Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Voivode of Transylvania

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Official in Transylvania, 12th–16th century
This article is about the royal governors of Transylvania. For the rulers of the Principality of Transylvania after 1570, seePrince of Transylvania.
Part of a series on
Great Officers of State
in the
Kingdom of Hungary
Kingdom of Hungary
Map of Transylvania
Changes in the administration of Transylvania between 1300 and 1867

TheVoivode of Transylvania (German:Vojwode von Siebenbürgen;[1]Hungarian:erdélyi vajda;[1][2]Latin:voivoda Transsylvaniae;[1][2]Romanian:voievodul Transilvaniei)[3] was the highest-ranking official inTransylvania within theKingdom of Hungary from the 12th century to the 16th century. Appointed by themonarchs, thevoivodes – themselves also the heads orispáns ofFehér County – were the superiors of theispáns of all the othercounties in the province.

They had wide-ranging administrative, military and judicial powers, but their jurisdiction never covered the whole province. TheSaxon andSzékely communities – organized into their own districts or "seats" from the 13th century – were independent of the voivodes. The kings also exempted some Transylvanian towns and villages from their authority over the centuries. Even so, theVoivodeship of Transylvania "was the largest single administrative entity"[4] in the entire kingdom in the 15th century. Voivodes enjoyed income from the royal estates attached to their office, but the right to "grant lands, collect taxes and tolls, or coin money"[5] was reserved for the monarchs. AlthoughRoland Borsa,Ladislaus Kán and some other voivodes rebelled against the sovereign, most remained faithful royal officials.

Because of the gradual disintegration of the medieval Kingdom of Hungary in the 16th century, the last voivodes of Transylvania, who came from theBáthory family, ceased to be high-ranking officials. Instead they were theheads of state, although underOttoman suzerainty, of anew principality emerging in the eastern territories of the kingdom. Accordingly,Stephen Báthory, the voivode elected by theDiet of the new realm, officially abandoned the title of voivode and adopted that of prince in 1576, upon his election asKing of Poland.

Origins

[edit]

The origin of the office is unclear.[2] The title voivode is ofSlavic origin with a meaning of "commander, lieutenant".[6] Although EmperorConstantine VII Porphyrogennetos wrote of the voivodes[7] or chieftains of theHungarian tribes around 950, he seems to have adopted the term used by aSlavic interpreter.[8] Romanian historians maintain that the title, homonymous with the one used inWallachia andMoldavia, suggests a perpetuation of the local ruling tradition.[9][further explanation needed]

The border position of Transylvania[10] led to the formation of the voivodeship, since the monarchs could not maintain direct control over this remote region.[11] Thus the voivodes were never autonomous, but remained provincial officials of the kings.[8] The voivodes were heads of Fehér County from 1201,[12] which may indicate that their position had its origin in the office of that county'sispán.[13]

Two royal charters issued in 1111 and 1113 mention oneMercurius"princeps Ultrasilvanus", but he may have been only an important landowner in Transylvania without holding any specific office.[10]Leustach Rátót was the first individual whose title voivode was documented. He held the office in the late 12th century, but his voivodeship was mentioned by aroyal charter in 1230. The earliest extant document mentioning a voivode namedLegforus was issued in 1199.[2][6][10] In addition to voivode, royal charters used the titlesbanus,[14]dux andherzog for the same office in the next decades, showing that the terminology remained uncertain until the second half of the 13th century.[6]

Functions

[edit]

Jurisdiction

[edit]
See also:Count of the Székelys

The territories under the jurisdiction of the voivodes are known as Voivodeship or Voivodate of Transylvania.[15][16] Voivodes were the chiefs of theispáns of the Transylvanian counties.[13] Although the counties in Transylvania were first attested from the 1170s, earlier references to fortresses at their seats[17] and archaeological finds suggest that a system of counties existed in the 11th century.[18] For instance,Torda County was first mentioned in a charter of 1227, but a royal castle atTorda (Turda) had already been documented in 1097,[19] and three burials coin-dated to the reign ofStephen I of Hungary (1000 or 1001–1038) were unearthed in the same fortress.[20]

Map of 16th-century Transylvania
Administrative division of Transylvania in the early 16th century, the territories under the control of the Voivode depicted in yellow

Theispáns of the Transylvanian counties ofDoboka,Hunyad,Kolozs,Küküllő and Torda were not listed among the witnesses of royal charters from the beginning of the 13th century, hinting that their direct connection to the monarchs had by that time been interrupted.[13] Thereafter they were employed by the voivode who appointed and dismissed them at will.[13][21][22] Only the heads ofSzolnok County remained directly connected to the monarchs for a longer period,[13] until their office was united with the voivodeship in the 1260s.[23][24][25] Similarly, the voivodes were simultaneously theispáns of the nearbyArad County between 1321 and 1412.[24][26]

The kings exempted some communities from the jurisdiction of the voivodes.[5] TheDiploma Andreanum, a royal charter of 1224, placed the territory of the Saxons betweenBroos (Szászváros, Orăștie) andBarót (Baraolt) under the authority of the Count ofHermannstadt (Nagyszeben, Sibiu), who was appointed by and directly subordinate to the monarchs.[27][28] Likewise, a special royal official, theCount of the Székelys, administered the Székely community[29] from around 1228.[30] In the latter case, the two offices were united by custom in 1462: from then on each voivode was also appointed Count of the Székelys.[29]

Following theMongol invasion of 1241 and 1242, KingBéla IV of Hungary exempted the inhabitants ofBilak (Mărişelu),[31]Gyalu (Gilău),Gyulafehérvár (Alba Iulia),Harina (Herina),Tasnád (Tășnad) andZilah (Zalău).[32] KingCharles I of Hungary granted immunity to the Saxon communities ofBirthälm (Berethalom, Biertan),Kleinschelken (Kisselyk, Şeica Mică),[33] andMediasch (Medgyes, Mediaș) in 1315, but the same monarch annulled other communities' similar privileges in 1324.[34]Altrodenau (Radna, Rodna) andBistritz (Beszterce, Bistrița) received immunity in 1366.[35]

Honour of the voivodes

[edit]

The office of voivode was one of the most important royalhonours in the kingdom.[36] All income from lands attached to the Transylvanian royal castles was collected for the voivodes.[36] They enjoyed the income from fines,[36] but royal revenues from taxes, tolls and mines remained the kings' due.[37]

Ruins of Kőhalom Castle
RestoredKőhalom Castle (Cetatea Cohalmului,Romania), held by the voivodes between 1324 andc. 1418[38]

During most of the 14th century, the voivodes held the castles atBánffyhunyad (Huedin),Boroskrakkó (Cricău),Csicsóújfalu (Ciceu-Mihăieşti),Déva (Deva),Hátszeg (Hațeg),Kőhalom (Rupea),Küküllővár (Cetatea de Baltă),Léta (Lita),Nagy-Talmács (Tălmaciu),Torja (Turia) andÚjvár (Gogan Varolea), together with their lands.[39] Additionally, the voivodes enjoyed the revenues of royal estates in Transylvania.[36] For instance, the estates atBonchida (Bonțida) andVajdahunyad (Hunedoara) were attached to them for decades.[40] However, the monarchs started to grant their castles and estates to noblemen, to thebishops of Transylvania or to the Saxon community after 1387.[40] Consequently, Küküllővár and the lands pertaining to it remained the last piece of the "voivodal domain" in the 1450s.[40]

The inhabitants of the Transylvanian counties were compelled to accommodate the voivodes and their officials.[41] The "guest settlers" – privileged colonists – at Boroskrakkó,[42]Magyarigen (Ighiu)[42] andRomosz (Romos)[33] were the first to be released from this duty in 1206.[43] InAlvinc (Vinţu de Jos) andBorberek (Vurpăr),[31] the obligation itself was not abolished, but limited to two occasions a year.[44] Finally King Charles I exempted all Transylvanian noblemen and their serfs from this irksome duty in 1324.[41]

The voivodes who preferred to stay in the royal court seldom resided in their province,[21] but were represented by their deputies.[36] The earliest record of avicar of a voivode dates from 1221.[45] Later the title "vice-voivode", first documented in 1278, came into general use.[45][46] In addition to vice-voivodes andispáns of the Transylvanian counties, the voivodes appointed thecastellans of the royal fortresses.[21][47] They tended to choose from among the noblemen serving in their own retinue,[48] which ensured that their followers received a fair share of their revenues.[49][50] Accordingly, when a king dismissed a voivode, his men were also replaced with his successor's men.[49]

Judicial functions

[edit]

Along with thepalatine, thejudge royal and theban, the voivode was one of the Kingdom's highest judges.[51] In this capacity, he was authorized to issue "credible" charters.[51] The earliest preserved charter dates to 1248.[45] The voivodes or their vice-voivodes always heard disputes together with local noblemen who knew local customs.[52][53] Initially, the voivodes and their deputies held their courts atMarosszentimre (Sântimbru), but they heard disputes at their own abodes from the 14th century.[52] Voivodes rarely headed their courts after the 1340s and were rather represented by their deputies.[53]

Although limiting his own jurisdiction, in 1342 voivodeThomas Szécsényi recognized the right of Transylvanian noblemen to judge legal cases of peasants who held parcels of land in their estates, "with the exception of three cases, such as robbery, highway robbery, and violent trespass".[53][54] This concession was confirmed in 1365 by KingLouis I of Hungary.[54] Furthermore, the monarchs grantedjus gladii (the right to the application of capital punishment) to more and more nobles in the course of the same century.[55]

According tocustomary law, noblemen could not be sued outside the province until the 15th century.[52] King Louis I even prohibited all prelates and noblemen who owned lands in Transylvania from bringing legal proceedings of lesser importance concerning these estates to the royal court.[56] Nevertheless, legal actions between Transylvanians and the inhabitants of other parts of the kingdom remained outside the jurisdiction of the voivodes.[41] Litigants could appeal to the royal court against the decision of the voivode from the 14th century, but the voivode often remained involved in the proceedings.[56] Legislation prescribed that appeals against decisions of the voivodes were to be addressed to the judge royal only from 1444.[55][56]

"Then, contempt of the general diet and the noble assembly of the Transylvanians held on the mandate of the king or of the lord voivode of Transylvania is fined by a hundredmarks, amounting to the same number offlorins; and that of a judicial seat, by fifty."

"Tripartitum"[57]

"General assemblies" convoked and presided over by the principal judges of the realm became important judicial institutions in the last decade of the 13th century.[58] General assemblies for the representatives of the Transylvanian counties were presided over by the voivode or the vice-voivode.[59] The first such assembly was held on June 8, 1288. They became important legal institutions from 1322.[60] Thereafter they were held on a regular basis, at least once a year at Keresztes (Cristiş) near Torda.[59][61]

With the authority of the monarch, the voivodes occasionally also invited the representatives of the Saxon and Székely communities to the counties' general meetings.[61] This contributed to the development of legal connections among the future "Three Nations of Transylvania".[61] The threat from thepeasants' revolt of 1437 gave rise to the first joint meeting of the Hungarian noblemen and the representatives of the Saxons and the Székelys, which was convoked without a former royal authorization by the vice-voivode.[62]Romaniancneazes were only once, in 1355, invited to the general assembly.[59] Otherwise, the vice-voivodes organized separate meetings for them.[61]

Military functions

[edit]
Ruins of Déva Castle
Ruins ofDéva Castle (Cetatea Deva,Romania), a fortress of the voivodes from 1321 toc. 1443[63]

The etymology of the title ("commander") suggests that voivodes had significant military duties.[64] They were the supreme leader of the troops recruited in the counties under their jurisdiction.[64] Although law obliged noblemen to fight in the king's army, Transylvanian nobles fought under the command of the voivode.[65] Furthermore, the voivodes had their own private retinue, formed primarily by armed noblemen.[64] Their right to raise an army under their own flag was confirmed by legislation in 1498.[66]

Military functions are attested, for instance, byPousa, the voivode at the time of the Mongol invasion who fell in battle on March 31, 1241.[67][68] VoivodeLawrence of the Aba clan fought in the royal army in a war againstAustria in 1246.[14] A Mongol army attacking the southern regions of Transylvania was defeated by voivodeErnye of the Ákos clan in 1260.[25] Roland Borsa fought against the invading Mongols in 1285.[69]

Voivode Nicholas Csáki failed to repel anOttoman invasion of Transylvania in 1420.[70][71] In contrast,John Hunyadi, voivode between 1441 and 1446,[72] defeated a major Ottoman army at Gyulafehérvár in 1442.[73] His successor Stephen Báthory likewise won a resounding victory atBreadfield (Hungarian:Kenyérmező,Romanian:Câmpul Pâinii) on October 13, 1479.[74] By contrast,John Zápolya (Szapolyai), the last voivode before thebattle of Mohács on August 29, 1526 did not arrive to the battlefield in time, summoned too late.[75] The battle ended with the Ottomans' annihilation of the royal army.[76] KingLouis II of Hungary was also killed on the battlefield.[77]

Monarchs and their voivodes

[edit]

Appointment and dismissal

[edit]

The voivodes had power concentrated in their hands, impelling the monarchs to replace them frequently:[11] forty-three voivodes ruled between 1199 and 1288.[78] Monarchs usually refrained from appointing as voivode noblemen who owned Transylvanian estates.[37]Michael of theKacsics clan was the first voivode to receive a land grant in the province, around 1210.[79] However, these originally uninhabited lands along the upper courses of the riverMureș (Maros) were confiscated in 1228.[80]

The era beginning with 1288 was characterized by longer periods in office.[13] Roland Borsa survived 10 years, while his successor, Ladislaus Kán, lasted 20 years.[13] This apparent stability was the consequence of the weakening of central government under the last two kings of theÁrpád dynasty,Ladislaus IV (1272–1290) andAndrew III (1290–1301).[81] Royal power was only restored in the reign of Charles I (1308–1342) who one by one defeated the rebellious noblemen throughout his kingdom.[82]

In Transylvania, he was assisted by Thomas Szécsényi, the voivode between 1321 and 1342.[83] Historian Ioan-Aurel Pop characterizes the following period as including "voidvodal dynasties":[21] five members of theLackfi family (father and four sons) were successively appointed between 1356 and 1376.[84] Likewise, Nicholas Csáki (1415 to 1426) was succeeded by his son Ladislaus.[61] The pair preferred to entrust their vice-voivode Roland Lépes to represent them, instead of visiting the province.[61] From the middle of the 15th century it was not unusual for two or even three noblemen to hold the office at the same time.[85] For instance, John Hunyadi was appointed together withNicholas Újlaki in 1441 by KingWladislas I.[86]

Cooperation and conflicts

[edit]
Further information:Roland Borsa andLadislaus Kán

The Mongols comprehensively plundered the eastern territories of the Kingdom of Hungary, including Transylvania, during both their invasion in 1241 and their withdrawal the following year.[87] The consolidation of the province was the main task of Lawrence of the Aba clan, who the office for 10 years from 1242.[88] One of his successors, appointed by King Béla IV, Ernye of the Ákos clan, was dismissed in 1260 by the king's son,Stephen who had just taken over Transylvania with the title ofduke.[14] The duke's action showed emerging tensions between father and son, rather than conflicts between the duke and Ernye.[14][89]

The first years of the reign of the minor Ladislaus IV were characterized by armed conflicts between parties of the leading noble families.[90] Although Roland Borsa, voivode in 1282 and between 1284 and 1294, was initially among the nobles assisting the king in consolidating royal power,[90] he himself became the source of new conflicts. First he prevented the canons of theGyulafehérvár Chapter from collecting their income in 1289. Next he unlawfully compelled noblemen and Saxon landowners in Transylvania to accommodate him and his retinue.[13] Later Borsa fought thebishop of Várad (Oradea) and even resisted King Andrew III who besieged him in the fortress ofAdorján (Adrian) atSzalárd (Sălard)[31] for three months in 1294.[81][91]

Borsa's successorLadislaus Kán went even further by usurpingroyal prerogative during his voivodeship between 1294 and 1315.[92] He arbitrarily assumed the titles of count of Bistritz, Hermannstadt and the Székelys to expand his authority over Saxon and Székely communities exempted from voivodal authority.[93] He set up a tax-collecting body, seemingly covering the entire province.[94] He capturedOtto of Bavaria, a claimant to the Hungarian throne and seized theHoly Crown of Hungary from him in the first half of 1307.[95][96] He handed the royal diadem to King Charles I in 1310, but continued to rule Transylvaniade facto independently until his death in 1315.[97] Hisson of the same name declared himself voivode, a title even used by the monarch when referring to him in a charter of August 12, 1315.[98] Dózsa Debreceni, the voivode King Charles I appointed in 1318, defeated some rebellious minor lords, but royal authority in Transylvania was only restored by Thomas Szécsényi in the 1320s.[99]

The next rebellion against royal power in Transylvania broke out in 1467.[100] Irritated by a new tax that KingMatthias Corvinus had just introduced, representatives of the Three Nations concluded an alliance against the monarch and declared the three incumbent voivodes (the brothers CountsJohn and Sigismund Szentgyörgyi and Berthold Ellerbach) their leaders. The king put down the revolt in a week, but did not sentence the three voivodes, because their active role in the revolt was never proven.[101]

End of the office

[edit]
Further information:Eastern Hungarian Kingdom andPrincipality of Transylvania (1570–1711)

The barons did not find a compromise candidate to succeed King Louis II who perished in thebattle of Mohács in 1526.[102] First the voivode, John Szapolyai was proclaimed king by a group of nobles, but the opposing party also elected its own king,Ferdinand I, a scion of theHabsburg family, by the end of the year.[103]

István Dobó
Baron István Dobó of Ruszka, last voivode appointed by aking of Hungary (1553–1559)

King John I accepted Ottoman suzerainty in 1529,[103] but in theTreaty of Nagyvárad of 1538 he conceded the right of theHabsburgs to succeed him after his death.[104] At that point his voivodes, Stephen Majláth and Emeric Balassa, decided to separate Transylvania from the kingdom in order to save the province from an Ottoman invasion. Although other leading Transylvanian noblemen soon joined them, King John I overcame their rebellion in some weeks.[105]

Following John's death, Ottoman troops occupied the central parts of the Kingdom of Hungary in 1541.[106] SultanSuleiman I permitted the king's widow,Queen Isabella, to retain the territories east of the riverTisza (Tisa), including Transylvania, in the name of her infant son,John Sigismund.[106][107]George Martinuzzi, bishop of Várad, soon started to reorganize the government in the name of the dowager queen and her son. The Ottomans assisted the bishop by capturing his opponent, Stephen Majláth,[106] although the sultan had earlier confirmed the latter's position as voivode.[108] An assembly of the Three Nations elected George Martinuzzi as governor on behalf of the infant king in 1542.[106]

The office of voivode was vacant[1] until September 1549, when Ferdinand (who had not given up the idea of reuniting the territories of the entire kingdom) appointed Martinuzzi to this post.[109] However, Isabella and his son only left their realm in 1551.[110] Thereafter, Transylvania was again under the rule of voivodes appointed by the monarch, ending withIstván Dobó.[1] He administered the province until 1556, when Isabella and John Sigismund returned.[111]

John Sigismund ceased to style himself king of Hungary after theTreaty of Speyer of 1570, under which he adopted the title of "Prince of Transylvania and Lord ofparts of the Kingdom of Hungary".[112][113] His successorStephen Báthory (who was elected ruler by the assembly of the Three Nations) revived the title of voivode, initially for himself.[114] He adopted the title of "prince of Transylvania" when he was electedking of Poland in 1576.[115] At the same time, he conferred the title voivode on his brotherChristopher in 1576.[115] Christopher Báthory was followed in 1581 by his minor son Sigismund who continued to style himself voivode until the death of his uncle, Stephen Báthory in 1586.[116] Sigismund Báthory's title of prince was acknowledged in 1595 byEmperor Rudolph (also king of Hungary).[116]

List of voivodes

[edit]

Twelfth century

[edit]
TermIncumbentMonarchNotesSource
c. 1111–c. 1113MercuriusColoman"princeps Ultrasilvanus", but maybe only a distinguished nobleman[2][10][117][118]
1176–c. 1196Leustach of the Rátót clanBéla IIIfirst voivode attested by a royal charter (from 1230); leader of Hungarian reinforcements sent to theByzantine Empire against theSeljuks in theBattle of Myriokephalon of 1176[2][6][118][119][120]
1199–1200LegforusEmerichis voivode title is documented by the earliest royal charter (from 1199)[2][6][118][119]
1200Eth of the Geregye clanEmericalsoispán ofFehér County[118][119][121]

Thirteenth century

[edit]
TermIncumbentMonarchNotesSource
1201Julius of the Kán clanEmericfirst rule; alsoispán ofFehér County[118][119][121]
1201Nicholas (I)Emericaccording to a non-authentic charter also in 1202[119][121]
1202–1206Benedict, son of KorlátEmeric,Ladislaus III,Andrew IIfirst rule[118][119][121]
1206Smaragd of the Smaragd clanAndrew II[118][119][121]
1208–1209Benedict, son of KorlátAndrew IIsecond rule; conspired against the king who exiled him[118][119][121][122]
1209–1212Michael of the Kacsics clanAndrew IIfirst voivode receiving land grant in Transylvania[118][119][121]
1212–1213Berthold of MeraniaAndrew IIbrother of Gertrud, Andrew II's queen; alsoarchbishop of Kalocsa[118][121][123]
1213Nicholas (II)Andrew II[118][119][121]
1214Julius of the Kán clanAndrew IIsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1214)[118][119][121]
1215Simon of the Kacsics clanAndrew II[118][119][121]
1216–1217Ipoch of the Bogátradvány clanAndrew II[118][119][121]
1217RaphaelAndrew IIhe might have been in office in 1218 (Kurt W. Treptow, Marcel Popa)[118][119][121]
1219–1221NeukaAndrew II[118][119][121]
1221–1222Paul, son of PeterAndrew II[118][119][121]
1227Pousa, son of SólyomAndrew IIfirst rule[68][118][119]
1229–1231Julius of the Rátót clanAndrew II[68][118][119]
1233–1234Denis of the Türje clanAndrew II[68][118][119]
1235Andrew, son of SerafinBéla IValso ispán ofPozsony County (1235)[68][118][124][125]
1235–1241Pousa, son of SólyomBéla IVsecond rule; died fighting against the invadingMongols[68][118][124][126]
1242–1252LawrenceBéla IValsoispán ofValkó County[68][118][124]
b. 1261Ernye of the Ákos clanBéla IVbanus quondam Transiluanus in 1261[68][118][124]
1261Csák of the Hahót clanBéla IVbanus Transilvanus; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1261); the king's son,Stephen is duke of Transylvania[14][68][124]
1263–1264Ladislaus (II) of the Kán clanBéla IVfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1263–1264); the king's son,Stephen is duke of Transylvania[14][118][124][127]
1267–1268Nicholas of the Geregye clanBéla IVfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1267–1268); it is presumable, he held the dignity uninterruptedly from 1264 to 1270; the king's son,Stephen is duke of Transylvania[14][124][127][128]
1270–1272Matthew of the Csák clanStephen Vfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1270–1272)[124][127][128]
1272–1273Nicholas of the Geregye clanLadislaus IVsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1272–1273)[124][127][128]
1273JohnLadislaus IValsoispán ofSzolnok County (1273)[124][128][129]
1273–1274Nicholas of the Geregye clanLadislaus IVthird rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1273–1274)[124][128][129]
1274Matthew of the Csák clanLadislaus IVsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1274)[124][128][129]
1274Nicholas of the Geregye clanLadislaus IVfourth rule; maybe in 1275 (Kurth W. Treptow, Marcel Popa); alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1274)[124][128][129]
1274–1275Matthew of the Csák clanLadislaus IVthird rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1274–1275)[124][129]
1275Ugrin of the Csák clanLadislaus IVfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1275)[124][128][129]
1275–1276Ladislaus (II) of the Kán clanLadislaus IVsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1275–1276)[124][128][129]
1276Ugrin of the Csák clanLadislaus IVsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1276)[124][128][129]
1276Matthew of the Csák clanLadislaus IVfourth rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1276)[124][128][129]
1277Nicholas of the Pok clan (Meggyesi)Ladislaus IVfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1277)[124][128][129]
1278–1280Finta of the Aba clanLadislaus IValsoispán ofSzolnok County (1278–1280); captured the king[124][128][129][130]
1280Stephen, son of TekeshLadislaus IValsoispán ofSzolnok County (1280)[124][128][129]
1282Roland of the Borsa clanLadislaus IVfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1282)[124][128][131]
1283Apor of the Péc clanLadislaus IValsoispán ofSzolnok County (1283)[124][128][131]
1284–1294Roland of the Borsa clanLadislaus IV,Andrew IIIsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1284–1294); successfully fought against the invading Mongols in 1285; rebelled against both kings[122][124][128][131]
1287–c. 1288 (?)Mojs of the Ákos clanLadislaus IVonly a non-authentic charter refers to him as voivode, if so, he was alsoispán ofSzolnok County in the same period[124][128][131]
1295–1314 or 1315Ladislaus (III) of the Kán clanAndrew IIIde facto independent ruler; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1295–1314)[124][128][131]

Fourteenth century

[edit]
Lackfi coat-of-arms
Coat-of-arms of theLackfi family
Stibor of Stiboricz
Stibor of Stiboricz
TermIncumbentMonarchNotesSource
c. 1315Ladislaus (IV) of the Kán clanself declared voivode, son of Ladislaus (III) Kán (1295–1314)[98]
1315–1316Nicholas MeggyesiCharles Isecond rule; unable to take up his office; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1315–1316)[128][132][133]
1318–1321Dózsa DebreceniCharles Ialsoispán ofSzolnok County (1318–1321)[40][128][133]
1321–1342Thomas SzécsényiCharles Ialsoispán ofSzolnok County (1321–1342),ispán ofArad County (1330–1342), andispán ofCsongrád County (1330)[40][128][133]
1342–1344Nicholas SirokaiLouis Ialsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1342–1344)[128][133][134]
1344–1350Stephen LackfiLouis Ialsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1344–1350)[128][133][134]
1350–1351Thomas Gönyűi or CsórLouis Iappointed byStephen, duke of Transylvania, the monarch's brother; alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1350–1351)[128][133][134]
1351–1356Nicholas Kont of OrahovicaLouis Ialsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1351–1356)[128][133][134]
1356–1359Andrew LackfiLouis Ibrother of Stephen Lackfi (1344–1350); alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1356–1359)[128][134][135]
1359–1367Denis LackfiLouis Ison of Stephen Lackfi (1344–1350); alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1359–1367)[128][134][135][136]
1367–1368Nicholas Lackfi, Jr.Louis Ison of Stephen Lackfi (1344–1350); alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1367–1368)[128][134][135][136]
1369–1372Emeric LackfiLouis Ison of Stephen Lackfi (1344–1350); alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1369–1372)[128][134][135][136]
1372–1376Stephen Lackfi of CsáktornyaLouis Ifirst rule; son of Stephen Lackfi (1344–1350); alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1372–1376)[128][135][136][137]
1376–1385Ladislaus Losonci, Sr.Louis I,Maryfirst rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1376–1385)[128][133][137][138]
1385–1386Stephen Lackfi of CsáktornyaCharles IIsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1385–1386)[133][137]
1386–1392Ladislaus Losonci, Sr.Sigismund,Marysecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1386–1392)[133][137][138]
1392–1393Emeric BebekSigismund,Maryalsoispán ofSzolnok County (1392–1393)[128][133][137]
1393–1395Frank SzécsényiSigismund,Maryalsoispán ofArad,Csongrád, andSzolnok Counties (1393–1395)[128][133][137]
1395–1401Stibor of StiboriczSigismundfirst rule; alsoispán ofArad andSzolnok Counties (1395–1401)[128][133][137]

Fifteenth century

[edit]
Nicholas Újlaki
Gravestone ofNicholas Újlaki in the Church of St. John of Capistrano atÚjlak (Ilok,Croatia)
John Hunyadi
John Hunyadi on an engraving
TermIncumbentMonarchNotesSource
1401Simon SzécsényiSigismundalsoispán ofSzolnok County (1401)[133][137]
1402–1403Nicholas CsákiSigismundfirst rule; alsoispán ofBékés,Bihar,Csanád,Csongrád,Keve,Krassó,Szolnok,Temes, andZaránd Counties (1402–1403); a leader of the party supporting KingLadislaus of Naples's claim to the Hungarian throne in 1403[128][133][137][139]
Nicholas Marcalialsoispán ofBékés,Csanád,Csongrád,Keve,Krassó,Szolnok,Temes, andZaránd Counties (1402–1403); joined the party supporting KingLadislaus of Naples's claim to the Hungarian throne in 1403[128][133][137][140]
1403–1409John TamásiSigismundalsoispáns ofSzolnok County (1403–1409)[128][133][141]
James Lack of Szántó
1409–1414Stibor of StiboriczSigismundsecond rule; alsoispán ofSzolnok County (1409–1414),Nyitra andTrencsén, Lord of allVáh[128][133][141]
1415–1426Nicholas CsákiSigismundsecond rule; alsoispán ofBékés,Bihar, andSzolnok Counties (1415–1426)[128][133][141]
1426–1437Ladislaus CsákiSigismundsecond rule; together with Peter Cseh of Léva (1436–1437); alsoispán ofKözép-Szolnok County (1426–1437),ispán ofSzatmár County (1430–1437), andispán ofBihar County (1433–1437); routed by therebelling peasants atDés (Dej);[133][139][142][143]
1436–1438Peter Cseh of LévaSigismund,Alberttogether with Ladislaus Csáki (1426–1437)[142][143][144]
1438–1441Desiderius LosonciAlbert,Ladislaus Vleft Ladislaus V's party and becameWladislas I's partisan in 1441[138][142][143][144]
1440–1441Ladislaus JakcsWladislas I[142][144]
Michael Jakcs
1441–1458Nicholas ÚjlakiWladislas I,Ladislaus Vfirst rule; together withJohn Hunyadi (1441–1446), with Emeric Bebek (1446–1448), and with John Rozgonyi (1449–1458); alsoban of Macsó and commander ofNándorfehérvár (Beograd,Serbia) (1441–1458),count of the Székelys (1441–1446),ispán ofCsanád,Csongrád,Máramaros, andTemes Counties (1441–1446),ispán ofArad County (1444–1446),ban of Severin (1445–1446), andban of Slavonia (1457)[85][144]
1441–1446John HunyadiWladislas Itogether withNicholas Újlaki (1441–1458); also commander ofNándorfehérvár (Beograd,Serbia) (1441–1446),count of the Székelys (1441–1446),ispán ofCsanád,Csongrád, andTemes Counties (1441–1446),ispán ofArad andBihar Counties (1443–1446),ispán ofKözép-Szolnok,Kraszna,Szabolcs,Szatmár, andUgocsa Counties (1444–1446),ispán ofBereg andMáramaros Counties (1445–1446), and regent-governor of theKingdom of Hungary (1446)[85][144]
1446–1448Emeric Bebekelected by theDiet of Hungarytogether withNicholas Újlaki (1441–1458); alsoispán ofAbaúj County (1446–1448) and judge of theJász people (1446–1448); died fighting against theOttomans in the secondbattle of Kosovo[85][144][145]
1449–1458John Rozgonyifirst rule; together withNicholas Újlaki (1441–1458); alsoispán ofSopron andVas Counties (1449–1454),count of the Székelys (1457–1458)[85][144]
1459–1461Ladislaus KanizsaiMatthiastogether with John and Sebastian Rozgonyi (1459–1460), and with his brother, Nicholas Kanizsai (1461)[146]
1459–1460John RozgonyiMatthiastogether with Ladislaus Kanizsai (1459–1461), and with Sebastian Rozgonyi (1459–1460)[147]
1459–1460Sebastian RozgonyiMatthiastogether with Ladislaus Kanizsai (1459–1461), and with John Rozgonyi (1459–1460)[148]
1461Nicholas KanizsaiMatthiastogether with his brother, Ladislaus Kanizsai (1459–1461)[146]
1462–1465Nicholas ÚjlakiMatthiassecond rule[149]
John Pongrác of DengelegMatthiasfirst rule[120]
1465–1467Bertold Ellerbach of MonyorókerékMatthiasdismissed after rebellious Transylvanian nobles elected them to their leaders[150]
Count Sigismund Szentgyörgyibrothers of Count Peter Szentgyörgyi (1498–1510); dismissed after rebellious Transylvanian nobles elected them to their leaders[151]
Count John Szentgyörgyi[151]
1468–1474Nicholas Csupor of MonoszlóMatthiastogether with John Pongrác of Dengeleg (1468–1472)[139]
1468–1472John Pongrác of DengelegMatthiassecond rule; together with Nicholas Csupor of Monoszló (1468–1474)[120]
1472–1475Blaise MagyarMatthiasleader of Hungarian reinforcements sent toStephen the Great,prince of Moldavia in theBattle of Vaslui of 1475[143][152]
1475–1476John Pongrác of DengelegMatthiasthird rule[143]
1478–1479Peter Geréb of VingártMatthias[143]
1479–1493Stephen (V) Báthory of EcsedMatthias,Wladislas II[143]
1493–1498Bartholomew Drágfi of BéltekWladislas IItogether with Ladislaus Losonci, Jr. (1493–1494); suppressed a rebellion of the Székelys[143][153]
1493–1495Ladislaus Losonci, Jr.Wladislas IItogether with Bartholomew Drágfi of Béltek (1493–1498)[138][143]
1498–1510Count Peter SzentgyörgyiWladislas IIbrother ofCounts Sigismund and John Szentgyörgyi (1465–1467)[143][154]

Sixteenth century

[edit]
Stephen Báthory
Stephen Báthory

"Voivode of Transylvania, István Báthory! (...) Transylvania has long been under my protection, (...) and the country is my own (...). Therefore, out of my power, in accordance with your fealty to me I make Transylvania over to you."

Ahidnâme of 1571 toStephen Báthory by SultanSelim II[114]
TermIncumbentMonarchNotesSource
1510–1526John Zápolya (Szapolyai)Wladislas II,Louis IIbecameking of Hungary[1][143][144]
1527–1529Péter PerényiJohn Zápolyaleft John Zápolya's party and became a partisan ofFerdinand I[1][143][155]
1530–1534Stephen (VIII) Báthory of SomlyóFerdinand I[1][143]
1530Bálint Török[143]
1530–1534Jerome LaskiJohn Zápolyaconspired against the king, who imprisoned him[1][143][156]
1533–1534Emeric Czibak[143]
1534–1540Stephen Majláth of SzunyogszegJohn Zápolyatogether with Emeric Balassa of Gyarmat (1538–1540); planned to secede Transylvania from the Kingdom of Hungary, but was captured by theOttomans[1][106][157]
1538–1540Emeric Balassa of GyarmatJohn Zápolyatogether with Stephen Majláth of Szunyogszeg (1534–1540); fled when the Ottomans invaded Transylvania[1][106][157]
1551George MartinuzziFerdinand Ialso elected governor of Transylvania on behalf of the minorJohn Sigismund, the elected king (1543–1551)[1][106]
1552–1553Andrew Báthory of EcsedFerdinand Iresigned[1][143][158]
1553–1556Stephen DobóFerdinand Ilast voivodes appointed by aking of Hungary[1][143]
Francis Kendi
1571–1576Stephen Báthoryelected by theThree Nations and confirmed by theOttoman SultanSelim II; declared himselfprince of Transylvania after his election asking of Poland in 1576[1][143][159]
1576–1581Christopher BáthoryStephen Báthory[1][115]
1581–1586Sigismund BáthoryStephen Báthorylast voivode; his title of prince of Transylvania confirmed in 1595 byEmperor Rudolph[160][161]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefghijklmnopFallenbüchl 1988, p. 77.
  2. ^abcdefgZsoldos 2011, p. 36.
  3. ^Negrău 2011, p. 92.
  4. ^Jefferson 2012, p. 142.
  5. ^abSedlar 1994, p. 275.
  6. ^abcdeKristó 2003, p. 97.
  7. ^Constantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando Imperio (ch. 38.), p. 171.
  8. ^abBóna 1994, p. 153.
  9. ^Ioan Aurel Pop:Istoria României. Transilvania, Volumul I, Edit. „George Barițiu”, Cluj-Napoca, 1997, p.452
  10. ^abcdCurta 2006, p. 355.
  11. ^abRady 2000, p. 18.
  12. ^Curta 2006, p. 354.
  13. ^abcdefghKristó 2003, p. 98.
  14. ^abcdefgSălăgean 2005, p. 176.
  15. ^Kristó 1979, p. 110
  16. ^Pop 1996, p. 143
  17. ^Curta 2006, pp. 355–356.
  18. ^Kristó 2003, p. 90.
  19. ^Curta 2006, p. 356.
  20. ^Kristó 2003, pp. 90–92.
  21. ^abcdPop 2005, p. 227.
  22. ^Engel 1996, p. 246.
  23. ^Zsoldos 2011, p. 209.
  24. ^abEngel 2001, p. 144.
  25. ^abSălăgean 2005, p. 177.
  26. ^Engel 1996, p. 97.
  27. ^Makkai 1994, p. 180.
  28. ^Sedlar 1994, p. 279.
  29. ^abEngel 2001, p. 115.
  30. ^Kristó 2003, p. 133.
  31. ^abcVistai, András János,Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Első kötet, A – H (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, A – H ")(PDF), archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 July 2011, retrieved21 August 2012
  32. ^Kristó 2003, pp. 156–157., 182.
  33. ^abVistai, András János,Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Harmadik kötet, Q – Zs (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, Q – Zs")(PDF), archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 July 2011, retrieved21 August 2012
  34. ^Kristó 2003, pp. 125., 234.
  35. ^Makkai 1994, p. 183.
  36. ^abcdeEngel 2001, p. 151.
  37. ^abMakkai 1994, p. 200.
  38. ^Engel 1996, p. 348.
  39. ^Engel 1996, pp. 11, 272, 295, 299, 325–326, 338, 354, 358, 408–409, 452.
  40. ^abcdeEngel 1996, p. 11.
  41. ^abcKristó 2003, p. 234.
  42. ^abVistai, András János,Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Második kötet, I – P (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, I – P ")(PDF), archived fromthe original(PDF) on 10 July 2011, retrieved21 August 2012
  43. ^Kristó 2003, p. 182.
  44. ^Kristó 2003, p. 183.
  45. ^abcKristó 2003, p. 222.
  46. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 178.
  47. ^Rady 2000, p. 116.
  48. ^Engel 2001, pp. 151–152.
  49. ^abEngel 2001, p. 152.
  50. ^Rady 2000, p. 110.
  51. ^abRady 2000, p. 69.
  52. ^abcStipta 1997, p. 51.
  53. ^abcMályusz 1994, p. 39.
  54. ^abMakkai 1994, p. 207.
  55. ^abPop 2005, p. 244.
  56. ^abcStipta 1997, p. 52.
  57. ^Stephen Werbőczy: The Customary Law of the Renowned Kingdom of Hungary in Three Parts (1517) (3.3.10.), p. 381.
  58. ^Kristó 2003, p. 220.
  59. ^abcPop 2005, p. 230.
  60. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 182.
  61. ^abcdefMakkai 1994, p. 223.
  62. ^Makkai 1994, p. 226.
  63. ^Engel 1996, p. 299.
  64. ^abcPop 2005, p. 246.
  65. ^Mályus 1994, p. 29.
  66. ^Rady 2000, pp. 147, 152–153
  67. ^Curta 2006, p. 411.
  68. ^abcdefghiZsoldos 2011, p. 38.
  69. ^Kristó 2003, p. 168.
  70. ^Pop 2005, p. 258.
  71. ^Makkai 1994, p. 224.
  72. ^Pop 2005, p. 261.
  73. ^Sedlar 1994, p. 247.
  74. ^Makkai 1994, p. 229.
  75. ^Engel 1996, pp. 370–371.
  76. ^Engel 1996, p. 371.
  77. ^Sedlar 1994, p. 398.
  78. ^Kristó 2003, p. 223.
  79. ^Curta 2006, p. 400.
  80. ^Makkai 1994, p. 201.
  81. ^abMakkai 1994, p. 204.
  82. ^Engel 1996, pp. 132–133.
  83. ^Makkai 1994, p. 205.
  84. ^Engel 1996, p. 182.
  85. ^abcdeEngel 1996, p. 15.
  86. ^Engel 2001, p. 283.
  87. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 175.
  88. ^Sălăgean 2005, pp. 175–176.
  89. ^Engel 1996, p. 106.
  90. ^abSălăgean 2005, p. 179.
  91. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 183.
  92. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 185.
  93. ^Kristó 2003, p. 228.
  94. ^Sălăgean 2005, p. 186.
  95. ^Engel 2001, pp. 129–130.
  96. ^Sălăgean 2005, pp. 186–187.
  97. ^Sălăgean 2005, pp. 187., 188.
  98. ^abKristó 2003, p. 232.
  99. ^Engel 2001, p. 133.
  100. ^Makkai 1994, p. 228.
  101. ^Engel 2001, p. 302.
  102. ^Barta 1994, p. 247.
  103. ^abEngel 2001, p. 371.
  104. ^Barta 1994, p. 251.
  105. ^Barta 1994, p. 252.
  106. ^abcdefgBarta 1994, p. 253.
  107. ^Felezeu 2009, p. 20.
  108. ^Felezeu 2009, p. 19.
  109. ^Barta 1994, p. 256.
  110. ^Felezeu 2009, p. 22.
  111. ^Barta 1994, p. 259.
  112. ^Barta 1994, pp. 259–260.
  113. ^Felezeu 2009, p. 25.
  114. ^abBarta 1994, p. 260.
  115. ^abcBarta 1994, p. 263.
  116. ^abBarta 1994, p. 294.
  117. ^Engel 2001, pp. 35., 381.
  118. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyTreptow, Popa 1996, p.lvi.
  119. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrsEngel 2001, p. 381.
  120. ^abcMarkó 2000, p. 291.
  121. ^abcdefghijklmnoZsoldos 2011, p. 37.
  122. ^abMarkó 2000, p. 283.
  123. ^Engel 2001, pp. 90., 381.
  124. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzEngel 2001, p. 382.
  125. ^Markó 2000, p. 254.
  126. ^Makkai 1994, p. 195.
  127. ^abcdZsoldos 2011, pp. 38., 209.
  128. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacadaeafagahaiajakalamanTreptow, Popa 1996, p.lvii.
  129. ^abcdefghijklZsoldos 2011, pp. 39., 209.
  130. ^Markó 2000, p. 207.
  131. ^abcdeZsoldos 2011, pp. 40., 209.
  132. ^Engel 1996, pp. 11., 200.
  133. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstEngel 2001, p. 383.
  134. ^abcdefghEngel 1996, pp. 11–12.
  135. ^abcdeEngel 1996, pp. 182., 383.
  136. ^abcdMarkó 2000, p. 287.
  137. ^abcdefghijEngel 1996, pp. 11., 13.
  138. ^abcdMarkó 2000, p. 288.
  139. ^abcMarkó 2000, p. 284.
  140. ^Markó 2000, p. 289.
  141. ^abcEngel 1996, pp. 11., 14.
  142. ^abcdEngel 1996, p. 14.
  143. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrsTreptow, Popa 1996, p.lviii.
  144. ^abcdefghEngel 2001, p. 384.
  145. ^Markó 2000, pp. 282–283.
  146. ^abMarkó 2000, p. 286.
  147. ^Markó 2000, p. 275.
  148. ^Markó 2000, pp. 291–292.
  149. ^Markó 2000, pp. 291., 294.
  150. ^Markó 2000, p. 285.
  151. ^abMarkó 2000, pp. 278., 293.
  152. ^Markó 2000, pp. 288–289.
  153. ^Markó 2000, pp. 283–285.
  154. ^Markó 2000, p. 278.
  155. ^Markó 2000, pp. 290–291.
  156. ^Markó 2000, pp. 287–288.
  157. ^abMarkó 2000, p. 282.
  158. ^Markó 2000, p. 256.
  159. ^Barta 1994, pp. 260, 263.
  160. ^Barta 1994, pp. 263, 294–295.
  161. ^Szegedi 2009, p. 101.

Sources

[edit]

Primary sources

[edit]
  • Constantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando Imperio (Greek text edited by Gyula Moravcsik, English translation b Romillyi J. H. Jenkins) (1967). Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies.ISBN 0-88402-021-5.
  • Stephen Werbőczy: The Customary Law of the Renowned Kingdom of Hungary in Three Parts (1517) (Edited and translated by János M. Bak, Péter Banyó and Martyn Rady with an introductory study by László Péter) (2005). Charles Schlacks, Jr. Publishers.ISBN 1-884445-40-3.

Secondary sources

[edit]
  • Barta, Gábor (1994). "The Emergence of the Principality and its First Crises (1526–1606)". In Köpeczi, Béla; Barta, Gábor; Bóna, István; Makkai, László; Szász, Zoltán; Borus, Judit (eds.).History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 247–300.ISBN 963-05-6703-2.
  • Bóna, István (1994). "The Hungarian–Slav Period (895–1172)". In Köpeczi, Béla; Barta, Gábor; Bóna, István; Makkai, László; Szász, Zoltán; Borus, Judit (eds.).History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 109–177.ISBN 963-05-6703-2.
  • (in Hungarian) C. Tóth, Norbert; Horváth, Richárd; Neumann, Tibor; Pálosfalvi, Tamás (2016).Magyarország világi archontológiája, 1458–1526, I. Főpapok és bárók [Secular Archontology of Hungary, 1458–1526, Volume I: Prelates and Barons] (in Hungarian). MTA Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont Történettudományi Intézete.ISBN 978-963-4160-35-9.
  • Curta, Florin (2006).Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-89452-4.
  • (in Hungarian) Engel, Pál (1996).Magyarország világi archontológiája, 1301–1457, I. ("Secular Archontology of Hungary, 1301–1457, Volume I"). História, MTA Történettudományi Intézete. Budapest.ISBN 963-8312-44-0.
  • Engel, Pál (2001).The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. I.B. Tauris Publishers.ISBN 1-86064-061-3.
  • (in Hungarian) Fallenbüchl, Zoltán (1988).Magyarország főméltóságai ("High Dignitaries in Hungary"). Maecenas Könyvkiadó.ISBN 963-02-5536-7.
  • Felezeu, Călin (2009). "The International Political Background (1541–1699)". In: Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Nägler, Thomas & Magyari, András,The History of Transylvania, Vol. II. (From 1541 to 1711). Romanian Academy, Center for Transylvanian Studies.ISBN 978-973-7784-43-8.
  • Jefferson, John (2012).The Holy Wars of King Wladislas and Sultan Murad. Brill Academic Publishers,ISBN 978-90-04-21904-5
  • (in Hungarian) Kristó, Gyula (1979).A feudális széttagolódás Magyarországon ("Feudal Anarchy in Hungary"). Akadémiai Kiadó.ISBN 963-05-1595-4
  • Kristó, Gyula (2003).Early Transylvania (895–1324). Lucidus Kiadó.ISBN 963-9465-12-7.
  • Makkai, László (1994). "The Emergence of the Estates (1172–1526)". In: Köpeczi, Béla (editor),History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó.ISBN 963-05-6703-2.
  • Mályusz, Elemér (1994). "Hungarian nobles of medieval Transylvania". In: Bak, János M.,Nobilities in Central and Eastern Europe: Kinship, Property and Privilege. Hajnal István Alapítvány & Medium Aevum Quotidianum Gesellschaft.ISBN 963-04-2014-7.
  • (in Hungarian) Markó, László (2000).A magyar állam főméltóságai Szent Istvántól napjainkig: Életrajzi Lexikon ("Great Officers of State in Hungary from King Saint Stephen to Our Days: A Biographical Encyclopedia"). Magyar Könyvklub.ISBN 963-547-085-1
  • (in Romanian) Negrău, Elisabeta (2011).Cultul suveranului sud-est european şi cazul Ţării Româneşti: O perspectivă artistică [=The Southeastern European Sovereigns' Cult in the Case of Wallachia: An Artistic Approach]. Lumen.ISBN 978-973-166-274-9.
  • Pop, Ioan-Aurel (1996).Romanians and Hungarians from the 9th to the 14th century: the genesis of the Transylvanian medieval state. Center for Transylvanian Studies.ISBN 973-577-037-7
  • Pop, Ioan-Aurel (2005). "Romanians in the 14th–16th Centuries: From the 'Christian Republic' to the 'Restoration of Dacia'". In: Pop, Ioan-Aurel & Bolovan, Ioan,History of Romania: Compendium. Romanian Cultural Institute (Center for Transylvanian Studies).ISBN 978-973-7784-12-4.
  • Rady, Martyn (2000).Nobility, Land and Service in Medieval Hungary. Palgrave (in association with School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London).ISBN 0-333-80085-0.
  • Sedlar, Jean W. (1994).East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000–1500. University of Washington Press.ISBN 0-295-97290-4.
  • Sălăgean, Tudor (2005). "Romanian Society in the Early Middle Ages (9th–14th Centuries AD)". In: Pop, Ioan-Aurel & Bolovan, Ioan,History of Romania: Compendium. Romanian Cultural Institute (Center for Transylvanian Studies).ISBN 978-973-7784-12-4.
  • (in Hungarian) Stipta, István (1997).A magyar bírósági rendszer története ("History of the Hungarian Judicial System"). Multiplex Media-Debrecen University Press.ISBN 963-04-9197-4.
  • Szegedi, Edit (2009). "The birth and evolution of the Principality of Transylvania (1541–1690)". In: Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Nägler, Thomas & Magyari, András,The History of Transylvania, Vol. II. (From 1541 to 1711). Romanian Academy, Center for Transylvanian Studies.ISBN 978-973-7784-43-8.
  • Treptow, Kurt W. & Popa, Marcel (1996).Historical Dictionary of Romania. Scarecrow Press, Inc.ISBN 0-8108-3179-1.
  • (in Hungarian) Zsoldos, Attila (2011).Magyarország világi archontológiája, 1000–1301 ("Secular Archontology of Hungary, 1000–1301"). História, MTA Történettudományi Intézete. Budapest.ISBN 978-963-9627-38-3.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Voivode_of_Transylvania&oldid=1252412990"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp