Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 113

Coordinates:38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W /38.89056; -77.00444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromVoss v. Fisher)

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
Interactive map ofSupreme Court of the United States
38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W /38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 236 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W /38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senateconfirmation
Authorised byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject toimpeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov
This article is part of a series on the
Supreme Court
of the United States
The Court
Current membership
Chief Justice

Associate justices

Retired justices
Lists of justices

Specialty lists
All nominations
Unsuccessful nominations
Justices who served in Congress
Burial places of justices
Court functionaries
Constitutional law
of the United States
Overview
Principles
Government structure
Individual rights
Theory

This is alist of cases reported in volume 113 ofUnited States Reports, decided by theSupreme Court of the United States in 1885.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 113 U.S.

[edit]
See also:List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
See also:List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office
See also:List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition

The Supreme Court is established byArticle III, Section 1 of theConstitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it toCongress to set the number of justices. Under theJudiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six toseven,nine,ten, and back tonine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 113 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Morrison WaiteChief JusticeOhioSalmon P. ChaseJanuary 21, 1874
(63–0)
March 4, 1874

March 23, 1888
(Died)
Samuel Freeman MillerAssociate JusticeIowaPeter Vivian DanielJuly 16, 1862
(Acclamation)
July 21, 1862

October 13, 1890
(Died)
Stephen Johnson FieldAssociate JusticeCalifornianewly created seatMarch 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)
Joseph P. BradleyAssociate JusticeNew Jerseynewly created seatMarch 21, 1870
(46–9)
March 23, 1870

January 22, 1892
(Died)
John Marshall HarlanAssociate JusticeKentuckyDavid DavisNovember 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
William Burnham WoodsAssociate JusticeGeorgiaWilliam StrongDecember 21, 1880
(39–8)
January 5, 1881

May 14, 1887
(Died)
Stanley MatthewsAssociate JusticeOhioNoah Haynes SwayneMay 12, 1881
(24–23)
May 17, 1881

March 22, 1889
(Died)
Horace GrayAssociate JusticeMassachusettsNathan CliffordDecember 20, 1881
(51–5)
January 9, 1882

September 15, 1902
(Died)
Samuel BlatchfordAssociate JusticeNew YorkWard HuntMarch 22, 1882
(Acclamation)
April 3, 1882

July 7, 1893
(Died)

Citation style

[edit]
See also:United States district court
See also:United States circuit court
See also:United States federal courts

Under theJudiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limitedoriginal jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 113 U.S.

[edit]
See also:Waite Court
Case NamePage & yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Cole v. City of La Grange1 (1885)GraynonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Company9 (1885)GraynonenoneN.H.affirmed
Barbier v. Connolly27 (1885)FieldnonenoneCal. Super. Ct.affirmed
Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Company v. Commissioners of Emigration33 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Davison v. Von Lingen40 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Md.affirmed
Drennen v. London Assurance Company51 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.D. Minn.reversed
Hollister v. Benedict and Burnham Manufacturing Company59 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.D. Conn.reversed
Hess v. Reynolds73 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.reversed
Polleys v. Black River Improvement Company81 (1885)MillernonenoneWis. Cir. Ct.dismissed
Pullman Palace Car Company v. Speck84 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.N.D. Ill.affirmed
Griffith v. Godey89 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.reversed
Rowell v. Lindsay97 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.E.D. Wis.affirmed
Findlay v. McAllister104 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.reversed
Central Railroad and Banking Company of Georgia v. Pettus116 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.M.D. Ala.reversed
Steele v. United States128 (1885)WoodsnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Ackley School District v. Hall135 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.D. Iowaaffirmed
Clawson v. United States143 (1885)HarlannonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Utahaffirmed
Bicknell v. Comstock149 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.reversed
United States v. Mueller153 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Consolidated Safety-Valve Company v. Crosby Steam Gauge and Valve Company157 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Mass.reversed
Novelty sufficient to distinguish a patent from prior art can be suggested by facts demonstrating the practical value of the invention. Here, the fact that known versions of the invention were not used and the fact that the claimed invention was widely adopted quickly suggest that the claimed invention had some modicum of novelty that its contemporaries lacked.
Bryan v. Kennett179 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.affirmed
Northern Liberty Market Company v. Kelly199 (1885)GraynonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.reversed
Tucker v. Masser203 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
A patent for a placer mining claim composed of distinct mining locations, some of which were made after 1870 and together embracing over one hundred and sixty acres, is valid. AffirmingSmelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U.S. 636 (1881).
Cardwell v. American Bridge Company205 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
Voss v. Fisher213 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.W.D. Mich.reversed
This case was about alleged patent infringement, and the claimed invention included a stuffed pad within a horse collar. The defendant did not infringe because the contested device did not include a stuffed pad or an equivalent.
Caillot v. Deetken215 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Cal.dismissed
The Supreme Court cannot have jurisdiction over a case based on a writ of error that was untimely filed. In this case, the filing was untimely because it came in after the end of the Supreme Court term following the filing of the writ in the circuit court.
Cheong Ah Moy v. United States216 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Cal.dismissed
Price v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company218 (1885)MillernonenonePa.dismissed
Dakota County v. Glidden222 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.D. Neb.dismissed
Anderson County v. Beal227 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Kan.affirmed
Harvey v. United States243 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneCt. Cl.multiple
Central Railroad of New Jersey v. Mills249 (1885)GraynonenoneC.C.D.N.J.affirmed
Looney v. District of Columbia258 (1885)GraynonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
A government contractor cannot both sell the debts owed to them by the District of Columbia at a discount as a security and also sue the District for the difference in what they were owed.
Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway Company v. United States261 (1885)GraynonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Coon v. Wilson268 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Spaids v. Cooley278 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.reversed
Sully v. Drennan287 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.S.D. Iowaaffirmed
Avegno v. Schmidt293 (1885)WoodsnonenoneLa.affirmed
Stone v. Chisolm302 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.D.S.C.affirmed
Thornley v. United States310 (1885)MillernonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Baylis v. Travellers' Insurance Company316 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.E.D.N.Y.reversed
Pneumatic Gas Company v. Berry322 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.E.D. Mich.affirmed
Ex parte Bigelow328 (1885)MillernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.habeas corpus denied
Quincy v. Jackson332 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Santa Anna v. Frank339 (1885)Harlannonenonenot indicatedaffirmed
McArthur v. Scott340 (1885)GraynoneWaiteC.C.S.D. Ohioreversed
Hyatt v. Vincennes National Bank408 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
United States v. Jordan418 (1885)BlatchfordnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Crane424 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.S.D. Iowaaffirmed
Prentice v. Stearns435 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.affirmed
Morgan v. Hamlet449 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmed
Chase v. Curtis452 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway Company v. Berry465 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneArk.affirmed
Morgan v. United States476 (1885)MatthewsnonenoneCt. Cl.reversed
Provident Institution for Savings v. Jersey City506 (1885)BradleynonenoneN.J.affirmed
Union Pacific Railway Company v. Cheyenne516 (1885)BradleynonenoneSup. Ct. Terr. Wyo.reversed
Erhardt v. Boaro I527 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Aposted but inchoate mining claim is valid only if there is an external reason to believe that there are precious metals within the land, such as an actual discovery of them. A mere guess by a speculator is insufficient.[2]
Erhardt v. Boaro II537 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
A case in equity regarding an injunction to stop contested mining inErhardt v. Boaro I, a case at law. Because the Supreme Court reversed the lower court in the legal case and remanded for a new trial, it reinstated an injunction pending the result of that new trial.
Richards v. Mackall539 (1885)WaitenonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.dismissal denied
Peugh v. Davis542 (1885)MillernonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Gumbel v. Pitkin545 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.D. La.dismissal denied
Fussell v. Gregg550 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
Fussell v. Hughes565 (1885)per curiamnonenoneC.C.N.D. Ohioaffirmed
City of St. Louis v. Myers566 (1885)WaitenonenoneMo.dismissed
Brown v. United States568 (1885)WoodsnonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Chicago Life Insurance Company v. Needles574 (1885)HarlannonenoneIll.affirmed
Pearce v. Ham585 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Ayers v. Watson594 (1885)BradleynonenoneC.C.W.D. Tex.reversed
California Artificial Stone Paving Company v. Molitor609 (1885)BradleynonenoneC.C.D. Cal.dismissed
Winona and St. Peter Railroad Company v. Barney618 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Minn.reversed
Kansas Pacific Railway Company v. Dunmeyer629 (1885)MillernonenoneKan.affirmed
Schmieder v. Barney645 (1885)WaitenonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.affirmed
Camp v. United States648 (1885)HarlannonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Maxwell's Executors v. Wilkinson656 (1885)GraynonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.reversed
Flagg v. Walker659 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.S.D. Ill.affirmed
Blake v. City and County of San Francisco679 (1885)WoodsnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
Fourth National Bank v. Stout684 (1885)WaitenonenoneC.C.E.D. Mo.dismissed
The court dismissed the appeal of a bank from a decree adjudging that it held property of another corporation in trust for the creditors of the latter and directed the bank to pay to each of the creditors.
Davies v. Corbin687 (1885)WaitenonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmance denied
Boyer v. Boyer689 (1885)HarlannonenonePa.reversed
Soon Hing v. Crowley703 (1885)FieldnonenoneC.C.D. Cal.affirmed
United States v. Indianapolis and St. Louis Railroad Company711 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.D. Ind.affirmed
Ex parte Fisk713 (1885)MillernonenoneC.C.S.D.N.Y.habeas corpus granted
Cooper Manufacturing Company v. Ferguson727 (1885)WoodsMatthewsnoneC.C.D. Colo.reversed
Carter v. Burr737 (1885)WaitenonenoneSup. Ct. D.C.affirmed
Gregory v. Hartley742 (1885)WaitenonenoneNeb.affirmed
United States v. Steever747 (1885)GraynonenoneCt. Cl.affirmed
Hardin v. Boyd756 (1885)HarlannonenoneC.C.E.D. Ark.affirmed

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^"Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. RetrievedApril 7, 2021.
  2. ^Donald W. Large, Defining Valuable Mineral Deposits - A Continuing Legal Quagmire, 1986 Ariz. St. L.J. 453, 457 n.36 (1986).

External links

[edit]
Portal:
List of cases by Court
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Complete list
By recent term
By subject matter
Other lists
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_113&oldid=1336057429"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp