrović,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofVera, president and priest, Đuro Mašić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofNegoslavci, president Radovan Crnjanski and priest Petar Ostojić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofBobota, president Miloš Maletić and priest Đuro Mašić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofPačetin, president Dimitrije Crnogorac and priest Nikolaj Semčenko,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofBršadin, its president Živko Simić and priest Đorđe Mišić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofMikluševci andČakovci, priest Kiprijan Relić and Kosta Anđelić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofOstrovo, president Milan Vučevac and priest Dušan Blidović,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofMarinci, priest Vasilije Lengenfelder and president Nikola Živanović,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofOpatovac andSotin, archpriest Emilijan Josifović and president Milivoj Kekić,
  • for Serbian Church municipality ofPalača, priest Borisav Božić and president Dušan Petojević

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Srpski Glas #1. pp. 7
  2. ^Vladimir Ćorović: Istorija srpskog naroda
  3. ^Djokić, Dejan; Ker-Lindsay, James (4 October 2010).New Perspectives on Yugoslavia: Key Issues and Controversies. Routledge.ISBN 978-1-136-93132-1.
  4. ^Српски културни клуб
  5. ^abcRegan, Krešimir (October 2008)."Srpski kulturni klub i Banovina Hrvatska".Journal of Contemporary History (in Croatian).40 (2). Zagreb: Croatian Institute of History.
Cultural identity
National
coordination
Regional
coordination
Organizations
Media
Education
Primary education
17 primary schools
Vukovar-Syrmia County
Osijek-Baranja County
Secondary education
7 schools
Other
Religion
Political parties
Symbols
History
Historical organizations
and institutions
Historical events
Historical documents
World War II
General
Concentration
camps
Massacres
Croatian War of Independence
Origins
Military offensives
Serbian regions
Serbian forces
Atrocities
against Serbs
Atrocities by
Serbian forces
Diplomacy
History
Coat of arms of Vukovar
Coat of arms of Vukovar
Districts
Buildings and
landmarks
Places of worship
Culture
Education
Transport
Manifestations
Neighboring municipalities
History
Eparchies
Monasteries
Churches
Cathedrals
Eastern Croatia
Central Croatia
Dalmatia
North Adriatic
Education
Other
Clergy
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vukovar_resolution&oldid=1323916758"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp