.svg)
AVolkstaat (Afrikaans pronunciation:[ˈfɔlkstɑːt],lit. 'People's State'[1]), also called aBoerestaat, is a proposedWhitehomeland[2] forBoers andAfrikaners within the borders ofSouth Africa, most commonly proposed as afully independent Boer/Afrikaner nation.[3][4] The proposed state would excludeAfrikaans-speaking Coloureds but acceptEnglish-speaking White South Africans and other White South Africans, if they accept Afrikaner culture and customs.[5]
Following theGreat Trek of the 1830s and 1840s,Boer colonists established severalBoer republics over the rest of the 19th century. The end ofapartheid and the establishment ofuniversal suffrage in South Africa in 1994 left some Afrikaners feeling disillusioned and marginalised by the political changes, which resulted in a proposal for an independent Volkstaat.
Several different methods have been proposed for the establishment of a Volkstaat. The geographic dispersal of minority Afrikaner communities throughout South Africa presents a significant obstacle to the establishment of a Volkstaat, because Afrikaners do not form a majority in any separate geographic area that could be sustainable independently. Supporters of the proposal have established several land cooperatives inOrania in theNorthern Cape province andKleinfontein inGauteng as practical implementations of the idea. Initiatives inBalmoral andMorgenzon, both inMpumalanga, failed to develop beyond their initial phase.
Historically, Boers have exhibited a drive for independence which resulted in the establishment of severalBoer republics in modern-daySouth Africa.Voortrekkers proclaimed separate independent republics, most notably theNatalia Republic,Orange Free State andSouth African Republic. However, during theSecond Boer War, British forces occupied the Orange Free State and South African Republic, which were subsequently incorporated into theCape Colony.
Underapartheid, the South African government promoted Afrikaner culture; though bothAfrikaans andEnglish were the official languages, the majority of the politicians running the country were Afrikaners. The underlying principle of apartheid wasracial separatism, and the means by which this was implemented, such as the homeland system ofbantustans, were biased against the non-European majority as they excluded them from exercising their rights in the broader South Africa.
In the 1980s, a group of Afrikaners, led byHF Verwoerd's son-in-law, formed a group called theOranjewerkers. They also planned a community based on "Afrikaner self-determination", and attempted to create a neo-"boerstaat" (literally: "Boer State," a reference to an idiomatic term for an Afrikaner-only state) in the remote EasternTransvaal (nowMpumalanga) community ofMorgenzon.[6]
In 1988, ProfessorCarel Boshoff (1927-2011) founded theAfrikaner-Vryheidstigting (Afrikaner Freedom Foundation), or Avstig. Avstig proposed a Volkstaat in theNorthern Cape province, in a largely rural and minimally developed region. Avstig bought the town ofOrania in 1991, and turned it into a model Volkstaat. Boshoff continued to be a representative of theFreedom Front, a political party which advocated the Volkstaat concept.[7] Orania lies at the far eastern apex of the original Volkstaat state, near where the boundaries of the three provinces Northern Cape,Eastern Cape, andFree State meet.
During the1994 general election,Afrikaners were asked by theFreedom Front (FF) to vote for the party if they wished to form an independent state or Volkstaat for Afrikaners. The results of the election showed that the Freedom Front had the support of 424,555 voters, the fourth highest in the country.[8] The FF did not however gain a majority in any of South Africa's voting districts, their closest being 4,692 votes inPhalaborwa, representing 30.38% of that district.[8]
Two surveys were conducted among white South Africans, in 1993 and 1996, asking the question "How do you feel about demarcating an area for Afrikanersand other "European" South Africans in which they may enjoy self determination? Do you support the idea of a Volkstaat?" The 1993 survey found that 29% supported the idea, and a further 18% would consider moving to a Volkstaat. The 1996 survey found that this had decreased to 22% supporting the idea, and only 9% wanting to move to a Volkstaat. In the second survey, the proportion of white South Africans opposed to the idea had increased from 34% to 66%.[9]
The 1996 survey found that "those who in 1996 said that they would consider moving to a Volkstaat are mainly Afrikaans speaking males, who are supporters of the Conservative Party or Afrikaner Freedom Front, hold racist views (24%; slightly racist: 6%, non racist: 0%), call themselves Afrikaners and are not content with the new democratic South Africa."[9] The study used the Duckitt scale of subtle racism to measure racist views.[9][10]
A 1999 pre-election survey suggested that the 26.9% of Afrikaners wanting to emigrate, but unable to, represented a desire for a solution such as a Volkstaat.[11]
In January 2010,Beeld, an Afrikaans newspaper, held an online survey. Out of 11,019 respondents, 56% (6,178) said that they would move to a Volkstaat if one were created, a further 17% (1,908) would consider it while only 27% (2,933) would not consider it as a viable option.[12] The newspaper's analysis of this was that the idea of a Volkstaat wasdoodgebore (stillborn) and that its advocates had been doing nothing but tread water for the past two decades, although it did suggest that the poll was a measure of dissatisfaction among Afrikaners.Hermann Giliomee later cited the Beeld poll in saying that over half of "northern Afrikaners" would prefer to live in a homeland.[13]
Dissatisfaction with life in post-apartheid South Africa is often cited as an indication of support for the idea of a Volkstaat among Afrikaners.[14][15] A poll carried out by theVolkstaat Council among white people in Pretoria identified crime, economic problems, personal security, affirmative action, educational standards, population growth, health services, language and cultural rights, and housing as reasons to support the creation of Volkstaat.[14]
In an interview withGlobal Politician, Volkstaat Council Chair Johann Wingard cited what he described as rising unemployment, reduced political representation for whites Afrikaners, and dangers to white Afrikaner cultural heritage as motivations for the creation of a Volkstaat.[7] However, white people in South Africa have the lowest unemployment rate of all racial groups in South Africa.[16]
TheFreedom Front has been the major political driving force for the formation of a Volkstaat. This Afrikaner-focused political party has representation in the national Parliament as well as several Provincial legislatures in South Africa. Support for this party however decreased to just under 140,000 votes, being less than 1% of the total votes cast (approximately 20% among registered Afrikaner voters) by the2004 national elections. The Freedom Front advocates following theBelgium,Canada and Spain models of granting territorial autonomy to linguistic minorities, believing it the only way to protect the rights of Afrikaner people. Under this policy, they proposed that a mostly uninhabited chunk of land in theWestern Cape andNorthern Cape, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean nearVredendal, to theOrange River at Orania, would be developed into an Afrikaner homeland.[17] As of 2024, the FF+ no longer explicitly supports the creation of a Volkstaat, but it does supportCape Independence, which is often seen as a separatist movement for Afrikaans speakers at large (rather than exclusively Afrikaners).
TheAfrikaner Weerstandsbeweging made headlines in March 2008 for their re-activation and plans of establishing an independent Boer state. Plans include a demand for land, such asStellaland andGoshen, that they claim is legally theirs in terms of theSand River Convention of 1852 and other historical treaties, through theInternational Court of Justice inThe Hague if necessary.[18] TheFront National also called for the re-establishment ofStellaland as possible Volkstaat.
Die Boeremag (The Farmer-Might) advocated for a violent overthrow of theAfrican National Congress government and sought to restore apartheid-era policies and create a separate homeland for Afrikaners. Most of its members were arrested in 2003, and are facing charges of treason.[7] Similar violent methods towards Volkstaat creation were employed by theOrde van die Dood in the 1980s.[19]
Penuell Maduna, one of the leading ANC negotiators during the transition era, noted that Afrikaner organizations could not agree on the borders of the new Volkstaat. He noted a proposal to create a Volkstaat that would stretch from majority-white neighborhoods in Pretoria to the Atlantic Ocean, which was seen as unacceptable by the ANC.[20]
On 5 June 1998,Mohammed Valli Moosa (then minister of constitutional development in the African National Congress (ANC) government) stated during a parliamentary budget debate that "the ideal of some Afrikaners to develop the North Western Cape as a home for the Afrikaner culture and language within the framework of the Constitution and the charter of human rights is viewed by the government as a legitimate ideal."[21]
On 23 July 2014, members of anAfrikaner group who call themselves the "Boer-Afrikaner Volksraad" announced forthcoming talks with theSouth African government around the concept of territorial self-determination for "Boer Afrikaner people". The talks would include either PresidentJacob Zuma, his deputyCyril Ramaphosa, or both; and would be held before the end of August 2014.[needs update][22]
There have been several notable attempts at a practical implementation of a Volkstaat.
One Volkstaat attempt is the small town ofOrania in the Northern Cape province. The land on which Orania is built is privately owned. It had a population of 519 in 2001, 10 years after being established. Today, Orania is home to about 3,000 Afrikaners but has approximately 7,000 'uitwoners' or 'outhabitants' who are part of the Orania Movement.[23][24][failed verification] Moving to Orania requires an application.[25] Orania is currently petitioning the government to become a separate municipality and in the meantime their(transitional) representative council will remain in place indefinitely with all its powers, rights and duties.[26]
Another attempt is the settlement ofKleinfontein outsidePretoria (in theTshwane metropolitan area). Similar to Orania, Kleinfontein was built on private property. Kleinfontein falls within the metropolitan area ofTshwane. In 2013 Tshwane recognized Kleinfontein as cultural community.[27] Members of the African National Congress and Democratic Alliance have denounced the settlement and the continued existence of white-only settlements in post-apartheid South Africa.
Kleinfontein currently has a population of around 650.
Two other notable Volkstaat attempts occurred in theMpumalanga province, but both failed to develop beyond their initial phase. The first was atBalmoral, at the site of a former concentration camp built during theSecond Boer War. The effort at Balmoral was financed byAmericanwhite supremacist politicianDavid Duke.[28] Prominent right-wingerWillem Ratte owns a farm in Balmoral.[29]
Meanwhile,Morgenzon was the site of another failed attempt to set up a Volkstaat in the 1990s. The idea originated in the early 1980s, when Hendrik Verwoerd Jr, son of the former prime ministerHendrik Verwoerd, moved to Morgenzon along with a group known asOranjewerkers.[30]
Ultimately only 20 families followed him, as his plans required them to give up their black servants and labourers, and most of Morgenzon's whites were reluctant to perform the menial tasks that were otherwise reserved for blacks.[30]
Section 235 of theSouth African Constitution allows for the right to self-determination of a community, within the framework of "the right of the South African people as a whole to self-determination", and pursuant to national legislation.[31] This section of the constitution was one of the negotiated settlements during the handing over of political power in 1994. The Freedom Front was instrumental in including this section in the constitution. No national legislation in this regard has yet been enacted for any ethnic group, however.
International law presents a possible recourse for the establishment of a Volkstaat over and above than what the South African Constitution offers. This is available to all minorities who wish to obtainself-determination in the form of independence. The requirements set by international law are explained by Prof C. Lloyd Brown-John of theUniversity of Windsor (Canada), as follows: "A minority who are geographically separate and who are distinct ethnically and culturally and who have been placed in a position of subordination may have a right to secede. That right, however, could only be exercised if there is a clear denial of political, linguistic, cultural and religious rights."[32] However, Afrikaner nationalists who have brought cases to the UN claiming indigenous status were rejected in 1996 and 2005 on the grounds that Afrikaners were neither marginalised or discriminated against.[33] The rights awarded to minorities were formally asserted by theUnited Nations General Assembly when it adopted resolution 47/135 on 18 December 1992.[34]
To bolster their bargaining positions, the homeland leaders teamed up with another group advocating segregation: conservative Afrikaners who demanded an ethnic Afrikaner homeland (volkstaat).
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)In 1996 and again in 2005, a group of Afrikaner nationalists submitted petitions claiming Indigenous status at the UN.5 The claims were rejected on the grounds that the group was neither marginalized, discriminated against, nor did it meet the criteria "set out in international legal standards and discourses at the present time".
Political history ofSouth Africa | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defunctpolities |
| ||||||||||||
| Events |
| ||||||||||||
| Political culture | |||||||||||||
| Defunct organisations |
| ||||||||||||
| Histories of political parties | |||||||||||||
