Generally, one vowel will trigger a shift in other vowels within the domain, such that the affected vowels match the relevant feature of the trigger vowel. Intervening segments are common between affected vowels, meaning that the vowels do not need to be next to each other for this change to apply, classifying this as a "long-distance" type of assimilation. Common phonological features that define the natural classes of vowels involved in vowel harmony includevowel backness,vowel height,nasalization,roundedness, andadvanced and retracted tongue root.
Certain authors and articles use the termvowel harmony to refer toprogressive (beginning-to-end) vowel assimilation, and useumlaut to refer toregressive assimilation. The termumlaut is also used in a different sense to refer to a type ofvowel gradation, as well as thediacritic that often marks such changes.Metaphony is often used synonymously with vowel harmony, but is typically used to describe historicalsound changes. This article uses the term "vowel harmony" to refer to bothprogressive andregressive assimilatory processes.
Vowel harmony is found in manyagglutinative languages. The given domain of vowel harmony taking effect often spans across morpheme boundaries, andsuffixes andprefixes will usually follow vowel harmony rules. Vowel harmony is also considered anareal feature in some parts of the world, especiallyNorthern andCentral Asia among theTurkic,Mongolic andTungusic language families, as well as other languages in contact with languages from the aforementioned families.
Vowel harmony processes are "long-distance" in the sense that the assimilation involves sounds that are separated by interveningsegments (usually consonant segments). In other words,harmony refers to the assimilation of sounds that arenot adjacent to each other. For example, a vowel at the beginning of a word can trigger assimilation in a vowel at the end of a word. The assimilation occurs across the entire word in many languages. This is represented schematically in the following diagram:
before assimilation
after assimilation
VaCVbCVbC
→
VaCVaCVaC
(Va = type-a vowel,Vb = type-b vowel, C = consonant)
In the diagram above, theVa (type-a vowel) causes the followingVb (type-b vowel) to assimilate and become the same type of vowel (and thus they become, metaphorically, "in harmony").
The vowel that causes the vowel assimilation is frequently termed thetrigger while the vowels that assimilate (orharmonize) are termedtargets. When the vowel triggers lie within theroot orstem of a word and theaffixes contain the targets, this is calledstem-controlled vowel harmony (the opposite situation is calleddominant).[2] This is fairly common among languages with vowel harmony[citation needed] and may be seen in theHungariandative suffix:
Root
Dative
Gloss
város
város-nak
'city'
öröm
öröm-nek
'joy'
The dative suffix has two different forms-nak/-nek. The-nak form appears after the root with back vowels (o anda are back vowels). The-nek form appears after the root with front vowels (ö ande are front vowels).
Unconventional systems, like the one inNez Perce, that do not seem to be based on any obvious phonetic feature at first.[8]
In many languages, vowels can be said to belong to particular sets or classes, such as back vowels or rounded vowels. Some languages have more than one system of harmony. For instance,Altaic languages are proposed to have a rounding harmony superimposed over a backness harmony.
Even among languages with vowel harmony, not all vowels need to participate in the vowel conversions; these vowels are termedneutral. Neutral vowels may beopaque and block harmonic processes or they may betransparent and not affect them.[2] Intervening consonants are also often transparent.
Finally, languages that do have vowel harmony often allow for lexicaldisharmony, or words with mixed sets of vowels even when an opaque neutral vowel is not involved. Van der Hulst & van de Weijer (1995) point to two such situations: polysyllabic trigger morphemes may contain non-neutral vowels from opposite harmonic sets and certain target morphemes simply fail to harmonize.[2] Manyloanwords exhibit disharmony. For example, Turkishvakit, ('time' [from Arabicwaqt]); *vakıt would have been expected. Other examples from Finnish includeolympialaiset ('Olympic games') andsekundäärinen ('secondary') which have both front and back vowels. In standard Finnish, these words are pronounced as they are spelled, but many speakers intuitively apply vowel harmony –olumpialaiset, andsekundaarinen orsekyndäärinen.
Turkic languages inherit their systems of vowel harmony fromProto-Turkic, which already had a fully developed system. The one exception isUzbek, which has lost its vowel harmony due to extensivePersian influence; however, its closest relative,Uyghur, has retained Turkic vowel harmony.
Tatar has no neutral vowels. The vowel é is found only inloanwords. Other vowels also could be found in loanwords, but they are seen as Back vowels. Tatar language also has a rounding harmony, but it is not represented in writing. O and ö could be written only in the first syllable, but vowels they mark could be pronounced in the place where ı and e are written.
Kazakh's system of vowel harmony is primarily a front/back system, but there is also a system of rounding harmony that is not represented by the orthography.
Kyrgyz's system of vowel harmony is primarily a front/back system, but there is also a system of rounding harmony, which strongly resembles that of Kazakh.
Turkish has a 2-dimensional vowel harmony system, where vowels are characterised by two features: [±front] and [±rounded]. There are two sets of vocal harmony systems: a simple one and a complex one. The simple one is concerned with thelow vowels e, a and has only the [±front] feature (e front vsa back). The complex one is concerned with thehigh vowels i, ü, ı, u and has both [±front] and [±rounded] features (i front unrounded vsü front rounded andı back unrounded vsu back rounded). The close-mid vowelsö, o are not involved in vowel harmony processes.
Turkish has two classes of vowels – front andback. Vowel harmony states that words may not contain both front and back vowels. Therefore, most grammatical suffixes come in front and back forms, e.g.Türkiye'de "in Turkey" butAlmanya'da "in Germany".
In addition, there is a secondary rule thati andı in suffixes tend to becomeü andu respectively after rounded vowels, so certain suffixes have additional forms. This gives constructions such asTürkiye'dir "it is Turkey",kapıdır "it is the door", butgündür "it is the day",karpuzdur "it is the watermelon".
In the suffix-(i)yor, theo is invariant, while thei changes according to the preceding vowel; for examplesönüyor – "he/she/it fades". Likewise, in the suffix-(y)ken, thee is invariant:Roma'dayken – "When in Rome"; and so is thei in the suffix-(y)ebil:inanılabilir – "credible". The suffix-ki exhibits partial harmony, never taking a back vowel but allowing only the front-voweled variant-kü:dünkü – "belonging to yesterday";yarınki – "belonging to tomorrow".
Most Turkish words do not only have vowel harmony for suffixes, but also internally. However, there are many exceptions.
Compound words are considered separate words with respect to vowel harmony: vowels do not have to harmonize between members of the compound (thus forms likebu|gün "this|day" = "today" are permissible). Vowel harmony does not apply forloanwords, as inotobüs – from French "autobus". There are also a few native modern Turkish words that do not follow the rule (such asanne "mother" orkardeş "sibling" which used to obey vowel harmony in their older forms,ana andkarındaş, respectively). However, in such words, suffixes nevertheless harmonize with the final vowel; thusannesi – "his/her mother", andvoleybolcu – "volleyballer".
In some loanwords the final vowel is ana,o oru and thus looks like a back vowel, but is phonetically actually a front vowel, and governs vowel harmony accordingly. An example is the wordsaat, meaning "hour" or "clock", a loanword from Arabic. Its plural issaatler. This is not truly an exception to vowel harmony itself; rather, it is an exception to the rule thata denotes a front vowel.
Disharmony tends to disappear through analogy, especially within loanwords; e.g.Hüsnü (a man's name) < earlierHüsni, from Arabichusnî;Müslüman "Moslem, Muslim (adj. and n.)" < Ottoman Turkishmüslimân, from Persianmosalmân.
Mongolic languages display various vowel harmony systems. While there is some debate,Proto-Mongolic appears to have had a system of backness harmony, from which the modern languages' systems descend.[12]
Mongolian innovates on Proto-Mongolic's system, exhibiting bothtongue root harmony and rounding harmony. The tongue root harmony involves the vowels:/a,ʊ,ɔ/ (+RTR) and/i,u,e,o/ (-RTR). The vowel/i/ is phonetically similar to the -RTR vowels, but is largely transparent to vowel harmony. Rounding harmony only affects the open vowels,/e,o,a,ɔ/. Some sources refer to the primary harmonization dimension as pharyngealization or palatalness (among others), but neither of these is technically correct. Likewise, referring to ±RTR as the sole defining feature of vowel categories in Mongolian is not fully accurate either. In any case, the two vowel categories differ primarily with regards to tongue root position, and ±RTR is a convenient and fairly accurate descriptor for the articulatory parameters involved.[13][14][15]
Kalmyk Oirat, a western Mongolic language, displays very clear backness harmony. Words may only contain back or front vowels, but may be rounded or unrounded. /y/ alternates with /u/, /ø/ alternates with /o/, /æ/ alternates with /a/, and /i/ has the allophonic alternation [ɨ] in suffixes. /e/ is mostly transparent to vowel harmony.
Korean is an example of a language with a vowel harmony system that is gradually becoming less productive. WhileMiddle Korean had strong vowel harmony, modern Korean only retains it in certain cases such asonomatopoeia,adjectives,adverbs,conjugation, andinterjections. Many native Korean words demonstrate the formerly productive vowel harmony, such as사람 (saram, 'person') and부엌 (bu-eok, 'kitchen').
The current system of Korean vowel harmony is based on the orthographic system where vowels are classified as either positive/light, negative/dark, or neutral. Many scholars treat the positive vowels as +RTR and the negative and neutral vowels as -RTR. The basic conjugations for Korean's tenses demonstrate this vowel harmony, using the +RTR vowel /a/ or -RTR vowel /ʌ/ depending on the last vowel of the verb/adjective stem.
Positive
Neutral
Negative
Verb/Adjective infinitive form
알다 [aɭ.da]
보다 [po.da]
내다 [nɛ.da]
예쁘다 [je.p͈ɯ.da]
피다 [pʰi.da]
먹다 [mʌk.da]
주다 [t͡ɕu.da]
Non-past tense marker
아 [a]
어 [ʌ]
(uncontracted) Conjugated form
알아 [a.ɾa]
보아 [po.a]
내어 [nɛ.ʌ]
예쁘어 [je.p͈ɯ.ʌ]
피어 [pʰi.ʌ]
먹어 [mʌ.kʌ]
주어 [t͡ɕu.ʌ]
Note that the vowel harmony does not spread to subsequent morphemes, such as the polite ending 요 [jo], which uses a +RTR vowel, but occurs the same on words that take the +RTR tense marker.
Persian is a language which includes various types of regressive and progressive vowel harmony in different words and expressions.[16]
In Persian, progressive vowel harmony only applies to prepositions/post-positions when attached to pronouns.
Preposition/Post-Position
Pronoun
Result
Be (To)
man (I)
Behem (to me)
Az (From)
man (I)
Azam (from me)
Ba (With)
man (I)
Baham (with me)
Ra (At/For)
man (I)
Mara (at/for me)
to (you)
Toro (at/for you)
In Persian, regressive vowel harmony, some features spread from the triggering non-initial vowel to the target vowel in the previous syllable. The application and non-application of this backness harmony which can also be considered rounding harmony.
Many, though not all, Uralic languages show vowel harmony between front and back vowels. Vowel harmony is often hypothesized to have existed inProto-Uralic, though its original scope remains a matter of discussion.
Hungarian has a system offront,back, andintermediate (neutral) vowels and some vowel harmony processes. The basic rule is that words including at least one back vowel get back vowel suffixes (karba – in(to) the arm), while words excluding back vowels get front vowel suffixes (kézbe – in(to) the hand). Single-vowel words which have only the neutral vowels (i,í oré) are unpredictable, bute takes a front-vowel suffix.
In Hungarian language there are long, and short vowels
There are long, and short vowel pairs which are indicated using accents in writing in all but four exceptions with the exceptions possibly be either long, or short as well
The four exceptions area [ɒ],á [a:],e [ɛ],é [e:]
Long vowels compared to short ones are quite simply voiced for a longer period of time. Hungarian long vowels aretwo units long compared to other Uralic language Finnish'sthree units long vowels. In order for two vowels to belong-short pairs, the long vowel pronounced short must beidentical to its short pair, and vice-versa. In the case of thefour exceptions, this isnot applicable because - contrary to their written form - the four exceptions arenot two pairs of long, and short vowels, but vowels with pronunciation difference that isnot only the length
In writing the long of such vowel pairs are marked with stick-like accents most of the time compared to its dot-accented, or non-accented versions
For examplepapír is often pronounced [pɒppir] (double "p" intentional) instead of [pɒpi:r]
In the four exceptions case the stick-like accent (á [a:],é [e:]) refer to long length most if not all the time
Note - while stick like accents mark long - double dot, and double stick accents markcleft lip pronunciation (approaching [ɛ] sound)
In practice these long and short vowels sometimes lengthen, or shorten due to agglutinations. Most if not all the time this change is with written difference (meaning that the accent becomes different according)
híd -hidak - in this case the pronunciation is according to the words are written (long in the first, short in the second word)
It can happen that an exceptional vowel is gaining, or losing an accent regardless of it not being the long, or the short pair of the other
fél -felek - in this case the pronunciation is according to the words are written (long in the first, short in the second word),yet these arenot long, and short pairs
fa -fák - in this case the pronunciation is according to the words are written (short in the first, long in the second word),yet these arenot short, and long pairs
There are cleft lip, and non-cleft lip vowel pairs. Cleft lip vowels approach [ɛ] sound when pronounced compared to its non-cleft lip vowel pairs. All these letters (or sounds if you will) other thane [ɛ], andé [e:] are marked with double accents (both double dot, and double sticks)
For exampleö [ø] is the short cleft lip version, whileő [ø:] is the long cleft lip version ofo [o]
Words with such sounds areoften agglutinated using cleft lip vowels also
okos +kd =okoskodó (he or she is playing smart)
Non-cleft lip vowel of root word tonon-cleft lip vowel in agglutination
hős +kd =hősködő (he or she is playing hero)
Cleft lip vowel of root word tocleft lip vowel in agglutination
daru +z =daruzó (he or she is operating a crane often)
Non-cleft lip vowel of root word tonon-cleft lip vowel in agglutination
hegedű +z =hegedűző (he or she is playing on a violin often)
Cleft lip vowel of root word tocleft lip vowel in agglutination
Naturally sincee [ɛ], andé [e:] are also cleft lip (by definition, not by accent on letter) with these as the last vowel of a word the following examples are also valid
foci +z =focizó (he or she playing football often)
Non-cleft lip vowel of root word tonon-cleft lip vowel in agglutination
tévé +z =tévéző (he or she is watching tv often)
Cleft lip vowel of root word tocleft lip vowel in agglutination
ló +vgl =lovagló (he or she is riding a horse)
Non-cleft lip vowel of root word tonon-cleft lip vowel in agglutination
teve +vgl =tevegelő (he or she is riding a camel)
Cleft lip vowel of root word tocleft lip vowel in agglutination
Note that "vgl" isnot considered an agglutination, but in the camel's case it is used as one. "To ride" meanslovagol, in which "o", and "l" are supposed to switch places.Lovag means knight, and "to ride a horse" is "to pretend to be a knight" rather in Hungarian language, but in the word for camel there is a "v", and it is very in a convenient place there. The word for knight is maybe related to the word for horse in Hungarian language
Note that all these examples here are adjectives, and not very translatable
Unrounded front vowels (orIntermediate orneutral vowels) can occur together with eitherback vowels (e.g.répa carrot,kocsi car) orrounded front vowels (e.g.tető,tündér), butrounded front vowels andback vowels can occur together only in words of foreign origins (e.g.sofőr = chauffeur, French word for driver). The basic rule is that words including at least one back vowel take back vowel suffixes (e.g.répában in a carrot,kocsiban in a car), while words excluding back vowels usually take front vowel suffixes (except for words including only the vowelsi,í, andé, for which there is no general rule, e.g.lisztet againsthidat, orcéloz againstrémes).
open
middle
closed
Back("low")
a á
o ó
u ú
Front("high")
unrounded(neutral)
e é
i í
rounded
ö ő
ü ű
Some other rules and guidelines to consider:
Compound words get suffix according to the last word, e.g.:ártér (floodplain) compound ofár +tér front vowel suffix just as the wordtér when stands alone (téren,ártéren)
In case of words of obvious foreign origins: only the last vowel counts (if it is noti orí):sofőrhöz,nüanszszal,generálás,októberben,parlamentben,szoftverrel
If the last vowel of the foreign word isi orí, then the last but one vowel will be taken into consideration, e.g.papírhoz,Rashiddal. If the foreign word includes only the vowelsi orí then it gets front vowel suffix, e.g.:Mitch-nek ( = "for Mitch")
There are some non-Hungarian geographical names that have no vowels at all (e.g. the Croatian island ofKrk), in which case as the word does not include back vowel, it gets front vowel suffix (e.g.Krk-re = to Krk)
For acronyms: the last vowel counts (just as in case of foreign words), e.g.:HR (pronounced:há-er) gets front vowel suffix as the last pronounced vowel is front vowel (HR-rel = with HR)
Some 1-syllable Hungarian words withi,í oré are strictly using front suffixes (gépre,mélyről,víz >vizet,hírek), while some others can take back suffixes only (héjak, szíjról,nyíl >nyilat,zsírban,írás)
Some foreign words that have fit to the Hungarian language and start with back vowel and end with front vowel can take either front or back suffixes (so can be optionally considered foreign word or Hungarian word):farmerban orfarmerben
Grammatical suffixes in Hungarian can have one, two, three, or four forms:
one form: every word gets the same suffix regardless of the included vowels (e.g.-kor)
two forms (most common): words get either back vowel or front vowel suffix (as mentioned above) (e.g.-ban/-ben)
three forms: there is one back vowel form and two front vowel forms; one for words whose last vowel is rounded front vowel and one for words whose last vowel is not rounded front vowel (e.g.-hoz/-hez/-höz)
four forms: there are two back vowel forms and two front vowel forms (e.g.-ot/-at/-et/-öt or simply-t, if the last sound is a vowel)
An example on basic numerals:
-kor(at, for time)
-ban/-ben(in)
-hoz/-hez/-höz(to)
-t/-ot/-at/-et/-öt(accusative)
Back
(regular stem)
hat (6)
hatkor nyolckor háromkor – egykor négykor kilenckor tízkor ötkor kettőkor
Hungarian language is a consonant oriented language that makes vowel harmony possible, but the vowels in agglutinations can not be changed according to free will. Some of such vowels even change the meaning of the word
For this reason the vowels in agglutinations are constrained seemingly arbitrary
For example it wasmentioned that the last cleft lip vowel in the root of the word induces an agglutination with also at least one cleft lip vowel in it, however this is not always the case due to certain agglutinations are constrained. One good example is the-kor agglutination that can not take any other vowel, buto
ötöt - in accusative case the vowel beforet isnot as constrained
ötkor - in this caseo vowel is constrained not to be cleft lip
egykor - in this caseo vowel is constrained not to be frontal (high), and not to be cleft lip
There are further examples of vowel constraints in agglutinations not only for cleft lip-ness with some agglutination possessing
only one (-kor, etc...)
only two (-zó --ző,-ás --és,-val --vel, etc...)
only three (-hez --höz --hoz)
or more forms (accusative case, etc..)
The vowel in these forms are only short, or only long
Generally speaking an agglutination with a given meaning - or even a given context of meanings - may only possess either a long, or a short vowel throughout its forms regarding constraints
In the following examples the used vowels in the agglutinations change the meaning
tévé +zk =tévézek -i am watching tv
tévé +zk =tévézik -he is watching tv
tévé +zk =tévézők -people who are watching tv
As you can see in the last example's agglutination oftévézők is withlong vowel. This resulted in anoun, not averb. Thelong vowel renders meaning completely detached of the other two examples' context. The other two are in a context with onlyshort vowels, with the rest of their context is the following:
tévé +zl =tévézel -you (singular) are watching tv
Agglutination-zel is withshort vowel
tévé +ztk =tévéztek -you (plural) are watching tv
Agglutination-ztek is withshort vowel
tévé +znk =tévézünk -we are watching tv
Agglutination-zünk is withshort vowel
tévé +znk =tévéznek -they are watching tv
Agglutination-znek is withshort vowel
Likewise using the same agglutination used totévézők, the wordutazók is also withlong vowel, that is also anoun againstutazok with ashort vowel that is likewise averb
In theKhanty language, vowel harmony occurs in the Eastern dialects, and affects both inflectional and derivational suffixes. The Vakh-Vasyugan dialect has a particularly extensive system of vowel harmony:[17]
Trigger Vowels
Front
/æ/
/ø/
/y/
/i/
/ɪ/
/ʏ/
/e/
/œ/
Back
/ɑ/
/o/
/u/
/ɯ/
/ʌ/
/ʊ/
/ɔ/
Target Vowels
Front
/æ/
/ø/
/y/
/i/
/ɪ/
/ʏ/
Back
/ɑ/
/o/
/u/
/ɯ/
/ʌ/
/ʊ/
Trigger vowels occur in the first syllable of a word, and control the backness of the entire word. Target vowels are affected by vowel harmony and are arranged in seven front-back pairs of similar height and roundedness, which are assigned the archiphonemes A, O, U, I, Ɪ, Ʊ.
The vowels/e/,/œ/ and/ɔ/ appear only in the first syllable of a word, and are thus strictly trigger vowels. All other vowel qualities may act in both roles.
Vowel harmony is lost in the Northern and Southern dialects, as well as in the Surgut dialect of Eastern Khanty.
TheErzya language has a limited system of vowel harmony, involving only two vowel phonemes:/e/ (front) versus/o/ (back).
Moksha, the closest relative of Erzya, has no phonemic vowel harmony, though/ə/ has front and backallophones in a distribution similar to the vowel harmony in Erzya.
Vowel harmony is found in most of theFinnic languages. It has been lost inLivonian and in StandardEstonian, where the front vowelsüäö occur only in the first (stressed) syllable.South EstonianVõro (andSeto) language as well as some [North] Estonian dialects, however, retain vowel harmony.
A diagram illustrating vowel harmony in Finnish.Finnish vowel harmony and case agreement exemplified bymahdollisissa yllättävissä tilanteissa ("in possible unexpected situations"):mahdollinen takes-ssa,yllättävä takes-ssä andtilanne, with a neutral vowel first but a back vowel second, takes-ssa.
In theFinnish language, there are three classes of vowels – front,back, andneutral, where each front vowel has a back vowel pairing. Grammatical endings such as case and derivational endings – but notenclitics – have only archiphonemic vowels U, O, A, which are realized as either back[u,o,ɑ] or front[y,ø,æ] inside a single word. From vowel harmony it follows that the initial syllable of each single (non-compound) word controls the frontness or backness of the entire word. Non-initially, the neutral vowels are transparent to and unaffected by vowel harmony. In the initial syllable:
a back vowel causes all non-initial syllables to be realized with back (or neutral) vowels, e.g.pos+ahta+(t)a →posahtaa
a front vowel causes all non-initial syllables to be realized with front (or neutral) vowels, e.g.räj+ahta+(t)a →räjähtää.
a neutral vowel acts like a front vowel, but does not control the frontness or backness of the word: if there are back vowels in non-initial syllables, the word acts like it began with back vowels, even if they come from derivational endings, e.g.sih+ahta+(t)a →sihahtaa cf.sih+ise+(t)a →sihistä.
For example:
kaura begins with back vowel →kauralla
kuori begins with back vowel →kuorella
sieni begins without back vowels →sienellä (not*sienella)
käyrä begins without back vowels →käyrällä
tuote begins with back vowels →tuotteessa
kerä begins with a neutral vowel →kerällä
kera begins with a neutral vowel, but has a noninitial back vowel →keralla
Some dialects that have a sound change opening diphthong codas also permit archiphonemic vowels in the initial syllable. For example, standard 'ie' is reflected as 'ia' or 'iä', controlled by noninitial syllables, in the Tampere dialect, e.g.tiä ←tie butmiakka ←miekka
... as evidenced bytuotteessa (not*tuotteessä). Even ifphonologically front vowels precede the suffix-nsa, grammatically it is preceded by a word controlled by a back vowel. As shown in the examples, neutral vowels make the system unsymmetrical, as they are front vowels phonologically, but leave the front/back control to any grammatical front or back vowels. There is little or no change in the actual vowel quality of the neutral vowels.
As a consequence, Finnish speakers often have problems with pronouncing foreign words which do not obey vowel harmony. For example,olympia is often pronouncedolumpia. The position of some loans is unstandardized (e.g.chattailla/chättäillä) or ill-standardized (e.g.polymeeri, sometimes pronouncedpolumeeri, andautoritäärinen, which violate vowel harmony). Where a foreign word violates vowel harmony by not using front vowels because it begins with a neutral vowel, then last syllable generally counts, although this rule is irregularly followed.[18] Experiments indicate that e.g.miljonääri always becomes (front)miljonääriä, butmarttyyri becomes equally frequently bothmarttyyria (back) andmarttyyriä (front), even by the same speaker.
With respect to vowel harmony, compound words can be considered separate words. For example,syyskuu ("autumn month" i.e. September) has bothu andy, but it consists of two wordssyys andkuu, and declinessyys·kuu·ta (not*syyskuutä). The same goes for enclitics, e.g.taaksepäin "backwards" consists of the wordtaakse "to back" and-päin "-wards", which gives e.g.taaksepäinkään (not*taaksepäinkaan or*taaksepainkaan). If fusion takes place, the vowel is harmonized by some speakers, e.g.tälläinen protällainen ←tämän lainen.
Some Finnish words whose stems contain only neutral vowels exhibit an alternating pattern in terms of vowel harmony when inflected or forming new words through derivation. Examples includemeri "sea",meressä "in the sea" (inessive), butmerta (partitive), not*mertä;veri "blood",verestä "from the blood" (elative), butverta (partitive), not*vertä;pelätä "to be afraid", butpelko "fear", not*pelkö;kipu "pain", butkipeä "sore", not*kipea.
Helsinki slang has slang words that have roots violating vowel harmony, e.g.Sörkka. This can be interpreted as Swedish influence.
Vowel harmony is present in allYokutsan languages and dialects. For instance,Yawelmani has 4 vowels (which additionally may be eitherlong or short). These can be grouped as in the table below.
Unrounded
Rounded
High
i
u
Low
a
ɔ
Vowels in suffixes must harmonize with either/u/ or its non-/u/ counterparts or with/ɔ/ or non-/ɔ/ counterparts. For example, the vowel in theaorist suffix appears as/u/ when it follows a/u/ in the root, but when it follows all other vowels it appears as/i/. Similarly, the vowel in the nondirective gerundial suffix appears as/ɔ/ when it follows an/ɔ/ in the root; otherwise it appears as/a/.
Word
IPA
Comment
-hun/-hin
(aorist suffix)
muṭhun
[muʈhun]
'swear (aorist)'
giy̓hin
[ɡijˀhin]
'touch (aorist)'
gophin
[ɡɔphin]
'take of infant (aorist)'
xathin
[xathin]
'eat (aorist)'
-tow/-taw
(nondirective gerundial suffix)
goptow
[ɡɔptɔw]
'take care of infant (nondir. ger.)'
giy̓taw
[ɡijˀtaw]
'touch (nondir. ger.)'
muṭtaw
[muʈtaw]
'swear (nondir. ger.)'
xattaw
[xatːaw]
'eat (nondir. ger.)'
In addition to the harmony found in suffixes, there is a harmony restriction on word stems where in stems with more than one syllable all vowels are required to be of the same lip rounding and tongue height dimensions. For example, a stem must contain all high rounded vowels or all low rounded vowels, etc. This restriction is further complicated by (i) long high vowels being lowered and (ii) anepenthetic vowel[i] which does not harmonize with stem vowels.
There is some evidence for vowel harmony according tovowel height orATR in the prefix i3/e- in inscriptions from pre-SargonicLagash (the specifics of the pattern have led a handful of scholars to postulate not only an/o/ phoneme, but even an/ɛ/ and, most recently, an/ɔ/)[19] Many cases of partial or completeassimilation of the vowel of certain prefixes and suffixes to one in the adjacent syllable are reflected in writing in some of the later periods, and there is a noticeable though not absolute tendency for disyllabic stems to have the same vowel in both syllables.[20] What appears to bevowel contraction inhiatus (*/aa/, */ia/, */ua/ > a, */ae/ > a, */ue/ > u, etc.) is also very common.
Japanese language - in some of the Kansai dialects.[29] Additionally, some[who?] consider that vowel harmony must have existed at one time inOld Japanese, though there is no broad consensus. See the pertinentPhonology.
Buchan Scots is a Scots dialect with vowel height harmony, compare[here] "hairy",[rili] "really". This effect is blocked byvoicedobstruents and certainconsonant clusters:[bebi] "baby",[lʌmpi] "lumpy".[30]
Although vowel harmony is the most well-known harmony, not all types of harmony that occur in the world's languages involve only vowels. Other types of harmony involve consonants (and is known asconsonant harmony). Rarer types of harmony are those that involvetone or both vowels and consonants (e.g.postvelar harmony).
Some languages have harmony processes that involve an interaction between vowels and consonants. For example,Chilcotin has a phonological process known asvowel flattening (i.e. post-velar harmony) where vowels must harmonize withuvular andpharyngealized consonants.
Chilcotin has two classes of vowels:
"flat" vowels[ᵊi,e,ᵊɪ,o,ɔ,ə,a]
non-"flat" vowels[i,ɪ,u,ʊ,æ,ɛ]
Additionally, Chilcotin has a class of pharyngealized "flat" consonants[tsˤ,tsʰˤ,tsʼˤ,sˤ,zˤ]. Whenever a consonant of this class occurs in a word, all preceding vowels must be flat vowels.
[jətʰeɬtsˤʰosˤ]
'he's holding it (fabric)'
[ʔapələsˤ]
'apples'
[natʰákʼə̃sˤ]
'he'll stretch himself'
If flat consonants do not occur in a word, then all vowels will be of the non-flat class:
[nænɛntʰǽsʊç]
'I'll comb hair'
[tetʰǽskʼɛn]
'I'll burn it'
[tʰɛtɬʊç]
'he laughs'
Other languages of this region of North America (the Plateau culture area), such asSt'át'imcets, have similar vowel–consonant harmonic processes.
Syllabic synharmony was a process in theProto-Slavic language ancestral to all modernSlavic languages. It refers to the tendency of frontness (palatality) to be generalised across an entire syllable. It was therefore a form of consonant–vowel harmony in which the property 'palatal' or 'non-palatal' applied to an entire syllable at once rather than to each sound individually.
The result was that back vowels were fronted afterj or a palatal consonant, and consonants were palatalised beforej or a front vowel. Diphthongs were harmonized as well, although they were soon monophthongized because of a tendency to end syllables with a vowel (syllables were or became open). This rule remained in place for a long time, and ensured that a syllable containing a front vowel always began with a palatal consonant, and a syllable containingj was always preceded by a palatal consonant and followed by a front vowel.
A similar process occurs inSkolt Sami, where palatalization of consonants and fronting of vowels is asuprasegmental process applying to a whole syllable. Suprasegmental palatalization is marked with the letterʹ, which is aModifier letter prime, for example in the wordvääʹrr 'mountain, hill'.
Languages such asNez Perce andChukchi have vowel harmony systems which can not be easily explained in terms of height, backness, tongue root, or rounding. In Nez Perce, Katherine Nelson (2013)[8] proposes that the two sets of vowels ("dominant" /i a o/ and "recessive" /i æ u/) be considered as distinct "triangles" of vowel space, each by themselves maximally dispersed, where one set is somewhat retracted (further back) in comparison to the dominant. Note here that /i/ can behave as a dominant or recessive vowel depending on the root it is in; it is not transparent to vowel harmony.[8]
^abcvan der Hulst, H., & van de Weijer, J. (1995). Vowel harmony. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.),The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 495–534). Oxford: Blackwell.
^abRose, S.; Walker, R. (2011). "Harmony Systems.". In J. Goldsmith; J. Riggle; A. Yu (eds.).Handbook of Phonological Theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
^Ko, S. (2018).Tongue Root Harmony and Vowel Contrast in Northeast Asian Languages. Otto Harrassowitz.
^Ko, S., Joseph, A., & Whitman, J. (2014). Comparative consequences of the tongue root harmony analysis for proto-Tungusic, proto-Mongolic, and proto-Korean. In M. Robbeets & W. Bisang (Eds.).Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond (pp. 141-176). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
^Ko, S. (2011). Vowel contrast and vowel harmony shift in the Mongolic languages.Language Research, 47(1), 23-43.
^"Yurok".Survey of California and Other Indian Languages. UC Berkeley.Archived from the original on 1 March 2013. Retrieved7 January 2017.
^Svantesson, Jan-Olof, ed. (2005).The phonology of Mongolian. The phonology of the world's languages. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN978-0-19-926017-1.
^Svantesson, J.-O., Tsendina, A., Karlsson, A., & Franzén, V. (2005). Vowel Harmony. InThe Phonology of Mongolian (pp. 46-57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
^Godfrey, R. (2012). Opaque intervention in Khalkha Mongolian vowel harmony: A contrastive account.McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(1), 1-14.
^Barrere, I., Janhunen, J. (2019). Mongolian Vowel Harmony in a Eurasian Context.International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, 1 (1).
^Gulya, János (1966).Eastern Ostyak chrestomathy. Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic series. Vol. 51. pp. 37–39.
^Ringen, Catherine O.; Heinämäki, Orvokki (1999). "Variation in Finnish Vowel Harmony: An OT Account".Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.17 (2):303–337.doi:10.1023/A:1006158818498.S2CID169988008.
^Smith, Eric J M (2007). "Harmony and the Vowel Inventory of Sumerian".Journal of Cuneiform Studies.57.
^Michalowski, Piotr (2008). "Sumerian". In Woodard, Roger D (ed.).The Ancient Languages of Mesopotamia, Egypt and Aksum. Cambridge University Press. p. 17.
^Issam M. Abu-SalimJournal of Linguistics Vol. 23, No. 1 (Mar., 1987), pp. 1–24
^Delucchi, Rachele (2016).Fonetica e fonologia dell'armonia vocalica. Esiti di -A nei dialetti della Svizzera italiana in prospettiva romanza. Tübingen: Narr Francke Verlag.ISBN978-3-7720-8509-3.
Delucchi, Rachele (2016),Fonetica e fonologia dell'armonia vocalica. Esiti di -A nei dialetti della Svizzera italiana in prospettiva romanza, vol. Romanica Helvetica 134, Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag,ISBN978-3-7720-8509-3
Downing, Laura J.; Krämer, Martin (2024). "20. Phrasal Vowel Harmony". Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198826804.013.20.
Jacobson, Leon Carl. (1978).DhoLuo vowel harmony: A phonetic investigation. Los Angeles: University of California.
Krämer, Martin. (2003).Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Li, Bing. (1996).Tungusic vowel harmony: Description and analysis. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
Lloret, Maria-Rosa (2007), "On the Nature of Vowel Harmony: Spreading with a Purpose", in Bisetto, Antonietta; Barbieri, Francesco (eds.),Proceedings of the XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, pp. 15–35
Piggott, G. & van der Hulst, H. (1997). Locality and the nature of nasal harmony.Lingua, 103, 85-112.
Roca, Iggy; Johnson, Wyn (1999),A Course in Phonology, Blackwell Publishing
Shahin, Kimary N. (2002).Postvelar harmony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub.
Smith, Norval; & Harry van der Hulst (Eds.). (1988).Features, segmental structure and harmony processes (Pts. 1 & 2). Dordrecht: Foris.ISBN90-6765-399-3 (pt. 1),ISBN90-6765-430-2 (pt. 2 ) .
Vago, Robert M. (Ed.). (1980).Issues in vowel harmony: Proceedings of the CUNY Linguistic Conference on Vowel Harmony, 14 May 1977. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
Vago, Robert M. (1994). Vowel harmony. In R. E. Asher (Ed.),The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 4954–4958). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Walker, R. L. (1998).Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity Effects (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Santa Cruz.